Mechanical Properties of Artificial Materials for Bone Repair

doi:10.1007/s12204-014-1565-8

Abstract

Abstract: Bone defect caused by injury, infection, tumor and congenital diseases is one of the most common diseases in clinical orthopaedics. Bone grafts are necessary when self-healing is not effective during the recovery. Preparation of ideal bone substitutes with good biocompatibility and biodegradability to repair bone defects has become the focus. So far artificial materials used in hard tissue repair and reconstruction most notably are metals and their alloys, then the ceramic materials and their composite materials. From the perspective of mechanical properties, metals have some advantages, but corrosion issue and stress shielding of metal have baffled scientists through the age and have been long searched for solution. The elastic modulus of ceramic is more close to the natural bone compared to metal while the improvement of brittleness has been always the emphasis for clinical use. Therefore, development of materials of proper mechanical properties without affecting biological compatibility has become a significant subject.

Key words: metal| ceramic, composite| mechanical property| bone

摘要： Bone defect caused by injury, infection, tumor and congenital diseases is one of the most common diseases in clinical orthopaedics. Bone grafts are necessary when self-healing is not effective during the recovery. Preparation of ideal bone substitutes with good biocompatibility and biodegradability to repair bone defects has become the focus. So far artificial materials used in hard tissue repair and reconstruction most notably are metals and their alloys, then the ceramic materials and their composite materials. From the perspective of mechanical properties, metals have some advantages, but corrosion issue and stress shielding of metal have baffled scientists through the age and have been long searched for solution. The elastic modulus of ceramic is more close to the natural bone compared to metal while the improvement of brittleness has been always the emphasis for clinical use. Therefore, development of materials of proper mechanical properties without affecting biological compatibility has become a significant subject.

关键词: metal| ceramic, composite| mechanical property| bone

CLC Number:

TB 39

HUANG Qian-wei (黄芊蔚), WANG Li-ping (王莉萍), WANG Jin-ye* (王瑾晔). Mechanical Properties of Artificial Materials for Bone Repair[J]. Journal of shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2014, 19(6): 675-680.

References

[1] Lanza R, Langer R, Vacanti J. Principles of tissue engineering [M]. Waltham, USA: Academic press,2011: 1224-1236.
[2] Silver F H. Biomaterials, medical devices and tissue engineering: An integrated approach [M]. Heidelberg,Germany: Springer, 1994: 1-45.
[3] Nakahara H, Bruder S P, Haynesworth S E, et al. Bone and cartilage formation in diffusion chambers by subcultured cells derived from the periosteum [J].Bone, 1990, 11(3): 181-188.
[4] Cowin S C. Bone mechanics handbook [M]. Boca Raton,FL, USA: CRC Press, 2001.
[5] Disegi J A, Eschbach L. Stainless steel in bone surgery [J]. Injury-International Journal of The Care of The Injured, 2000, 31(Sup 4): D2-D6.
[6] Van Noort R. Titanium: The implant material of today [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1987, 22(11):3801-3811.
[7] Chu C L, Chung C Y, Lin P H, et al. Fabrication of porous NiTi shape memory alloy for hard tissue implants by combustion synthesis [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2004, 366(1): 114-119.
[8] Levine B R, Sporer S, Poggie R A, et al. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery [J]. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(27):4671-4681.
[9] Bobyn J D, Toh K K, Hacking S A, et al. Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: A canine model [J]. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1999, 14(3):347-354.
[10] Matsuno H, Yokoyama A, Watari F, et al. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of refractory metal implants,titanium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum and rhenium [J]. Biomaterials, 2001, 22(11): 1253-1262.
[11] Johansson C B, Hansson H A, Albrektsson T.Qualitative interfacial study between bone and tantalum,niobium or commercially pure titanium [J]. Biomaterials,1990, 11(4): 277-280.
[12] Hench L L, Splinter R J, Allen W C, et al.Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials [J]. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1971, 5(6): 117-141.
[13] Cheng K, Han G, WengW, et al. Sol-gel derived fluoridated hydroxyapatite films [J]. Materials Research Bulletin, 2003, 38(1): 89-97.
[14] Bernard L, Freche M, Lacout J L, et al. Preparation of hydroxyapatite by neutralization at low temperature — influence of purity of the raw material [J].Powder Technology, 1999, 103(1): 19-25.
[15] Jarcho M, Bolen C H, Thomas M B, et al. Hydroxylapatite synthesis and characterization in dense polycrystalline form [J]. Journal of Materials Science,1976, 11(11): 2027-2035.
[16] Woodard J R, Hilldore A J, Lan S K, et al.The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity [J]. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(1): 45-54.
[17] Albee F H, Morrison H F. Studies in bone growth:triple calcium phosphate as a stimulus to osteogenesis[J]. Annals of Surgery, 1920, 71(1): 32-39.
[18] Peter S J, Miller S T, Zhu G, et al. In vivo degradation of a poly (propylene fumarate)/β-tricalcium phosphate injectable composite scaffold [J]. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1998, 41(1): 1-7.
[19] Miao X, Tan D M, Li J, et al. Mechanical and biological properties of hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate scaffolds coated with poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) [J].Acta Biomaterialia, 2008, 4(3): 638-645.
[20] Peitl O, Zanotto E D, Hench L L. Highly bioactive P2O5-Na2O-CaO-SiO2 glass-ceramics [J]. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2001, 292(1): 115-126.
[21] Cao W, Hench L L. Bioactive materials [J]. Ceramics International, 1996, 22(6): 493-507.
[22] Marghussian V K, Sheikh-Mehdi Mesgar A. Effects of composition on crystallization behaviour and mechanical properties of bioactive glass-ceramics in the MgO-CaO-SiO2-P2O5 system [J]. Ceramics International,2000, 26(4): 415-420.
[23] Lee E J, Teng S H, Jang T S, et al. Nanostructured poly (ε-caprolactone)-silica xerogel fibrous membrane for guided bone regeneration [J]. Acta Biomaterialia,2010, 6(9): 3557-3565.
[24] Moore D C, Chapman M W, Manske D. The evaluation of a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic for use in grafting long-bone diaphyseal defects [J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1987, 5(3): 356-365.
[25] Verdonschot N, Van Hal C T H, Schreurs B W, et al. Time-dependent mechanical properties of HA/TCP particles in relation to morsellized bone grafts for use in impaction grafting [J]. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2001, 58(5): 599-604.
[26] Ryu H S, Hong K S, Lee J K, et al. Magnesia-doped HA/β-TCP ceramics and evaluation of their biocompatibility [J]. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(3): 393-401.
[27] Gong X H, Tang C Y, Hu H C, et al. Improved mechanical properties of HIPS/hydroxyapatite composites by surface modification of hydroxyapatite via in-situ polymerization of styrene [J]. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2004, 15(10):1141-1146.
[28] Silva V V, Lameiras F S, Domingues R Z.Microstructural and mechanical study of zirconiahydroxyapatite (ZH) composite ceramics for biomedical applications [J]. Composites Science and Technology,2001, 61(2): 301-310.
[29] Villar G, Graham A D, Bayley H. A tissue-like printed material[J]. Science, 2013, 340(6128): 48-52.