正交下穿盾构开挖面失稳的离散元分析

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.12.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于上海轨道交通工程实践，采用离散元软件PFC2D模拟盾构隧道的正交下穿施工，分析了存在既有隧道情况下盾构开挖面塌陷失稳破坏的失稳模式、地表沉降及支护压力比，并与现场监测数据进行比较验证，沿开挖纵向进行关于开挖面塌陷失稳影响的普适性规律研究.结果表明，当开挖面距离既有隧道较近且未穿越时，既有隧道对失稳模式存在显著影响，表现为烟囱状失稳区扩大、地表沉降槽不连续、极限支护压力比减小；当开挖面穿越既有隧道后，有既有隧道开挖的失稳模式基本与无既有隧道开挖一致.模拟过程中测得2种工况极限支护压力比分布为0.4~0.6，其中下穿工况极限支护压力比较小，即较不容易发生塌陷破坏.综合对模拟结果的分析，当开挖面位于既有隧道前2倍隧道直径范围内时，开挖面的失稳模式将受到既有隧道的影响.

关键词: 下穿盾构, 开挖面失稳, 离散元, 数值模拟

Abstract: Based on the tunneling case for Shanghai railway transportation line, undercrossing tunneling simulation was performed by using the DEM (discrete element method) software PFC2D. The instability mode, surface subsidence and support pressure ratio were investigated to analyze the coverage from existing tunnel to the instabilities of the shield tunnel face, and were compared with the monitoring of the surface subsidence, to discuss the universal law of the face collapse along the longitudinal excavation. The consequences of DEM simulation showed the instability mode was varied when the tunnel face was close to the existing tunnel before crossing, performing the expansion of the chimney, the discontinuity of the surface subsidence tank and the decrease of the limiting support pressure ratio. When the tunnel face passed through the existing tunnel, it had very little influence on the instability mode. The limiting support pressure ratio lied between 0.4 and 0.6 in both situations of single shield tunnel and undercrossing shield tunnel. And the ratios in the undercrossing were lower than the one in the single so that it was more difficult to collapse in the undercrossing. According to the comprehensive analysis of simulation results, the existing tunnel had a significant impact on the instability mode when the tunnel face was in the range of twice the tunnel diameter in front of the existing tunnel.

Key words: undercrossing shield tunnel, face instability, discrete element method (DEM), numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TU 94

张孟喜1，张梓升1，王维2,吕岩2，韩佳尧2，金琦2. 正交下穿盾构开挖面失稳的离散元分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(12): 1594-1602.

ZHANG Mengxi,ZHANG Zisheng,WANG Wei,Lü Yan,HAN Jiayao,JIN Qi. Discrete Element Analysis for Instability of Undercrossing Shield Tunnel Face[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(12): 1594-1602.

参考文献

［1］白海卫, 何海健, 李玲. 正交下穿施工对上部既有隧道安全的影响研究［J］. 地下空间与工程学报, 2014, 10(2): 434-440. BAI Haiwei, HE Haijian, LI Ling. Study on longitudinal deformation and internal forces of upper existing metro tunnel caused by undercrossing tunneling［J］. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2014, 10(2): 434-440. ［2］汪洋, 何川, 曾东洋, 等. 盾构隧道正交下穿施工对既有隧道影响的模型试验与数值模拟［J］. 铁道学报, 2010, 32(2): 79-85. WANG Yang, HE Chuan, ZENG Dongyang, et al. Model test and numerical simulation of influence of perpendicular undercross shield tunnel construction on existing tunnel［J］. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2010, 32(2): 79-85. ［3］张治国, 张孟喜. 软土城区土压平衡盾构上下交叠穿越地铁隧道的变形预测及施工控制［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(S2): 3428-3439. ZHANG Zhiguo, ZHANG Mengxi. Deformation prediction of subway tunnel induced by EPB shield in soft clay during above and down overlapped traversing process and its construction control［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(S2): 3428-3439. ［4］MAYNAR M J, RODRIGUEZ L E. Discrete nume-rical model for analysis of earth pressure balance tunnel excavation［J］. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(10): 1234-1242. ［5］缪林昌, 王正兴, 石文博. 砂土盾构隧道掘进开挖面稳定理论与颗粒流模拟研究［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(1): 98-104. MIAO Linchang, WANG Zhengxing, SHI Wenbo. Theoretical and numerical simulations of face stability around shield tunnels in sand［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(1): 98-104. ［6］孙潇昊, 缪林昌, 林海山. 不同埋深盾构隧道开挖面稳定问题数值模拟［J］. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 47(1): 164-169. SUN Xiaohao, MIAO Linchang, LIN Haishan. Numerical simulation research on excavation face stability of different depths of shield tunnel［J］. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 47(1): 164-169. ［7］朱伟, 钟小春, 加瑞. 盾构隧道垂直土压力松动效应的颗粒流模拟［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(5): 750-754. ZHU Wei, ZHONG Xiaochun, JIA Rui. Simulation on relaxation effect of vertical earth pressure for shield tunnels by particle flow code［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(5): 750-754. ［8］ZHANG Z X, HU X Y, SCOTT K D. A discrete numerical approach for modeling face stability in slurry shield tunnelling in soft soils［J］. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(1): 94-104. ［9］汤旅军, 陈仁朋, 尹鑫晟, 等. 密实砂土地层盾构隧道开挖面失稳离心模型试验研究［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(10): 1830-1838. TANG Lüjun, CHEN Renpeng, YIN Xinsheng, et al. Centrifugal model tests on face stability of shield tunnels in dense sand［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(10): 1830-1838.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	17

	来源	其他网站

	次数	17
	比例	100%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	35

	来源	其他网站

	次数	35
	比例	100%

[1]	丁恩宝, 常晟铭, 孙聪, 赵雷明, 吴浩. 半浸桨不同半径切面入水的水动力特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1188-1198.
[2]	吴怀娜, 冯东林, 刘源, 蓝淦洲, 陈仁朋. 基于门式抗浮框架的基坑开挖下卧隧道变形控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1227-1237.
[3]	刘谨豪, 严远忠, 张琪, 卞荣, 贺雷, 叶冠林. 地面堆载对既有隧道影响离心试验和数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 886-896.
[4]	孙健, 彭斌, 朱兵国. 无油双涡圈空气涡旋压缩机的数值模拟及试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(5): 611-621.
[5]	秦汉, 伍彬, 宋玉辉, 刘金, 陈兰. 细长体高速风洞超大攻角支撑干扰数值分析[J]. 空天防御, 2022, 5(3): 44-51.
[6]	薛飞, 王誉超, 伍彬. 高速飞行器后向分离特性研究[J]. 空天防御, 2022, 5(3): 80-86.
[7]	杜登轩 , 乐绍林 , 周欢 , HtayHtayAung , 喻国良. 均匀来流中承台相对埋深对复合桩墩局部水动力及冲刷的影响 [J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(2): 64-71.
[8]	郑高媛, 赵亦希, 崔峻辉. 车身用铝饰条拉弯成形面畸变缺陷形成规律[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(1): 53-61.
[9]	金戈, 范珉, 周振栋, 谭勇, 钟小波. 升降式止回阀动态特性分析与改进[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(S2): 110-118.
[10]	徐德辉, 顾汉洋, 刘莉, 黄超. 新型锥形式旋叶汽水分离器热态试验与数值研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(9): 1087-1094.
[11]	刘恒, 伍锐, 孙硕. 非均匀流场螺旋桨空泡数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 976-983.
[12]	王超, 刘正, 李兴, 汪春辉, 徐佩. 自由状态冰块尺寸及初始位置参数对冰桨耦合水动力性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 990-1000.
[13]	李岩松, 丁鼎倩, 韩东, 刘静, 梁永图. 起伏输油管道临界完全携积水油速数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(7): 878-890.
[14]	赵朋飞, 薛昕, 杨成. 模拟碱骨料反应引起的箍筋端部锚固退化对钢筋混凝土梁受剪性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 681-688.
[15]	张源, 李范春, 贾德君. 点阵压气机叶轮的设计与3D打印仿真[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 729-740.