Ultimate Strength and Protective Performance of Stiffened Panels Exposed to Fire-Induced High Temperature

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.196

Abstract

Abstract:

Stiffened panel is a typical strength member in ships. Considering the change of material properties under the action of fire and high temperature, according to the thermal elastic-plastic finite element theory, based on the nominal temperature-time curve, the protective effect of the passive fire protection layer on the high temperature response characteristics and the residual strength of the stiffened panel and the influence of coating positions on the failure mode of the stiffened panel are studied, which provides reference for structural performance evaluation and structural fire protection design. Numerical analyses indicate that passive fire protection layer can effectively slow down the increase of stress and deformation induced by temperature rise. Overall coating does not change the failure mode of the overall buckling of the structure accompanied by the tripping of the stiffener, but significantly delays the failure time and has an obvious effect on maintaining residual ultimate strength. Partial coating will change the failure characteristics of the structure. Overall failure occurs when only the plate is coated, and beam-column failure occurs when only the stiffener is coated, accompanied by local buckling of the web. Overall coating shows the best protective performance on the residual strength of the stiffened panel, followed by plate coating. Stiffener coating, however, has a weak protective effect. The protection performance mainly depends on the heating and failure mode of the structure.

Key words: stiffened panel, passive fire protection layer, collapse mode, residual ultimate strength, protective performance

CLC Number:

U663.6

YU Xinye, XUE Hongxiang, Yan Shuwei. Ultimate Strength and Protective Performance of Stiffened Panels Exposed to Fire-Induced High Temperature[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(7): 929-936.

Figures/Tables 15

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

References 8

[1]	PAIK J K. Ultimate limit state analysis and design of plated structures[M]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
[2]	PAIK J K, KIM B J, SEO J K. Methods for ultimate limit state assessment of ships and ship-shaped offshore structures—Part II: Stiffened panels[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2008, 35(2): 271-280. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.08.007 URL
[3]	ZHANG S M, JIANG L. A procedure for non-linear structural collapse analysis[C]∥Proceedings of ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. California, USA: ASME, 2014.
[4]	MANCO M R, VAZ M A, CYRINO J, et al. Behavior of stiffened panels exposed to fire[C]∥4th International Conference on Marine Structures. Espoo, Finland: CRC Press, 2013.
[5]	郝军凯, 薛鸿祥, 吴传伟, 等. 舱室火灾作用下甲板板架热力响应及防护性能[J]. 船舶工程, 2020, 42(6): 41-48.
	HAO Junkai, XUE Hongxiang, WU Chuanwei, et al. Thermodynamic response and protection performance of deck grillage under effect of cabin fire[J]. Ship Engineering, 2020, 42(6): 41-48.
[6]	FRICKE W, BRONSART R. Report of committee III. 1, ultimate strength[C]∥Proceedings of the 18th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress. Hamburg, Germany: Schiffbautechnische Gesellschaft, 2012: 285-363.
[7]	European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1-2: General rules—Structural fire design: EN 1993-1-2[S]. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2001.
[8]	LI G Q, HAN J, LOU G B, et al. Predicting intumescent coating protected steel temperature in fire using constant thermal conductivity[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2016, 98: 177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2015.03.008 URL