立体式预制构件养护仓温湿度分布建模及数值模拟

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.12.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对目前混凝土构件厂生产线主要使用的立体养护仓温湿度分布进行模拟研究.考虑立体养护仓的高温高湿特点，采用壁面冷凝和雾状冷凝模拟养护仓内的凝结放热现象.模拟结果表明：仓室内大部分区域相对湿度都能较快地达到100%，但温度分布极不均匀，上下温差达到26℃.通过改变喷口朝向、位置和数量发现：喷口向下喷时仓室内温度更均匀；喷口高度在仓室总高度的46%~65%区间时，仓室内温度分布的均匀性最好；喷口数量的增加能够改善喷口之间温度的不均匀性.

关键词: 立体式预制构件养护仓, 温湿度分布, 数值模拟, 冷凝模拟, 优化分析

Abstract: Temperature and humidity distribution of curing rooms which are mainly used in the production line of concrete component factory are studied by simulation. Considering high temperature and high humidity in the curing room, wall condensation and mist condensation are used to simulate the condensation in the room. The simulation results show that the relative humidity of most areas reaches 100% very fast, but the temperature distribution is extremely uneven and temperature difference is up to 26℃. In addition, by changing the nozzle orientation, position and quantity, it is found that the temperature is more uniform when the nozzle is downward; when the nozzle is located in 46% to 65% of the total height of the room, the temperature distribution achieves the best uniformity; the increase in the number of nozzles can improve the temperature distribution between the nozzles.

Key words: curing rooms of concrete, temperature and humidity distribution, numerical simulation, condensation simulation, optimization analysis

中图分类号:

汤洁冬，翟晓强. 立体式预制构件养护仓温湿度分布建模及数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(12): 1543-1551.

TANG Jiedong,ZHAI Xiaoqiang. Modelling and Simulation of Temperature and Humidity Distribution in Curing Rooms of Concrete[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(12): 1543-1551.

参考文献

［1］祁建, 霍光, 李宣, 等. PC自动化生产线养护工艺及养护系统研究［J］. 建筑机械化, 2016(4): 21-24. QI Jian, HUO Guang, LI Xuan, et al. Research on technology and system of PC automatic production line［J］. Construction Mechanization, 2016(4): 21-24. ［2］田耀刚, 彭波, 丁庆军, 等. 蒸养参数对高强混凝土抗硫酸盐侵蚀性能的影响［J］. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2010(3): 1-4. TIAN Yaogang, PENG Bo, DING Qingjun, et al. Effects of steam-cured parameters on sulfate resistance performance of high strength concrete［J］. China Concrete and Cement Products, 2010(3): 1-4. ［3］LI M Y, WANG Q, YANG J. Influence of steam curing method on the performance of concrete containing a large portion of mineral admixtures［J］. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 2017: 1-11. ［4］LONG G C, HE Z M, OMRAN A. Heat damage of steam curing on the surface layer of concrete［J］. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2012, 64(11): 995-1004. ［5］WANG Q, LI M Y, ZHANG B. Influence of pre-curing time on the hydration of binder and the properties of concrete under steam curing condition［J］. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2014, 118(3): 1505-1512. ［6］HWANG S D, KHATIB R, LEE H K, et al. Optimization of steam-curing regime for high-strength, self-consolidating concrete for precast, prestressed concrete applications［J］. Pci Journal, 2012, 57(3): 48-62. ［7］杨江朋. 晋陕黄河特大桥节段箱梁冬季蒸养方案设计［J］. 高速铁路技术, 2015, 6(3): 94-96. YANG Jiangpeng. Design of steam curing scheme in winter for segmental box girder of high-speed railway passenger dedicated line［J］. High Speed Railway Technology, 2015, 6(3): 94-96. ［8］ZHANG Y H, SUN H, LI X, et al. Study of steam-cured system impact on concrete compressive strength and prediction of strength model［J］. Materials Review, 2015, 29: 554-564 ［9］LI X, NIU W Y. Effect of supplementary curing after steam-curing on performance of concrete［J］. Materials Science Forum, 2015, 852: 1376-1382. ［10］中国建筑科学研究院.混凝土质量控制标准: GB50164-2011［S］.北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2004. China Academy of Building Research. Standard for quality control of concrete: GB50164-2011 ［S］.Bejing: China Architecture& Building Press, 2004. ［11］朱红钧. FLUENT 15.0流场分析实战指南［M］. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2015. ZHU Hongjun. FLUENT 15.0 flow field analysis practical guide［M］.Beijing: People’s Posts and Telecommunications Press, 2015. ［12］FU W, LI X W, WU X X, et al. Numerical investigation of convective condensation with the presence of non-condensable gases in a vertical tube［J］. Nuclear Engineering & Design, 2016, 297: 197-207. ［13］刘晖, 康勇. 新的水饱和压力与饱和温度计算方法［J］. 压缩机技术, 2005(6): 26-27. LIU Hui, KANG Yong. New method for calculating saturated pressure and saturation temperature［J］. Compressor Technology, 2005(6): 26-27. ［14］余徽, 朱家骅, 杜怀明, 等. 高湿度工业废气冷凝脱湿模型研究与数值模拟［J］. 化工学报, 2005, 56(8): 1389-1396. YU Hui, ZHU Jiahua, DU Huaiming, et al. Modeling and simulation of condensation and dehumidifying of high humidity industrial exhaust gases［J］. Journal of Chemical Industry & Engineering (China), 2005, 56(8): 1389-1396.

[1]	丁恩宝, 常晟铭, 孙聪, 赵雷明, 吴浩. 半浸桨不同半径切面入水的水动力特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1188-1198.
[2]	吴怀娜, 冯东林, 刘源, 蓝淦洲, 陈仁朋. 基于门式抗浮框架的基坑开挖下卧隧道变形控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1227-1237.
[3]	刘谨豪, 严远忠, 张琪, 卞荣, 贺雷, 叶冠林. 地面堆载对既有隧道影响离心试验和数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 886-896.
[4]	孙健, 彭斌, 朱兵国. 无油双涡圈空气涡旋压缩机的数值模拟及试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(5): 611-621.
[5]	秦汉, 伍彬, 宋玉辉, 刘金, 陈兰. 细长体高速风洞超大攻角支撑干扰数值分析[J]. 空天防御, 2022, 5(3): 44-51.
[6]	薛飞, 王誉超, 伍彬. 高速飞行器后向分离特性研究[J]. 空天防御, 2022, 5(3): 80-86.
[7]	杜登轩 , 乐绍林 , 周欢 , HtayHtayAung , 喻国良. 均匀来流中承台相对埋深对复合桩墩局部水动力及冲刷的影响 [J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(2): 64-71.
[8]	郑高媛, 赵亦希, 崔峻辉. 车身用铝饰条拉弯成形面畸变缺陷形成规律[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(1): 53-61.
[9]	金戈, 范珉, 周振栋, 谭勇, 钟小波. 升降式止回阀动态特性分析与改进[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(S2): 110-118.
[10]	徐德辉, 顾汉洋, 刘莉, 黄超. 新型锥形式旋叶汽水分离器热态试验与数值研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(9): 1087-1094.
[11]	刘恒, 伍锐, 孙硕. 非均匀流场螺旋桨空泡数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 976-983.
[12]	王超, 刘正, 李兴, 汪春辉, 徐佩. 自由状态冰块尺寸及初始位置参数对冰桨耦合水动力性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 990-1000.
[13]	李岩松, 丁鼎倩, 韩东, 刘静, 梁永图. 起伏输油管道临界完全携积水油速数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(7): 878-890.
[14]	赵朋飞, 薛昕, 杨成. 模拟碱骨料反应引起的箍筋端部锚固退化对钢筋混凝土梁受剪性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 681-688.
[15]	张源, 李范春, 贾德君. 点阵压气机叶轮的设计与3D打印仿真[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 729-740.