上海交通大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (7): 901-911.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2023.438
收稿日期:
2023-09-01
修回日期:
2023-10-26
接受日期:
2023-12-26
出版日期:
2025-07-28
发布日期:
2025-07-22
通讯作者:
张腾飞
E-mail:tfzhang@126.com
作者简介:
徐 寒(1999—),硕士生,从事低压配电网保护研究.
基金资助:
XU Han1, ZHU Sanli1, ZHANG Tengfei1(), CHEN Shu2, LIU Mingxiang3
Received:
2023-09-01
Revised:
2023-10-26
Accepted:
2023-12-26
Online:
2025-07-28
Published:
2025-07-22
Contact:
ZHANG Tengfei
E-mail:tfzhang@126.com
摘要:
低压配电系统触漏电事故频发,但生物体触电与三相不平衡等非正常运行状态下的故障特征难以区分,导致现有剩余电流保护装置无法正常工作,低压配电系统供电安全性与供电连续性难以兼顾.为此,提出一种剩余电流保护与重合闸逻辑组合优化方法,用于处理低压配电系统触漏电事故引起的接地故障.首先,在入户变压器低压侧同时装设剩余电流保护装置和自动重合闸,当检测到故障相剩余电流过阈值后,瞬时跳开断路器以优先保障供电安全性;其次,提取剩余电流信号的鲁棒经验模态分解近似熵特征值和固有模态时域特征值,建立过阈值状态识别神经网络;最后,基于该神经网络模型对生物体触电状态和三相不平衡状态进行有效区分,优化剩余电流保护定值整定算法和自动重合闸的动作逻辑以兼顾供电连续性.仿真分析表明:该模型迭代7次后的分类结果均方误差仅为9.49×10-9,相关系数达到0.99,验证了所提故障处理方法的可行性.
中图分类号:
徐寒, 朱三立, 张腾飞, 陈舒, 刘明祥. 低压配电系统剩余电流保护与重合闸逻辑组合优化方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(7): 901-911.
XU Han, ZHU Sanli, ZHANG Tengfei, CHEN Shu, LIU Mingxiang. Optimization Method for Combination of Residual Current Protection and Coincidence Brake Logic in a Low-Voltage Distribution System[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2025, 59(7): 901-911.
表2
不同三相不平衡度下各相电流与剩余电流
样本序号 | A相负荷/kW | B相负荷/kW | C相负荷/kW | IA/A | IB/A | IC/A | I0/mA | γ/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2.55 | 2.55 | 0 | 9.96 | 10.03 | 0.068 | 37.41 | 99.36 |
2 | 3.40 | 1.28 | 0.43 | 8.08 | 7.13 | 2.760 | 38.81 | 65.89 |
3 | 6.80 | 2.55 | 0.85 | 16.06 | 14.21 | 5.470 | 39.15 | 65.95 |
4 | 5.95 | 1.70 | 2.25 | 16.22 | 9.87 | 12.390 | 30.33 | 39.19 |
5 | 10.20 | 0 | 0 | 26.54 | 0.08 | 0.080 | 75.19 | 70.51 |
6 | 7.51 | 2.55 | 0 | 14.94 | 14.91 | 0.071 | 49.53 | 99.53 |
7 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 0 | 23.45 | 23.52 | 0.070 | 37.62 | 99.71 |
8 | 4.50 | 1.28 | 0.55 | 9.13 | 7.60 | 3.580 | 43.11 | 60.85 |
9 | 5.10 | 0 | 0 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.080 | 74.82 | 70.46 |
表3
不同情况下一次跳闸剩余电流信号REMD近似熵特征值
状态 | 样本 编号 | IMF1 | IMF2 | IMF3 | IMF4 | IMF5 | IMF6 | IMF7 | IMF8 | a |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生物体触电 | 1 | 3.44×10-4 | 8.17×10-4 | 4.89×10-4 | 1.60×10-4 | 2.92×10-4 | 1.62×10-4 | 1.94×10-4 | 2.375 | |
2 | 2.12×10-3 | 1.74×10-3 | 2.11×10-4 | 1.75×10-4 | 1.78×10-4 | 2.40×10-4 | 1.39×10-4 | 0.82 | ||
3 | 5.12×10-4 | 9.88×10-4 | 6.53×10-4 | 4.31×10-4 | 1.72×10-4 | 2.43×10-4 | 1.94×10-4 | 1.51×10-4 | 1.93 | |
… | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | ||
79 | 1.76×10-3 | 7.82×10-4 | 4.13×10-4 | 3.69×10-4 | 2.19×10-4 | 1.19×10-4 | 1.92×10-4 | 0.84 | ||
80 | 1.35×10-3 | 1.26×10-3 | 5.83×10-4 | 4.88×10-4 | 2.90×10-4 | 7.33×10-4 | 1.60×10-4 | 1.95×10-4 | 0.93 | |
三相不平衡 | 81 | 2.15×10-3 | 1.94×10-4 | 3.49×10-4 | 2.78×10-4 | 1.01×10-4 | 0.09 | |||
82 | 1.97×10-4 | 2.51×10-4 | 2.28×10-4 | 1.68×10-4 | 2.58×10-4 | 2.13×10-4 | 0.47 | |||
83 | 2.04×10-3 | 1.17×10-3 | 4.34×10-4 | 3.11×10-4 | 2.08×10-4 | 1.98×10-4 | 0.87 | |||
… | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | ||
159 | 2.06×10-3 | 3.46×10-4 | 3.19×10-4 | 2.14×10-4 | 2.17×10-4 | 2.34×10-4 | 0.16 | |||
160 | 2.05×10-3 | 3.41×10-4 | 3.22×10-4 | 1.54×10-4 | 2.83×10-4 | 2.54×10-4 | 0.17 |
表4
两种不同情况下IMF时域特征指标
样本编号 | IMF | 标准差 | 裕度因子 | 能量值 | 样本编号 | IMF | 标准差 | 裕度因子 | 能量值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 5.32×10-1 | 1.76 | 2.73×104 | 81 | 1 | 4.15 | 8.02×10-1 | 1.03×106 |
2 | 1.55×10-1 | 43.1 | 2.41×103 | 2 | 10.22 | 2.07×10-1 | 6.60×106 | ||
3 | 3.10×10-1 | 15.4 | 7.69×103 | 3 | 13.44 | 1.73×10-1 | 1.09×107 | ||
4 | 1.74×10-1 | 11.1 | 4.84×103 | 4 | 2.73 | 1.54×10-1 | 9.14×105 | ||
5 | 8.57×10-2 | 7.85 | 1.10×103 | 5 | 2.81 | 6.12×10-1 | 4.85×105 | ||
6 | 3.67×10-2 | 75.4 | 1.18×102 | 6 | 1.38×10-2 | 1.24×10-2 | 13.28 | ||
7 | 3.33×10-2 | 50.6 | 92.99 | 7 | |||||
8 | 8 | ||||||||
2 | 1 | 4.34×10-1 | 2.32 | 1.85×104 | 82 | 1 | 3.09 | 1.04 | 5.76×105 |
2 | 1.36×10-1 | 71.8 | 1.69×103 | 2 | 6.28×10-1 | 4.31 | 2.90×104 | ||
3 | 1.90×10-1 | 26.11 | 3.09×103 | 3 | 2.11 | 1.52 | 2.71×105 | ||
4 | 1.40×10-1 | 17.02 | 1.59×103 | 4 | 2.89 | 8.97×10-1 | 6.90×105 | ||
5 | 1.29×10-1 | 15.57 | 2.06×103 | 5 | 6.83×10-1 | 2.85×10-1 | 1.04×106 | ||
6 | 3.15×10-2 | 28.87 | 1.41×102 | 6 | 1.97 | 1.47 | 2.37×105 | ||
7 | 5.94×10-2 | 29.83 | 2.84×102 | 7 | |||||
8 | 2.08×10-2 | 1.27×102 | 37.2 | 8 | |||||
…… | …… | ||||||||
80 | 1 | 9.79×10-2 | 32.74 | 8.82×102 | 160 | 1 | 3.46 | 9.66×10-1 | 7.21×105 |
2 | 7.69×10-2 | 63.74 | 5.08×102 | 2 | 8.75×10-1 | 6.6 | 4.64×104 | ||
3 | 7.54×10-2 | 1.19×102 | 4.78×102 | 3 | 2.53×10-1 | 9.34 | 3.84×103 | ||
4 | 3.76×10-2 | 61.54 | 1.14×102 | 4 | 4.45×10-2 | 43.6 | 1.27×102 | ||
5 | 4.65×10-2 | 48.45 | 1.81×102 | 5 | 3.55×10-2 | 57.8 | 82.46 | ||
6 | 4.31×10-2 | 41.25 | 3.16×102 | 6 | 1.90×10-3 | 1.40×103 | 2.30×10-1 | ||
7 | 5.06×10-3 | 2.69×102 | 3.34 | 7 | |||||
8 | 3.37×10-3 | 5.11×102 | 9.28×10-1 | 8 |
[1] | 董俊, 李一凡, 束洪春, 等. 配电网馈出线路单相永久性接地故障性质辨识方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(21): 4576-4585. |
DONG Jun, LI Yifan, SHU Hongchun, et al. Study on identification method of single phase permanent ground fault in distribution network feedout line[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(21): 4576-4585. | |
[2] | SUN J. Feature extraction of arc high impedance grounding fault of low-voltage distribution lines based on Bayesian network optimisation algorithm[J]. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory & Applications, 2023, 8(2): 109-118. |
[3] | 高伟, 饶俊民, 全圣鑫, 等. 不均衡小样本下多特征优化选择的生命体触电故障识别方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(7): 2060-2071. |
GAO Wei, RAO Junmin, QUAN Shengxin, et al. Biological electric-shock fault identification method based on multifeature optimization selection under unbalanced small sample[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(7): 2060-2071. | |
[4] | 李春兰, 罗杰, 石砦, 等. 基于小波分析和概率神经网络的触电事故识别方法[J]. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 44(1): 75-81. |
LI Chunlan, LUO Jie, SHI Zhai, et al. Electric shock identification method based on probabilistic neural network and wavelet analysis[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 44(1): 75-81. | |
[5] |
褚旭, 鲍泽宏. 综合能源系统电力网架继电保护原理综述[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(4): 379-392.
doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.492 |
CHU Xu, BAO Zehong. Overview of protection principle of power grid in integrated energy system[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(4): 379-392. | |
[6] | LUO X, DU Y, WANG X H, et al. Tripping characteristics of residual current devices under nonsinusoidal currents[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2011, 47(3): 1515-1521. |
[7] | FRESCHI F. High-frequency behavior of residual current devices[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2012, 27(3): 1629-1635. |
[8] | 翟国亮, 梁栋, 王玮, 等. 基于剩余电流和不平衡电流突变向量比的TN-C-S系统漏电故障检测方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44(5): 1726-1737. |
ZHAI Guoliang, LIANG Dong, WANG Wei, et al. Leakage fault detection method for TN-C-S system based on residual current and unbalanced current mutation vector ratio[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44(5): 1726-1737. | |
[9] | LI C L, DU S H, LIAO C Y. Impacts of distribution network unbalanced impedance on action performances of residual current operated device[C]// 2008 3rd International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies. Nanjing, China: IEEE, 2008: 2105-2110. |
[10] | 吕新东, 单强, 刘辉, 等. 三相不平衡对剩余电流保护器误动的影响分析[J]. 工业仪表与自动化装置, 2022(2): 81-85. |
LÜ Xindong, SHAN Qiang, LIU Hui, et al. Analysis of mal-operation of residual current device arose by three-phase imbalance[J]. Industrial Instrumentation & Automation, 2022(2): 81-85. | |
[11] | 史鸿飞, 邓丰, 钟航, 等. 基于暂态时-频特征差异的配电网高阻接地故障识别方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44(16): 6455-6470. |
SHI Hongfei, DENG Feng, ZHONG Hang, et al. Identification method of high impedance fault in distribution network based on transient time-frequency characteristic difference[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44(16): 6455-6470. | |
[12] | 杨智奇, 李天友, 陈航宇. 低压配电网的保护配置及其适应性分析[J]. 电气技术, 2020, 21(12): 40-44. |
YANG Zhiqi, LI Tianyou, CHEN Hangyu. Analysis of protection characteristics and applicability of low-voltage distribution lines[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2020, 21(12): 40-44. | |
[13] | DONG L, BINGYIN X, GUOLIANG Z, et al. TN-C-S leakage protection method using residual and unbalanced current[C]// CIRED 2022 Shanghai Workshop. Shanghai, China: IET, 2022: 477-479. |
[14] | PESANTEZ D, CORREA D, ROBLES P. Protection for prevention of human electrocution in low-voltage distribution systems with declared load of 12 kVA[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2023, 217: 109038. |
[15] | 韩晓慧, 杜松怀, 苏娟, 等. 触电信号暂态特征提取及故障类型识别方法[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(11): 3591-3596. |
HAN Xiaohui, DU Songhuai, SU Juan, et al. Fault transient feature extraction and fault type identification for electrical shock signals[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(11): 3591-3596. | |
[16] | 王金丽, 刘永梅, 杜松怀, 等. 基于剩余电流固有模态能量特征的生物触电故障诊断模型[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(21): 202-208. |
WANG Jinli, LIU Yongmei, DU Songhuai, et al. Fault diagnosis model for biological electric shock based on residual current intrinsic mode function energy features[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(21): 202-208. | |
[17] | 关海鸥, 李伟凯, 杜松怀, 等. 基于Hilbert-Huang变换的生物触电电流检测模型[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(14): 202-209. |
GUAN Haiou, LI Weikai, DU Songhuai, et al. Detection model of biological electric shock current based on Hilbert-Huang transform[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(14): 202-209. | |
[18] | 李春兰, 罗杰, 王长云, 等. 基于循环谱特征和聚类分析的触电识别[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(22): 4677-4687. |
LI Chunlan, LUO Jie, WANG Changyun, et al. Electric shock recognition method based on cyclic spectrum features and cluster analysis[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(22): 4677-4687. | |
[19] | 张宇辉, 邵毕成, 孔祥旭, 等. 基于EWT和改进Prony算法的超高压线路单相自适应重合闸故障识别方法[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2022, 42(4): 28-34. |
ZHANG Yuhui, SHAO Bicheng, KONG Xiangxu, et al. Single phase adaptive reclosing fault property identification method for EHV transmission lines based on EWT and improved Prony algorithm[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2022, 42(4): 28-34. | |
[20] | 贾博文, 武建文, 刘俊堂, 等. 270V直流开断特性研究与耗散功率变化的Mayr模型仿真分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(5): 1334-1342. |
JIA Bowen, WU Jianwen, LIU Juntang, et al. Research on DC breaking characteristics of 270V DC system and simulation analysis of the Mayr model with variable dissipation power[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(5): 1334-1342. | |
[21] | 巩泉役, 彭克, 陈羽, 等. 基于电弧随机性和卷积网络的交流串联电弧故障识别方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46(24): 162-169. |
GONG Quanyi, PENG Ke, CHEN Yu, et al. Identification method of AC series arc fault based on randomness of arc and convolutional network[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(24): 162-169. | |
[22] | WANG W, ZENG X J, YAN L J, et al. Principle and control design of active ground-fault arc suppression device for full compensation of ground current[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2017, 64(6): 4561-4570. |
[23] | ZHENG H T, YUAN J B, CHEN L. Short-term load forecasting using EMD-LSTM neural networks with a xgboost algorithm for feature importance evaluation[J]. Energies, 2017, 10(8): 1168. |
[24] | 关海鸥. 低压电网剩余电流暂态过程特征提取与识别方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2014. |
GUAN Haiou. Study on feature extraction and recognition methods of residual current transient process for low-voltage power grids[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2014. | |
[25] | 熊晓祎, 肖先勇, 左金威, 等. 触电事故特征改进近似熵检测方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2017, 45(13): 27-33. |
XIONG Xiaoyi, XIAO Xianyong, ZUO Jinwei, et al. Electrical shock feature detection method based on improved approximate entropy[J]. Power System Protection & Control, 2017, 45(13): 27-33. | |
[26] | BRO R, SMILDE A K. Principal component analysis[J]. Anal Methods, 2014, 6(9): 2812-2831. |
[1] | 胡龙, 方八零, 樊飞龙, 陈达伟, 李新喜, 曾润. 用户-基站-充电站能量互动和储能共享优化方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(7): 877-888. |
[2] | 夏金磊, 唐翊杰, 王玲玲, 蒋传文, 顾玖. 考虑灵活调节能力的梯级水风光蓄互补系统日前优化运行策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(7): 889-900. |
[3] | 邓倩文, 李奇, 邱宜彬, 李豆萌, 霍莎莎, 陈维荣. 考虑多灵活性资源联合运行的综合能源系统优化配置方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(7): 912-922. |
[4] | 崔一阳, 潘斗南, 黎灿兵, 刘健哲. 大规模电网机组组合状态迭代路径搜索优化方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(6): 711-719. |
[5] | 陈实, 杨林森, 刘艺洪, 罗欢, 臧天磊, 周步祥. 小样本数据驱动模式下的新建微电网优化调度策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(6): 732-745. |
[6] | 张理, 王宝, 贾健雄, 宋竹萌, 叶钰童, 余跃, 林嘉庆, 徐潇源. 微电网功率预测与调度端到端协同优化方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(6): 720-731. |
[7] | 曾金灿, 何耿生, 李姚旺, 杜尔顺, 张宁, 朱浩骏. 基于卷积神经网络与轻量级梯度提升树组合模型的电力行业短期以电折碳方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(6): 746-757. |
[8] | 高波, 李飞, 史轮, 陶鹏, 石振刚, 张超, 彭杰, 赵一伊. 基于实时碳强度评估的社区综合能源系统低碳互动管理策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(5): 580-591. |
[9] | 黄逸翔, 窦迅, 李林溪, 杨函煜, 于建成, 霍现旭. 基于全局灵敏度分析的综合能源设备响应价值量化方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(5): 569-579. |
[10] | 娄为, 胡蓉, 于谨铭, 张希鹏, 樊飞龙, 刘嵩源. 内嵌市场博弈模型的电网-抽水蓄能多主体协调调度[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(3): 365-375. |
[11] | 魏茂华, 杨苓, 翁亮涛, 杨继沛, 陈泳桥. 考虑容量差异的孤岛直流微网分布式储能单元SOC均衡策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(3): 376-387. |
[12] | 彭超逸, 陈文哲, 徐苏越, 李建设, 周华锋, 顾慧杰, 聂涌泉, 孙海顺. 支持虚拟电厂提供灵活爬坡服务的云边协同市场模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(2): 186-199. |
[13] | 李建林, 张则栋, 梁策, 曾飞. 计及源-荷不确定性的综合能源系统多目标鲁棒优化调度[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(2): 175-185. |
[14] | 孙欣, 江海林, 谢敬东, 王思敏, 王森. 基于用户信用指数的园区电动汽车充放电调度机制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(2): 200-207. |
[15] | 朱兰, 张学涵, 唐陇军, 仇念航, 田英杰. 计及紧急可中断负荷的电能、惯性与一次调频联合出清模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(1): 16-27. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||