经典式Spar平台涡激运动与驰振特性的对比试验

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.206

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (5): 497-504.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.206

所属专题：《上海交通大学学报》2021年12期专题汇总专辑；《上海交通大学学报》2021年“海洋科学与工程”专题

经典式Spar平台涡激运动与驰振特性的对比试验

张晨雅¹, 寇雨丰¹^,²(), 吕海宁¹^,², 肖龙飞¹^,², 刘明月¹^,²

1.上海交通大学海洋工程国家重点实验室, 上海 200240
2.三亚崖州湾深海科技研究院, 海南三亚 572024

收稿日期:2020-07-01 出版日期:2021-05-28 发布日期:2021-06-01
通讯作者: 寇雨丰 E-mail:kouyufeng@sjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:张晨雅(1996-),女,浙江省嘉兴市人,硕士生,从事海洋工程水动力学研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(52031006);国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(51909158);国家重点研发计划(2018YFC0309700)

Comparative Test of Characteristics of Vortex-Induced Motion and Galloping of Classic Spar Platform

ZHANG Chenya¹, KOU Yufeng¹^,²(), LÜ Haining¹^,², XIAO Longfei¹^,², LIU Mingyue¹^,²

1. State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2. SJTU-Sanya Yazhou Bay Institute of Deepsea Science and Technology, Sanya 572024, Hainan, China

Received:2020-07-01 Online:2021-05-28 Published:2021-06-01
Contact: KOU Yufeng E-mail:kouyufeng@sjtu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究经典式Spar平台的涡激运动和驰振特性,开展了平台在系泊状态下的水池模型试验,分析不同流速作用下Spar平台的横荡运动特性,并通过对比仅流、仅波浪与波流耦合工况试验结果,分析波流耦合作用对Spar平台涡激运动和驰振运动性能的影响.结果表明:高折合速度的海流使得Spar平台发生驰振运动,相比涡激运动,其振荡周期更长、振幅更大,且具有随机性.波流耦合作用不会改变Spar平台流致运动的具体模式,但是显著影响流致运动的幅值.

关键词: 单柱式平台, 涡激运动, 驰振, 模型试验, 海洋工程水动力学

Abstract:

In order to study the characteristics of vortex-induced motion and galloping of the classic Spar platform, a model test with a mooring system is conducted in basin. The sway motion characteristics of the Spar platform at different current velocities are analyzed. By comparing the results in currents, waves, and wave-current coupled conditions, the coupling effects of current and wave on vortex-induced motion and galloping of the Spar platform are also studied. The results show that galloping is induced by the currents with high reduced velocities. Compared with the vortex-induced motion, the galloping phenomenon has a longer period, larger amplitude, and randomness. The coupling of current and wave would not change the mode of flow-induced motion, but it significantly affects the motion amplitude.

Key words: Spar platform, vortex-induced motion, galloping, model test, hydrodynamics of marine engineering

中图分类号:

P751

张晨雅, 寇雨丰, 吕海宁, 肖龙飞, 刘明月. 经典式Spar平台涡激运动与驰振特性的对比试验[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(5): 497-504.

ZHANG Chenya, KOU Yufeng, LÜ Haining, XIAO Longfei, LIU Mingyue. Comparative Test of Characteristics of Vortex-Induced Motion and Galloping of Classic Spar Platform[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021, 55(5): 497-504.

图/表 13

图1

表1

图2

图3

表2

图4

图5

表3

Spar平台在流作用下的运动响应幅值

U_r	横荡		纵荡
U_r	$A D max$	$A D nom$	$A D max$	$A D nom$
9.3	0.0948	0.0490	0.0749	0.0291
22.8	0.4914	0.2526	0.2535	0.1224
25.6	0.5109	0.2783	0.2089	0.0899

表3

图6

表4

一年一遇流、波浪及波流耦合作用下平台横荡幅值

工况	横荡
工况	$A D max$	$A D nom$
流(V_c=0.73 m/s)	0.0948	0.0490
波浪(H_s=8.7 m)	0.0760	0.0365
波流耦合(H_s=8.7 m, V_c=0.73 m/s)	0.2071	0.1124

表4

图7

表5

高海况流、波浪及波流耦合作用下平台横荡幅值

工况		横荡
工况		$A D max$	$A D nom$
百年一遇	流(V_c=1.79 m/s)	0.4914	0.2526
	波浪(H_s=15 m)	0.1156	0.0568
	波流耦合(H_s=15 m, V_c=1.79 m/s)	1.1292	0.6111
千年一遇	流(V_c=2.01 m/s)	0.5109	0.2783
	波浪(H_s=18 m)	0.1518	0.0608
	波流耦合(H_s=18 m, V_c=2.01 m/s)	1.5295	0.6089

表5

图8

参考文献 14

[1]	FUJARRA A L C, ROSETTI G F, DE WILDE J, et al. State-of-art on Vortex-Induced Motion: A comprehensive survey after more than one decade of experimental investigation [C]//Proceedings of the 31th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Rio de Janeiro: OMAE, 2012: 561-582.
[2]	GAO W, ZHU W, DONG L, et al. A study of Spar-FPSO VIM phenomenon and its influence to mooring system [C]//Proceedings of the 21th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Rhodes: ISOPE, 2016: 1067-1074.
[3]	孙洪源, 黄维平, 李磊, 等. 基于实验的浮式圆柱体涡激运动研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(3):93-97.
	SUN Hongyuan, HUANG Weiping, LI Lei, et al. Tests for vortex induced motions of a floating cylinder[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(3):93-97.
[4]	何佳伟, 赵伟文, 万德成. 带螺旋侧板的Spar平台涡激运动数值模拟[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2019, 14(4):74-84.
	HE Jiawei, ZHAO Weiwen, WAN Decheng. Numerical simulation of vertex induced motion for Spar platform with helical strakes[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2019, 14(4):74-84.
[5]	PARK Y C, ANTONY A, MOIDEEN H, et al. Gulfstar-VIM and mooring chain fatigue [C]//Proceedings of the Annual Offshore Technology Conference. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference, 2015: 4577-4620.
[6]	FINNIGAN T, IRANI M, VAN DIJK R. Truss Spar VIM in waves and currents [C]//Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Halkidiki: OMAE, 2005: 475-482.
[7]	GONÇALVES R T, FUJARRA A L C, ROSETTI G F, et al. Mitigation of vortex-induced motion (VIM) on a monocolumn platform: Forces and movements[J]. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2010, 132(4):041102. doi: 10.1115/1.4001440 URL
[8]	IRANI M, PERRYMAN S, BREWER J, et al. Vortex induced motions of the Horn Mountain Truss Spar [C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Estoril: OMAE, 2008: 967-973.
[9]	BLEVINS R D. Flow-induced vibration[M]. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.
[10]	WAALS O J, PHADKE A C, BULTEMA S. Flow induced motions of multi column floaters [C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. San Diego: OMAE, 2007: 669-678.
[11]	GONÇALVES R T, GAMBARINE D M, MOMENTI A M, et al. Experimental study on flow-induced vibration of floating squared section cylinders with low aspect ratio: Part II—Effects of rounded edges [C]//Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Busan: OMAE, 2016: 54813.
[12]	LIANG S P, WANG J S, HU Z M. VIV and galloping response of a circular cylinder with rigid detached splitter plates[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 162:176-186. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.05.026 URL
[13]	LAMAS F, RAMIREZ M A M, FERNANDES A C. Yaw galloping of a TLWP platform under high speed currents by analytical methods and its comparison with experimental results [C]//Proceedings of 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Trondheim: OMAE, 2017: 61909.
[14]	董艳秋. 深海采油平台波浪载荷及响应[M]. 天津: 天津大学出版社, 2005: 76.
	DONG Yanqiu. Wave loads and response of the oil-extraction platform in deep ocean[M]. Tianjin: Tianjin Univerity Press, 2005: 76.

参数	实际值	模型值
直径/m	34.1	0.568
中央井尺寸/m	12.8	0.213
螺旋侧板高度/m	4.44	0.074
吃水/m	198.1	3.302
干舷/m	16.8	0.280
立柱总高度/m	214.9	3.582
总排水量/t	174598	0.7886
垂向重心高度/m	87.78	1.463
横摇惯性半径/m	75.1	1.252
纵摇惯性半径/m	75.2	1.253
首摇惯性半径/m	16.8	0.280

[1]	赵光义, 张萌萌, 付世晓, 许玉旺, 任浩杰, 白英利. 均匀流作用下并联悬垂双取水管涡激振动载荷特性试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(8): 1067-1080.
[2]	陈鹏宇, 朱一鸣, 谢小敏. 单锚系泊船舶偏荡运动特性仿真与试验研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2025, 12(3): 87-93.
[3]	刘树祥1, 丁勇1, 王奕霖2, 李飒2. 自升式平台水平承载特性试验研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2025, 12(1): 74-78.
[4]	宋俊霖, 刘博, 唐立恒, 廖晨聪. 不同灌浆效果下黏土海床导管架桩基础的竖向承载特性离心试验[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(1): 38-47.
[5]	汤乾宇. 考虑波流耦合作用的平台涡激运动试验研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2024, 11(4): 75-84.
[6]	李旭, 肖龙飞, 魏汉迪, 吴文成, 朱子扬, 李琰. 环境载荷逆向识别与虚拟模型试验方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(2): 141-146.
[7]	刘东喜, 马仁杰, 蔡文娟, 卢天择. 立式圆柱液舱内自由液面三维旋转晃荡试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(11): 1665-1673.
[8]	姚汝林, 樊奇东, 余龙, 汪学锋. 基于重叠网格方法的中型邮轮减摇鳍数值和试验分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(S1): 178-184.
[9]	毕建巍, 苏雷, 解立波, 张昱, 凌贤长. 波浪作用下液化场地高桩码头动力响应试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(11): 1442-1454.
[10]	刘谨豪, 严远忠, 张琪, 卞荣, 贺雷, 叶冠林. 地面堆载对既有隧道影响离心试验和数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 886-896.
[11]	阳杰, 何炎平, 孟龙, 赵永生, 吴浩宇. 极限海况下6 MW单柱型浮式风力机耦合动力响应[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(1): 21-31.
[12]	赵东亚，胡志强，陈刚. 浮式液化天然气系统液体装载船体的耦合响应[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(5): 540-548.
[13]	杨羿帆, 李欣, 武博, 李健行, 盛楠. 不同形状长月池对钻井船阻力影响研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2019, 6(1): 470-477.
[14]	刘建成, 郭英豪, 肖龙飞, 滕晓青, 王金光, 徐立新, 陆海东. 半潜式钻井平台波浪砰击载荷试验研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(增刊): 234-237.
[15]	张亚国1，李镜培2. 静压沉桩引起的土体应力与孔压分布特征[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(12): 1587-1593.

经典式Spar平台涡激运动与驰振特性的对比试验

Comparative Test of Characteristics of Vortex-Induced Motion and Galloping of Classic Spar Platform

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 14

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

编号	有义波高 H_s/m	谱峰周期 T_p/s	谱峰因子γ	表层流速 V_c/(m·s^-1)	备注
1	8.7	12.3	2.6		一年一遇
2	8.7	12.3	2.6	0.73	一年一遇
3	15	17	3.55		百年一遇
4	15	17	3.55	1.79	百年一遇
5	18	22	4		千年一遇
6	18	22	4	2.01	千年一遇