Cooperative Control of Aircraft Ground Deicing Resources

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.342

Abstract

Abstract:

Aimed at the problem of weak coordination and low balance of distributed resources under multiple parallel deicing tasks, a cooperative control method of aircraft ground deicing resources based on multi-agent negotiation was proposed, which combined airport deicing resource allocation and space-time distribution. A framework for collaborative operation of multi-agent deicing resources was established, and a resource optimization method for the bidding mechanism of a global collaborative consortium was designed to improve the overall task balance. Based on the operating plan, an autonomous multi-agent resource collaborative optimization model was constructed. The model predictive control method was applied to generate a collaborative control strategy, and the feasibility was verified in actual scenarios. The results demonstrate that the resource coordination and anti-interference ability of the proposed method are significantly enhanced while meeting the real-time requirements. Compared with the results obtained by other methods, the average takeoff tolerance is 4.89 min, increased by 1.015 min, and the average utilization rate is increased by 15.28%, which can ensure the safety and synergy of deicing resources.

Key words: air transportation, collaborative control, multi-Agent negotiation, model predictive control, ground deicing resources

CLC Number:

V351.392
U8

LI Biao, WANG Liwen, XING Zhiwei, WANG Sibo, LUO Qian. Cooperative Control of Aircraft Ground Deicing Resources[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021, 55(11): 1362-1370.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.1

Fig.6

Tab.2

Fig.7

Tab.3

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Tab.4

Comparison results of simulation optimization para-meters

除冰坪		S₁	S₂	S₃	S₄
r_t	I	9.24	11.51	9.46	11.57
	II	9.87	12.27	10.80	12.86
	III	10.22	12.74	10.14	11.04
$e -$	I	0.609	0.660	0.666	0.712
	II	0.571	0.613	0.457	0.608
	III	0.404	0.557	0.388	0.321

Tab.4

Fig.12

References 16

[1]	FUKUYAMA S. Dynamic game-based approach for optimizing merging vehicle trajectories using time-expanded decision diagram[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 120:102766. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102766 URL
[2]	崔艾军, 邢志伟. 飞机地面除冰运行合作博弈模型研究[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2015, 33(1):9-12.
	CUI Aijun, XING Zhiwei. Cooperative game model for aircraft ground deicing operation[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2015, 33(1):9-12.
[3]	邢志伟, 李斯, 罗谦. 机场道面除冰雪车辆队形控制模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2019, 19(4):182-190.
	XING Zhiwei, LI Si, LUO Qian. Formation control model of airport pavement deicing vehicles[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(4):182-190.
[4]	DASZCZUK W B. Measures of structure and operation of automated transit networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, 21(7):2966-2979. doi: 10.1109/TITS.6979 URL
[5]	LIU F, LIU X Z, MOU M J, et al. Safety assessment of approximate segregated parallel operation on closely spaced parallel runways[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(2):463-476. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2018.12.009 URL
[6]	肖春华, 林伟, 杨升科, 等. 结冰云雾参数对冰与固壁间剪切强度影响的初步研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2019, 34(12):2627-2634.
	XIAO Chunhua, LIN Wei, YANG Shengke, et al. Preliminary study on influence of icing cloud parameters on ice shear strength on solid wall[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(12):2627-2634.
[7]	张伟, 李彪. 飞机地面除冰运行调度模型研究[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2017, 35(5):22-25.
	ZHANG Wei, LI Biao. Research on dispatching model of aircraft ground deicing[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2017, 35(5):22-25.
[8]	陈斌, 焦琳青, 杨亚磊, 等. 复杂多约束条件下航班除冰延误机理及资源优化配置[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2020, 37(5):1069-1079.
	CHEN Bin, JIAO Linqing, YANG Yalei, et al. Flight deicing delay mechanism and resource optimization configuration under complex and multiple constraints[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2020, 37(5):1069-1079.
[9]	FAN H Y, TARUN P K, CHEN V C P, et al. Data-driven optimization for dallas fort worth international airport deicing activities[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 263(1/2):361-384. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2747-1 URL
[10]	SLIM H, NADEAU S. A mixed rough sets/fuzzy logic approach for modelling systemic performance variability with FRAM[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(5):1918. doi: 10.3390/su12051918 URL
[11]	ARIYAJUNYA B, TARUN P K, CHEN V C P, et al. Modeling the impact of airport deicing/anti-icing activities on the dissolved oxygen levels in the receiving waterways[J]. Journal of Water Management Modeling, 2018, 26(441):1-8.
[12]	张红颖, 周子林, 李彪. 基于多Agent的通航运力资源协同调度[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1):214-221.
	ZHANG Hongying, ZHOU Zilin, LI Biao. Collaborative schedule of general aviation resource based on multi-agent[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(1):214-221.
[13]	JANSSEN S, SHARPANSKYKH A, CURRAN R. Agent-based modelling and analysis of security and efficiency in airport terminals[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 100:142-160. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.012 URL
[14]	王静, 潘开灵, 刘翱, 等. 云制造平台下订单可分解的协同生产计划模型及求解[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(12):1655-1662.
	WANG Jing, PAN Kailing, LIU Ao, et al. The model and solution for collaborative production planning with order splitting in cloud manufacturing platform[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(12):1655-1662.
[15]	李冰, 成卫, 晏永廷, 等. 基于MP与MPC相结合的分布式交通信号控制研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(5):86-93.
	LI Bing, CHENG Wei, YAN Yongting, et al. Distributed traffic signal control based on combination of MP and MPC[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(5):86-93.
[16]	徐长安, 倪少权, 陈钉均. 基于两阶段算法的运行图与天窗协同优化[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(4):882-888.
	XU Chang’an, NI Shaoquan, CHEN Dingjun. Collaborative optimization for timetable and maintenance window based on two-stage algorithm[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4):882-888.

除冰坪编号	除冰机位数量/个	兼容除冰机位/个	除冰车量编队数/个
1	4	2	4
2	6	3	6
3	5	3	5
4	3	3	6
5	6	3	9
6	4	3	5
7	4	3	5

除冰坪编号	保障能力	综合补液能力	平均正点率	综合得分
1	74.688	90.053	83.333	82.691
2	81.429	86.010	85.714	84.384
3	78.889	80.230	87.143	82.087
4	57.708	88.820	86.667	77.732

除冰坪	单独除冰任务	联合体除冰任务	联合编队
S₁	M₄, M₆, M₁₁, M₁₅, M₂₀, M₃₀, M₃₉, M₄₉, M₅₄	M₂₁, M₃₂, M₄₀, M₅₁	V₅
S₂	M₁, M₅, M₈, M₁₀, M₁₃, M₁₆, M₂₆, M₃₁, M₃₅, M₄₂, M₄₄, M₅₅	M₁₉, M₂₉, M₃₆, M₃₈, M₄₈, M₅₃	V₅
S₃	M₂, M₇, M₉, M₁₂, M₁₄, M₂₂, M₃₃, M₃₄, M₄₁, M₄₃, M₄₇, M₅₂	M₁₈, M₂₈, M₃₇	V₆
S₄	M₃, M₁₇, M₂₃, M₂₄, M₄₅, M₄₆, M₅₀	M₂₅, M₂₇	V₇