基于灰狼优化算法改进支持向量回归的充填体强度预测研究

doi:10.1007/s12204-022-2408-7

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了高精度快速预测矿山充填体强度并为矿山数字化、智能化提供新技术支持，本文建立基于灰狼优化算法改进的支持向量回归（GWO-SVR）模型。首先，基于充填体单轴抗压强度实验数据，利用灰狼优化算法（GWO）对支持向量回归（SVR）中的惩罚系数c和核函数参数g进行高精度优化。然后以料浆浓度、水泥掺量、人工砂尾砂比和养护龄期为输入变量，以充填体单轴抗压强度为输出变量，建立了使用最佳两个最优参数best_c 和 best_g的预测模型。该GWO-SVR模型预测充填体强度的均方根误差为 0.143，可决系数为 0.983，说明该模型的预测效果准确可靠。与未经 GWO 优化的原始 SVR 模型和 PSO-SVR 模型相比，GWO-SVR 模型的性能得到了极大的提升。GWO-SVR 模型的建立为科学预测矿山充填体强度提供了新的工具。

关键词: 地下采矿，充填体强度，预测模型，灰狼优化算法，支持向量回归

Abstract: In order to predict backfill strength rapidly with high accuracy and provide a new technical support for digitization and intelligentization of mine, a support vector regression (SVR) model improved by grey wolf optimization (GWO), GWO-SVR model, is established. First, GWO is used to optimize penalty term and kernel function parameter in SVR model with high accuracy based on the experimental data of uniaxial compressive strength of filling body. Subsequently, a prediction model which uses the best two parameters of best c and best g is established with the slurry density, cement dosage, ratio of artificial aggregate to tailings, and curing time taken as input factors, and uniaxial compressive strength of backfill as the output factor. The root mean square error of this GWO-SVR model in predicting backfill strength is 0.143 and the coefficient of determination is 0.983, which means that the predictive effect of this model is accurate and reliable. Compared with the original SVR model without the optimization of GWO and particle swam optimization (PSO)-SVR model, the performance of GWO-SVR model is greatly promoted. The establishment of GWO-SVR model provides a new tool for predicting backfill strength scientifically.

Key words: underground mining, backfill strength, prediction model, grey wolf optimization (GWO), support vector regression (SVR)

中图分类号:

TD853

张博, 李克庆, 胡亚飞, 吉坤, 韩斌. 基于灰狼优化算法改进支持向量回归的充填体强度预测研究[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2023, 28(5): 686-694.

ZHANG Bo(张博)，LI Keqing (李克庆),HU Yafei(胡亚飞)，JI Kun(吉坤)，HAN Bin*(韩斌). Prediction of Backfill Strength Based on Support Vector Regression Improved by Grey Wolf Optimization[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2023, 28(5): 686-694.

参考文献

[1] WU A X, WANG Y, WANG H J. Status and prospects of the paste backfill technology [J]. Metal Mine, 2016(7): 1-9 (in Chinese)[2] YIN S H, HOU Y Q, YANG S X, et al. Analysis of deformation failure and energy dissipation of mixed aggregate cemented backfill during uniaxial compression [J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2021, 52(3): 936-947 (in Chinese).
[3] WU A X, SHEN H M, JIANG L C, et al. Arching effect of long-narrow cemented paste backfill body and its effect on target strength [J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2016, 26(3): 648-654 (in Chinese).
[4] HAN B, WANG X L, XIAO W G. Estimation and evaluation of backfill strength in underground stope based on multivariate nonlinear regression analysis [J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2012, 29(5): 714-718 (in Chinese).
[5] ZHANG Q L, LI X P, YANG W. Optimization of filling slurry ratio in a mine based on back-propagation neural network [J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44(7): 2867-2874 (in Chinese).
[6] WEI W, GAO Q. Strength prediction of backfilling body based on modified BP neural network [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2013, 45(6): 90-95 (in Chinese).
[7] DONG Y, YANG Z Q, GAO Q. Strength forecasting of backfilling materials by BP neural network model collaborated with orthogonal experiment [J]. Materials Review, 2018, 32(6): 1032-1036 (in Chinese).
[8] XU M F, GAO Y T, JIN A B, et al. Prediction of cemented backfill strength by ultrasonic pulse velocity and BP neural network [J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2016, 38(8): 1059-1068 (in Chinese).
[9] WU W, JI K, ZHANG P, et al. Strength prediction of filling body based on ANN-PSO model and its engineering application [J]. Mining Research and Development, 2020, 40(2): 53-57 (in Chinese).
[10] REDDY A V S, REDDY M D, KUMAR REDDY M S. Network reconfiguration of primary distribution system using GWO algorithm [J]. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2017, 7(6): 3226.
[11] YUVARAJ N, KARTHIKEYAN T, PRAGHASH K. An improved task allocation scheme in serverless computing using gray wolf optimization (GWO) based reinforcement learning (RIL) approach [J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2021, 117(3): 2403-2421.
[12] DANG X J, SHI L, ZHAO N, et al. Prediction of utilization ratio of blast furnace gas based on parameter optimized by SVR method [J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2021, 33(4): 279-283 (in Chinese).
[13] SUN J, MO Y N, DAI C X, et al. Detection of moisture content of tomato leaves based on dielectric properties and IRIV-GWO-SVR algorithm [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(14): 188-195 (in Chinese).
[14] MIRJALILI S, MIRJALILI S M, LEWIS A. Grey wolf optimizer [J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2014, 69: 46-61.
[15] ZHANG H, HE S, ZHANG S, et al. Prediction of hospitalization costs for coronary heart disease based on GWO-SVR [J]. Intelligent Computer and Applications, 2020, 10(11): 42-46 (in Chinese).
[16] QIU Y G, ZHOU J, KHANDELWAL M, et al. Performance evaluation of hybrid WOA-XGBoost, GWO-XGBoost and BO-XGBoost models to predict blast-induced ground vibration [J]. Engineering with Computers, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366- 021-01393-9.
[17] ZHOU J, QIU Y G, ZHU S L, et al. Optimization of support vector machine through the use of metaheuristic algorithms in forecasting TBM advance rate [J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 97: 104015.
[18] ZHOU J, QIU Y G, ARMAGHANI D J, et al. Predicting TBM penetration rate in hard rock condition: A comparative study among six XGB-based metaheuristic techniques [J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12(3): 101091.
[19] CAO F, ZHOU Y, WANG C X, et al. An improved support vector regression method for concrete strength prediction [J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2021, 40(1): 90-97 (in Chinese).
[20] LI Q L, SONG Y Y, YAO C J, et al. Intelligent design and optimization system for cleaning device of rice and wheat combine harvester[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(5): 92-101 (in Chinese).
[21] JIANG E Y, ZAN P, ZHU X J, et al. Rectal perception function rebuilding based on support vector machine optimized by particle swarm optimization [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2014, 48(2): 168- 172 (in Chinese).
[22] LI E M, ZHOU J, SHI X Z, et al. Developing a hybrid model of salp swarm algorithm-based support vector machine to predict the strength of fiber-reinforced cemented paste backfill [J]. Engineering with Computers, 2021, 37(4): 3519-3540.