基于冲击功离散性的曲轴早期疲劳失效评估方法

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2023.203

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 111-120.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2023.203

基于冲击功离散性的曲轴早期疲劳失效评估方法

李向哲¹, 梁刚², 郑小梅³, 徐聪聪², 许金泉¹()

1.上海交通大学海洋工程国家重点实验室,上海 200240
2.中国船舶集团有限公司第七一一研究所,上海 201108
3.北京航空工程技术研究中心,北京 100076

收稿日期:2023-05-22 修回日期:2023-07-18 接受日期:2023-08-09 出版日期:2025-01-28 发布日期:2025-02-06
通讯作者: 许金泉,教授,博士生导师,电话(Tel.):021-64473073;E-mail: jqxu@sjtu.edu.cn.
作者简介:李向哲(1993—),博士生,从事材料强度与疲劳可靠性的研究.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(11772189);国家重大科技专项(J2019-IV-0008-0076)

Assessment Method for Early Fatigue Failure of Crankshaft Based on Dispersion of Impact Energy

LI Xiangzhe¹, LIANG Gang², ZHENG Xiaomei³, XU Congcong², XU Jinquan¹()

1. State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2. Shanghai Marine Diesel Engine Research Institute, CSSC, Shanghai 201108, China
3. Beijing Aeronautical Engineering Technical Research Center, Beijing 100076,China

Received:2023-05-22 Revised:2023-07-18 Accepted:2023-08-09 Online:2025-01-28 Published:2025-02-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

考虑实际材料强度寿命特性的离散性,提出了一种用于评估曲轴早期疲劳失效的方法.材料强度寿命离散性的微观机理在于材料内部的微观组织结构(包括微观缺陷)分布的不均匀性,这可以用初始损伤的概率分布来统一表征.同种牌号的合金,其强度寿命特性的中值基本一致,但离散范围则会有很大差别,必须通过足够的取样试验才能确定.对于由34CrNi3MoA合金制成的某柴油发动机曲轴锻件,由冲击取样试验的冲击功离散性估算了疲劳极限的离散性,由结构疲劳试验确定了疲劳极限概率分布的均值.传统设计手册所推荐的安全系数只是暗中假定了材料的某种离散性,本研究给出考虑材料实际离散性的安全系数与可靠性间的定量关系.当实际使用的材料不满足规定的可靠性要求时,曲轴就易发生早期疲劳失效.

关键词: 早期疲劳失效, 离散性, 冲击功, 疲劳极限, 可靠性

Abstract:

Considering scattering behaviors of strength and fatigue life characteristics of actual materials, a method for evaluating the early fatigue failure of crankshafts has been proposed. The micro-mechanism of the scatter of strength and life characteristics is the nonuniform distribution of microstructures (including micro-defects) inside the material, which can be uniformly characterized by the probability distribution of initial damage. For the same grade of alloy, the median values of strength and fatigue life can be basically the same, but the dispersion can be significantly different, which must be determined by sufficient sampling tests. For a diesel engine crankshaft forging made of the 34CrNi3MoA alloy, the dispersion of fatigue limit was estimated based on the scatter of impact sampling test data, while the mean value of probability distribution of fatigue limit was determined by structural fatigue tests. The safety factor recommended in the conventional design manual only implicitly assumes material dispersion. Considering the actual dispersion of the tested material, the quantitative relationship between safety factor and reliability has been established. Early fatigue failure of the crankshaft can easily occur when the actual dispersion of material fails to meet the specified reliability requirement.

Key words: early fatigue failure, dispersion, impact energy, fatigue limit, reliability

中图分类号:

O346.2

李向哲, 梁刚, 郑小梅, 徐聪聪, 许金泉. 基于冲击功离散性的曲轴早期疲劳失效评估方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(1): 111-120.

LI Xiangzhe, LIANG Gang, ZHENG Xiaomei, XU Congcong, XU Jinquan. Assessment Method for Early Fatigue Failure of Crankshaft Based on Dispersion of Impact Energy[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2025, 59(1): 111-120.

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

表2

图8

表3

图9

参考文献 29

[1]	VIZENTIN G, VUKELIC G, MURAWSKI L, et al. Marine propulsion system failures—A review[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2020, 8: 662.
[2]	ZHOU H, WEI P, LIU H, et al. Roles of microstructure, inclusion, and surface roughness on rolling contact fatigue of a wind turbine gear[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2020, 43(7): 1368-1383.
[3]	ALIAKBARI K, NEJAD R M, TOROQ S K P, et al. Assessment of unusual failure in crankshaft of heavy-duty truck engine[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 134: 106085.
[4]	ZERBST U, KLINGER C. Material defects as cause for the fatigue failure of metallic components[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2019, 127: 312-323.
[5]	张松林, 马栋梁, 王德禹. 基于长短期记忆神经网络的板裂纹损伤检测方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(5): 527-535. doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.095
	ZHANG Songlin, MA Dongliang, WANG Deyu. Method for plate crack damage detection based on long short-term memory neural network[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021, 55(5): 527-535.
[6]	王佳良, 魏大盛, 王延荣, 等. 含缺陷轮盘失效概率分析流程与数值模拟[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(11): 2562-2570.
	WANG Jialiang, WEI Dasheng, WANG Yanrong, et al. Analysis procedure and numerical simulation of failure probability of turbine disk caused by defects[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(11): 2562-2570.
[7]	轩福贞, 朱明亮, 王国彪. 结构疲劳百年研究的回顾与展望[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(6): 26-51. doi: 10.3901/JME.2021.06.026
	XUAN Fuzhen, ZHU Mingliang, WANG Guobiao. Retrospect and prospect on century-long research of structural fatigue[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 57(6): 26-51. doi: 10.3901/JME.2021.06.026
[8]	许金泉. 材料强度学[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2009.
	XU Jinquan. Theory on the strength of materials[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2009.
[9]	CUI X, ZHANG S, WANG Z Y, et al. Microstructure and fatigue behavior of 24CrNiMo low alloy steel prepared by selective laser melting[J]. Materials Science & Engineering: A, 2022, 845: 143215.
[10]	赵少汴. 抗疲劳设计手册[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2015.
	ZHAO Shaobian. Anti-fatigue design manual[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2015.
[11]	GROTE K H, ANTONSSON E K. Handbook of mechanical engineering[M]. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2009.
[12]	黄朝晖, 袁奇, 张弘斌, 等. 某型火箭发动机涡轮转子流热固耦合强度及疲劳寿命分析[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2022, 56(8): 73-84.
	HUANG Chaohui, YUAN Qi, ZHANG Hongbin, et al. Analysis of fluid-thermal-solid coupling strength and fatigue life of a certain rocket engine turbine rotor[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2022, 56(8): 73-84.
[13]	VAARA J, KUNNARI A, FRONDELIUS T. Literature review of fatigue assessment methods in residual stressed state[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 110: 104379.
[14]	SOLA J F, ALINEJAD F, RAHIMIDEHGOLAN F, et al. Fatigue life assessment of crankshaft with increased horsepower[J]. International Journal of Structural Integrity, 2019, 10: 13-24.
[15]	丁然, 李强. 基于损伤累积模型的可靠度保守估计方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(10): 1225-1229. doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.10.012
	DING Ran, LI Qiang. Method in conservative estimation of reliability based on damage accumulation model[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2019, 53(10): 1225-1229.
[16]	韦益夫, KAWAMURA Y, 王德禹. 改进移动最小二乘法及其在结构可靠性分析中的应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(4): 455-460. doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.04.010
	WEI Yifu, KAWAMURA Y, WANG Deyu. An improved moving least square method and application in structural reliability analysis[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2018, 52(4): 455-460.
[17]	LUO C, KESHTEGAR B, ZHU S P, et al. Hybrid enhanced Monte Carlo simulation coupled with advanced machine learning approach for accurate and efficient structural reliability analysis[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 388: 114218.
[18]	段红燕, 唐国鑫, 盛捷, 等. 一种新型的疲劳强度预测模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(6): 801-808. doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.051
	DUAN Hongyan, TANG Guoxin, SHENG Jie, et al. A novel prediction model for fatigue strength[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(6): 801-808.
[19]	苏霞. ADB610钢力学性能的可靠性研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2009.
	SU Xia. Reliability study on mechanical property of ADB610 steel[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2009.
[20]	LI W, YU Y, LI X, et al. Quantitative characterization of material uniformity and fatigue life reliability based on the initial damage discreteness[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2023, 167: 107382.
[21]	LARSEN R J, MARX M L. An introduction to mathematical statistics[M]. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2005.
[22]	中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会. 大型合金结构钢锻件技术条件:JB/T 6396—2006[S]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2006.
	National Development and Reform Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Specification for the heavy alloy structural steel forgings: JB/T 6396—2006[S]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2006.
[23]	中华人民共和国工业和信息化部. 中速柴油机整体曲轴钢锻件技术条件: CB/T 4313—2013[S]. 北京: 中国船舶工业综合技术经济研究院, 2014.
	Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China. Specification of solid crankshaft forgings for median speed diesel engine: CB/T 4313—2013[S]. Beijing: China Institute of Marine Technology and Economy, 2014.
[24]	LI H F, DUAN Q Q, ZHANG P, et al. The quantitative relationship between fracture toughness and impact toughness in high-strength steels[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 211: 362-370.
[25]	CHAOUADI R, GERARD R. Development of a method for extracting fracture toughness from instrumented Charpy impact tests in the ductile and transition regimes[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2021, 115: 103080.
[26]	WALLIN K. Critical assessment of the Rolfe-Novak CVN-KIC upper shelf correlation[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2021, 258: 108117.
[27]	王自强, 陈少华. 高等断裂力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
	WANG Ziqiang, CHEN Shaohua. Advanced fracture mechanics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009.
[28]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 金属材料夏比摆锤冲击试验方法: GB/T 229—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020.
	General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Metallic materials-Charpy pendulum impact test method: GB/T 229—2020[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020.
[29]	中国船级社. 钢质海船入级规范[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2018.
	China Classification Society. Rules for classification of sea-going steel ships[S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2018.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	5	2	0	28

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	21	14
比例	60%	40%

摘要

291

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

1	0	290

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	33	258
比例	11%	89%

区域编号	A_KV/J
1	77, 82, 82
2	49, 86, 65
3	92, 76, 68
4	100, 118, 107
5	94, 106, 106
6	116, 116, 117
7	65, 60, 60
8	80, 88, 96
9	49, 40, 61
10	86, 73, 57

应力幅/MPa	i	f_i	if_i	i²f_i
395	1	1	1	1
380	0	2	0	0

X	R_e/%	n	P_f/%
0	50.00	1.00	50.00
1.29	90.00	1.21	10.00
2.33	99.00	1.47	1.00
3.00	99.87	1.70	0.13
3.08	99.90	1.73	0.10
3.62	99.99	1.98	0.01

基于冲击功离散性的曲轴早期疲劳失效评估方法

Assessment Method for Early Fatigue Failure of Crankshaft Based on Dispersion of Impact Energy

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	叶伦, 欧阳旭, 姚建刚, 杨胜杰, 尹骏刚. 考虑多重不确定性因素的可靠性指标计算与备用容量优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(1): 30-39.
[2]	李士刚, 王坤云, 袁烨, 诸戈, 王欣. 复杂装备系统任务可靠性在役考核评估方法[J]. 空天防御, 2023, 6(1): 23-28.
[3]	廖欣, 朱建华, 卞付国, 李克勇. 利用“三再”方法提升导弹武器装备可靠性的研究与实践[J]. 空天防御, 2023, 6(1): 11-16.
[4]	陈守芳, 李健, 熊莉芳, 袁军社. 可重复使用发动机管路连接与密封可靠性工作思考[J]. 空天防御, 2023, 6(1): 6-10.
[5]	翟玮昊, 龚敏浩, 林名润, 匡婷玉, 文珊珊. 基于主动学习的Kriging模型的可靠性分析[J]. 空天防御, 2023, 6(1): 1-5.
[6]	陶威, 刘钊, 许灿, 朱平. 三维正交机织复合材料翼子板多尺度可靠性优化设计[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(5): 615-623.
[7]	倪何, 覃海波, 郑奕杨. 考虑给水泄漏的锅炉升负荷仿真及其可靠性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(4): 444-454.
[8]	高英铭, 陈震, 张秀芳, 潘尔顺. 基于随机流网络与Markov过程的制造系统可靠性建模及维护优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(3): 229-235.
[9]	许显杨，陈璐. 考虑设备可靠性与能耗的平行机调度[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(3): 247-255.
[10]	高魏华, 吕广强, 曹鲁光, 丁小芩, 李烽. 软硬件综合FMEA在弹载嵌入式软件中的应用[J]. 空天防御, 2020, 3(1): 10-16.
[11]	吴礼银，许标，张庆，文宾双. 降额设计在核电厂安全级DCS可靠性分析中的研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(Sup.1): 98-103.
[12]	倪安宁1，刘晏尘1，崔毓伟1，卢军莉2. 评价公交行程时间可靠性价值的Mixed Logit模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2019, 53(2): 146-152.
[13]	龙周, 陈松坤, 王德禹. 基于SMOTE算法的船舶结构可靠性优化设计[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(1): 26-34.
[14]	甘志云, 刘贵吉, 李江, 董春, 马璟. 手工超声波检验在CRA复合管焊缝中的应用[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(增刊): 287-289.
[15]	李林斌. 深水结构设计流剖面的推算方法研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(增刊): 193-198.