泵喷推进器非定常空化性能数值模拟分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

摘要：基于均质多相流的RANS(Reynolds Averaged NavierStokes)方程，采用分块网格技术生成高质量结构化网格，同时结合剪切应力SST（Shear Stress Transport）k－ω湍流模型和ZGB(ZwartGerberBelamri）空化模型以对NACA66翼型进行了定常流空化性能数值模拟，数值计算结果与实验值吻合良好，验证了数值计算法的实用性与可靠性.在此基础上，利用URANS(Unsteady Reynolds Averaged NavierStokes）方程和滑移网格技术，对装有泵喷推进器的无人水下航行器（Unmanned Underwater Vehicle，UUV）进行了非定常流空化性能数值模拟与分析.计算结果表明，数值模拟可以较为精确地预测泵喷推进器空化现象的起始与发展、形状与位置等特性；空化现象发生时，泵喷推进器效率出现明显的降低且达到20%以上；UUV表面与定转子叶片的压力分布较为合理，与空化现象吻合；转子叶顶区域压力面与吸力面之间的压差引起了顶隙梢涡与顶隙空化，造成了泵喷推进器效率进一步的损耗.

关键词: 泵喷推进器, 非定常流空化性能, 顶隙梢涡, 顶隙空化, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Abstract： The steady cavitating flows of NACA66 hydrofoil were investigated numerically based on the RANS equations of homogeneous multiphase using high quality multiblock structure grid, combined with SST k－ω turbulence model and Z-G-B cavitation model. Numerical simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental data. Consequently, it is indicated that the numerical simulation method is applicable and reliable. Furthermore, URANS equations and sliding mesh method were applied to the numerical predictions of unsteady cavitation performance for pump-jet propulsor on UUV. The results show that the numerical simulations accurately predict the cavitation inception and extension, shape and location. When cavitation phenomenon appears, the efficiency of pumpjet propulsor drops significantly, even up to more 20%. The obtained pressure distributions of UUV surface, rotor and stator blades are reasonable and consistent with the cavitation phenomenon. Additionally, the pressure difference of pressure side and suction side of rotor blade causes tip vortex and tip clearance cavitation, which result in a further drop in efficiency of pump-jet propulsor.

Key words: pump-jet propulsor, unsteady cavitation performance, tip vortex, tip clearance cavitation, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

U 661.1

鹿麟，潘光. 泵喷推进器非定常空化性能数值模拟分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(02): 262-268.

LU Lin,PAN Guang. Numerical Simulation Analysis of Unsteady Cavitation Performance of a Pump-jet Propulsor[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(02): 262-268.

参考文献

［1］刘占一，宋保维，黄桥高，等. 基于CFD技术的泵喷推进器水动力性能仿真方法［J］. 西北工业大学学报, 2010, 28(5):724729.

LIU Zhanyi, SONG Baowei, HUANG Qiaogao, et al. Applying CFD technique to calculating successfully hydrodynamic performance of water jet pump［J］. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2010, 28(5): 724729.

［2］潘光，胡斌，王鹏，等. 泵喷推进器定常水动力性能数值模拟［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2013, 47(6):932937.

PAN Guang, HU Bin, WANG Peng, et al. Numerical simulation of steady hydrodynamic performance for pumpjet propulsor［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(6): 932937.

［3］杨琼方，王永生，张志宏. 螺旋桨叶截面空化模拟数值模型的改进与评估［J］. 北京理工大学学报, 2011, 31(12): 14011407.

YANG Qiongfang, WANG Yongsheng, ZHANG Zhihong. Improvement and evaluation of numerical model for cavitation flow viscous simulation around propeller blade section［J］. Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2011, 31(12): 14011407.

［4］Lindau J W, Pena C, Baker W J, et al. Modeling of cavitating flow through waterjet propulsors［J］. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2012, 2012(1): 113.

［5］Ahn S J, Kwon O J. Numerical investigation of cavitating flows for marine propulsors using an unstructured mesh technique［J］. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2013, 43(5): 259267.

［6］LIU Yan, ZHAN Pengfei, WANG Qiang, et al. URANS computation of cavitating flows around skewed propellers［J］. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2012, 24(3): 339346.

［7］Singhal A K, Athavale M M, Li H, et al. Mathematical basic and validation of full cavitation model［J］. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2002, 124(3): 617624.

［8］JI Bin, LUO Xianwu, WANG Xin, et al. Unsteady numerical simulation of cavitating turbulent flow around a highly skewed model marine propeller［J］. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133(1): 01110210111028.

［9］JI Bin, LUO Xianwu, WU Yulin, et al. Numerical investigation of unsteady cavitating turbulent flow around a full scale marine propeller［J］. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010, 22(5): 747752.

[1]	丁恩宝, 常晟铭, 孙聪, 赵雷明, 吴浩. 半浸桨不同半径切面入水的水动力特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1188-1198.
[2]	吴怀娜, 冯东林, 刘源, 蓝淦洲, 陈仁朋. 基于门式抗浮框架的基坑开挖下卧隧道变形控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1227-1237.
[3]	刘谨豪, 严远忠, 张琪, 卞荣, 贺雷, 叶冠林. 地面堆载对既有隧道影响离心试验和数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 886-896.
[4]	孙健, 彭斌, 朱兵国. 无油双涡圈空气涡旋压缩机的数值模拟及试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(5): 611-621.
[5]	秦汉, 伍彬, 宋玉辉, 刘金, 陈兰. 细长体高速风洞超大攻角支撑干扰数值分析[J]. 空天防御, 2022, 5(3): 44-51.
[6]	薛飞, 王誉超, 伍彬. 高速飞行器后向分离特性研究[J]. 空天防御, 2022, 5(3): 80-86.
[7]	杜登轩 , 乐绍林 , 周欢 , HtayHtayAung , 喻国良. 均匀来流中承台相对埋深对复合桩墩局部水动力及冲刷的影响 [J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(2): 64-71.
[8]	郑高媛, 赵亦希, 崔峻辉. 车身用铝饰条拉弯成形面畸变缺陷形成规律[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(1): 53-61.
[9]	金戈, 范珉, 周振栋, 谭勇, 钟小波. 升降式止回阀动态特性分析与改进[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(S2): 110-118.
[10]	徐德辉, 顾汉洋, 刘莉, 黄超. 新型锥形式旋叶汽水分离器热态试验与数值研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(9): 1087-1094.
[11]	刘恒, 伍锐, 孙硕. 非均匀流场螺旋桨空泡数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 976-983.
[12]	王超, 刘正, 李兴, 汪春辉, 徐佩. 自由状态冰块尺寸及初始位置参数对冰桨耦合水动力性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 990-1000.
[13]	李岩松, 丁鼎倩, 韩东, 刘静, 梁永图. 起伏输油管道临界完全携积水油速数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(7): 878-890.
[14]	赵朋飞, 薛昕, 杨成. 模拟碱骨料反应引起的箍筋端部锚固退化对钢筋混凝土梁受剪性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 681-688.
[15]	张源, 李范春, 贾德君. 点阵压气机叶轮的设计与3D打印仿真[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 729-740.