适用于环境-经济调度研究的燃煤机组二氧化碳排放特性模型

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.368

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (12): 1663-1672.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.368

所属专题：《上海交通大学学报》2021年“电气工程”专题；《上海交通大学学报》2021年12期专题汇总专辑

适用于环境-经济调度研究的燃煤机组二氧化碳排放特性模型

张展鹏¹, 班明飞¹(), 郭丹阳², 陈启超³, 江海洋⁴

1.东北林业大学机电工程学院, 哈尔滨 150006
2.哈尔滨红光锅炉集团有限公司, 哈尔滨 150050
3.国网经济技术研究院有限公司,北京 102211
4.国网黑龙江省电力有限公司电力调度控制中心,哈尔滨 150090

收稿日期:2021-06-30 出版日期:2021-12-28 发布日期:2021-12-30
通讯作者: 班明飞 E-mail:mban2@iit.edu
作者简介:张展鹏(1998-),男,吉林省长春市人,硕士生,主要从事燃煤机组大气污染物排放特性建模研究.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52107075);中央高校基本科研业务专项基金(2572020BF04)

A Model for Carbon Dioxide Emission Characteristics of Coal-Fired Units for Environment-Economic Dispatch Research

ZHANG Zhanpeng¹, BAN Mingfei¹(), GUO Danyang², CHEN Qichao³, JIANG Haiyang⁴

1. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150006, China
2. Harbin Hongguang Boiler Group Co., Ltd., Harbin 150050, China
3. State Grid Economic and Technological Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102211, China
4. Power Dispatch and Control Center, State Grid Heilongjiang Electric Power Co., Ltd., Harbin 150090, China

Received:2021-06-30 Online:2021-12-28 Published:2021-12-30
Contact: BAN Mingfei E-mail:mban2@iit.edu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为精准量化不同容量燃煤机组碳排放量,更好地服务于我国“碳达峰、碳中和”目标,建立了一种适用于电力系统环境-经济调度的新型燃煤机组CO₂排放特性模型.首先,总结并分析了近年来我国燃煤机组容量和煤耗变化情况;其次,采用K-Medoide聚类分析了典型机组的负荷率与CO₂排放强度的关系,建立了受基本方程规范的新型燃煤机组碳排放特性模型;最后,结合理论分析与实际数据,对所建立的模型进行算例仿真,验证了模型的有效性.

关键词: 电力系统, 燃煤机组, 二氧化碳, 排放强度, 排放特性模型

Abstract:

In order to accurately quantify the carbon emissions of coal-fired units with different capacities and serve the goal of “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality” in China better, a novel CO₂ emission characteristic model for environment-economic dispatch of power systems is established. First, the changes in the capacity and coal consumption of coal-fired units in China in recent years are summarized and analyzed. Then, the relationship between the load rate and CO₂ emission intensity is analyzed using the K-Medoide cluster method, and the carbon emission characteristic model of new coal-fired units restricted to basic equations is established. Finally, combined with theoretical analysis and actual data, a simulation is conducted to verify the validity of the model.

Key words: power system, coal-fired units, carbon dioxide, emission intensity, emission characteristic model

中图分类号:

TM732

张展鹏, 班明飞, 郭丹阳, 陈启超, 江海洋. 适用于环境-经济调度研究的燃煤机组二氧化碳排放特性模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(12): 1663-1672.

ZHANG Zhanpeng, BAN Mingfei, GUO Danyang, CHEN Qichao, JIANG Haiyang. A Model for Carbon Dioxide Emission Characteristics of Coal-Fired Units for Environment-Economic Dispatch Research[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021, 55(12): 1663-1672.

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

图7

图8

参考文献 34

[1]	卫志农, 向育鹏, 孙国强, 等. 计及碳排放含有碳捕集电厂电网的多目标动态最优潮流[J]. 电网技术, 2012, 36(12):11-17.
	WEI Zhinong, XIANG Yupeng, SUN Guoqiang, et al. Carbon emission-considered multi-objective dynamic optimal power flow of power system containing carbon-capture plant[J]. Power System Technology, 2012, 36(12):11-17.
[2]	周媛, 郑丽凤, 周新年, 等. 基于采伐剩余物的生物质固体燃料生态效益分析[J]. 森林工程, 2018, 34(1):24-29.
	ZHOU Yuan, ZHENG Lifeng, ZHOU Xinnian, et al. Eco-benefit evaluation of biomass solid fuel based on forest cutting ResiduesFull text replacement[J]. Forest Engineering, 2018, 34(1):24-29.
[3]	康重庆, 陈启鑫, 夏清. 低碳电力技术的研究展望[J]. 电网技术, 2009, 33(2):1-7.
	KANG Chongqing, CHEN Qixin, XIA Qing. Prospects of low-carbon electricity[J]. Power System Technology, 2009, 33(2):1-7.
[4]	TANG L, QU J B, MI Z F, et al. Substantial emission reductions from Chinese power plants after the introduction of ultra-low emissions standards[J]. Nature Energy, 2019, 4(11):929-938. doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0468-1 URL
[5]	TALAQ J H, EL-HAWARY F, EL-HAWARY M E. A summary of environmental/economic dispatch algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1994, 9(3):1508-1516. doi: 10.1109/59.336110 URL
[6]	VENKATESH P, GNANADASS R, PADHY N P. Comparison and application of evolutionary programming techniques to combined economic emission dispatch with line flow constraints[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2003, 18(2):688-697. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.811008 URL
[7]	S KULKARNI A G K. Combined economic and emission dispatch using improved backpropagation neural network[J]. Electric Machines & Power Systems, 2000, 28(1):31-44.
[8]	刘盛松, 邰能灵, 侯志俭, 等. 基于最优潮流与模糊贴近度的电力系统环境保护研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2003, 23(4):21-26.
	LIU Shengsong, TAI Nengling, HOU Zhijian, et al. Study on environmental protection of power systems based on optimal power flow and fuzzy nearness[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2003, 23(4):21-26.
[9]	谭忠富, 于超. 节能减排目标下燃煤机组电量分配模糊优化模型[J]. 电网技术, 2012, 36(1):219-223.
	TAN Zhongfu, YU Chao. A fuzzy optimization model for allocation of generated energy among coal-fired units with targets of energy saving and emission reduction[J]. Power System Technology, 2012, 36(1):219-223.
[10]	刘晓, 艾欣, 彭谦. 计及需求响应的含风电场电力系统发电与碳排放权联合优化调度[J]. 电网技术, 2012, 36(1):213-218.
	LIU Xiao, AI Xin, PENG Qian. Optimal dispatch coordinating power generation with carbon emission permit for wind farms integrated power grid considering demand response[J]. Power System Technology, 2012, 36(1):213-218.
[11]	陈艺璇, 余涛. 考虑大气污染物时空分布控制的多时间尺度协调多目标优化调度策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(8):2280-2296.
	CHEN Yixuan, YU Tao. Multi-time scale coordinated and multi-objective optimal dispatch strategy incorporating temporal and spatial distribution control of air pollutants[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(8):2280-2296.
[12]	ADHINARAYANAN T, SYDULU M. Particle swarm optimisation for economic dispatch with cubic fuel cost function[C]// TENCON 2006-2006 IEEE Region 10 Conference. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2006: 1-4.
[13]	KRISHNAMURTHY S, TZONEVA R. Impact of price penalty factors on the solution of the combined economic emission dispatch problem using cubic criterion functions[C]// 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2012: 1-9.
[14]	彭春华. 综合环境保护及竞价风险的发电侧经济运行[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2008, 28(28):97-102.
	PENG Chunhua. Economic operation problem of generating side considering environmental protection and bidding risk[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(28):97-102.
[15]	彭春华, 孙惠娟. 基于非劣排序微分进化的多目标优化发电调度[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2009, 29(34):71-76.
	PENG Chunhua, SUN Huijuan. Multi-objective optimization power dispatch based on non-dominated sorting differential evolution[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(34):71-76.
[16]	ABIDO M A. Environmental/economic power dispatch using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2003, 18(4):1529-1537. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.818693 URL
[17]	宁志, 丛星亮, 陈永龙. 300 MW和1000 MW燃煤机组能耗和污染物排放特性[J]. 电站辅机, 2019, 40(1):28-33.
	NI Zhi, CONG XingLiang, CHEN YongLong. Energy consumption and pollutant emission performance of 300 MW and 1000 MW coal-fired power units[J]. Power Station Auxiliary Equipment, 2019, 40(1):28-33.
[18]	叶勇健. 2030年高效、绿色、灵活、经济的燃煤发电技术路线[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2019, 35(2):28-33.
	YE Yongjian. Technological roadmap of coal-fired power featuring in high efficiency, green, flexibility and economical competition up to 2030[J]. Electric Power Technology and Environmental Protection, 2019, 35(2):28-33.
[19]	中电联行业发展与环境资源部. 中国煤电清洁发展报告[J]. 中国电力企业管理, 2017(28):49-51.
	Ministry of Industry Development and Environmental Resources at China Electricity Council. China coal power clean development report[J]. China Power Enterprise Management, 2017(28):49-51.
[20]	朱法华, 许月阳, 孙尊强, 等. 中国燃煤电厂超低排放和节能改造的实践与启示[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(4):1-8.
	ZHU Fahua, XU Yueyang, SUN Zunqiang, et al. Practice and enlightenment of ultra-low emission and energy-saving retrofit of coal-fired power plants in China[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(4):1-8.
[21]	MA Z Z, DENG J G, LI Z, et al. Characteristics of NO_x emission from Chinese coal-fired power plants equipped with new technologies[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2016, 131:164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.006 URL
[22]	王霂晗, 朱林, 张晶杰, 等. 欧盟火电厂二氧化碳排放在线监测系统质量保证体系对中国的启示[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(3):154-158.
	WANG Muhan, ZHU Lin, ZHANG Jingjie, et al. Practice of quality assurance system of carbon dioxide emission on-line monitoring system in the European union[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(3):154-158.
[23]	国家发展和改革委员会. 中国发电企业温室气体排放核算方法与报告指南(试行)[EB/OL](2013-11-04)[2021-06-05]. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/att/att/site1/20131104/001e3741a2cc13e13f1101.pdf.
	National Development and Reform Commission. Guidelines on accounting methods and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from China’s power generation enterprises (Trial)[EB/OL](2013-11-04)[2021-06-05]. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/att/att/site1/20131104/001e3741a2cc13e13f1101.pdf.
[24]	李峥辉, 卢伟业, 庞晓坤, 等. 火电企业CO₂排放在线监测系统的研发应用[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2020, 26(4):182-189.
	LI Zhenghui, LU Weiye, PANG Xiaokun, et al. Research and application of on-line monitoring system for CO₂ emissions from thermal power enterprises[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2020, 26(4):182-189.
[25]	董玉亮, 袁家海, 马丽荣. 面向灵活性发电的燃煤机组大气排放特性分析[J]. 发电技术, 2018, 39(5):425-432.
	DONG Yuliang, YUAN Jiahai, MA Lirong. Air emissions characteristics of coal-fired power unit for flexibility generation[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2018, 39(5):425-432.
[26]	刘叶, 吴晟, 周海河, 等. 基于K-means聚类算法优化方法的研究[J]. 信息技术, 2019, 43(1):66-70.
	LIU Ye, WU Sheng, ZHOU Haihe, et al. Research on optimization method based on K-means clustering algorithm[J]. Information Technology, 2019, 43(1):66-70.
[27]	陈亮. 节能发电调度全过程优化模型与关键技术研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2012.
	CHEN Liang. Study on optimization models and key technologies for the whole process of energy-saving generation dispatch[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2012.
[28]	王漪, 柳焯, 柳进. 受基本方程规范的火电机组耗量特性系数辨识[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(4):1151-1160.
	WANG Yi, LIU Zhuo, LIU Jin. Fuel consumption characteristic coefficients identification restricted to basic equations for thermal power units[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37(4):1151-1160.
[29]	张辉, 贾思宁, 范菁菁. 燃气与燃煤电厂主要污染物排放估算分析[J]. 环境工程, 2012, 30(3):59-62.
	ZHANG Hui, JIA Sining, FAN Jingjing. The major pollutants estimate analysis of gas and coal power plants[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2012, 30(3):59-62.
[30]	孙友源, 郑张, 秦亚琦, 等. 火电机组碳排放特性研究及管理建议[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(3):144-149.
	SUN Youyuan, ZHENG Zhang, QIN Yaqi, et al. Study on carbon emission characteristics and suggestions on carbon emission management of coal-fired power plant[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(3):144-149.
[31]	ONGSAKUL W, PETCHARAKS N. Unit commitment by enhanced adaptive Lagrangian relaxation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(1):620-628. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.820707 URL
[32]	郭丹阳, 班明飞, 于继来. 生态GDP核算体系下的差别化燃煤机组安全约束组合模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(2):524-535.
	GUO Danyang, BAN Mingfei, YU Jilai. Security-constrained unit commitment model for differentiated coal-fired units under ecological GDP accounting system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(2):524-535.
[33]	BAN M F, YU J L, SHAHIDEHPOUR M, et al. Considering the differentiating health impacts of fuel emissions in optimal generation scheduling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2020, 11(1):15-26. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.5165391 URL
[34]	张晓花, 赵晋泉, 陈星莺. 节能减排多目标机组组合问题的模糊建模及优化[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2010, 30(22):71-76.
	ZHANG Xiaohua, ZHAO Jinquan, CHEN Xingying. Multi-objective unit commitment fuzzy modeling and optimization for energy-saving and emission reduction[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2010, 30(22):71-76.

负荷率/ %	I_g=200 MW		I_g=300 MW		I_g=600 MW		I_g=1000 MW
负荷率/ %	煤耗/[g· (kW·h)^-1]	排放强度/[g· (kW·h)^-1]	煤耗/[g· (kW·h)^-1]	排放强度/[g· (kW·h)^-1]	煤耗/[g· (kW·h)^-1]	排放强度/[g· (kW·h)^-1]	煤耗/[g· (kW·h)^-1]	排放强度/[g· (kW·h)^-1]
50	380	1065	337	945	316	885	305	848
75	343	950	322	900	307	859	289	805
100	325	910	318	885	302	851	282	790

I_g/ MW	a/(t· MW^-2·h^-1)	b/ [t·(MW·h)^-1]	c/ (t·h^-1)
100~200	0.0002766	0.656496	39.063752
200~300	0.0001296	0.764384	24.132013
300~600	0.0000471	0.773090	29.265488
600~1000	0.0000552	0.653291	87.038448

压力参数	I_g/ MW	ζ/ [g·(kW·h)^-1]	E_av/ [g·(kW·h)^-1]
超超临界	1000	288	806
超临界	600	306	856
亚临界	300	319	893
超高压	200	360	1008

机组编号	机组出力		煤耗成本系数			CO₂排放系数			r_amp/ (MW·h^-1)	t_on/ h	t_off/ h
机组编号	P_max/ MW	P_min/ MW	α_i/(美元· MW^-2·h^-1)	β_i/[美元· (MW·h)^-1]	γ_i/(美元· h^-1)	a_i/(t· MW^-2·h^-1)	b_i/[t· (MW·h)^-1]	c_i/ (t·h^-1)	r_amp/ (MW·h^-1)	t_on/ h	t_off/ h
Y1	455	150	0.00048	16.19	1000	0.022	-2.86	130	130	8		8
Y2	455	150	0.00031	17.26	970	0.020	-2.72	132	130	8		8
Y3	130	20	0.00200	16.60	700	0.044	-2.94	138	60	5		5
Y4	130	20	0.00211	16.50	680	0.058	-2.35	130	60	5		5
Y5	162	25	0.00398	19.70	450	0.065	-2.36	125	90	6		6
Y6	80	20	0.00712	22.26	370	0.080	-2.28	110	40	3		3
Y7	85	25	0.00079	27.74	480	0.075	-2.36	135	40	3		3
Y8	55	10	0.00413	25.92	660	0.082	-1.29	157	40	1		1
Y9	55	10	0.00220	27.27	665	0.090	-1.14	160	40	1		1
Y10	55	10	0.00173	27.79	670	0.084	-2.14	138	40	1		1

时段/h	负载/MW	时段/h	负载/MW	时段/h	负载/MW
1	700	9	1300	17	1000
2	750	10	1400	18	1100
3	850	11	1450	19	1200
4	950	12	1500	20	1400
5	1000	13	1400	21	1300
6	1100	14	1300	22	1100
7	1150	15	1200	23	900
8	1200	16	1050	24	800

适用于环境-经济调度研究的燃煤机组二氧化碳排放特性模型

A Model for Carbon Dioxide Emission Characteristics of Coal-Fired Units for Environment-Economic Dispatch Research

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 34

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	符杨, 丁枳尹, 米阳. 计及储能调节的时滞互联电力系统频率控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1128-1138.
[2]	吴勇虎, 吕欢欢, 于汀, 兰志刚. 10MW 海洋温差能电站电力系统方案研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(1): 46-51.
[3]	游广增, 汤翔鹰, 胡炎, 邰能灵, 朱欣春, 李玲芳. 基于典型运行场景聚类的电力系统灵活性评估方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(7): 802-813.
[4]	李浩, 张振宇, 宋霞, 陈江平. 带喷射器的跨临界CO₂车用空调系统实验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(2): 179-187.
[5]	庞宇, 黄文焘, 吴骏, 邰能灵, 孙国亮. 船舶大功率脉冲负载抗冲击供电系统[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(10): 1197-1209.
[6]	王雨风，王丹东，胡记超，陈亮，陈江平. 两相流CO2喷射器内部流场的数值模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(7): 860-865.
[7]	俞彬彬，王丹东，向伟，余浩弘，陈江平. 跨临界CO2电动汽车空调系统性能分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(7): 866-872.
[8]	张林林，胡熊伟，李鹏，石访，于之虹. 基于极限学习机的电力系统暂态稳定评估方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(6): 749-756.
[9]	刘国锋, 万光芬, 高璇. 大功率电驱压缩机平台电力系统应用研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(1): 58-62.
[10]	赵建宇, 唐怡. 闭环电气系统在大型工程船舶上的应用[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2017, 4(6): 343-346.
[11]	李海荣, 梁宇成, 王远江, 张艺. 某高含二氧化碳天然气脱碳溶剂试验研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2015, 2(5): 300-304.
[12]	文勇. 350 t自航起重船电力推进系统设计[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2014, 1(3): 245-248.
[13]	马强, 张理, 肖钢, 陈明, 颜廷富. 风光互补直流并网在海岛上的应用[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2014, 1(3): 254-257.
[14]	巫江虹, 李程, 杨兆光. CO₂微通道气冷器的流场分解模拟及实验验证[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2012, 46(03): 474-479.

优化模型	排放总量/t
情形I	55984
情形II	43272
情形III	25869