静钻根植桩低应变动力响应的现场试验和数值模拟

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.04.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对静钻根植竹节桩的成桩特性，通过现场试验和有限元数值模拟，研究桩周水泥土随着龄期变化对竹节桩低应变测试曲线的影响.首先通过现场试验，得到现场试桩在水泥土不同龄期的低应变曲线，发现桩端反射信号的幅值和到达速度均受到水泥土硬化的影响；同时通过室内弯曲元试验，测得不同龄期下相同配合比水泥土的切变模量；然后通过多次反演拟合，建立三维有限元数值模型，结合室内试验结果，对竹节桩低应变测试特性进行研究；接着将模型曲线与实测曲线进行对比，重点研究了桩端低应变反射信号的幅值和综合波速，两者曲线特性符合良好；最后对三维有限元数值模型进行参数分析，分析桩周普通土和桩底土切变模量对桩身低应变曲线的影响.结果表明：桩周水泥土在随着龄期硬化期间，会导致桩端反射信号幅值逐渐变小，在5 d以后已较难分辨；同时，低应变测试的综合波速也会随之增大，但是均明显小于竹节桩在地表时的波速，该数值模型能较好的模拟静钻根植竹节桩的低应变动力特性；参数分析说明，桩身低应变测试的综合波速变化与桩周普通土和桩底土的切变模量变化无关，仅由桩周水泥土引起.

关键词: 静钻根植竹节桩, 水泥土, 低应变测试, 波速, 现场试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to investigate the effect of cemented soil on dynamic response of static drill rooted pile, field tests and numerical simulation methods were employed. At first, field tests were performed to acquire the time domain curves of pile by low-strain testing, indicating that the amplitude and the arrival time of the reflected signal from pile tip were both affected by the cemented soil. Then, the shear moduli of cemented soil in different ages were obtained by bending element test. Afterwards, a three-dimensional finite element numerical model was established based on the tests on cemented soil, focusing on the amplitude of the reflected signal and wave velocity. After that, a comparison between the results of field tests and numerical simulation was presented, demonstrating good agreement. Finally, a parameter study for the effect of soil’s modulus was presented. The above research indicated that the modulus of cemented soil influenced both the amplitude of the reflected signal and the wave velocity of the pile. The numerical model could well simulate the dynamic response of the pile in low-strain test, and could be used for further research. The modulus of surrounding and base soil had no influence on the wave velocity of the pile.

Key words: static drill rooted nodular pile, cemented soil, low-strain test, wave velocity, field test, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TU 473

肖偲, 王奎华, 张日红, 王孟波. 静钻根植桩低应变动力响应的现场试验和数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(4): 406-412.

XIAO Si, WANG Kuihua, ZHANG Rihong, WANG Mengbo. Field Test and Numerical Simulation for the Dynamic Response of Low-Strain Testing on Static Drill Rooted Pile[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2020, 54(4): 406-412.

参考文献

［1］ZHOU J J, GONG X N, WANG K H, et al. Shaft capacity of the pre-bored grouted planted pile in dense sand［J］. Acta Geotechnica, 2018(1): 1-13. ［2］ZHOU J J, GONG X N, WANG K H, et al. Testing and modeling the behavior of pre-bored grouting planted piles under compression and tension［J］. Acta Geotechnica, 2017, 12(9): 1-15. ［3］ZHOU J J, WANG K H, GONG X N, et al. Bearing capacity and load transfer mechanism of a static drill rooted nodular pile in soft soil areas［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University—Science A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 2013, 14(10): 705-719. ［4］周佳锦, 龚晓南, 王奎华, 等. 静钻根植竹节桩荷载传递机理模型试验［J］. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(3): 531-537. ZHOU Jiajin, GONG Xiaonan, WANG Kuihua, et al. Model test on load transfer mechanism of a static drill rooted nodular pile［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science Edition), 2015, 49(3): 531-537. ［5］周佳锦, 王奎华, 龚晓南, 等. 静钻根植竹节桩承载力及荷载传递机制研究［J］. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(5): 1367-1376. ZHOU Jiajin, WANG Kuihua, GONG Xiaonan, et al. Bearing capacity and load transfer mechanism of static drill rooted nodular piles［J］. Rock & Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(5): 1367-1376. ［6］周佳锦, 龚晓南, 王奎华, 等. 静钻根植竹节桩抗拔承载性能试验研究［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(3): 570-576. ZHOU Jiajin, GONG Xiaonan, WANG Kuihua, et al. Behavior of the static drill rooted nodular piles under tension［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(3): 570-576. ［7］周佳锦, 龚晓南, 王奎华, 等. 静钻根植竹节桩桩端承载性能数值模拟研究［J］. 岩土力学, 2015(S1): 651-656. ZHOU Jiajin, GONG Xiaonan, WANG Kuihua, et al. Numerical simulation of tip bearing capacity of static drill rooted nodular pile［J］. Rock & Soil Mechanics, 2015(S1): 651-656. ［8］王奎华, 李振亚, 吕述晖, 等. 静钻根植竹节桩纵向振动特性及应用研究［J］. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(3): 522-530. WANG Kuihua, LI Zhenya, LV Shuhui, et al. Vertical vibration characteristics of static drill rooted nodular pile and its applications［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University （Engineering Science Edition）, 2015, 49(3): 522-530. ［9］李振亚, 王奎华, 高柳. 考虑土体竖向波动效应的静钻根植竹节桩纵向振动阻抗研究［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(7): 1791-1802. LI Zhenya, WANG Kuihua, GAO Liu. Longitudinal dynamic impedance of static drill rooted nodular pile considering vertical wave effect of soil［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics, 2017, 36(7): 1791-1802. ［10］LI Z Y, WANG K H, WU W B, et al. Longitudinal dynamic impedance of a static drill rooted nodular pile embedded in layered soil［J］. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2018, 36(3): 253-263. ［11］WU W B, NAGGAR M H E, ABDLRAHEM M, et al. A new interaction model for the vertical dynamic response of pipe piles considering soil plug effect［J］. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2017, 54(7): 987-1001. ［12］吴文兵, 蒋国盛, 王奎华, 等. 土塞效应对管桩纵向动力特性的影响研究［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(6): 1129-1141. WU Wenbing, JIANG Guosheng, WANG Kuihua, et al. Influence of soil plug effect on vertical dynamic response of pipe piles［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(6): 1129-1141. ［13］吴文兵, 邓国栋, 张家生, 等. 考虑横向惯性效应时桩侧土-管桩-土塞纵向耦合振动特性研究［J］. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(4): 993-1002. WU Wenbing, DENG Guodong, ZHANG Jiasheng, et al. Vertical dynamic response of soil surrounding pile-pipe pile-soil plug by considering lateral inertial effect［J］. Rock & Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(4): 993-1002. ［14］范玉明, 丁选明, 王昌丽, 等. 钢管混凝土桩低应变动测响应研究［J］. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2015(1): 154-159. FAN Yuming, DING Xuanming, WANG Changli, et al. Research on dynamic response of concrete filled steel pile for low strain dynamic testing［J］. Journal of Railway Science & Engineering, 2015(1): 154-159. ［15］周燕国. 土结构性的剪切波速表征及对动力特性的影响［D］. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2007. ZHOU Yanguo. Shear wave velocity-based characterization of soil structure and its effects on dynamic behavior［D］. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2007. ［16］WU W B, WANG K H, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Soil-pile interaction in the pile vertical vibration considering true three-dimensional wave effect of soil［J］. International Journal for Numerical & Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2013, 37(17): 2860-2876. ［17］WU W B, LIU H, NAGGAR M H E, et al. Torsional dynamic response of a pile embedded in layered soil based on the fictitious soil pile model［J］. Computers and Geotechnics, 2016, 80: 190-198. ［18］丁选明, 刘汉龙. 低应变下变阻抗薄壁管桩动力响应频域解析解［J］. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(6): 1793-1798. DING Xuanming, LIU Hanlong. Analytical solution in frequency domain of dynamic response of thin-wall pipe piles with variable wave impedance under low strain transient concentrated load［J］. Rock & Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(6): 1793-1798.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

449

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	449

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	313	136
比例	70%	30%

摘要

1307

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	1307

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	915	392
比例	70%	30%

[1]	丁恩宝, 常晟铭, 孙聪, 赵雷明, 吴浩. 半浸桨不同半径切面入水的水动力特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1188-1198.
[2]	吴怀娜, 冯东林, 刘源, 蓝淦洲, 陈仁朋. 基于门式抗浮框架的基坑开挖下卧隧道变形控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1227-1237.
[3]	刘谨豪, 严远忠, 张琪, 卞荣, 贺雷, 叶冠林. 地面堆载对既有隧道影响离心试验和数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 886-896.
[4]	孙健, 彭斌, 朱兵国. 无油双涡圈空气涡旋压缩机的数值模拟及试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(5): 611-621.
[5]	秦汉, 伍彬, 宋玉辉, 刘金, 陈兰. 细长体高速风洞超大攻角支撑干扰数值分析[J]. 空天防御, 2022, 5(3): 44-51.
[6]	薛飞, 王誉超, 伍彬. 高速飞行器后向分离特性研究[J]. 空天防御, 2022, 5(3): 80-86.
[7]	杜登轩 , 乐绍林 , 周欢 , HtayHtayAung , 喻国良. 均匀来流中承台相对埋深对复合桩墩局部水动力及冲刷的影响 [J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(2): 64-71.
[8]	郑高媛, 赵亦希, 崔峻辉. 车身用铝饰条拉弯成形面畸变缺陷形成规律[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(1): 53-61.
[9]	金戈, 范珉, 周振栋, 谭勇, 钟小波. 升降式止回阀动态特性分析与改进[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(S2): 110-118.
[10]	徐德辉, 顾汉洋, 刘莉, 黄超. 新型锥形式旋叶汽水分离器热态试验与数值研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(9): 1087-1094.
[11]	刘恒, 伍锐, 孙硕. 非均匀流场螺旋桨空泡数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 976-983.
[12]	王超, 刘正, 李兴, 汪春辉, 徐佩. 自由状态冰块尺寸及初始位置参数对冰桨耦合水动力性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 990-1000.
[13]	李岩松, 丁鼎倩, 韩东, 刘静, 梁永图. 起伏输油管道临界完全携积水油速数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(7): 878-890.
[14]	张源, 李范春, 贾德君. 点阵压气机叶轮的设计与3D打印仿真[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 729-740.
[15]	赵朋飞, 薛昕, 杨成. 模拟碱骨料反应引起的箍筋端部锚固退化对钢筋混凝土梁受剪性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 681-688.