Evaluation and Analysis of Reuse of A Decompression Drainage Dock

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2023.S1.12

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the overall relocation and protection project of “Yangtze River Estuary II” ancient ship in 2022, aimed at the failure of the decompression drainage behind the dock wall of No. 1 Shipyard, the short-term working conditions of the salvage ship in and out of the dock and the permanent working conditions in the later period are simulated. The displacement and stress of the dock wall and pile foundation are analyzed and calculated. It is found that when Dock No. 1 is re-used, the load increment mainly comes from the groundwater pressure behind the dock wall that cannot be drained. The calculation shows that the original pile foundation structure of the dock wall has a reasonable design force, and the installation of a decompression drainage system can greatly reduce the water pressure behind the dock wall. In the short-term working conditions of the salvage ship entering and leaving the dock, the water pressure behind the newly added wall is small, and the displacement and bearing capacity of the pile foundation are not exceeded. In the long-term working condition, if the decompression drainage system completely fails and the new water pressure behind the wall is large, the uplift bearing capacity of the inclined pile may exceed the limit. Therefore, in order to ensure the long-term safety and durability of the dock and reduce the impact on the surrounding environment, reasonable measures should be taken to ensure that the drainage channel behind the dock wall is smooth and the groundwater level is maintained below the bottom of the lower beam in combination with the situation of dock reuse in the future.

Key words: dock walls, decompression drainage, batter pile, evaluation

CLC Number:

U673.33

LI Hongqiao, YUAN Jian, LI Ke, PAN Yingwang, ZHOU Dongrong, WEI Liangmeng, DAI Qing, CAI Li. Evaluation and Analysis of Reuse of A Decompression Drainage Dock[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(S1): 190-197.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.1

Fig.6

Tab.2

Tab.3

References 12

[1]	陈蕾. 大型船坞工程施工期结构有限元分析研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2012.
	CHEN Lei. Finite element analysis of large dock construction[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2012.
[2]	江杰, 顾倩燕, 黄茂松. 软土地区船坞底板桩筏基础设计方法的改进[J]. 水运工程, 2009(Sup.1): 61-64.
	JIANG Jie, GU Qianyan, HUANG Maosong. Modification for design of piled raft foundation of dock in soft soil[J]. Port & Water Engineering, 2009 (Sup.1): 61-64.
[3]	李润茹, 张树兴. 中远六万吨级船坞水工结构[J]. 中国港湾建设, 1999(6): 17-20.
	LI Runru, ZHANG Shuxing. Hydraulic structure of Zhongyun dock for ships up to 60 000 DWT[J]. China Harbour Engineering, 1999(6): 17-20.
[4]	李江文. 组合钢板桩结构特点及应用分析[J]. 中国水运(下半月), 2020, 20(5): 197-199.
	LI Jiangwen. Structural characteristics and application analysis of composite steel sheet pile[J]. China Water Transport, 2020, 20(5): 197-199.
[5]	顾倩燕. 船坞工程结构设计技术创新与实践[J]. 水运工程, 2011(1): 75-86.
	GU Qianyan. Innovation and application of dock structure design[J]. Port & Water Engineering, 2011(1): 75-86.
[6]	钟百毅, 马仁正, 孙鹏飞, 等. 上海船厂2号船坞坞口与坞室结构新型式设计与研究[R]. 上海: 中国船舶工业第九设计研究院,1998.
	ZHONG Baiyi, MA Rengzheng, SUN Pengfei, et al. New type design and research of dock mouth and dock room structure in No.2 Dock of Shanghai Shipyard[R]. Shanghai: China Shipbuilding Ninth Design and Research Institute, 1998.
[7]	章祝君, 高加云, 李小军. 大型并列船坞岸壁结构变形特性分析及控制[J]. 水运工程, 2017(5): 98-102.
	ZHANG Zhujun, GAO Jiayun, LI Xiaojun. Analysis and control of structure deformation with anchorage system-wall of large paratactic dock[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2017(5): 98-102.
[8]	张玉萍. 干船坞底板计算模型探讨[J]. 水运工程, 2010(5): 17-20.
	ZHANG Yuping. Discussion on calculation model for dry-dock floor[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2010(5): 17-20.
[9]	冯云芬, 高树飞, 贡金鑫. 基于分项系数法的板桩式坞墙稳定性设计[J]. 水运工程, 2021(3): 191-196.
	FENG Yunfen, GAO Shufei, GONG Jinxin. Design for stability of sheet piled dock wall based on partial factor method[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2021(3): 191-196.
[10]	江杰, 顾倩燕. 软土地区大型船坞底板优化设计[J]. 水运工程, 2011(7): 11-15.
	JIANG Jie, GU Qianyan. Optimum design of slab for large-scale dock in soft soil[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2011(7): 11-15.
[11]	韩健勇, 赵文, 李天亮, 等. 深基坑与邻近建筑物相互影响的实测及数值分析[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2020, 52(4): 149-156.
	HAN Jianyong, ZHAO Wen, LI Tianliang, et al. Field measurement and numerical analysis of the influences between the deep excavation and adjacent buildings[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2020, 52(4): 149-156.
[12]	白时雨, 王文军, 谢新宇, 等. 考虑扰动影响的土体小应变硬化模型参数试验研究及其在基坑工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 206-216.
	BAI Shiyu, WANG Wenjun, XIE Xinyu, et al. Experimental study on HS-small model parameters of soil considering disturbance and its application in foundation pit engineering[J]. Rock & Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(1): 206-216.

层次	土层名称	层面标高/m	重度/ (kN·m^-3)	天然孔隙比 e	固快直剪
层次	土层名称	层面标高/m	重度/ (kN·m^-3)	天然孔隙比 e	黏聚力,c/kPa	内摩擦角,φ/(°)
②	灰色黏质粉土	0.26	18.4	1.00	8	27.6
④	灰色淤泥质黏土	-6.75	17.1	1.41	13	10.7
⑤₁	灰色黏土	-12.15	17.8	1.20	13	15.3
⑤₂	灰色粉质黏土	-15.88	18.5	0.98	19	21.2
⑥	暗绿色粉质黏土	-20.45	19.9	0.71	45	24.6
⑦₁	灰色砂质粉土	-24.7	19.1	0.82	7	32.7
⑦₂	灰黄色粉砂	-36.5	19.3	0.79	4	34.6

工况列表	左侧横梁下桩基				右侧横梁下桩基				单桩抗拔承载力设计值/ kN	单桩抗压承载力设计值/ kN
工况列表	最大拉桩轴力/kN	对应桩号	最大压桩轴力/kN	对应桩号	最大拉桩轴力/kN	对应桩号	最大压桩轴力/kN	对应桩号	单桩抗拔承载力设计值/ kN	单桩抗压承载力设计值/ kN
工况1 减压排水失效现状下,打捞船进入1#船坞时,注水至2.6 m标高	397	#5	1170	#2			858	#8	831	2054
工况2 古船进驻1#船坞内后,坞室再抽干	719	#5	1542	#2			859	#8	831	2054
工况3 坞墙背后地下水水位4.2 m,且坞室为抽干状态	1040	#5	1761	#2			869	#8	831	2054
工况4 坞墙背后地下水水位4.2 m,坞室抽干,且钢板桩因钢材锈蚀导致刚度折减30%	1081	#5	1793	#2			872	#8	831	2054

工况列表	位移分布图	桩基侧向位移/mm
工况列表	位移分布图	最大值	限值
工况1		6.151	10
工况2		0.114	10
工况3		8.491	10
工况4		9.858	10

[1]	FAN Hong, HE Jie, TIAN Shuxin. Robust Evaluation Method of Integrated Energy System Based on Variable Step Simulation and Improved Entropy Weight Method [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2024, 58(1): 59-68.
[2]	YAN Wenting, YANG Long, LI Changcheng, LUO Wei. Resilience Evaluation and Enhancement Strategy of Distribution Network Considering Impact of Seismic Attack on Transportation Networks [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(9): 1165-1175.
[3]	CHEN Jing, KE Shitang, LI Wenjie, ZHU Tingrui, YUN Yiwen, REN Hehe. Unsteady Evolution Law and Evaluation Index of Shallow Sea Wind-Wave-Current-Seabed Coupling Field [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(6): 666-679.
[4]	HU Mingxuan, QIAO Jun, ZHANG Zhinan. Segmentation and Evaluation of Continuous Rehabilitation Exercises [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(5): 533-544.
[5]	SU Xintong, YU Haiming, ZHAO Huijuan, XUE Lei, CHEN Wenzhe. Evaluation of Phased Array Radar of Anti-jamming Capability Based on Combination Weighting-TOPSIS [J]. Air & Space Defense, 2023, 6(4): 80-85.
[6]	CHEN Jichi, WEI Guohua, CHAI Juanfang . A Method for Evaluating the Effect and Accuracy of 3D Reconstruction Based on Infrared Image [J]. Air & Space Defense, 2023, 6(4): 42-50.
[7]	WANG Huoping, WANG Deyang, PENG YiJin, WANG Weiwei. Several Applications of Vibration Monitoring in Structural Safety Assurance of Jacket Platform [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2023, 10(4): 78-.
[8]	SU Hongjia, LUO Yucheng, LIU Fei. Review of Equipment Effectiveness Evaluation and Supporting Technologies [J]. Air & Space Defense, 2023, 6(3): 29-38.
[9]	PANG Na1 (庞娜), LUO Wenguang1∗ (罗文广), WU Ruoyuan1 (吴若园), LAN Hongli1 (蓝红莉), QIN Yongxin1 (覃永新), SU Qi2 (苏琦). Safety Evaluation of Commercial Vehicle Driving Behavior Based on AHP-CRITIC Algorithm [J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2023, 28(1): 126-135.
[10]	LUO Jing1 (罗京), ZHOU Dai1∗ (周岱), TAN Yunlong2 (谭云龙), XIA Ganlin3 (夏甘霖), ZHAO Guohua4,5 (赵国华). Research on Real-time Dynamic Evaluation of Highway Passenger Service Satisfaction Based on Internet [J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2023, 28(1): 39-51.
[11]	LIU Kai1 (刘凯), DANG Wei1 (党炜), ZOU Tianji1,2∗ (邹田骥), LÜ Congmin1 (吕从民), LI Peng1,2 (李鹏), ZHANG Haitao1 (张海涛). Reliability Evaluation of Two-Phase Degradation Process with a Fuzzy Change-Point [J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2022, 27(6): 867-872.
[12]	ZHANG Dayuan, JIANG Desheng, CHEN Guanyu, MENG Feixiang. Research on Evaluation Method of Surface-to-Air Missile System Survival Effectiveness Based on Remaining Operational Capability [J]. Air & Space Defense, 2022, 5(4): 24-29.
[13]	LU Guannan1 (卢冠男), WANG Mengling1∗ (王梦灵), FOX Tamara2, JIANG Peng3 (蒋鹏), JIANG Fusong3 (蒋伏松). Novel Indicators for Adverse Glycemic Events Detection Analysis Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Neural Network Predictive Models [J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2022, 27(4): 498-504.
[14]	WANG Wenbin, ZHENG Shujiang, FAN Ruixiang, CHEN Wen, ZHOU Shiyang. Performance Evaluation Index and Method of Micro-Grid Distributed Electricity Trading Under the Background of “Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality” [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(3): 312-324.
[15]	LUO Jing, ZHANG Yinan. Operational Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Reconnaissance and Strike Integrated UAV Equipment Based on Improved Grey-AHP [J]. Air & Space Defense, 2022, 5(2): 1-7.