海洋平台人员疏散试验与仿真模拟研究

doi:10.1007/s12204-023-2629-4

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着海上油气开发的快速发展，关于海洋平台的人员疏散问题越来越受到人们的关注。本文首先在实地海洋平台上针对120名人员开展疏散实验，并运用Pathfinder对该疏散实验场景进行模拟，软件疏散模拟数据与实验结果匹配度高。其次，参考IMO疏散导则和使用实验速度数据，针对平台上四种典型疏散场景进行仿真模拟研究。仿真结果表明，海洋平台疏散场景的出口利用率和人员疏散效率有待提高。最后，针对四种疏散场景下的人员疏散路径进行优化，并用多个数学指标来评价优化后的不同场景的人员疏散性能。最终结果表明，人员按照优化路径进行疏散有助于提高出口使用率，缩短疏散时间。本研究对IMO疏散导则的修订工作有一定参考价值，并为海洋平台紧急疏散提供了有效疏散策略。

关键词: 海洋平台, 实验研究, 应急疏散, 路径规划

Abstract: With the rapid development of marine oil and gas exploitation, the evacuation of offshore platforms has received more attention. First, an experimental investigation of the evacuation process of 120 participants in a real offshore platform is performed, and then simulation results provided by Pathfinder are validated against the measurement results. Second, four typical evacuation scenarios on the platform referring to IMO guidelines are investigated by Pathfinder with the speed values achieved in experiments. The simulation results show that both the utilization of exits and evacuation efficiency of people on the offshore platform need to be further improved. Last, the evacuation routes of people under the four scenarios are optimized, and the improvement of the evacuation performance after the optimization is evaluated by several mathematical indicators. Final results show that the evacuation with the optimized route design prompts the use efficiency of exits and further reduces the evacuation time. The present study provides a useful advice for potentially revising the IMO guidelines in future and provides efficient evacuation strategies for planning the emergency evacuation on offshore platforms.

中图分类号:

TU 998.1

张菁菁1, 赵金城1, 2, 3, 宋振森1, 2, 3, 段立平1, 2, 3. 海洋平台人员疏散试验与仿真模拟研究[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(5): 747-758.

ZHANG Jingjing^a (张菁菁), ZHAO Jincheng^{a, b, c∗}(赵金城), SONG Zhensen^{a, b, c} (宋振森), DUAN Liping^{a, b, c}(段立平). Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of Evacuation in an Offshore Platform[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(5): 747-758.

参考文献

[1] LIAROPOULOS A, SAPOUNTZAKI K, NIVOLIANITOU Z. Risk governance gap analysis in search and rescue at offshore platforms in the Greek territory [J]. Safety Science, 2016, 86: 132-141.
[2] ABRAMOWICZ-GERIGK T, BURCIU Z. Analysis of safety requirements for large offshore units evacuation systems. LSA safety function [J]. Archives of Transport, 2012, 24(4): 429-440.
[3] BERCHA F G, CEROVSEK M, ABEL W. Assessment of the reliability of marine installation escape, evacuation, and rescue systems and procedures [C]//The Fourteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Toulon: ISOPE, 2004: ISOPE-I-04-417.
[4] MUSHARRAF M, KHAN F, VEITCH B. Modeling and simulation of offshore personnel during emergency situations [J]. Safety Science, 2019, 111: 144-153.
[5] PING P, WANG K, KONG D P, et al. Estimating probability of success of escape, evacuation, and rescue (EER) on the offshore platform by integrating Bayesian Network and Fuzzy AHP [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2018, 54: 57-68.
[6] VINNEM J E. Offshore risk assessment: Principles, modelling and applications of QRA studies [M]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1999.
[7] KATSUHARA M, OKAZAKI T, KAMEYAMA M, et al. Simulation of human escape on board considering human factor [J]. Journal - Japan Society for Safety Engineering, 1999, 38: 443-449.
[8] BRUMLEY A, KOSS L. The influence of human factors on the motor ability of passengers during the evacuation of ferries and cruise ships [C]//Conference on Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation. London: RINA, 2000: 19.
[9] HWANG K I. An experiment on walking speeds of freshmen unexperienced in shipboard life on a passenger ship [J]. Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, 2013, 37(3): 239-244.
[10] WANG Y F, WANG K, WANG T, et al. Reliabilities analysis of evacuation on offshore platforms: A dynamic Bayesian Network model [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 150: 179-193.
[11] CABALLERO-MORALES S O, MARTINEZFLORES J L. Helicopter routing model with non-deterministic failure rate for evacuation of multiple oil platforms [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 139: 105669.
[12] BUBBICO R, LEE S, MOSCATI D, et al. Dynamic assessment of safety barriers preventing escalation in offshore Oil&Gas [J]. Safety Science, 2020, 121: 319-330.
[13] CHENG J C P, TAN Y, SONG Y Z, et al. Developing an evacuation evaluation model for offshore oil and gas platforms using BIM and agent-based model [J]. Automation in Construction, 2018, 89: 214-224.
[14] MUSHARRAF M, SMITH J, KHAN F, et al. Assessing offshore emergency evacuation behavior in a virtual environment using a Bayesian Network approach [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2016, 152：28-37.
[15] PING P, WANG K, KONG D P. Analysis of emergency evacuation in an offshore platform using evacuation simulation modeling [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 505: 601-612.
[16] International Maritime Organization. Guidelines for evacuation analysis for new and existing passenger ships: MSC/Circ.1238 [S]. Copenhagen: IMO, 2016.
[17] WANG C X, LU S R. Personnel emergency evacuation ¨ simulation engineering software - Pathfinder from introduction to mastery [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2016 (in Chinese).
[18] ZHAO Z, CHEN Q G, WANG H R. Guidance evacuation based on Pathfinder model under the emergency state in public place [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2013, 32(12): 1327-1330 (in Chinese).
[19] WANG J, WANG W, KE Q C, et al. Evacuation simulation research of a university library staff based on Pathfinder [J]. Security and Safety Technology Magazine, 2011(6): 3-7 (in Chinese).
[20] CHOW W K, NG C M Y. Waiting time in emergency evacuation of crowded public transport terminals [J]. Safety Science, 2008, 46(5): 844-857.
[21] OWEN M, GALEA E R, LAWRENCE P J. The exodus evacuation model applied to building evacuation scenarios [J]. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 1996, 8(2): 65-84.
[22] CHIEN S W, CHEN W L, SHEN T, et al. Safety evacuation in MRT underground station by using buildingEXODUS with example of Xindian Station of TRTC [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(S2): 5025-5029 (in Chinese).