Journal of shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) ›› 2015, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 464-467.doi: 10.1007/s12204-015-1650-7
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Fu-yuan* (张福元), LI Dong-yang (李东阳), GENG Bin (耿 斌), LIU Zhan-ling (刘占岭)
Online:
2015-08-29
Published:
2015-08-05
Contact:
ZHANG Fu-yuan (张福元)
E-mail: generzhang@sina.com
CLC Number:
ZHANG Fu-yuan* (张福元), LI Dong-yang (李东阳), GENG Bin (耿 斌), LIU Zhan-ling (刘占岭). Risk Assessment of Contractor Support Based on Improved Risk Matrix Method[J]. Journal of shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2015, 20(4): 464-467.
[1] Xu Xian-hao, Tang Ze-lin. Risk assessment of logistics outsourcing based on risk matrix [J]. Logistics Technology,2006 (5): 67-69 (in Chinese). [2] Zhang Fu-yuan. Study on the risk management of high-tech equipment contractor support [R]. Shijiazhuang:Shijiazhuang New Technology Application Institute, 2011 (in Chinese). [3] Zhu Qi-chao, Kuang Xing-hua, Shen Yong-ping. Risk matrix method and its application [J]. Engineering Sciences,2003, 5(1): 89-94 (in Chinese). [4] Xu Shu, Hu Ming-ming, Li Zi-ru. The application of risk matrix method in risk assessment of business outsourcing[J]. Modernization of Management, 2004 (2):13-16 (in Chinese). |
[1] | HUANG Junxian, CHEN Chun, CAO Yijia, QUAN Shaoli, WANG Yi. Distribution Network Fault Risk Assessment Method Considering Difference in Entropy Value of Rare Factors [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2024, 58(12): 1857-1867. |
[2] | XIA Yu, WANG Lei. Risk Assessment Method for Marine Engineering Project Bidding Based on Back Propagation Neural Network [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(S1): 46-53. |
[3] | XIN Shangzhe, WANG Lei, PAN Jie, ZHOU Dongrong, CHEN Shihai, ZHU Xiaodong. A Three-Parameter Semi-Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Off-Bottom Stage in Wreck Salvage [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(S1): 13-19. |
[4] | CHEN Renpeng, WANG Zhiteng, WU Huaina, LIU Yuan, MENG Fanyan. Risk Assessment for Shield Tunneling Beneath Buildings Based on Interval Improved TOPSIS Method and FAHP Method [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(12): 1710-1719. |
[5] | ZHOU Feng, LIU Haotian, LA Jiankai . Fatigue Analysis of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Cylinders for Safety Risk Assessment [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Science), 2020, 25(3): 394-397. |
[6] | XIA Zhenghong (夏正洪), ZHENG Bo (郑波), WAN Jian (万健), ZHU Xinping (朱新平). Recognition Algorithm and Risk Assessment of Airport Hotspots [J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2019, 24(6): 769-774. |
[7] | HUANG Fu-xiang, LI Li-hui, YIN Bing-gang, LIU Guo-feng, Chen Jin-ming. Research on damage and risk of Collision of FPSO Boardside Risers [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2019, 6(2): 487-493. |
[8] | WANG Wei, CHEN Guo-min, CHEN Qi, LU Yu, ZHANG Zong-chao. Reliability Calculation Analysis and Risk Assessment of Submarine Pipelines Under Corrosion Defects [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2018, 5(6): 390-395. |
[9] | HU Zhong-qian, LV Song-song, LI Zhong-tao, WANG Hong-hong. Application of Quantified Risk Assessment Technology in the Development of Deepwater Gas Field in the South China Sea [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2017, 4(4): 193-198. |
[10] | Zi-peng ZHOU, Guo-min SUN, Ning HE. Risk Evaluation Research of Subsea Oil and Gas Pipeline Stability [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2014, 1(3): 195-199. |
[11] | WANG Xiaoxia,YANG Fengbao,LIN Suzhen,SHI Dongmei. A Method of Risk Assessment Based on Flexible Similarity Measurement and Possibility Skewness [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2014, 48(10): 1440-1445. |
[12] | LIU Yu-Tao, HU Hao, SONG Yuan-Bin. Pipeline Integrity Management System Based on Dynamic Risk Assessment [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2011, 45(05): 687-690. |
[13] |
ZHANG Baowen1,LUO Zheng2,XUE Zhi1,YIN Ying1 . A Network Risk Assessment Model Based on Network Global Privilege Graph [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2010, 44(09): 1197-1200. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 220
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 833
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||