上海交通大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (11): 1367-1374.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.11.013
王驿凯1,叶祖樑1,潘祖栋2,赵建峰2,胡斌3,曹锋1
发布日期:2019-12-11
通讯作者:
曹锋,男,教授,博士生导师,电话(Tel.):029-82663583;E-mail:fcao@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.
作者简介:王驿凯(1992-),男,山东省临沂市人,博士生,现主要从事跨临界CO2热泵系统研究.
基金资助:WANG Yikai 1,YE Zuliang 1,PAN Zudong 2,ZHAO Jianfeng 2,HU Bin 3,CAO Feng 1
Published:2019-12-11
摘要: 空气源热泵系统在低温工况下运行时,存在蒸发器表面结霜、系统性能恶化等问题.针对传统除霜方法在跨临界CO2热泵系统应用中的局限性,对热气旁通除霜方法进行实验研究.在搭建的空气源跨临界CO2热泵系统实验平台上,以外径12.7mm的旁通铜管作为节流机构,对除霜过程中的动态参数变化以及环境温度对除霜时间的影响进行分析,并绘制除霜不同时刻的系统压焓图.实验结果表明:热气旁通除霜过程较为稳定,各测点参数变化较为平缓.结合实验数据,可以发现,采用热气旁通除霜方法可明显提高蒸发器进口温度至30℃左右,缩短除霜时间;而除霜时间受除霜稳定期影响较大,环境温度降低或环境湿度增大均会延长系统除霜时间,除霜能耗比值与除霜时间比值的变化趋势基本一致.对热气旁通除霜效率进行计算,其值为46.5%,与其他热气除霜方法相比,效率增长33.62%,除霜时间缩短100s,说明热气旁通除霜方法更适用于空气源跨临界CO2热泵系统.
中图分类号:
王驿凯,叶祖樑,潘祖栋,赵建峰,胡斌,曹锋. 跨临界CO2热泵的热气旁通除霜方法及除霜时间分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(11): 1367-1374.
WANG Yikai,YE Zuliang,PAN Zudong,ZHAO Jianfeng,HU Bin,CAO Feng. Hot-Gas Bypass Defrosting Method and Analysis of Defrosting Time for Transcritical CO2 Heat Pump[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2019, 53(11): 1367-1374.
| [1]CALERO M, ALAMEDA-HERNANDEZ E, FERNNDEZ-SERRANO M, et al. Energy consumption reduction proposals for thermal systems in residential buildings[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2018, 175: 121-130. [2]BRADY L, ABDELLATIF M. Assessment of energy consumption in existing buildings[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2017, 149: 142-150. [3]NAWAZ K, SHEN B, ELATAR A, et al. Perfor-mance optimization of CO2 heat pump water heater[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2018, 85: 213-228. [4]AMER M, WANG C C. Review of defrosting me-thods[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 73: 53-74. [5]刘业凤, 吴琪. 结霜机理及热泵除霜技术研究综述[J]. 节能技术, 2018, 36(3): 195-200. LIU Yefeng, WU Qi. Review of frosting mechanism and heat pump defrosting technology[J]. Energy Conservation Technology, 2018, 36(3): 195-200. [6]LIU Z B, FAN P Y, WANG Q H, et al. Air source heat pump with water heater based on a bypass-cycle defrosting system using compressor casing thermal storage[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 128: 1420-1429. [7]HUANG D, LI Q X, YUAN X L. Comparison between hot-gas bypass defrosting and reverse-cycle defrosting methods on an air-to-water heat pump[J]. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(9): 1697-1703. [8]KIM J, CHOI H J, KIM K C. A combined dual hot-gas bypass defrosting method with accumulator heater for an air-to-air heat pump in cold region[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 147: 344-352. [9]HOFFENBECKER N, KLEIN S A, REINDL D T. Hot gas defrost model development and validation[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2005, 28(4): 605-615. [10]LIANG C H, ZHANG X S, LI X W, et al. Control strategy and experimental study on a novel defrosting method for air-source heat pump[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(8/9): 892-899. [11]MINETTO S. Theoretical and experimental analysis of a CO2 heat pump for domestic hot water[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2011, 34(3): 742-751. [12]HU B, YANG D F, CAO F, et al. Hot gas defrosting method for air-source transcritical CO2 heat pump systems[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2015, 86: 864-872. [13]HU B, WANG X L, CAO F, et al. Experimental analysis of an air-source transcritical CO2 heat pump water heater using the hot gas bypass defrosting method[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 71(1): 528-535. [14]DING Y J, MA G Y, CHAI Q H, et al. Experiment investigation of reverse cycle defrosting methods on air source heat pump with TXV as the throttle regulator[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2004, 27(6): 671-678. [15]WANG W, XIAO J, FENG Y C, et al. Characteristics of an air source heat pump with novel photoelectric sensors during periodic frost-defrost cycles[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 50(1): 177-186. [16]KIM M H, LEE K S. Determination method of defrosting start-time based on temperature measurements[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 146: 263-269. [17]GE Y J, SUN Y Y, WANG W, et al. Field test study of a novel defrosting control method for air-source heat pumps by applying tube encircled photo-electric sensors[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2016, 66: 133-144. [18]SONG M J, FAN C, MAO N, et al. An experimental study on time-based start defrosting control strategy optimization for an air source heat pump unit with frost evenly distributed and melted frost locally drained[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2018, 178: 26-37. [19]沈维道, 童钧耕. 工程热力学[M]. 第4版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007. SHEN Weidao, TONG Jungeng. Engineering thermodynamics[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007 [20]MOFFAT R J. Describing the uncertainties in experimental results[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 1988, 1(1): 3-17. |
| [1] | 王雨风,王丹东,胡记超,陈亮,陈江平. 两相流CO2喷射器内部流场的数值模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(7): 860-865. |
| [2] | 周志松,江龙,王丽伟,王如竹,高鹏. 非平衡条件下氯化锰-氨的吸附/解吸特性分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2016, 50(04): 583-587. |
| [3] | 林芃1,王如竹2,徐振中2,邵飞1,王吉1. 管内垂直降膜绝热吸收评估方法与实验分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2013, 47(08): 1264-1270. |
| [4] | 梁媛媛, 徐博, 陈江平. 结霜工况下平行流换热器的换热性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2013, 47(04): 674-678. |
| [5] | 梁媛媛, 赵宇, 陈江平. 微通道平行流蒸发器仿真模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2013, 47(03): 413-416. |
| [6] | 金晓明1, 杨马英2, 杨荻1. 超临界参数机组负荷控制与优化策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2012, 46(12): 1901-1906. |
| [7] | 胡晓晨, 祁照岗, 殷礼鸣, 陈江平. 新型金属氢化物反应床传热性能分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2012, 46(04): 530-535. |
| [8] | 徐志发, 宗军良. 超大型泥水平衡盾构施工对环境影响评价分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2011, 45(10): 1567-1570. |
| [9] | 徐博1,张驰1,陈江平1,孙西辉2,马小魁2. 积液型两相流分配器的性能与优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2015, 49(01): 91-95. |
| [10] | 马磊,谷波,田镇,李萍. 基于新流动沸腾传热关联式的微通道平行流蒸发器数值模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2017, 51(9): 1043-1049. |
| [11] | 张雨龙,张鹏,马非. 冰晶颗粒的浮升融化过程[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(5): 473-480. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||