注塑模稳态温度场的有限体积法模拟

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2023.040

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 461-467.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2023.040

注塑模稳态温度场的有限体积法模拟

冯漾漾¹, 丁浩亮², 胡平山¹, 严波¹()

1.上海交通大学材料科学与工程学院,上海 200030
2.航天材料及工艺研究所,北京 100076

收稿日期:2023-02-10 修回日期:2023-03-18 接受日期:2023-05-29 出版日期:2024-04-28 发布日期:2024-04-30
通讯作者: 严波,副教授;E-mail:luxer@sjtu.edu.cn.
作者简介:冯漾漾(1998-),硕士生,从事注塑模具温度场模拟研究.

Steady-State Temperature Field Simulation of Injection Mold Based on Finite Volume Method

FENG Yangyang¹, DING Haoliang², HU Pingshan¹, YAN Bo¹()

1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
2. Aerospace Research Institute of Materials and Processing Technology, Beijing 100076, China

Received:2023-02-10 Revised:2023-03-18 Accepted:2023-05-29 Online:2024-04-28 Published:2024-04-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对于注塑模具的冷却过程稳态温度场模拟,传统有限体积法(FVM)求解型腔面上等效热流时,节点温度梯度往往基于控制体积内的平均值近似计算,不一定等于边界面上的局部节点温度梯度,且控制体积内各面热流计算相互独立,可能导致控制体积内热量不守恒.为此改进FVM通过将稳态温度场热量守恒作为前提条件,基于节点控制体积的其他面热流量计算型腔面热流,修正了传统FVM.自主开发了C++有限体积法数值模拟程序,分别把传统FVM和改进FVM模拟得到的注塑模稳态温度场与商业软件结果对比,发现传统FVM能够模拟出注塑模具的温度分布情况,但存在较大计算误差;采用改进型腔面等效稳态热流算法后,计算误差显著降低,证明改进后FVM能更加准确地模拟冷却过程的稳态温度场.

关键词: 有限体积法, 注塑成型, 模具温度场, 数值模拟

Abstract:

For steady-state temperature field simulation during cooling stage of plastic injection molding, when the traditional finite volume method (FVM) is used to solve the equivalent heat flux on the cavity surface, the approximate node temperature gradient is often based on the average value in the control volume, but it may not be equal to the local node temperature gradient on the boundary surface. In addition, the calculation of heat flux on each surface in the control volume is independent, which may lead to the non-conservation of heat energy on the control volume. To this end, the improved FVM is modified by taking the heat conservation of steady-state temperature field as a prerequisite and calculating the heat flow of cavity surface based on the node control volume. A numerical simulation software of C++ language based on FVM is developed, which compares the steady-state temperature field of plastic injection molding simulated by the traditional FVM algorithm and the improved FVM algorithm with the results of commercial softwares. The results show that the traditional FVM algorithm can simulate the rough temperature distribution of injection mold, but there is a large calculation error. By improving the equivalent steady-state heat flux calculation method for cavity surface, the calculation error is greatly reduced, which proves that the improved FVM algorithm can predict more accurately the steady-state temperature field in cooling stage.

Key words: finite volume method (FVM), injection molding, mold temperature field, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TQ320

冯漾漾, 丁浩亮, 胡平山, 严波. 注塑模稳态温度场的有限体积法模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(4): 461-467.

FENG Yangyang, DING Haoliang, HU Pingshan, YAN Bo. Steady-State Temperature Field Simulation of Injection Mold Based on Finite Volume Method[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2024, 58(4): 461-467.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表1

图7

图8

图9

表2

参考文献 11

[1]	KWON T H. Mold cooling system design using boundary element method[J]. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1988, 110(4): 384-394. doi: 10.1115/1.3187898 URL
[2]	QIAO H. Transient mold cooling analysis using BEM with the time-dependent fundamental solution[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2005, 32(3/4): 315-322. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2004.07.006 URL
[3]	ZHOU H M, ZHANG Y, WEN J S, et al. An acceleration method for the BEM-based cooling simulation of injection molding[J]. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2009, 33(8/9): 1022-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2009.04.001 URL
[4]	LIN Y W, LI H M, CHEN S C, et al. 3D numerical simulation of transient temperature field for lens mold embedded with heaters[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2005, 32(9): 1221-1230. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2004.10.025 URL
[5]	CHEN L, ZHOU X W, HUANG Z G, et al. Three-dimensional transient finite element cooling simulation for injection molding tools[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 120(11/12): 7919-7936. doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-09154-8
[6]	DEMIRDŽIĆ I, MUZAFERIJA S. Numerical method for coupled fluid flow, heat transfer and stress analysis using unstructured moving meshes with cells of arbitrary topology[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1995, 125(1/2/3/4): 235-255. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(95)00800-G URL
[7]	YANG S, ZHANG M Y, BI J, et al. Evaluation of the long-term thermal stability of a crushed-rock revetment embankment in pan-Arctic permafrost regions under the effect of snow drift[J]. Energy, 2023, 263: 125664. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125664 URL
[8]	PRAJAPATI H, RAVOORI D, WOODS R L, et al. Measurement of anisotropic thermal conductivity and inter-layer thermal contact resistance in polymer fused deposition modeling (FDM)[J]. Additive Manufacturing, 2018, 21: 84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.019 URL
[9]	SARDO L, DALDOUL W, VINCENT M, et al. Simulations of heat transfer in thermoplastic injection molds manufactured by additive techniques[J]. International Polymer Processing, 2019, 34(1): 37-46. doi: 10.3139/217.3594 URL
[10]	AHMMED M S. A finite volume numerical approach for predicting heat transfer in presence of thermal contact resistance[J]. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2023, 37: 101618. doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101618 URL
[11]	严波, 李阳, 赵朋, 等. 基于改进有限体积法的三维注塑成型充模过程数值模拟[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(10): 25-32. doi: 10.3901/JME.2015.10.025
	YAN Bo, LI Yang, ZHAO Peng, et al. 3D simulation of filling stage of plastic injection molding based on improved finite volume method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 51(10): 25-32. doi: 10.3901/JME.2015.10.025

算法	温度最大值/℃	最大值误差/℃
Moldflow MPI	198.6	—
传统FVM	239.7	41.1
改进FVM	205.3	6.7

算法	温度最大值/℃	最大值误差/℃
Moldflow MPI	110.4	—
传统FVM	139.0	28.6
改进FVM	96.7	13.7

[1]	洪蕾1，肖皓1，叶佳2，马国红1. 径向超声波辅助MIG焊电弧的数值模拟[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(2): 330-338.
[2]	李树勋，沈恒云，刘斌才，胡迎港，马廷前. 高温熔盐止回阀受熔盐颗粒冲击的压力脉动响应[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(2): 271-279.
[3]	张念凡, 肖龙飞, 陈刚. 海洋结构物波浪砰击的数值研究综述[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(2): 127-140.
[4]	郭同彪, 张吉, 李新亮. 压缩拐角强激波边界层干扰直接数值模拟研究[J]. 空天防御, 2024, 7(2): 29-35.
[5]	周东荣, 张家铭, 庄欠伟, 黄昕, 翟一欣, 朱小东, 张弛, 张子新. 曲线顶管底幕法施工对沉船扰动的CEL数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(S1): 60-68.
[6]	陈昊, 戴孟祎, 韩兆龙, 周岱, 包艳, 涂佳黄. 带有尾缘襟翼的兆瓦级大型垂直轴风力机气动性能优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(6): 642-652.
[7]	刘忠波, 韩青亮, 任双双, 王彦, 房克照. 双层Boussinesq水波方程速度公式的修正[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(2): 177-182.
[8]	庞妍, 卿强, 王沙沙, 张翔宇, 龚景海. 膜结构在暴雨积水时材料模型研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(2): 213-220.
[9]	王肇喜, 翟师慧, 赵凡, 王者蓝, 谢夏阳. 基于虚拟激励法的多激励振动试验数值分析[J]. 空天防御, 2023, 6(2): 69-76.
[10]	辛鹏飞, 苗建印, 匡以武, 张红星, 王文. 液体冷却并联通道热沉中的流量分配特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(10): 1355-1366.
[11]	操太春, 吴刚, 孔祥逸, 于东玮, 吴琳, 张大勇. 极地海洋工程装备圆管结构的对流换热影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(1): 17-23.
[12]	吴怀娜, 冯东林, 刘源, 蓝淦洲, 陈仁朋. 基于门式抗浮框架的基坑开挖下卧隧道变形控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1227-1237.
[13]	丁恩宝, 常晟铭, 孙聪, 赵雷明, 吴浩. 半浸桨不同半径切面入水的水动力特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1188-1198.
[14]	刘谨豪, 严远忠, 张琪, 卞荣, 贺雷, 叶冠林. 地面堆载对既有隧道影响离心试验和数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 886-896.
[15]	孙健, 彭斌, 朱兵国. 无油双涡圈空气涡旋压缩机的数值模拟及试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(5): 611-621.

注塑模稳态温度场的有限体积法模拟

Steady-State Temperature Field Simulation of Injection Mold Based on Finite Volume Method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 11

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价