Revised Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Characteristic Boundary Conditions for Intense Reactive Turbulence

Expand
  • (University of Michigan - Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Online published: 2018-02-01

Abstract

The three-dimensional Navier-Stokes characteristic boundary conditions (3D-NSCBC), although physically reasonable and popular in many applications, may encounter the instability problem in simulating complex flows, especially for large Reynolds number reactive turbulence where locally the strong reversed flow appears at the outflow boundary surfaces. In the present work, a revised 3D-NSCBC strategy is proposed based on the kinematic relation in different moving coordinate systems. Following this strategy, a systematic formulation is presented for the outflow surface with local reversed flow and can be easily extended to the coupled edge and corner boundaries. Direct numerical simulation (DNS) tests of flow with different turbulence intensities are carried out. Compared with the conventional 3D-NSCBC, the newly proposed method exhibits satisfactory performance to confine numerical instability in the strong reversed flow region. The results confirm the robustness and effectiveness of this newly proposed algorithm.

Cite this article

ZHAO Peipei (赵培培), WANG Lipo* (王利坡) . Revised Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Characteristic Boundary Conditions for Intense Reactive Turbulence[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2018 , 23(1) : 190 -201 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-018-1925-x

References

[1] BERENGER J P. A perfectly matched layer for the absorptionof electromagnetic waves [J]. Journal of ComputationalPhysics, 1994, 114(2): 185-200. [2] HU F Q. On absorbing boundary conditions for linearizedeuler equations by a perfectly matched layer[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 129(1):201-219. [3] TAM C K W, AURIANULT L, CAMBULI F. Perfectlymatched layer as an absorbing bound- ary conditionfor the linearized euler equations in open and ducteddomains [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1998,144(1): 213-234. [4] KREISS H. Initial boundary value problems for hyperbolicsystems [J]. Communications on Pure and AppliedMathematics, 1970, 23(3): 277-298. [5] ENGQUIST B, MAJDA A J. Absorbing boundaryconditions for the numerical simulation of waves [J].Mathematics of Computation, 1977, 31(139): 629-651. [6] GUSTAFSSON B, OLIGER J. Stable boundary approximationsfor implicit time discretizations for gasdynamics [J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific and StatisticalComputing, 1982, 3(4): 408-421. [7] HIGDON R L. Absorbing boundary conditions fordifference approximations to the multi-dimensionalwave equation [J]. Mathematics of Computation, 1986,47(176): 437-459. [8] THOMPSON K W. Time dependent boundary conditionsfor hyperbolic systems [J]. Journal of ComputationalPhysics, 1987, 68(1): 1-24. [9] THOMPSON K W. Time-dependent boundary conditionsfor hyperbolic systems, II [J]. Journal of ComputationalPhysics, 1990, 89(2): 439-461. [10] POINSOT T J, LELE S K. Boundary conditions for directsimulations of compressible viscous flows [J]. Journalof Computational Physics, 1992, 101(1): 104-129. [11] NICOUD F. Defining wave amplitude in characteristicboundary conditions [J]. Journal of ComputationalPhysics, 1999, 149(2): 418-422. [12] VALORANI M, FAVINI B. On the numerical integrationof multidimensional, initial boundary value problemsfor the euler equations in quasilinear form [J].Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations,1998, 14(6): 781-814. [13] SUTHERLAND J C, KENNEDY C A. Improvedboundary conditions for viscous, reacting, compressibleflows [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2003,191(2): 502-524. [14] PROSSER R. Improved boundary conditions for thedirect numerical simulation of turbulent subsonicflows. I. inviscid flows [J]. Journal of ComputationalPhysics, 2005, 207(2): 736-768. [15] YOO C S, WANG Y, TROUV′E A, et al. Characteristicboundary conditions for direct simulations of turbulentcounterflow flames [J]. Combustion Theory andModelling, 2005, 9(4): 617-646. [16] YOO C S, IM H G. Characteristic boundary conditionsfor simulations of compressible reacting flowswith multi-dimensional, viscous and reaction effects[J]. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 2007, 11(2):259-286. [17] LODATO G, DOMINGO P, VERVISCH L. Threedimensionalboundary conditions for direct and largeeddysimulation of compressible viscous flows [J]. Journalof Computational Physics, 2008, 227(10): 5105-5143. [18] COUSSEMENT A, GICQUEL O, CAUDAL J, et al.Three-dimensional boundary conditions for numericalsimulations of reactive compressible flows with complexthermochemistry [J]. Journal of ComputationalPhysics, 2012, 231(17): 5571-5611. [19] TODA H B, CABRIT O, TRUFFIN K, et al. Assessmentof subgrid-scale models with a large-eddysimulation-dedicated experimental database: The pulsatileimpinging jet in turbulent cross-flow [J]. Physicsof Fluids, 2014, 26(7): 1760-1765. [20] JIN T, LUO K, LU S, et al. DNS investigation on flamestructure and scalar dissipation of a supersonic liftedhydrogen jet flame in heated coflow [J]. InternationalJournal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(23): 9886-9896. [21] LEE D, HUH K Y. DNS analysis of propagation speedand conditional statistics of turbulent premixed flamein a planar impinging jet [J]. Proceedings of the CombustionInstitute, 2011, 33(1): 1301-1307. [22] LAI J, CHAKRABORTY N. Effects of lewis numberon head on quenching of turbulent premixed flames: Adirect numerical simulation analysis [J]. Flow Turbulenceand Combustion, 2016, 96(2): 279-308. [23] LAI J, CHAKRABORTY N. Statistical behavior ofscalar dissipation rate in head-on quenching of turbulentpremixed flames: A direct numerical simulationanalysis [J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2016,188(2): 250-276. [24] RUDY D H, STRIKWERDA J C. A nonreflecting outflowboundary condition for subsonic navier-stokes calculations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1980,36(1): 55-70. [25] POINSOT T, VEYNANTE D. Theoretical and numericalcombustion [M]. PA: RT Edwards, Inc., 2005. [26] JENKINS K W, CANT R S. Direct numerical simulationof turbulent ame kernels [C]//Recent Advancesin DNS and LES. Berlin: Springer Netherlands, 1999:3583-3604. [27] RUTLAND C J, CANT R S. Turbulent transport inpremixed ames [C]//In Proceedings of the SummerProgram, Stanford University/NASA Ames. San Francisco:Centre for Turbulence Research, 1994: 75-94. [28] CHAKRABORTY N, CANT R S. Effects of lewis numberon flame surface density transport in turbulent premixedcombustion [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2011,158(9): 1768-1787. [29] CHAKRABORTY N, LIPANTNIKOV A N. Statisticsof conditional uid velocity in the corrugated flameletsregime of turbulent premixed combustion: A directnumerical simulation study [J]. Journal of Combustion,2011: 1-13. [30] WRAY A A. Minimal storage time-advancementschemes for spectral methods [C]//NASA Ames ResearchReport. Moffett Field: NASA Ames ResearchCenter, 1991: 1-9. [31] CHAKRABOTY N, CANT R S. Unsteady effects ofstrain rate and curvature on turbulent premixed flamesin an inflowoutflow configuration [J]. Combustion andFlame, 2004, 137(1): 129-147. [32] CHAKRABOTY N, CANT R S. A priori analysis ofthe curvature and propagation terms of the flame surfacedensity transport equation for large eddy simulation[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2007, 19: 363-371.
Options
Outlines

/