Research and Test Verification of Dynamic Characteristics of Deck V-Arch Bridge

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.284

Abstract

Abstract:

To solve the problem that the natural frequency of deck arch bridges would decrease rapidly when the span increases, a novel arch bridge structure named deck V-arch bridge is proposed. The V-shaped members are added between the main girders and the arch ribs to increase the stiffness of the arch bridge, thereby increasing the natural frequency of the structure. Through the timely conversion of the structural system, the first-phase dead load is carried by the arch ribs, while the second-phase dead load and live load are carried by the variable height truss with main girders as upper chords, arch ribs as lower chords, and V-shaped members as webs, with multi-point elastic constraints. The entire structure has the advantages of arch and truss. In order to verify the correctness of the research and calculation of the dynamic characteristics of the deck V-arch bridge, a test bridge with a span of 10 m is built. The first natural frequency of the vertical bending in the plane of the bridge is tested by utilzing the pulsation test. The stiffness and dynamic characteristics are calculated by utilizing the finite element software. The influence of V-shaped member stiffness on the natural frequency and that of the number of V-shaped members on the temperature stress of the structure are analyzed. The necessity of system transformation is studied. The results show that the difference between test value and calculated value of the first natural frequency of vertical bending in the plane is small. The mode shape is in good agreement with the finite element analysis. With little or no additional material, the natural frequency of the structure is significantly increased, especially the in-plane frequency. The stiffness of the V-shaped members has a reasonable setting range. When the inner angles of the triangle formed by the main girders or the arch ribs are between 45 ℃ and 60 ℃,the number of V-shaped web members is suitable. The structural stiffness of deck arch bridge with V-shaped members is greatly improved, and at the position of L/4 (L is the span of the bridge), the upward deflection generated by the static live load of the train is approximately zero. After the transformation of the structural system, the deck V-arch bridge can fully exert the superiority of the arch force.

Key words: deck arch bridge, dynamic characteristics, test, finite element, stiffness, high-speed railway bridge

CLC Number:

XIE Xiaoli, PANG Mulin, QIU Chen, QIN Shisheng. Research and Test Verification of Dynamic Characteristics of Deck V-Arch Bridge[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021, 55(3): 276-289.

Figures/Tables 29

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.1

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Tab.2

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Tab.3

Fig.16

Tab.4

Fig.17

Tab.5

Tab.6

Tab.7

Fig.18

Fig.19

Tab.8

Fig.20

Fig.21

References 24

[1]	肖汝诚，程进，葛耀君，等．桥梁工程篇[DB/OL]. [2019-10-01]. .
	XIAO Rucheng, CHENG Jin, GE Yaojun, et al. Bridge engineering chapter[DB/OL]. [2019-10-01]. .
[2]	严翯．拱桥在我国铁路建设中的应用[J]. 四川建筑，2016, 36(2): 97-98.
	YAN Yan. Application of arch bridge in railway construction in China[J]. Sichuan Architecture, 2016, 36 (2): 97-98.
[3]	姚昌荣，李亚东，梁东，等．山区大跨度桥梁结构选型[J]. 桥梁建设，2012, 42(6): 81-86.
	YAO Changrong, LI Yadong, LIANG Dong, et al. Type selection of large-span bridge structure in mountain area[J]. Bridge Construction, 2012, 42 (6): 81-86.
[4]	牛斌. 中国高速铁路桥梁综述[C]∥中国土木工程学会桥梁及结构工程分会：第十八届全国桥梁学术会议论文集(上册)．北京：人民交通出版社，2008: 11.
	NIU Bin. Overview of high-speed railway bridges in China[C]∥China Civil Engineering Society Bridge and Structural Engineering Branch. Proceedings of the 18th National Bridge Academic Conference (Book 1). Beijing: China Communications Press, 2008: 11.
[5]	ZHENG J L, WANG J J. Concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges in China[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(1): 143-155.
[6]	丁文富，杜宇本，蒋良文．大瑞铁路怒江四线大跨车站特大桥综合勘察技术与成果分析[J].铁道标准设计，2018, 62(4): 101-106.
	DING Wenfu, DU Yuben, JIANG Liangwen. Comprehensive survey technology and result analysis of the large bridge over the Nujiang 4th line of the Darui Railway[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2018, 62 (4): 101-106.
[7]	谢海清，徐勇，陈列，等．沪昆高铁北盘江特大桥铺设无砟轨道适应性研究[J]. 铁道标准设计，2018, 62(11): 93-96.
	XIE Haiqing, XU Yong, CHEN Lie, et al. Adaptability research of ballastless track laying on Shanghai-Kunming high-speed railway Beipanjiang super large bridge[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2018, 62 (11): 93-96.
[8]	许三平．蒙华铁路洛河大桥总体设计[J]. 铁道工程学报，2018, 35(8): 44-49.
	XU Sanping. Overall design of Luohe Bridge of Menghua railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2018, 35(8): 44-49.
[9]	周勇政，陈良江，高策．我国高速铁路桥梁设计技术及探索[J]. 桥梁建设，2018, 48(5): 11-15.
	ZHOU Yongzheng, CHEN Liangjiang, GAO Ce. Design technology and exploration of high-speed railway bridges in China[J]. Bridge Construction, 2018, 48 (5): 11-15.
[10]	郑健．中国高速铁路桥梁建设关键技术[J]. 中国工程科学，2008, 10(7): 18-27.
	ZHENG Jian. The key technology of high-speed railway bridge construction in China[J]. Engineering Science of China, 2008, 10 (7): 18-27.
[11]	QIN S Q, GAO Z Y. Developments and prospects of long-span high-speed railway bridge technologies in China[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(6): 787-794.
[12]	姚玲森. 桥梁工程[M]. 第2版．北京：人民交通出版社，2008.
	YAO Lingsen. Bridge engineering[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: People’s Communications Press, 2008.
[13]	陈宝春．拱桥技术的回顾与展望[J]. 福州大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 37(1): 94-106.
	CHEN Baochun. Review and prospect of arch bridge technology[J]. Journal of Fuzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 37 (1): 94-106.
[14]	刘东. 大跨度钢管砼拱桥自振特性分析[J]. 重庆交通学院学报，2002, 21(3): 1-3.
	LIU Dong. The analysis of the free vibration characteristic of the long-span arch bridge made of concrete filled in steel tube[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong Institute, 2002, 21(3): 1-3.
[15]	CHATTERJEE P K, DATTA T K. Dynamic analysis of arch bridges under travelling loads[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1995, 32(11): 1585-1594.
[16]	欧碧峰，赵灿晖，乐建平．大跨度钢管混凝土拱桥的动力特性分析[J]. 公路交通技术，2005(3): 84-87.
	OU Bifeng, ZHAO Canhui, YUE Jianping. Analysis of dynamic characteristics of long-span concrete-filled steel tube arch bridge[J]. Highway Transportation Technology, 2005(3): 84-87.
[17]	张强．大跨度钢管混凝土拱桥动力特性及车桥振动研究[D]．哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学，2006.
	ZHANG Qiang. Research on dynamic character and vibration of vehicle-span concrete filled steel tube arch bridges[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2006.
[18]	曾勇，马如进，谭红梅．大跨上承式钢管混凝土拱桥的动力特性研究[J]. 中外公路，2014, 34(3): 113-117.
	ZENG Yong, MA Rujin, TAN Hongmei. Research on the dynamic characteristics of long-span through-type CFST arch bridge[J]. China Foreign Highway, 2014, 34 (3): 113-117.
[19]	蒋凌杰，吴志隆．上承式混凝土拱桥自振特性分析[J]. 市政技术，2017, 35(4): 88-90.
	JIANG Lingjie, WU Zhilong. Analysis of natural vibration characteristics of through-supporting concrete arch bridge[J]. Municipal Technology, 2017, 35 (4): 88-90.
[20]	杨伟．钢管混凝土劲性骨架拱桥动力特性及其响应研究[D]．重庆：重庆交通大学，2018.
	YANG Wei. Research on dynamic characteristics and response of concrete-filled steel tube stiff skeleton arch bridge[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2018.
[21]	CHEN B C. Future trends on super-long span arch bridges, advances in structural engineering-theory and application[C]∥Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Structural Engineering for Young Experts (ISSEYE-9). Fuzhou: Science Press, 2006: 1997-2002.
[22]	高亮，辛涛，肖宏，等．高速铁路桥上不同轨枕型式动力特性对比[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(1): 68-72.
	GAO Liang, XIN Tao, XIAO Hong, et al. Comparison of dynamic characteristics of different sleeper types on high-speed railway bridges[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 40 (1): 68-72.
[23]	郑开启，孟少平，冯英洁．六圭河特大桥动力特性分析[C]∥第七届全国土木工程研究生学术论坛论文集. 南京：东南大学出版社，2009: 133.
	ZHENG Kaiqi, MENG Shaoping, FENG Yingjie. Analysis of the dynamic characteristics of the Liuguihe Extra Large Bridge[C]∥Proceedings of the 7th National Civil Engineering Graduate Academic Forum. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2009: 133.
[24]	SALAWU O S, WILLIAMS C. Review of full-scale dynamic testing of bridge structures[J]. Engineering Structures, 1995, 17(2): 113-121.

构件	截面类型	方钢管规格尺寸/(mm×mm×mm)	面积/mm²
拱肋	箱型	120×80×5	1835
拱肋横撑	箱型	30×30×3	300
立柱	箱型	40×40×4	576
立柱横撑	箱型	30×30×3	300
V形构件	箱型	40×20×3	534
V形构件横撑	箱型	30×30×3	300
帽梁	箱型	50×40×4	656
主纵梁	箱型	80×40×4	896
横梁	箱型	40×40×4	576

振型阶次	现有上承式拱桥		上承式加V拱桥
振型阶次	ω/Hz	振型	ω/Hz	振型
1	11.86	1阶反对称竖弯	15.32	1阶对称侧弯(梁拱同侧)
2	14.62	1阶对称侧弯(梁拱同侧)	26.82	1阶主拱反对称扭转
3	17.93	2阶对称竖弯	31.32	1阶主拱反对称扭转+主梁反对称侧弯
4	23.74	1阶主拱反对称扭转	31.38	1阶主拱对称扭转
5	29.68	1阶主拱反对称扭转+主梁反对称侧弯	33.65	1阶主拱对称扭转+主梁对称侧弯
6	29.89	1阶主拱对称扭转	38.58	1阶反对称竖弯

桥型	ω/Hz		误差/%
桥型	计算值	试验值	误差/%
现有上承式拱桥	11.86	10.95	7.67
上承式加V拱桥	38.58	36.65	5.00

构件	截面类型	材料	单元类型	抗扭惯性矩/m⁴	截面惯性矩/m⁴		面积/m²	用量/t
构件	截面类型	材料	单元类型	抗扭惯性矩/m⁴	对x轴	对y轴	面积/m²	用量/t
V形构件	箱型	Q345	梁单元	1.62×10^－1	1.33×10^－1	8.97×10^－2	1.28×10^－1	1 580.4
构件横联	箱型	Q345	梁单元	3.97×10^－3	2.64×10^－3	2.64×10^－3	2.53×10^－2	31.8
立柱	箱型	Q345	梁单元	2.26×10^－1	2.12×10^－1	1.15×10^－1	1.59×10^－1	1 773.1
主梁	箱型	Q345	梁单元	3.43×10⁰	1.11×10⁰	5.04×10¹	1.18×10⁰	4 152.6
立柱横撑	箱型	Q345	梁单元	7.81×10^－3	5.21×10^－3	5.21×10^－3	3.17×10^－2	285.5
拱圈横撑	箱型	Q345	梁单元	1.67×10^－1	1.73×10^－1	8.00×10^－2	1.33×10^－1	801.9

振型阶次	现有上承式拱桥		上承式加V拱桥
振型阶次	ω/Hz	振型	ω/Hz	振型
1	0.275 7	1阶对称侧弯(梁拱同侧)	0.299 3	1阶对称侧弯(梁拱同侧)
2	0.611 1	1阶反对称竖弯	0.755 7	1阶反对称扭转
3	0.696 1	1阶反对称扭转	1.000 0	1阶对称侧弯(梁拱反侧)
4	0.864 2	2阶对称竖弯	1.160 1	1阶反对称竖弯
5	0.911 5	1阶对称侧弯(梁拱反侧)	1.193 8	2阶对称竖弯