顶管施工过程中浆液扩散对减阻效果影响

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2022.446

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (7): 1067-1074.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2022.446

顶管施工过程中浆液扩散对减阻效果影响

徐浩东¹, 余童真², 樊伟³, 李明广¹(), 刘念武⁴

1.上海交通大学船舶海洋与建筑工程学院,上海 200240
2.中铁二院华东勘察设计有限责任公司,杭州 310000
3.安徽省交通建设股份有限公司,合肥 230000
4.浙江理工大学建筑工程学院,杭州 310018

收稿日期:2022-11-04 修回日期:2023-02-02 接受日期:2023-02-02 出版日期:2024-07-28 发布日期:2024-07-26
通讯作者: 李明广,副研究员,博士生导师,电话(Tel.):021-34207003;E-mail:lmg20066028@sjtu.edu.cn.
作者简介:徐浩东(1998-),硕士生,从事岩土工程数值模拟方面研究.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52078466);上海市自然科学基金(22ZR1430800)

Influence of Slurry Diffusion on Drag Reduction During Pipe Jacking Cnstruction

XU Haodong¹, YU Tongzhen², FAN Wei³, LI Mingguang¹(), LIU Nianwu⁴

1. School of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd.,Hangzhou 310000, China
3. Anhui Gourgen Traffic Construction Co., Ltd.,Hefei 230000, China
4. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:2022-11-04 Revised:2023-02-02 Accepted:2023-02-02 Online:2024-07-28 Published:2024-07-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

浆液扩散是影响顶管注浆减阻的关键因素,为此建立顶管三维数值分析模型,引入扩散环模拟顶管施工过程中浆液的扩散过程,根据管周土体与管片接触情况修改管土摩擦因数,研究顶管施工过程中浆液扩散过程对减阻效果的影响.将计算得到的顶进摩阻力与实测数据进行对比,验证方法的可靠性,进一步研究了顶管施工过程中滤过效应对土体位移的影响及注浆扩散相关参数对顶管施工过程中土体位移及顶进摩阻力的影响.结果表明:考虑滤过效应时的地表沉降更小;滤过效应引起的渗透系数衰减越强则地表沉降及顶进摩阻力越小;浆液扩散的越快,泥浆套越完整,则顶管顶进期间的注浆减阻效果越好.

关键词: 顶管施工, 注浆减阻, 数值模拟, 浆液扩散

Abstract:

Slurry diffusion is the key factor affecting the resistance reduction of pipe jacking grouting. Therefore, this paper establishes a three-dimensional numerical analysis model of pipe jacking, introduces a diffusion ring to simulate the slurry diffusion process during pipe jacking construction, modifies the friction coefficient according to the contact between the soil around the pipe and the segment, and studies the influence of the slurry diffusion process on the resistance reduction effect during pipe jacking construction. The calculated jacking friction is compared with the measured data to verify the reliability of the method proposed. The influence of the filtering effect on soil displacement and the influence of grouting diffusion-related parameters on soil displacement and jacking friction during pipe jacking construction are further studied. The results show that the surface subsidence is smaller when the filtration effect is considered; The stronger the attenuation of permeability coefficient caused by the filtration effect, the smaller the surface settlement and jacking friction resistance; The faster the slurry diffuses and the more complete the slurry jacket is, the better the resistance reduction effect of grouting during pipe jacking.

Key words: pipe jacking construction, resistance reduction by grouting, numerical simulation, slurry diffusion

中图分类号:

TU443

徐浩东, 余童真, 樊伟, 李明广, 刘念武. 顶管施工过程中浆液扩散对减阻效果影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(7): 1067-1074.

XU Haodong, YU Tongzhen, FAN Wei, LI Mingguang, LIU Nianwu. Influence of Slurry Diffusion on Drag Reduction During Pipe Jacking Cnstruction[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2024, 58(7): 1067-1074.

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

模型相关参数取值

序号	H/ m	γ/ (kN·m^-3)	e	c'/ kPa	φ'/ (°)	$E o e d r e f$ / MPa	$E 50 r e f$ / MPa	$E u r r e f$ / MPa	R_f	$G 0 r e f$ / MPa	γ_0.7× 10⁴	k/ (cm·s^-1)
黏土②₁	12.5	18.4	0.95	10	27	7.16	8.80	50.14	0.9	200.5	2.7	5.21×10^-7
淤泥质黏土④	10	16.7	1.41	6	24	5.80	7.08	40.56	0.6	162.2	2.7	2.38×10^-7
粉质黏土⑤₁	2.5	18.0	1.01	5	28	4.52	5.43	31.66	0.9	126.6	2.7	3.37×10^-7
砂质黏土⑤₂	2.5	17.7	0.99	2	30	5.97	7.16	41.79	0.9	167.1	2.7	3.07×10^-4
粉质黏土	4	18.0	0.99	4	28	4.37	5.24	30.58	0.9	122.3	2.7	2.70×10^-6
粉质黏土	8	18.2	0.94	5	30	4.48	5.37	31.34	0.9	125.3	2.7	1.57×10^-7
砂质粉土	22.5	19.0	0.73	1	30	13.31	13.31	53.23	0.9	266.1	2.7	6.99×10^-4
粉细砂	22	19.2	0.71	0	30	14.25	14.25	57.00	0.9	285.0	2.7	8.76×10^-4

表1

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

参考文献 9

[1]	向安田, 朱合华, 丁文其. 顶管施工中顶力和平均摩阻力与顶程关系分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2008(4): 1005-1009.
	XIANG Antian, ZHU Hehua, DING Wenqi. Relationship of jacking force and average friction with jacking pathin pipe-jacking construction[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008(4): 1005-1009.
[2]	杨俊峰, 邓文杰, 余世祥, 等. 富水砂层多孔顶管施工顶力及管节摩阻力监测分析[J]. 施工技术(中英文), 2021, 50(19): 64-68.
	YANG Junfeng, DENG Wenjie, YU Shixiang, et al. Moniyoring and analysis of jacking in water-rich sand layer[J]. Constructuib Technology, 2021, 50(19): 64-68.
[3]	SHIMADA H, MATSUI K. Seepage behavior of mud slurry on soil around pipe in using pipe jacking[J]. Journal Issue, 1997, 113(9): 669-676.
[4]	张雪, 万中正, 王传银, 等. 无水砂层中矩形顶管施工用触变泥浆配比优化及减阻性能试验[J]. 工程地质学报, 2021, 29(5): 1611-1620.
	ZHANG Xue, WAN Zhongzheng, WANG Chuan-yin, et al. Optimization thixotropic slurry ratio and drag reduction performance test for rectangular pipe jacking in anhydrous sand layer[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2021, 29 (5): 1611-1620.
[5]	喻军, 龚晓南. 考虑顶管施工过程的地面沉降控制数值分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33 (Sup.1): 2605-2610.
	YU Jun, GONG Xiaonan. Numerical analysis of surface settlement control considering pipe jacking construction process[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33 (Sup.1): 2605-2610.
[6]	吴勇, 徐日庆, 段景川, 等. 浅覆土大断面小间距矩形顶管施工的环境效应[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2017, 54(5): 78-85.
	WU Yong, XU Riqing, DUAN Jingchuan, et al. Environmental effects of rectangular pipe jacking construction with large cross section and small spacing in shallow overburden[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2017, 54(5): 78-85.
[7]	张忠苗, 邹健, 何景愈, 等. 考虑压滤效应下饱和黏土压密注浆柱扩张理论[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2011, 45(11): 1980-1984.
	ZHANG Zhongmiao, ZOU Jian, HE Jingyu, et al. Cavity expansion theory of compaction grouting in saturated clay considering pressure filtration[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2011, 45 (11): 1980-1984.
[8]	房凯, 夏唐代, 包柳青, 等. 考虑滤过效应的卵砾石层浆液扩散研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(7): 1443-1448.
	FANG Kai, XIA Tangdai, BAO Liuqing, et al. Cement grout dispersion considering filtration in gravel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(7): 1443-1448.
[9]	朱光轩, 张庆松, 冯啸, 等. 基于颗粒吸附概率模型的渗透注浆滤过机制研究[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2020, 52(5): 125-135.
	ZHU Guangxuan, ZHANG Qingsong, FENG Xiao, et al. Study on the filtration mechanism in permeation grouting using the particle deposition probability model[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2020, 52(5): 125-135.

[1]	冯漾漾, 丁浩亮, 胡平山, 严波. 注塑模稳态温度场的有限体积法模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(4): 461-467.
[2]	洪蕾1，肖皓1，叶佳2，马国红1. 径向超声波辅助MIG焊电弧的数值模拟[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(2): 330-338.
[3]	李树勋，沈恒云，刘斌才，胡迎港，马廷前. 高温熔盐止回阀受熔盐颗粒冲击的压力脉动响应[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(2): 271-279.
[4]	张念凡, 肖龙飞, 陈刚. 海洋结构物波浪砰击的数值研究综述[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(2): 127-140.
[5]	郭同彪, 张吉, 李新亮. 压缩拐角强激波边界层干扰直接数值模拟研究[J]. 空天防御, 2024, 7(2): 29-35.
[6]	贺文选, 叶茂盛, 张雨, 张雅泰, 代晓辉, 张崎. 悬挂链在磨损条件下的极限强度评估[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2024, 11(1): 23-29.
[7]	周东荣, 张家铭, 庄欠伟, 黄昕, 翟一欣, 朱小东, 张弛, 张子新. 曲线顶管底幕法施工对沉船扰动的CEL数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(S1): 60-68.
[8]	袁玮皓, 李炎龙, 张弛, 周东荣, 胡建, 王钰. 曲线顶管发射架的设计及应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(S1): 124-130.
[9]	陈昊, 戴孟祎, 韩兆龙, 周岱, 包艳, 涂佳黄. 带有尾缘襟翼的兆瓦级大型垂直轴风力机气动性能优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(6): 642-652.
[10]	王肇喜, 翟师慧, 赵凡, 王者蓝, 谢夏阳. 基于虚拟激励法的多激励振动试验数值分析[J]. 空天防御, 2023, 6(2): 69-76.
[11]	刘忠波, 韩青亮, 任双双, 王彦, 房克照. 双层Boussinesq水波方程速度公式的修正[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(2): 177-182.
[12]	庞妍, 卿强, 王沙沙, 张翔宇, 龚景海. 膜结构在暴雨积水时材料模型研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(2): 213-220.
[13]	辛鹏飞, 苗建印, 匡以武, 张红星, 王文. 液体冷却并联通道热沉中的流量分配特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(10): 1355-1366.
[14]	操太春, 吴刚, 孔祥逸, 于东玮, 吴琳, 张大勇. 极地海洋工程装备圆管结构的对流换热影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(1): 17-23.
[15]	吴怀娜, 冯东林, 刘源, 蓝淦洲, 陈仁朋. 基于门式抗浮框架的基坑开挖下卧隧道变形控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1227-1237.

顶管施工过程中浆液扩散对减阻效果影响

Influence of Slurry Diffusion on Drag Reduction During Pipe Jacking Cnstruction

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 9

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价