高强度钢材低温力学性能试验研究与预测模型

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2022.526

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在极地严寒地区工程中应用高强钢可节省用钢量,减少低温严酷环境下钢结构制作、运输和安装成本.为研究HG785高强钢在极地低温环境下的力学性能,对考虑2种厚度和5种低温环境的高强钢试样开展单轴拉伸试验.试验结果表明,极地低温环境下HG785高强钢的弹性模量、屈服强度和极限抗拉强度相较于其在25 ℃常温环境下有所提高,失效模式均为颈缩延性破坏并无脆断倾向.采用全子集法对试验结果进行回归分析,建立极地低温环境下高强钢力学性能指标预测模型,可指导高强钢在结构构件、节点与体系中的合理高效应用,为高强钢结构在极地低温地区服役与结构设计优化策略决策提供理论依据.

关键词: 高强钢, 单轴拉伸试验, 低温材性, 预测模型

Abstract:

The application of high-strength steel in extremely cold polar regions can reduce steel consumption and save the cost of fabrication, transportation, and installation of steel structures in the harsh low-temperature environment. In order to study the mechanical properties of HG785 high-strength steel under polar low-temperature conditions, uniaxial tensile tests were conducted on high-strength steel coupons by considering two thicknesses and five low-temperature cases. It was found that the elastic modulus, yield strength, and ultimate tensile strength of HG785 high-strength steel in polar low-temperature environment are higher than those at an ambient temperature of 25 ℃. All tensile coupon specimens failed by traditional necking in a ductile manner without brittle failure tendency. Based on the test results, accurate prediction models for mechanical properties of HG785 high-strength steel in polar low-temperature environment were established by the best subset regression analysis. This will facilitate the application of high-strength steel in the design of structural members, joints, and systems in an efficient manner, and provide theoretical support for the promotion of high-strength steel structures in polar low-temperature regions.

Key words: high-strength steel, uniaxial tensile test, low temperature mechanical properties, prediction model

中图分类号:

TU391

蔡骜, 陈满泰, 左文康, 段立平, 赵金城. 高强度钢材低温力学性能试验研究与预测模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(11): 1707-1715.

CAI Ao, CHEN Mantai, ZUO Wenkang, DUAN Liping, ZHAO Jincheng. Experimental Study and Prediction Model of Low Temperature Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Steel[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2024, 58(11): 1707-1715.

图/表 10

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

图6

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 31

[1]	MA J L, CHAN T M, YOUNG B. Material properties and residual stresses of cold-formed high strength steel hollow sections[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015, 109: 152-165.
[2]	CHEN M T, YOUNG B. Tests of cold-formed normal and high strength steel tubes under tension[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 153: 106844.
[3]	班慧勇, 施刚, 石永久, 等. 建筑结构用高强度钢材力学性能研究进展[J]. 建筑结构, 2013, 43(2): 88-94.
	BAN Huiyong, SHI Gang, SHI Yongjiu, et al. Research advances on mechanical properties of high strength structural steels[J]. Building Structure, 2013, 43(2): 88-94.
[4]	徐克龙, 施刚, 林错错. 960 MPa高强度钢材轴压柱局部稳定性能及设计方法[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 44(1): 102-111.
	XU Kelong, SHI Gang, LIN Cuocuo. Analysis and design method on local buckling behavior of 960 MPa high strength steel columns under axial compression[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2017, 44(1): 102-111.
[5]	王卫永, 李国强. 高强钢结构抗火设计理论研究进展[J]. 工业建筑, 2016, 46(7): 61-67.
	WANG Weiyong, LI Guoqiang. Research progress of fire resistance design theory of high strength steel structures[J]. Industrial Construction, 2016, 46(7): 61-67.
[6]	MENG X, GARDNER L. Cross-sectional behaviour of cold-formed high strength steel circular hollow sections[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 156: 106822.
[7]	郭宏超, 万金怀, 刘云贺, 等. Q690D高强钢焊缝连接疲劳性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2018, 51(9): 1-9.
	GUO Hongchao, WAN Jinhuai, LIU Yunhe, et al. Experimental study on fatigue performance of Q690D high strength steel welded joints[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018, 51(9): 1-9.
[8]	KE K, ZHANG M Y, YAM M C H, et al. Block shear performance of double-line bolted S690 steel angles under uniaxial tension[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2022, 171: 108668.
[9]	JIANG B H, YAM M C H, KE K, et al. Block shear failure of S275 and S690 steel angles with single-line bolted connections[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 170: 106068.
[10]	LIN X M, YAM M C H, KE K, et al. Investigation of block shear strength of high strength steel bolted connections[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2022, 196: 107407.
[11]	KE K, CHEN Y Y. Seismic performance of MRFs with high strength steel main frames and EDBs[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 126: 214-228.
[12]	ZHOU Z Y, KE K, CHEN Y Y, et al. High strength steel frames with curved knee braces: Performance-based damage-control design framework[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2022, 196: 107392.
[13]	BJORHOVDE R. Development and use of high performance steel[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2004, 60(3/4/5): 393-400.
[14]	施刚, 班慧勇, 石永久, 等. 高强度钢材钢结构研究进展综述[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(1): 1-13.
	SHI Gang, BAN Huiyong, SHI Yongjiu, et al. Overview of research progress for high strength steel structures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(1): 1-13.
[15]	李国强. 高强结构钢连接研究进展[J]. 钢结构(中英文), 2020, 35(6): 1-40.
	LI Guoqiang. Progress of research on high-strength structural steel connections[J]. Steel Construction, 2020, 35(6): 1-40.
[16]	施刚, 班慧勇, 石永久, 等. 高强度钢材钢结构的工程应用及研究进展[J]. 工业建筑, 2012, 42(1): 1-7.
	SHI Gang, BAN Huiyong, SHI Yongjiu, et al. Engineering application and recent research progress on high strength steel structures[J]. Industrial Construction, 2012, 42(1): 1-7.
[17]	范重, 刘先明, 范学伟, 等. 国家体育场大跨度钢结构设计与研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2007, 28(2): 1-16.
	FAN Zhong, LIU Xianming, FAN Xuewei, et al. Design and research of large-span steel structure for the National Stadium[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2007, 28(2): 1-16.
[18]	陈振明, 张耀林, 彭明祥, 等. 国产高强钢及厚板在央视新台址主楼建筑中的应用[J]. 钢结构, 2009, 24(2): 34-38.
	CHEN Zhenming, ZHANG Yaolin, PENG Ming-xiang, et al. Application of high-strength steel and thick steel plates to cctv new site building[J]. Steel Construction, 2009, 24(2): 34-38.
[19]	田黎敏, 郝际平, 戴立先, 等. 深圳湾体育中心结构施工过程模拟分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2011, 41(12): 118-121.
	TIAN Limin, HAO Jiping, DAI Lixian, et al. Simulation analysis on erection procedure of Shenzhen Bay Sports Center[J]. Building Structure, 2011, 41(12): 118-121.
[20]	王元清, 林云, 张延年, 等. 高强度钢材Q460C低温力学性能试验[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 27(4): 646-652.
	WANG Yuanqing, LIN Yun, ZHANG Yannian, et al. Experimental study on the mechanical properties of Q460C the high strength construction steel at low temperature[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science), 2011, 27(4): 646-652.
[21]	王元清, 林云, 张延年, 等. 高强度结构钢材Q460-C低温冲击韧性试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2012, 42(1): 8-12.
	WANG Yuanqing, LIN Yun, ZHANG Yannian, et al. Experimental study on the impact toughness of Q460-C high-strength construction steel at low temperature[J]. Industrial Construction, 2012, 42(1): 8-12.
[22]	YAN J B, RICHARD LIEW J Y, ZHANG M H, et al. Mechanical properties of normal strength mild steel and high strength steel S690 in low temperature relevant to Arctic environment[J]. Materials & Design, 2014, 61: 150-159.
[23]	YAN J B, LUO Y L, LIN X C, et al. Effects of the Arctic low temperature on mechanical properties of Q690 and Q960 high-strength steels[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 300: 124022.
[24]	荆慧强, 何冠杰, 贾延奎. HG785高强钢焊接残余应力试验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(6): 139-142.
	JING Huiqiang, HE Guanjie, JIA Yankui. Experimental study on welded residual stress of HG785 high strength steel[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(6): 139-142.
[25]	陈丽娟, 赵隆崎, 蔡珍, 等. 合金元素减量化HG785钢的连续冷却转变规律研究[J]. 钢铁研究, 2014, 42(6): 37-39.
	CHEN Lijuan, ZHAO Longqi, CAI Zhen, et al. Research on continuous cooling transformation behavior of alloying elements reduced HG785 steel[J]. Research on Iron and Steel, 2014, 42(6): 37-39.
[26]	ASTM. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials: E8/E8M—16a[S]. USA: ASTM International, 2016.
[27]	CHEN M T, YOUNG B. Tensile tests of cold-formed stainless steel tubes[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2020, 146(9): 04020165.
[28]	CHEN M T, ZHANG T, GONG Z, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructure characteristics of wire arc additively manufactured high-strength steels[J]. Engineering Structures, 2024, 300: 117092.
[29]	CHEN M T, GONG Z, ZHANG T, et al. Mechanical behavior of austenitic stainless steels produced by wire arc additive manufacturing[J]. Thin-walled Structures, 2024, 196: 111455.
[30]	CHEN M T, CHEN Y, ZUO W, et al. Experimental investigation on the tensile behavior of wire arc additively manufactured duplex stainless steel plates[J]. Engineering Structures, 2024, 321: 118764.
[31]	CHEN M T, PANDEY M, YOUNG B. Mechanical properties of cold-formed steel semi-oval hollow sections after exposure to ISO-834 fire[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2021, 167: 108202.

试样	t/ mm	T/ ℃	E_T/ GPa	E_T/ E_Ta	I_E,P	f_yT/ MPa	f_yT/ f_yTa	I_fy,P	f_uT/ MPa	f_uT/ f_uTa	I_fu,P	I_E,Test/ I_E,P	I_fy,Test/ I_fy,P	I_fu,Test/ I_fu,P
H6T25	6	25	186	1.00	1.00	615	1.00	1.00	699	1.00	1.00	1.000	1.000	1.000
H6T-20	6	-20	190	1.02	1.08	695	1.13	1.06	833	1.19	1.07	0.951	1.062	1.110
H6T-40	6	-40	205	1.10	1.12	747	1.22	1.10	835	1.20	1.11	0.987	1.107	1.073
H6T-60	6	-60	214	1.15	1.16	726	1.18	1.14	855	1.22	1.16	0.988	1.039	1.056
H6T-75	6	-75	226	1.21	1.20	756	1.23	1.17	847	1.21	1.20	1.009	1.053	1.014
H8T25	8	25	193	1.00	1.00	627	1.00	1.00	704	1.00	1.00	1.000	1.000	1.000
H8T-20	8	-20	201	1.04	1.08	686	1.10	1.06	799	1.14	1.07	0.967	1.029	1.057
H8T-40	8	-40	210	1.09	1.12	650	1.04	1.10	745	1.06	1.11	0.972	0.945	0.950
H8T-60	8	-60	238	1.24	1.16	662	1.06	1.14	790	1.12	1.16	1.061	0.929	0.969
H8T-75	8	-75	218	1.13	1.20	729	1.16	1.17	865	1.23	1.20	0.940	0.996	1.027
平均值												0.988	1.016	1.026
变异系数												0.034	0.054	0.049

序号	变量	R²	调整后R²	C_p	AIC	SBC
1	T	0.80	0.77	1.00	-34.16	-33.25
2	t	0.00	-0.12	28.72	-18.15	-17.24
3	E_Ta	0.00	-0.12	28.72	-18.15	-17.24
4	t,T	0.80	0.74	3.00	-32.16	-30.95
5	T,E_Ta	0.80	0.74	3.00	-32.16	-30.95
6	t,E_Ta	0.00	-0.12	28.72	-16.15	-14.94
7	t,T,E_Ta	0.80	0.74	3.00	-30.16	-28.65

序号	变量	R²	调整后R²	C_p	AIC	SBC
1	T	0.53	0.47	8.03	-25.38	-24.47
2	t	0.24	0.14	16.78	-20.54	-19.63
3	f_yTa	0.24	0.14	16.78	-20.54	-19.63
4	t,T	0.77	0.70	3.00	-30.34	-29.13
5	T,f_yTa	0.77	0.70	3.00	-30.34	-29.13
6	t,f_yTa	0.24	0.14	16.78	-18.54	-17.33
7	t,T,f_yTa	0.77	0.70	3.00	-28.34	-26.82

序号	变量	R²	调整后R²	C_p	AIC	SBC
1	T	0.65	0.61	3.86	-27.51	-26.60
2	f_uTa	0.10	-0.01	19.30	-18.09	-17.18
3	t	0.10	-0.01	19.30	-18.09	-17.18
4	T,f_uTa	0.75	0.68	3.00	-28.94	-27.73
5	t,T	0.75	0.68	3.00	-28.94	-27.73
6	t,f_uTa	0.10	-0.01	19.30	-16.09	-14.88
7	t,T,f_uTa	0.75	0.68	3.00	-26.94	-25.42