Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents and Dynamic Elastic Instability of Steel Liquid Storage Tanks

Abstract

Abstract:

Abstract： To comprehensively evaluate the dynamic stability of liquid storage tanks under earthquake excitations, the equivalent dynamic perturbation equations were established based on coupled fluidsolid model with displacementpressure form, the resistance force in structure domain was parameterized by timevarying geometric stiffening matrix, the generalized perturbation variables were then modified and the vector length was adjusted in real-time, and the dynamic Lyapunov characteristic exponents were then solved with time-stepping techniques, by which the dynamic stability analysis of a 100 000 m3 oil storage tank was respectively executed under harmonic and earthquake ground motions. The results show that the dynamic instability regions obtained by the above Lyapunov method were essentially consistent with the estimates of Floquet method, and the maximum relative error of critical peak ground acceleration calculated by Lyapunov method and B-R criteria method is appoximately 10 %, and the wind girders are helpful to inhibit dynamic instability regions and improve the critical peak ground acceleration. The proposed Lyapunov method is suitable for secondorder dynamic systems, can consider the effect of earthquake duration, and does not restrict the characteristics of seismic waves. Moreover it also dramatically reduces the computing cost of dynamic stability analysis and meets the precision requirement for engineering application.

Key words: liquid storage tanks, earthquake excitations, dynamic stability, perturbation equations, Lyapunov characteristic exponents, wind

CLC Number:

TE 972
TU 33

YANG Hongkang1,2,GAO Boqing1. Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents and Dynamic Elastic Instability of Steel Liquid Storage Tanks[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2014, 48(11): 1660-1666.

References

［1］Salzano E, Garcia Agreda A, Di Carluccio A, et al. Risk assessment and early warning systems for industrial facilities in seismic zones［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94(10): 15771584.

［2］Chen Z, Sun B, Yu C, et al. Comparison of the strength design and prevention method of elephant foot buckling among countries' standards of oil tanks［C］∥Proceedings of the ASME 2009 pressure vessels and piping division conference. Prague, Czech Republic: ASME, 2009: 461466.

［3］Chiba M, Tani J, Hashimoto H, et al. Dynamic stability of liquidfilled cylindrical shells under horizontal excitation, part I: experiment［J］. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1986, 104(2):301319.

［4］Fukuyama M, Nakagawa M, Ishihama K, et al. Dynamic buckling experiments of fluidstructurecoupled coaxial thin cylinder［J］. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1999, 188(1): 1326.

［5］Maekawa A, Shimizu Y, Suzuki M, et al. Vibration test of a 1/10 reduced scale model of cylindrical water storage tank［J］. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2010, 132(5): 125137.

［6］Takayanagi M. Parametric resonance of liquid storage axisymmetric shell under horizontal excitation［J］. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1990, 113:511516.

［7］杨宏康, 高博青. 基于Floquet理论的储液罐动力稳定性分析［J］. 浙江大学学报：工学版, 2013, 47(2): 379384.

YANG Hongkang, GAO Boqing. Dynamic stability analysis of liquid storage tanks based on Floquet theory［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University：Engineering Science, 2013, 47(2): 379384.

［8］Virella J C, Godoy L A, Suarez L E. Dynamic buckling of anchored steel tanks subjected to horizontal earthquake excitation［J］. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2006,62(6):521531.

［9］Buratti N, Tavano M. Dynamic buckling and seismic fragility of anchored steel tanks by the added mass method［J］. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2014, 43(1):121.

［10］Skokos C, Gerlach E. Numerical integration of variational equations ［J］. Physical Review E, 2010, 82(3): 036704.

［11］Skokos C. The Lyapunov charactaristic exponents and their computation［J］. Lecture Notes in Physics, 2010, 790: 63135.

［12］Moslemi M, Kianoush M R. Parametric study on dynamic behavior of cylindrical groundsupported tanks［J］. Engineering Structures, 2012, 42：214230.

［13］Crisfield M, Remmers J, Verhoosel C. Nonlinear finite element analysis of solids and structures. 2nd ed［M］. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2012: 169215.

［14］Chopra A K. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 4th ed［M］. New Jersey: PrenticeHall, 2012: 447466.

［15］郭洪亮. 某港口10万m3大型储油罐静动力有限元分析［D］. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2006.

［16］GB50011—2010. 建筑抗震设计规范［S］. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.

［17］GB50341—2003. 立式圆筒形钢制焊接油罐设计规范［S］. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2003.

[1]	WANG Hong, QI Yankun, HE Yong, YANG Guojun. Multi-Stage Opportunistic Maintenance Decision-Making for Electric Multiple Unit Systems with Bi-Objective Optimization [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(9): 1276-1284.
[2]	CHUANG Zhenju, LI Chunzheng, LIU Shewen. Numerical Analysis of Influence of Blade Icing on Dynamic Response of Integrated Wind Turbine Structure [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(9): 1176-1187.
[3]	LI Linyan, HAN Shuang, QIAO Yanhui, LI Li, LIU Yongqian, YAN Jie, LIU Haidong. A Wind-Solar-Electric Vehicles Coordination Scheduling Method for High Proportion New Energy Grid-Connected Scenarios [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(5): 554-563.
[4]	YU Hao, ZHANG Zhemeng, PENG Sui, ZHANG Zhiqiang, REN Wanxin, LI Canbing. Comparative Analysis of Technical Standards for Offshore Wind Power via VSC-HVDC [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(4): 403-412.
[5]	DAI Yi, CHEN Zuogang, WANG Fei. Uncertainty Analysis of Offshore Platform Wind Load Tests [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(3): 361-367.
[6]	ZHAO Zhongliang, LI Hao, LAI Jiang, YANG Haiyong, WANG Xiaobing, LI Yuping. Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Missile Model with Direct Force and Aerodynamic Force Compound Control Technology [J]. Air & Space Defense, 2022, 5(3): 1-9.
[7]	QIN Han, WU Bin, SONG Yuhui, LIU Jin, CHEN Lan. Numerical Analysis of Support Interference for a Slender Configuration at Super Large Angles of Attack in High Speed Wind Tunnel [J]. Air & Space Defense, 2022, 5(3): 44-51.
[8]	PENG Zhongliang, LU Yun, ZHOU Zhichao, HUANG Zhen, LIU Tailai. Aerodynamic Research on the Problem of Canard-Wing Interference of Rolling Airframe Missile [J]. Air & Space Defense, 2022, 5(3): 52-57.
[9]	RONG Zhen, HU Wenjie, QIU Yunlong, ZHANG Yujian, WANG Yizhuang, JIANG Zhongzheng, CHEN Weifang. Φ120 Hypersonic Wind Tunnel Flow Field Calibration [J]. Air & Space Defense, 2022, 5(3): 58-64.
[10]	CHEN Yihua1 (陈熠画), CHEN Xinquan1∗ (陈新权), YANG Qi1,2 (杨启), OUYANG Yiping1 (欧阳义平). Dynamic Stability Analysis of Backhoe Dredger Based on Time Domain Method [J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2022, 27(3): 339-345.
[11]	TANG Hongtao, WANG Dannan, SHAO Yiping, ZHAO Wenbin, JIANG Weiguang, CHEN Qingfeng. A Modified Migrating Birds Optimization for Multi-Objective Lot Streaming Hybrid Flowshop Scheduling [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(2): 201-213.
[12]	LU Wu, DING Ranran, ZHAO Wenbin, HUANG Dong, WANG Zheming. “Window Effect” and Protective Measures of Exogenous Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on Implantable Cardiac Pacemaker [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(11): 1518-1531.
[13]	SHEN Yangwu, SONG Xingrong, LUO Ziren, SHEN Feifan, HUANG Sheng. Inertial Control Strategy for Wind Farm with Distributed Energy Storage System Based on Model Predictive Control [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(10): 1285-1293.
[14]	GUO Jinyu, LI Wentao, LI Yuan. Adaptive Process Monitoring of Online Reduced Kernel Principal Component Analysis [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(10): 1397-1408.
[15]	LU Qiuyu, YU Zhen, YANG Yinguo, LI Li. Two-Stage Optimal Schedule of Offshore Wind-Power-Integrated Multi-Microgrid Considering Uncertain Power of Sources and Loads [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(10): 1308-1316.