非轴对称布局压气机试验与数值模拟研究

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2024.056

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (12): 1916-1928.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2024.056

非轴对称布局压气机试验与数值模拟研究

武晓龙¹, 夏凯龙²(), 孟德君³, 郝晟淳³, 朱铭敏²

¹ 海装沈阳局驻沈阳地区某军事代表室, 沈阳 110015
² 上海交通大学航空航天学院, 上海 200240
³ 中国航发沈阳发动机研究所, 沈阳 110015

收稿日期:2024-02-26 修回日期:2024-04-06 接受日期:2024-05-08 出版日期:2025-12-28 发布日期:2025-12-30
通讯作者: 夏凯龙 E-mail:klxia0419@sjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:武晓龙(1983—),高级工程师,从事航空推进理论与工程研究.
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项(2017-II-0004-0017);上海市教委专项(2023科技02-7)

Experimental and Numerical Simulation Study of Compressors with Non-Axisymmetric Layouts

WU Xiaolong¹, XIA Kailong²(), MENG Dejun³, HAO Shengchun³, ZHU Mingmin²

¹ Navy Consumer Representative Office of Engine in Shenyang, Shenyang 110015, China
² School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
³ Shenyang Engine Research Institute, AECC, Shenyang 110015, China

Received:2024-02-26 Revised:2024-04-06 Accepted:2024-05-08 Online:2025-12-28 Published:2025-12-30
Contact: XIA Kailong E-mail:klxia0419@sjtu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

实际轴流压气机中存在的叶片安装角和叶尖间隙非轴对称性偏差,对压气机气动性能和稳定性有较大影响.本文在四级低速大尺寸压气机试验台上,对原型、非轴对称安装角和间隙布局的三套压气机试验件开展了试验测量与数值模拟研究,以获得压气机总体性能、级间气动参数以及非轴对称性的影响.试验结果表明,两种非轴对称布局相较于原型都降低了压气机的效率,但是非轴对称间隙布局将原型失速裕度提高了0.67%.数值模拟分析原因在于近失速工况下,当来自大间隙扇区的低能流体经过小间隙扇区时,高熵区被分解,不稳定流体被重构,进而缓解了失速特征.本文获得的原始测量数据校准了数值模拟工具,并为进一步明确高压压气机实际流场特征提供了参考.

关键词: 轴流压气机, 非轴对称布局, 加工偏差, 试验测量, 数值模拟, 气动性能

Abstract:

The non-axisymmetric deviation of blade stagger angle and tip clearance has significant impact on aerodynamic performance and stability in actual compressors. In this paper, three sets of compressor test, including the prototype with a uniform layout, as well as non-axisymmetric stagger angle and tip clearance layouts, were studied on a four-stage low-speed research compressor test rig. Experimental measurements and numerical simulations were conducted to obtain the overall performance, interstage aerodynamic parameters, and non-axisymmetric properties. The test results show that the two non-axisymmetric layouts reduce compressor efficiency compared with the prototype, but the non-axisymmetric clearance layout increases the prototype stall margin by 0.67%. Numerical simulation analysis reveals that in the near-stall condition, when the low-energy fluid from the large clearance sector passes through the small clearance sector, the high-entropy region is decomposed and the unstable fluid is reconstructed, thus alleviating the stall characteristics. The original measurement data obtained in this paper calibrates the numerical simulation tool and provides a reference for further clarifying the actual flow field characteristics of high-pressure compressors.

Key words: axial compressor, non-axisymmetric layout, manufacturing deviation, experimental measurement, numerical simulation, aerodynamic performance

中图分类号:

V231.3

武晓龙, 夏凯龙, 孟德君, 郝晟淳, 朱铭敏. 非轴对称布局压气机试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(12): 1916-1928.

WU Xiaolong, XIA Kailong, MENG Dejun, HAO Shengchun, ZHU Mingmin. Experimental and Numerical Simulation Study of Compressors with Non-Axisymmetric Layouts[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2025, 59(12): 1916-1928.

图/表 17

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表2

表3

图8

图9

表4

图10

图11

图12

图13

参考文献 19

[1]	郑新前, 王钧莹, 黄维娜, 等. 航空发动机不确定性设计体系探讨[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44 (7): 027099.
	ZHENG Xinqian, WANG Junying, HUANG Weina, et al. Uncertainty-based design system for aeroengines[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(7): 027099.
[2]	DAY I J. Stall, surge, and 75 years of research[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2016, 138(1): 011001. doi: 10.1115/1.4031473 URL
[3]	刘佳鑫, 于贤君, 孟德君, 等. 高压压气机出口级叶型加工偏差特征及其影响[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 423796. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23796
	LIU Jiaxin, YU Xianjun, MENG Dejun, et al. State and effect of manufacture deviations of compressor blade in high-pressure compressor outlet stage[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(2): 423796. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23796
[4]	于贤君, 李明志, 安广丰, 等. 高压压气机出口级叶型加工偏差影响的相关性分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2022, 43(4): 929-938.
	YU Xianjun, LI Mingzhi, AN Guangfeng, et al. Correlation analysis on the influence of manufacture deviation for the compressor blade airfoils of a high-pressure compressor outlet stage[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2022, 43(4): 929-938.
[5]	王浩浩, 高丽敏, 杨光, 等. 钝头前缘加工不确定性对亚声速压气机叶型气动性能的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39(2):20220252.
	WANG Haohao, GAO Limin, YANG Guang, et al. Influence of manufacturing uncertainty of blunt leading edge on aerodynamic performance of compressor blade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(2):20220252.
[6]	SURIYANARAYANAN V, RENDU Q, VAHDATI M, et al. Effect of manufacturing tolerance in flow past a compressor blade[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2021, 144(4): 041005. doi: 10.1115/1.4052600 URL
[7]	ZHANG H, ZHUANG H, TENG J, et al. Some effects of non-axisymmetric tip clearance layout on axial compressor aerodynamics[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part A Journal of Power and Energy, 2021, 235 (9): 952-961.
[8]	XIA K, DENG H, ZHANG H, et al. Overall performance and loss analysis of a low-speed research compressor with different non-axisymmetric tip clearance layouts[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2023, 36(5): 04023055. doi: 10.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-4887 URL
[9]	CHEN Y, HOU A, WANG W, et al. Performance estimation method for non-uniform tip clearance cases[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018, 34(6): 1355-1363. doi: 10.2514/1.B36442 URL
[10]	XIA K, DENG H, ZHONG Y, et al. The impact of second-harmonic tip clearance distributions caused by casing ovalization and blade height variation in a large-scale compressor stage[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2024, 145: 108866. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2023.108866 URL
[11]	MA S, HU J, WANG X, et al. Effect of non-uniformity of rotor stagger angle on the stability of a low-speed axial compressor[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(8): 2714. doi: 10.3390/en15082714 URL
[12]	ZHENG S Y, TENG J F, WU Y, et al. Impact of nonuniform stagger angle distribution on high-pressure compressor rotor performance[C]//ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. Oslo, Norway: ASME, 2018, 50992: V02AT39A023.
[13]	庄皓琬, 滕金芳, 马宇晨, 等. 非轴对称安装角对压气机转子叶片性能的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2021, 36(9): 1999-2011.
	ZHUANG Haowan, TENG Jinfang, MA Yuchen, et al. Impacts of non-axisymmetric stagger angle on performance of compressor rotor blade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2021, 36(9): 1999-2011.
[14]	蔡宇桐, 高丽敏, 马驰, 等. 基于NIPC的压气机叶片加工误差不确定性分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2017, 38(3): 490-497.
	CAI Yutong, GAO Limin, MA Chi, et al. Uncertainty quantification on compressor blade considering manufacturing error based on NIPC method[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2017, 38(3): 490-497.
[15]	姬田园, 楚武利, 张皓光, 等. 基于数据驱动的扭转度偏差影响压气机性能的不确定性量化[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45: 629938.
	JI Tianyuan, CHU Wuli, ZHANG Haoguang, et al. Data-driven-based approach for uncertainty quantification of twist deviation affecting compressor performance[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45: 629938.
[16]	但玥, 王浩浩, 高丽敏. 扭转度误差对跨声速压气机叶片性能的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2023, 44(10): 2208019.
	DAN Yue, WANG Haohao, GAO Limin, et al. Effects of twist angle error on transonic compressor blades performance[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2023, 44(10): 2208019.
[17]	夏志恒, 罗佳奇. 涡轮叶片来流角扰动不确定性量化分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2020, 35(3): 519-531.
	XIA Zhiheng, LUO Jiaqi. Uncertainty quantification of inlet incidence angle variation for turbine blade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(3): 519-531.
[18]	FRANK R G, WACKER C, NIEHUIS R. Loss characterization of advanced VIGV configurations with adjustable blade geometry[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2022; 144(3): 031012. doi: 10.1115/1.4052409 URL
[19]	朱铭敏, 羌晓青, 居振州, 等. 四级低速大尺寸压气机的试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2021, 42(5): 1150-1160.
	ZHU Mingmin, QIANG Xiaoqing, JU Zhenzhou, et al. Experimental and numerical research in a four-stage low speed research compressor[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2021, 42(5): 1150-1160.

参数	IGV	R1	S1
流量系数	—	0.58	0.58
叶片数	80	53	79
设计转速/(r·min^-1)	—	900	—
弦长(中径)/mm	108.3	153.9	120.6
轮毂比	—	0.88	0.88
稠度(中径)	—	1.30	1.02
展弦比(中径)	—	0.82	1.06

工况点	类别	流量/(kg·s^-1)	无量纲流量	总压比	效率/%
DP	试验	15.249	0.764	1.073 5	80.77
	数值	15.561	0.779	1.071 8	83.69
NC	试验	19.963	1.000	1.009 0	19.61
	数值	19.984	1.000	1.008 7	22.19
NS	试验	13.618	0.682	1.079 9	78.97
	数值	13.484	0.675	1.077 4	80.97

试验件	工况点	流量/(kg·s^-1)	无量纲流量	总压比	效率/%	裕度/%
原型	DP	15.249	0.764	1.073 5	80.77	12.64
	NC	19.963	1	1.009 0	19.61	12.64
	NS	13.618	0.685	1.079 9	78.97	12.64
非轴对称安装角	DP	15.160	0.764	1.073 6	80.29	12.72
	NC	19.836	1	1.009 1	19.74	12.72
	NS	13.531	0.682	1.080 1	78.58	12.72

试验件	工况点	流量/(kg·s^-1)	无量纲流量	总压比	效率/%	裕度/%
原型	DP	15.249	0.764	1.073 5	80.77	12.64
	NC	19.963	1	1.009 0	19.61	12.64
	NS	13.618	0.685	1.079 9	78.97	12.64
非轴对称间隙	DP	15.127	0.762	1.073 3	80.16	13.31
	NC	19.851	1	1.009 0	19.67	13.31
	NS	13.430	0.677	1.079 7	78.15	13.31

非轴对称布局压气机试验与数值模拟研究

Experimental and Numerical Simulation Study of Compressors with Non-Axisymmetric Layouts

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	祝怡情, 吴锋, 周岱, 韩兆龙, 卓杨, 朱宏博, 张凯. 海洋风电场尾流荷载作用下水平轴风力机结构动力响应[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(8): 1081-1091.
[2]	金韬, 高斌, 王强强, 周行, 何文, 冯少孔. 拟共震源高密度面波法数据反演模拟算法及应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(7): 1029-1040.
[3]	张强, 陈振华, 王文龙, 苏怀维, 迟德建. 炸点控制对钢筋混凝土T梁桥的毁伤特性数值模拟研究[J]. 空天防御, 2025, 8(5): 83-90.
[4]	巩超, 侯远杭, 张宇骐, 刘殿勇, 万跃进. 畸形波浪环境下的埋首式无人艇水面运动特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(4): 447-457.
[5]	王子阳 , 王晓华, 郭冲霄, 等. 串油工艺研究及方法优化[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2025, 12(4): 104-115.
[6]	李易, 欧树彦, 梁伟栋, 董佳宝, 庄至栋. 飞行器低空大动压整流罩旋抛分离数值模拟[J]. 空天防御, 2025, 8(1): 102-108.
[7]	徐浩东, 余童真, 樊伟, 李明广, 刘念武. 顶管施工过程中浆液扩散对减阻效果影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(7): 1067-1074.
[8]	邓贺方, 夏凯龙, 滕金芳, 羌晓青, 朱铭敏, 卢少鹏. 不同转速下沟槽型机匣对跨声速压气机性能的影响[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(6): 1151-1160.
[9]	刘羿伯1, 毕羽琴1, 马强2, 3, 肖华平1, 刘书海1. 水下螺旋轴流混输泵叶轮的结构设计与优化[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2024, 11(4): 14-20.
[10]	冯漾漾, 丁浩亮, 胡平山, 严波. 注塑模稳态温度场的有限体积法模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(4): 461-467.
[11]	王慧, 杜登轩, 刘海超, 喻国良, 张民曦. 均匀来流中带环翼的复合桩墩的局部冲刷数值试验研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2024, 11(3): 1-9.
[12]	张念凡, 肖龙飞, 陈刚. 海洋结构物波浪砰击的数值研究综述[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(2): 127-140.
[13]	李树勋，沈恒云，刘斌才，胡迎港，马廷前. 高温熔盐止回阀受熔盐颗粒冲击的压力脉动响应[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(2): 271-279.
[14]	郭同彪, 张吉, 李新亮. 压缩拐角强激波边界层干扰直接数值模拟研究[J]. 空天防御, 2024, 7(2): 29-35.
[15]	洪蕾1，肖皓1，叶佳2，马国红1. 径向超声波辅助MIG焊电弧的数值模拟[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(2): 330-338.