低渗油井节能生产参数多目标优化方法

doi:10.1007/s12204-024-2736-x

J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 486-498.doi: 10.1007/s12204-024-2736-x

低渗油井节能生产参数多目标优化方法

1. 西安建筑科技大学机电工程学院，西安710055；2. 中国机械联合工程有限公司智能装备工程公司，重庆400039；3. 中国地质大学（武汉）机械工程与电子信息学院，武汉430074；4. 西安鹏瑞石油科技有限公司设计研发中心，西安 710016

收稿日期:2023-06-29 接受日期:2023-09-07 出版日期:2026-04-01 发布日期:2024-05-06

Multi-Objective Approach for Optimizing Production Parameters of Low-Permeability Oil Well to Enhance Energy Efficiency

刘沛津¹，丁浩健¹，晏东阳²，孙浩峰³，黄涛¹，李杰⁴

1. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China; 2. Intelligent Equipment Engineering Company, China Machine China Union Engineering Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400039, China; 3. School of Mechanical Engineering and Electronic Information, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; 4. Design and Development Center, Xi’an Pengrui Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710016, China

Received:2023-06-29 Accepted:2023-09-07 Online:2026-04-01 Published:2024-05-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对低渗油井开采过程中生产参数随着油井工况变化的跟踪性能不足、匹配度低下，导致高能耗、低能效的实际问题，提出一种基于模型误差补偿的多目标生产参数优化方法，并依此制定低渗油井节能生产参数。首先，建立了低渗油井生产过程单井日产液量收益子模型与单井单位生产能耗成本子模型，并以此为基础，采用高斯混合模型方法对单井单位生产能耗成本子模型进行误差补偿，解决油井生产过程中的不确定信息对模型精度的影响问题，提高模型精度；其次，综合考虑模型决策变量与约束，建立了以最大化日产液量收益，最小化单位生产能耗成本的多目标优化模型；然后，采用非支配排序遗传算法求解所建多目标优化模型得到生产参数。最后，将求解结果中特征明显的解集作为生产参数，应用到长庆油田某采油厂低渗油井进行实际生产验证。结果表明：油井生产收益增大，且节能效果明显，验证了本文所建模型和优化算法的有效性。

关键词: 低渗油井, 生产控制参数, 模型误差补偿, 多目标优化, 非支配遗传算法

Abstract: Aiming at the practical problems of high energy consumption and low energy efficiency during the exploitation of low-permeability oil wells because of insufficient traceability and poor matching performance of production parameters, this paper proposes a multi-objective approach for optimizing production parameters of low-permeability oil well to enhance its energy efficiency. First, a sub-model of daily liquid production yield and a sub-model of unit production energy consumption cost for single low-permeability oil well were established, and the Gaussian mixture model method was employed to compensate for the errors in the sub-model of unit production energy consumption cost, to solve the problem of the influence of uncertain facts during the oil well exploitation and to improve the precision of the model. Second, a multi-objective optimization model was established by taking into account the decision variables and constraints of the model, to maximize the daily liquid production yield while minimizing the unit production energy consumption cost. Subsequently, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm was employed to solve the multi-objective optimization model and obtain the production parameters. Finally, the solution set with obvious features was taken as the production parameters and applied to the actual production verification of low-permeability oil wells in a certain oil production plant of the ChangQing Oilfield. The results showed an increase in oil well production yield, and a significant energy-saving effect, thereby verifying the effectiveness of the proposed model and optimization algorithm in this paper.

中图分类号:

TP273

. 低渗油井节能生产参数多目标优化方法[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2026, 31(2): 486-498.

Liu Peijin, Ding Haojian, Yan Dongyang, Sun Haofeng, Huang Tao, Li Jie. Multi-Objective Approach for Optimizing Production Parameters of Low-Permeability Oil Well to Enhance Energy Efficiency[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2026, 31(2): 486-498.

参考文献

[1] MENG Y, LI M B, LI X F, et al. Intermittent pumping design of low production oil well in low-permeability reservoir [J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2020, 27(2): 268-272 (in Chinese).
[2] WANG Y, LI L, WU D, et al. Real‐time dynamic energy efficiency evaluation and analysis of industrial processes based on multi‐objective state transition algorithm with reference vector [J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2022, 100: S121-S140.
[3] NNABUIFE S G, TANDOH H, WHIDBORNE J F. Slug flow control using topside measurements: A review [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances, 2022, 9: 100204.
[4] EPELLE E I, GEROGIORGIS D I. Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming (MINLP) for production optimisation of naturally flowing and artificial lift wells with routing constraints [J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2019, 152: 134-148.
[5] SONG X D. The practices and understanding of reducing electricity consumption of mechanical production wells in low permeability oilfields [J]. Energy Conservation in Petroleum & Petrochemical Industry, 2019, 9(8): 33-35 (in Chinese).
[6] QUAN J. A brief discussion on the characteristics and basic methods of developing low-yield and low-permeability oil wells [J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2017 (15): 123, 125 (in Chinese).
[7] JIANG Y Y, SUN X H. Determination of pumping cycle and pumping parameters between pumping units without stopping [J]. Energy Conservation and Measurement in Petroleum & Petrochemical Industry, 2020, 10(10): 43-46 (in Chinese).
[8] SONG X D. The practices and understanding of reducing electricity consumption of mechanical production wells in low permeability oilfields [J]. Energy Conservation in Petroleum & Petrochemical Industry, 2019, 9(8): 33-35 (in Chinese).
[9] TARAKANOV A, ELSHEIKH A H. Regression-based sparse polynomial chaos for uncertainty quantification of subsurface flow models [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 399: 108909.
[10] LIU T, GAO X W, WANG L N. Error compensation method for comprehensive energy consumption in oil and gas production process [J]. Information and Control, 2015, 44(6): 648-653 (in Chinese).
[11] GASPAR A, BARRETO C, SCHIOZER D. Assisted process for design optimization of oil exploitation strategy [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2016, 146: 473-488.
[12] GAO X, LIU T, YUAN Q, et al. A novel optimization approach for oil and gas production process considering model parameters uncertainties [J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 94(9): 1710-1722.
[13] SHEN F, REN S S, ZHANG X Y, et al. A digital twin-based approach for optimization and prediction of oil and gas production [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 2021: 3062841.
[14] WANG Y, LV Y, GUO D L, et al. A novel multi-input AlexNet prediction model for oil and gas production [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018: 5076547.
[15] LIU T, GAO X W, WANG L N. Multi-objective optimization for oil production process with compensating model error [J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2015, 32(5): 615-622 (in Chinese).
[16] SUN W, REN T, NAN Z J, et al. Fuzzy optimization design of swabbing parameter for low permeability oilfield [J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2016, 23(10): 84-85 (in Chinese).
[17] WEI Y. Energy-saving algorithm of pumping unit based on the objective optimization [D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Petroleum University, 2016 (in Chinese).
[18] LIU T, GAO X W, WANG L N. Hybrid modeling method of comprehensive energy consumption for oil and gas production process [J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2013, 34(11): 1525-1528 (in Chinese).
[19] ZHENG X Q, SHI J F, CAO G, Et al. Progress and prospects of oil and gas production engineering technology in China [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(3): 565-576 (in Chinese).
[20] ZHANG W A, GAO W A, LIU A D. Robot skill learning based on dynamic motion primitives and adaptive control [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(3): 354-365 (in Chinese).
[21] XUE G Q, YUAN Y C, JIANG K, et al. Application of numerical modeling of capillary pressure based on J function in low permeability reservoirs [J]. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2018, 37(9): 28-34 (in Chinese).
[22] LIAN W J, SHI D D, AN Q L, et al. An initial cluster center selection algorithm based on maximum expectation [J]. Computer Engineering & Software, 2020, 41(5): 1-5 (in Chinese).
[23] LUO D, JIANG B B. A multi-objective biogeography-based optimization with particle swarm optimization for solving tomato planning planting [J]. Computer Applications and software, 2023, 40(7): 294-299 (in Chinese).
[24] Dong S M, Zhang X S, Wu C J, et al. Simulation and optimization method for the integral energy-saving suction parameters of rod pumping wells in an oilfield [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(3): 475-479 (in Chinese).

低渗油井节能生产参数多目标优化方法

Multi-Objective Approach for Optimizing Production Parameters of Low-Permeability Oil Well to Enhance Energy Efficiency

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭琦, 闫军, 郝乾鹏, 韩东, 杨志豪, 闫馨月, 张海鹏, 李然. 基于闭环聚类和多目标优化的风电短期功率预测方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2026, 60(2): 246-255.
[2]	刘佳惠, 王聪, 张宏立, 马萍, 李新凯, 董颖超. 代理模型辅助的复杂地形风电场微观选址多目标优化设计[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(9): 1315-1326.
[3]	王超尘, 姜鸿儒, 王步历, 夏巧伟, 张贤椿. 杀伤链到杀伤网的演进：建模、评估与优化研究综述[J]. 空天防御, 2025, 8(4): 1-8.
[4]	张澳圆, 胡小锋, 张亚辉. 多场景多目标动态变化下船舶小组立装焊重调度[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(4): 476-488.
[5]	米阳, 陈宇阳, 陈博洋, 韩云昊, 袁明瀚. 考虑微能网接入主动配电网的共享储能多目标配置[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(9): 1309-1322.
[6]	张赫, 周正凯, 林环宇, 王天慈. 关键车道优先下的港区公铁平交道口优化研究[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(5): 791-800.
[7]	张良, 郑丽冬, 冷祥彪, 吕玲, 蔡国伟. 基于灰狼算法的风-光-抽水蓄能联合系统多目标优化策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(10): 1554-1566.
[8]	钟科星, 丁乐声, 张聪, 毛彦东, 陈金龙. 基于神经网络的风电海缆弯曲限制器优化设计[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2024, 11(1): 70-76.
[9]	彭斌, 刘慧鑫, 陶耀辉. 基于变径基圆渐开线涡旋压缩机的几何模型及优化研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(8): 1046-1054.
[10]	马洲俊, 王勇, 王杰, 陈少宇. 柔性控制器MMC子模块最优冗余数量双重协同优化方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(3): 325-332.
[11]	何维, 孙宏磊, 陶袁钦, 蔡袁强. 开挖引起的隧道位移动态多目标优化反演预测[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(12): 1688-1699.
[12]	杨博, 王俊婷, 俞磊, 曹璞璘, 束洪春, 余涛. 基于孔雀优化算法的配电网储能系统双层多目标优化配置[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(10): 1294-1307.
[13]	李玲芳, 陈占鹏, 胡炎, 邰能灵, 高孟平, 朱涛. 基于灵活性和经济性的可再生能源电力系统扩展规划[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(7): 791-801.
[14]	孙鸿强, 张占月, 方宇强. 基于NSGA-II算法的编队卫星重构策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(3): 320-330.
[15]	王运龙, 姜云博, 管官, 邢佳鹏, 于光亮. 基于知识工程的船舶机舱设备三维布局设计[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(10): 1219-1227.