Wavelet-Based Hybrid Thresholding Method for Ultrasonic Liver Image Denoising

doi:10.1007/s12204-015-1601-3

Abstract

Abstract: This paper presents a wavelet-based hybrid threshold method according to the soft- and hard-threshold functions proposed by Donoho. The wavelet-based hybrid threshold method may help doctors to know more details on the liver disease through denoising the ultrasound image of the liver. First of all, an analytical expression for the hybrid threshold function is discussed. The wavelet-based hybrid threshold method is then investigated for ultrasound image of the liver. Finally, we test the influence of this parameter on the proposed method with the real ultrasound image corrupted by speckle noise with different variances. Moreover, we compare the proposed method under the varying parameters with the soft-threshold function and the hard-threshold function. Three metrics, which are correlation coefficient, edge preservation index and structural similarity index, are measured to quantify the denoised results of ultrasound liver image. Experimental results demonstrate the potential of the proposed method for ultrasound liver image denosing.

Key words: ultrasonic liver image| hybrid threshold function| denoising, wavelet transform

摘要：

This paper presents a wavelet-based hybrid threshold method according to the soft- and hard-threshold
functions proposed by Donoho. The wavelet-based hybrid threshold method may help doctors to know more details
on the liver disease through denoising the ultrasound image of the liver. First of all, an analytical expression for
the hybrid threshold function is discussed. The wavelet-based hybrid threshold method is then investigated for
ultrasound image of the liver. Finally, we test the influence of this parameter on the proposed method with the
real ultrasound image corrupted by speckle noise with different variances. Moreover, we compare the proposed
method under the varying parameters with the soft-threshold function and the hard-threshold function. Three
metrics, which are correlation coefficient, edge preservation index and structural similarity index, are measured
to quantify the denoised results of ultrasound liver image. Experimental results demonstrate the potential of the
proposed method for ultrasound liver image denosing.

关键词: ultrasonic liver image| hybrid threshold function| denoising, wavelet transform

CLC Number:

TP 391.4

ZHU Hai-jiang (祝海江). Wavelet-Based Hybrid Thresholding Method for Ultrasonic Liver Image Denoising[J]. Journal of shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2015, 20(2): 135-142.

References 30

[1]	Wagner R F, Smith S W, Sandrik J M, et al.Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans [J]. IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics, 1983, 30(3):156-163.
[2]	Insana M F, Wagner R F, Garra B S, et al. Analysis of ultrasound image texture via generalized Rician statistics [J]. Optical Engineering, 1986, 25(6): 743-748.
[3]	Dutt V, Greenleaf J F. ultrasound echo envelope analysis using a homodyned K-distribution signal model [J]. Ultarasonic Imaging, 1994, 16(4): 265-287.
[4]	Jakeman E, Tough R J A. Generalized Kistribution:A statistical model for weak scattering [J].Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1987, 4(9):1764-1772.
[5]	Koo J I, Park S B. Speckle reduction with edge preservation in medical ultrasonic images using a homogeneous region growing mean filter (HRGMF) [J].Ultrasonic Imaging, 1991, 13(3): 211-237.
[6]	Angelova D, Mihaylova L. Contour segmentation in 2D ultrasound medical images with particle filtering[J]. Machine Vision and Applications, 2011, 22(3):551-561.
[7]	Sivakumar R, Nedumaran D. Implementation of wavelet filters for speckle noise reduction in ultrasound medical images: A comparative study [C]//16th International Conference on Signals, Systems and Communication.Chalkida, Greece: IEEE, 2009: 239-242.
[8]	Lanzolla A M L, Andria G, Attivissimo F,et al. Improving B-mode ultrasound medical images [C]// Proceedings of IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. Beijing,China: IEEE, 2011: 1704-1708.
[9]	Damodaran N, Ramamurthy S, Velusamy S, et al. Speckle noise reduction in ultrasound biomedical B-scan images using discrete topological derivative [J].Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2012, 38(2): 276-286.
[10]	Sivakumar R, Gayathri M K, Nedumaran D.Speckle filtering of ultrasound B-scan images: A comparative study between spatial and diffusion filters [C]// 2010 IEEE Conference on Open Systems. Kuala Lumpur: IEEE, 2010: 80-85.
[11]	Mateo J L, Fernandez-Caballero A F. Finding out general tendencies in speckle noise reduction in ultrasound images [J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2009, 36: 7786-7797.
[12]	Bhuiyan M I H, Ahmad M O, Swamy M N S. Spatially adaptive thresholding in wavelet domain for despeckling of ultrasound images [J], IET Image Processing,2009, 3(3): 147-162.
[13]	Khare A, Khare M, Jeong Y, et al. Despeckling of medical ultrasound images using Daubechies complex wavelet transform [J], Signal Processing, 2010, 90:428-439.
[14]	Aiazzi B, Alparone L, Baronti S. Multiresolution local-statistics speckle filtering based on a ratio laplacian pyramid [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1998, 36(5): 1466-1476.
[15]	Rabbani H, Vafadust M, Abolmaesumi P, et al.Speckle noise reduction of medical ultrasound images in complex wavelet domain using mixture priors [J].IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2008,55(9): 2152-2160.
[16]	Bioucas-Dias J M, Figueiredo M A T. Multiplicative noise removal using variable splitting and constrained optimization [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2010, 19: 1720-1730.
[17]	Saputro A H, Mustafa M M, Hussain A, et al.Enhancement of myocardial boundary tracking using wavelet-based motion estimation [J]. Journal of Information and Computational Science, 2011, 8(10): 1779-1792.
[18]	Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K. Pointwise shape-adaptive DCT for high-quality denoising and deblocking of grayscale and color images [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2007, 16(5): 1395-1411.
[19]	Gupta S, Chauhan R C, Saxena S C. Homomorphic wavelet thresholding technique for denoising medical ultrasound images [J]. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 2005, 29(5): 208-214.
[20]	Mihcak M K, Kozintsev I, Ramchandran K, et al. Low complexity image denoising based on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients [J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 1999, 6(12): 300-303.
[21]	Donoho D L, Jonestone I M. Ideal spatial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage [J]. Biometrika, 1994, 81(3):425-455.
[22]	Bruce A G, Gao H Y. Understanding WaveShrink:Variance and bias estimation [J]. Biometrika, 1996,83(4): 727-745.
[23]	Pizurica A, Philips W, Lemahieu I, et al. A versatile wavelet domain noise filtration technique for medical imaging [J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,2003, 22(3): 323-331.
[24]	Rabbani H. Image denoising in steerable pyramid domain based on a local Laplace prior [J]. Pattern Recognition,2009, 42(9): 2181-2193.
[25]	Tomic M, Sersic D, Vrankic M. Edge-preserving adaptive wavelet denoising using ICI rule [J]. Electronics Letters, 2008, 44(11): 698-699.
[26]	Sendur L, Selesnick I W. Bivariate shrinkage with local variance estimation [J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2002, 9(12): 438-441.
[27]	Yu H, Zhao L, Wang H. Image denoising using trivariate shrinkage filter in the wavelet domain and joint bilateral filter in the spatial domain [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2009, 18(10): 2364-2369.
[28]	Loupas T, Mcdicken W N, Allan P L. An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images [J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 1989, 36(1): 129-135.
[29]	Chi D Z, Gang T, Gao S S. Background removal and weld crack detection based on energy distribution of image [J]. China Welding: English Edition, 2007, 16(1): 14-18.
[30]	Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R, et al. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2004, 13(4): 600-612.