基于两种预压缩模型的格莱圈静密封性能

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.11.012

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (11): 1359-1366.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.11.012

基于两种预压缩模型的格莱圈静密封性能

蔡智媛1,王冰清1,彭旭东1,郭生荣2,孟祥铠1

1. 浙江工业大学过程装备及其再制造教育部工程研究中心，杭州 310032； 2. 中航工业金城南京机电液压工程研究中心，南京 211106

发布日期:2019-12-11
通讯作者: 彭旭东，男，教授，博士生导师，电话(Tel.):0571-88871503；E-mail: xdpeng@126.com.
作者简介:蔡智媛（1994-），女，湖北省咸宁市人，硕士生，目前主要从事橡塑往复密封技术研究.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(51575490，51775505)，国家重点基础研究发展计划(973) (2014CB046404)，浙江省自然科学基金重点项目(LZ15E050002)

Static Sealing Performance of Glyd-Ring Seal with Two Precompression Models

CAI Zhiyuan 1,WANG Bingqing 1,PENG Xudong 1,GUO Shengrong 2,MENG Xiangkai 1

1. MOE Engineering Research Center of Process Equipment and Its Remanufacture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China; 2. AVIC Jincheng Nanjing Engineering Institute of Aircraft Systems, Nanjing 211106, China

Published:2019-12-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于ANSYS软件建立了液压格莱圈密封二维轴对称几何模型，对模拟密封圈安装过程中采用的轴向推进和径向压缩两种预压缩有限元模型及相关模拟结果进行了对比研究.首先，给出了两种模型下格莱圈密封应力分布的差异.其次，对比分析了两种模型下不同压缩率和介质压力对静密封性能的影响.结果表明：两种模型下获得的静密封性能影响规律基本相同，且应力分布基本相似，但对密封圈应力集中部位预测结果存在偏差，表现为径向压缩模型下的应力集中部位更靠近空气侧；此外，轴向推进预压缩模型的模拟结果揭示出聚四氟乙烯滑环靠介质侧的倒角处易发生磨损，这一结果与工程实际比较符合.

关键词: 预压缩有限元模型；格莱圈；静密封性能

Abstract: The two-dimensional axisymmetric geometry model of hydraulic Glyd-ring seal was established by applying the ANSYS software, which was used to analyze the effects of two precompression finite element models, the axial push and the radial compression, that were used to simulate the sealing ring installation process, and the related simulation results were compared and studied. Firstly, the stress distribution differences of two FEA models were given. Secondly, the influences of compression rate and sealed pressure on the static sealing performance with the two FEA models were compared and analyzed. The results indicate that the effect law on the static sealing performance of the two FEA models is basically the same, and the stress distribution is basically similar, but there is a deviation in the prediction of the stress concentration parts of the seal ring, which shows that the stress concentration of the radial compression model is closer to the air side. In addition, the simulation results of the axial push precompression FEA model reveal that the chamfer of polytetrafluoroethylene ring near the oil side is easier to meet with wear, which is in consistency with engineering practice.

Key words: precompression finite element model; Glyd-ring; static sealing perfor-mance

中图分类号:

TB 42

蔡智媛,王冰清,彭旭东,郭生荣,孟祥铠. 基于两种预压缩模型的格莱圈静密封性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(11): 1359-1366.

CAI Zhiyuan,WANG Bingqing,PENG Xudong,GUO Shengrong,MENG Xiangkai. Static Sealing Performance of Glyd-Ring Seal with Two Precompression Models[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2019, 53(11): 1359-1366.

参考文献

［1］彭旭东, 王玉明, 黄兴, 等. 密封技术的现状与发展趋势［J］. 液压气动与密封, 2009, 29(4): 4-11. PENG Xudong, WANG Yuming, HUANG Xing, et al. State-of-the-art and future development of sealing technology［J］. Hydraulics Pneumatics & Seals, 2009, 29(4): 4-11. ［2］张建, 熊庆辉, 冀宏, 等. 基于Abaqus/CAE的格莱圈参数化建模及密封性能分析［J］. 液压气动与密封, 2017, 37(1): 35-38. ZHANG Jian, XIONG Qinghui, JI Hong, et al. Pa-rametric modeling and sealing performance analysis for Glyd-ring seals based on Abaqus/CAE［J］. Hydraulics Pneumatics & Seals, 2017, 37(1): 35-38. ［3］NIKAS G K. Eighty years of research on hydraulic reciprocating seals: Review of tribological studies and related topics since the 1930s［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 2010, 224(1): 1-23. ［4］张付英, 孙宇佳, 姜向敏. 方形同轴组合密封的结构及运行参数优化研究［J］. 天津科技大学学报, 2016, 31(4): 60-64. ZHANG Fuying, SUN Yujia, JIANG Xiangmin. Optimization of the structure and operating parameters of rectangular coaxially combined seal［J］. Journal of Tianjin University of Science & Technology, 2016, 31(4): 60-64. ［5］杨忠炯, 包捷, 周剑奇, 等. 振动对格莱圈密封性能的影响［J］. 流体机械, 2017, 45(6): 38-43. YANG Zhongjiong, BAO Jie, ZHOU Jianqi, et al. Influence of vibration on the sealing performance of Glyd-ring［J］. Fluid Machinery, 2017, 45(6): 38-43. ［6］HEIPL O, MURRENHOFF H. Friction of hydraulic rod seals at high velocities［J］. Tribology International, 2015, 85: 66-73. ［7］王冰清, 彭旭东, 孟祥铠. 基于软弹流润滑模型的液压格莱圈密封性能分析［J］. 摩擦学学报, 2018, 38(1): 75-83. WANG Bingqing, PENG Xudong, MENG Xiangkai. Analysis of sealing performance of a hydraulic Glyd-ring seal based on soft EHL model［J］. Tribology, 2018, 38(1): 75-83. ［8］魏东明, 魏炜. 活塞用格莱圈安装方法［J］. 设备管理与维修, 2004(3): 40. WEI Dongming, WEI Wei. Method for mounting a piston ring［J］. Plant Maintenance Engineering, 2004(3): 40. ［9］杜晓琼, 陈国海, 闫晓亮, 等. 考虑安装过程的O型密封圈有限元分析模型［J］. 液压与气动, 2017(10): 27-33. DU Xiaoqiong, CHEN Guohai, YAN Xiaoliang, et al. Finite element analysis model of O-ring considering installation process［J］. Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 2017(10): 27-33. ［10］SANG J B, SUN L F, XING S F, et al. Mechanical properties of polymer rubber materials based on a new constitutive model［J］. Polymers & Polymer Compo-sites, 2014, 22(8): 693-698. ［11］BATHE K J, RAMM E, WILSON E L. Finite element formulations for large deformation dynamic analysis［J］. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1975, 9(2): 353-386. ［12］PENG C, OUYANG X P, ZHU Y, et al. Investigation into the influence of stretching on reciprocating rod seals based on a novel 3-D model vs axisymmetric model［J］. Tribology International, 2018, 117: 1-14. ［13］GONG R, LIU M, ZHANG H, et al. Experimental investigation on frictional behavior and sealing performance of different composites for seal application［J］. Wear, 2015, 342/343: 334-339. ［14］王益群, 高殿荣. 液压工程师技术手册［M］. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2010: 308-312. WANG Yiqun, GAO Dianrong. Technical manual for hydraulic engineers［M］. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2010: 308-312. ［15］刘洪宇, 王冰清, 孟祥铠, 等. 基于正交试验的高压X形密封圈结构优化［J］. 润滑与密封, 2017, 42(7): 106-110. LIU Hongyu, WANG Bingqing, MENG Xiangkai, et al. Structure optimization of a X-ring seal under high pressure by orthogonal array method［J］. Lubrication Engineering, 2017, 42 (7): 106-110.

[1]	郑金鹏，沈明学，孟祥铠，厉淦，彭旭东. 机械密封用O形橡胶密封圈微动特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(06): 856-862.
[2]	孔亚彬，沈明学，张执南，孟祥铠，彭旭东. 橡胶O形圈/不锈钢配副往复摩擦生热特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(11): 1352-1358.

基于两种预压缩模型的格莱圈静密封性能

Static Sealing Performance of Glyd-Ring Seal with Two Precompression Models

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价