上海交通大学学报

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 35-42.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.01.005

• 学报（中文） • 上一篇    下一篇

异重流水卷吸经验式不确定性对层平均数学模型的影响

张维凯，胡鹏   

  1. 浙江大学 港口海岸与近海工程研究所， 浙江舟山 316000
  • 出版日期:2020-01-28 发布日期:2020-01-16
  • 通讯作者: 胡鹏，男，副教授，博士生导师，电话（Tel.）: 0580-2092306；E-mail: pengphu@zju.edu.cn.
  • 作者简介:张维凯（1988-），男，安徽省合肥市人，硕士生，主要从事异重流数学模型研究.
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划（2017YFC0405400）, 国家自然科学基金资助项目（11772300）

Influence of Empirical Relation Uncertainty for Water Entrainment on Layer-Averaged Numerical Modeling of Turbidity Currents

ZHANG Weikai,HU Peng   

  1. Institute of Port, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316000, Zhejiang, China
  • Online:2020-01-28 Published:2020-01-16

PDF (PC)

488

摘要： 基于贝叶斯定理的Gibbs随机采样方法，结合现有异重流水卷吸实验数据，探讨了异重流水卷吸经验式中经验系数E1和E2的不确定性，获取的E1和E2样本总数为2×105.统计发现，其中概率最大的(E1,E2)样本取值与原式取值相近.将样本值输入异重流层平均水沙耦合数学模型，模拟陡坡上异重流演化过程.结果表明：计算异重流厚度、速度、泥沙体积分数、底床形变区间范围随运动距离的增加逐渐增大；采用概率最大经验系数值可能低估异重流厚度和泥沙体积分数，高估异重流速度和底床形变；95%样本输入异重流模型所得计算水力参数范围远大于25%样本所得计算水力参数范围，意味着模型对(E1,E2)的取值十分敏感.

关键词: 异重流； 水卷吸经验关系式； 贝叶斯方法； 不确定性； 层平均数学模型

Abstract: Combining with the existing experimental data of water entrainment for turbidity currents, uncertainties of empirical coefficients, E1 and E2, in empirical formula were investigated using the method of Gibbs sampling based on Bayesian theory. A total of 2×105 sample values for E1 and E2 were obtained. Through statistics, the maximum probability (E1,E2) values are similar to the original formula. By inputting these sample values of (E1,E2) into a fully coupled mathematical model, the evolution of the turbidity currents over a steep slope is simulated. The results indicates that the range of the computed current thickness, velocity, sediment’s volume fraction and bottom deformation increases with distance. If the sample values of (E1,E2) with the highest frequency were used, the model may underestimate the current thickness and sediment volume fraction, and over-estimate the current velocity and bottom deformation. The range of hydraulic parameters calculated with 95% (E1,E2) sample values inputted into turbidity current models is much larger than that with 25% (E1,E2) sample values, which indicates that the model is very sensitive to the value of (E1,E2).

Key words: turbidity currents； empirical relation for water entrainment； Bayesian method； uncertainty； layer-averaged numerical modeling

中图分类号: