Opportunistic Replacement Optimization for Multi-Component System Based on Programming Theory

doi:10.1007/s12204-018-2026-6

摘要/Abstract

摘要： It is widely accepted that too excessive or too insufficient maintenance actions on a system are consumptive or potentially risky. This paper focuses on the optimization of opportunistic replacement for a multicomponent system in which no failure or suspension histories can be used for prediction of all the critical components in the system. Firstly, the remaining useful life (RUL) is predicted using the real-time sensor data, which is based on an “individual-based lifetime inference” method. Then a failure risk estimation method is introduced, which is based on the degradation extent and service time of components. Subsequently, the possible replacement combinations of components are compared, which is based on a proposed current-term cost rate. Finally, the best replacement scheduling is selected. The proposed framework is validated by the simulation dataset and PHM-2012 competition bearing dataset. Group replacement and individual replacement are conducted for comparison, and sensitivity analysis is discussed.

关键词: remaining useful life (RUL) prediction , opportunistic replacement, cost rate, long task horizon

Abstract: It is widely accepted that too excessive or too insufficient maintenance actions on a system are consumptive or potentially risky. This paper focuses on the optimization of opportunistic replacement for a multicomponent system in which no failure or suspension histories can be used for prediction of all the critical components in the system. Firstly, the remaining useful life (RUL) is predicted using the real-time sensor data, which is based on an “individual-based lifetime inference” method. Then a failure risk estimation method is introduced, which is based on the degradation extent and service time of components. Subsequently, the possible replacement combinations of components are compared, which is based on a proposed current-term cost rate. Finally, the best replacement scheduling is selected. The proposed framework is validated by the simulation dataset and PHM-2012 competition bearing dataset. Group replacement and individual replacement are conducted for comparison, and sensitivity analysis is discussed.

Key words: remaining useful life (RUL) prediction , opportunistic replacement, cost rate, long task horizon

中图分类号:

TH 16
TP 207

XIAO Lei (肖雷), XIA Tangbin (夏唐斌). Opportunistic Replacement Optimization for Multi-Component System Based on Programming Theory[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Science), 2018, 23(Sup. 1): 77-84.

参考文献 20

[1]	JARDINE A K S, LIN D M, BANJEVIC D. A reviewon machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementingcondition-based maintenance [J]. Mechanical Systemsand Signal Processing, 2006, 20(7): 1483-1510.
[2]	XIA T B, DONG Y F, XIAO L, et al. Recent advancesin prognostics and health management for advancedmanufacturing paradigms [J]. Reliability Engineeringand System Safety, 2018, 178: 255-268.
[3]	BARALDI P, MAIO F D, AL-DAHIDI S, et al. Predictionof industrial equipment remaining useful life byfuzzy similarity and belief function theory [J]. ExpertSystems with Applications, 2017, 83: 226-241.
[4]	AL-DAHIDI S, MAIO F D, BARALDI P, et al. Remaininguseful life estimation in heterogeneous fleetsworking under variable operating conditions [J]. ReliabilityEngineering and System Safety, 2016, 156: 109-124.
[5]	TIAN Z G, WONG L, SAFAEI N. A neural networkapproach for remaining useful life prediction utilizingboth failure and suspension histories [J]. MechanicalSystems and Signal Processing, 2010, 24(5): 1542-1555.
[6]	TAO F L, YANG C, CHENG Y J, et al. Machine componenthealth prognostics with only truncated historiesusing geometrical metric approach [J]. MechanicalSystems and Signal Processing, 2018, 113: 168-179.
[7]	WANG D, YANG F F, TSUI K L, et al. Remaininguseful life prediction of lithiumion batteries basedon spherical cubature particle filter [J]. IEEE Transactionson Instrumentation and Measurement, 2016,65(6): 1282-1291.
[8]	SI X S. An adaptive prognostic approach via nonlineardegradation modeling: Application to battery data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2015,62(8): 5082-5096.
[9]	XIAO L, CHEN X H, ZHANG X H, et al. A novelapproach for bearing remaining useful life estimationunder neither failure nor suspension histories condition[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2017, 28(8):1893-1914.
[10]	TIAN Z G, JIN T D, WU B R, et al. Condition basedmaintenance optimization for wind power generationsystems under continuous monitoring [J]. RenewableEnergy, 2011, 36(5): 1502-1509.
[11]	XIAO L, SONG S L, CHEN X H, et al. Joint optimizationof production scheduling and machine group preventivemaintenance [J]. Reliability Engineering andSystem Safety, 2016, 146: 68-78.
[12]	SHAFIEE M, FINKELSTEIN M, B′ERENGUER C.An opportunistic condition-based maintenance policyfor offshore wind turbine blades subjected to degradationand environmental shocks [J]. Reliability Engineeringand System Safety, 2015, 142: 463-471.
[13]	XIA T B, TAO X Y, XI L F. Operation process rebuilding(OPR)-oriented maintenance policy for changeablesystem structures [J]. IEEE Transactions on AutomationScience and Engineering, 2017, 14(1): 139-148.
[14]	ZHANG C, GAO W, GUO S, et al. Opportunisticmaintenance for wind turbines considering imperfect,reliability-based maintenance [J]. Renewable Energy,2017, 103: 606-612.
[15]	SARKER B R, FAIZ T I. Minimizing maintenancecost for offshore wind turbines following multi-level opportunisticpreventive strategy [J]. Renewable Energy,2016, 85: 104-113.
[16]	ABDOLLAHZADEH H, ATASHGAR K, ABBASI M.Multi-objective opportunistic maintenance optimizationof a wind farm considering limited number ofmaintenance groups [J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 88:247-261.
[17]	YILDIRIMM, GEBRAEEL N Z, SUN X A. Integratedpredictive analytics and optimization for opportunisticmaintenance and operations in wind farms [J]. IEEETransactions on Power Systems, 2017, 32(6): 4319-4328.
[18]	VERBERT K, SCHUTTER B D, BABUˇSKA R.Timely condition-based maintenance planning formulti-component systems [J]. Reliability Engineeringand System Safety, 2017, 159: 310-321.
[19]	ZHANG X H, KANG J S, JIN T D. Degradation modelingand maintenance decisions based on BayesianBelief Networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2014, 63(2): 620-633.
[20]	NECTOUX P, GOURIVEAU R, MEDJAHER K, etal. PRONOSTIA: An experimental platform for bearingsaccelerated degradation tests [C]//IEEE InternationalConference on Prognostics and Health Management.Denver, Colorado, USA: IEEE, 2012: 1-8.