基于扰动观测器的压缩式制冷系统改进Smith预估解耦控制

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.05.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决压缩式制冷系统运行时存在的时滞、耦合及外部干扰等问题，提出一种基于扰动观测器(DOB)的改进Smith预估解耦控制方案.首先，在常规Smith预估控制结构中引入DOB对系统总体扰动进行观测；然后，利用一阶Pade近似将系统模型中的时滞环节做线性化处理，进而通过串联对角矩阵的方式实现系统解耦；最后，根据ITAE(Integral of Time-weighted Absolute Error)最小评价准则完成控制器参数整定，并分析了系统鲁棒稳定性.仿真结果表明：该方法较好地实现压缩式制冷系统解耦的同时，使系统获得了更强的鲁棒性及抗扰性，并且约有 0.6% 的节能效果.

关键词: 压缩式制冷系统, Smith预估控制, 时滞, 扰动观测器, 鲁棒性, 解耦

Abstract: Since compression refrigeration system has problems of delay, coupling and external disturbance, an improved Smith predictive decoupling control based on disturbance observer has been proposed. First, the disturbance observer is used to observe overall disturbances of the system in the conventional Smith predictive control structure. The time-delay element is linearized by first-order Pade model. Then a diagonal matrix is applied to decouple the compression refrigeration system. Finally, the tuning of the controller parameter is realized based on the minimization of ITAE criterion, and the robust stability of the whole control system is discussed. Through the simulation, the proposed method can provide a better decoupling, better robustness and immunity for the compression refrigeration system. Moreover, it saves about 0.6% energy.

Key words: compression refrigeration system, Smith predictive control, time delay, disturbance observer (DOB), robustness, decoupling

中图分类号:

TP 273

李冬辉，高峰. 基于扰动观测器的压缩式制冷系统改进Smith预估解耦控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(5): 593-599.

LI Donghui,GAO Feng. Improved Smith Predictive Decoupling Control Based on Disturbance Observer for Compression Refrigeration System[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2019, 53(5): 593-599.

参考文献

［1］RADHAKISHNAN N, SU Y,SU R, et al. Token based scheduling for energy management in building HVAC systems［J］. Applied Energy, 2016, 173: 67-79. ［2］李兆博, 吴爱国, 何熠, 等. 制冷系统的改进Smith预估补偿和解耦控制［J］. 控制理论与应用, 2013, 30(1): 111-117. LI Zhaobo, WU Aiguo, HE Yi, et al. Improved Smith predictive compensation and decoupling in refrigeration system［J］. Control Theory & Applications, 2013, 30(1): 111-117. ［3］CHEN W, CHEN Z, ZHU R, et al. Experimental investigation of a minimum stable superheat control system of an evaporator ［J］. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2002, 25(8): 1137-1142. ［4］CHEN Y, TREADO S. Development of a simulation platform based on dynamic models for HVAC control analysis ［J］. Energy and Buildings, 2014, 68(Part A): 376-386. ［5］PING W. Control design of the cold intermediary flow with the electronic expansion value ［C］//The Japanese Freezing Academic Paper Collection. Tokyo: The Technology Paper Publisher, 1989: 4-11. ［6］SCHURT L C, HERMES C J L, NETO A T. Assessment of the controlling envelope of a model-based multivariable controller for vapor compression refrigeration systems［J］. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(13): 1538-1546. ［7］薛洪武, 吴爱国, 董娜. 制冷系统自抗扰解耦控制［J］. 西安交通大学学报, 2016, 50(9): 85-90. XUE Hongwu, WU Aiguo, DONG Na. Active disturbance rejection decoupling control for refrigeration systems［J］. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2016, 50(9): 85-90. ［8］YIN X, LI S. Energy efficient predictive control for vapor compression refrigeration cycle systems ［J］. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2018, 5(5): 953-960. ［9］赵东亚, 邹涛, 王治平. Smith 预估控制研究进展［J］. 化工进展, 2010, 29(8): 1406-1410. ZHAO Dongya, ZOU Tao, WANG Zhiping. Progress in study of Smith-predictor controller［J］. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2010, 29(8): 1406-1410. ［10］翟文鹏, 吴爱国, 由玉文, 等. 制冷系统的广义预测控制方法研究［J］. 制冷技术, 2012, 40(2): 28-33. ZHAI Wenpeng, WU Aiguo, YOU Yuwen, et al. Dynamic modeling of vapor-compression refrigeration system with a high pressure receiver［J］. Refrigeration, 2012, 40(2): 28-33. ［11］薛定宇. 反馈控制系统设计与分析——MATLAB语言应用［M］. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2000. XUE Dingyu. Design and analysis of feedback control system—Application of MATLAB language［M］. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2000. ［12］白建波, 郑宇, 苗国厂. 暖通空调系统基于SMITH预估自校正控制算法［J］. 化工学报, 2012, 63(S2): 100-105. BAI Jianbo, ZHENG Yu, MIAO Guochang. Self-tuning control algorithm with SMITH predictor for HVAC systems［J］. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(S2): 100-105. ［13］刘康志, 姚郁. 线性鲁棒控制［M］. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013. LIU Kangzhi, YAO Yu. Linear robust control［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 2013. ［14］张井岗, 刘志远, 陈志梅, 等. 时滞系统的二自由度控制［J］. 信息与控制, 2002, 31(4): 325-328. ZHANG Jinggang, LIU Zhiyuan, CHEN Zhimei, et al. Two-degree-of-freedom control for time-delay system［J］. Information and Control, 2002, 31(4): 325-328. ［15］王丽君, 童朝南, 李擎, 等. 实用自抗扰控制在大时滞厚度自动监控系统中的应用［J］. 控制理论与应用, 2012, 29(3): 368-374. WANG Lijun, TONG Chaonan, LI Qing, et al. Practical active disturbance rejection solution for monitoring automatic gauge control system with large time-delay ［J］. Control Theory & Applications, 2012, 29(3): 368-374.

[1]	符杨, 丁枳尹, 米阳. 计及储能调节的时滞互联电力系统频率控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1128-1138.
[2]	李锦江, 向先波, 刘传, 杨少龙. 基于预设性能制导律的欠驱动AUV海底地形鲁棒时滞跟踪控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 944-952.
[3]	李晗, 张波涛, 王俊杰, 孙运达, 龚圣捷. 光纤光栅传感器振动与温度信号解耦[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(2): 214-222.
[4]	万慧, 齐晓慧, 李杰. 基于线性矩阵不等式的线性/非线性切换自抗扰控制系统的稳定性分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(11): 1491-1501.
[5]	李庆波, 方泽远, 陈国良, 梅志伟, 杨婷. 基于跟踪微分器的捷联导引头解耦算法研究[J]. 空天防御, 2021, 4(4): 44-49.
[6]	侯珏, 姚栋伟, 吴锋, 吕成磊, 王涵, 沈俊昊. 混合励磁电机的电动汽车增程器控制策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(2): 206-212.
[7]	刘邱, 赵东亚. 单输入单输出系统离散积分滑模预测控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(9): 898-903.
[8]	朱金梁, 王婷, 李涛. 基于Wirtinger型积分不等式的线性时滞广义系统稳定性准则[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(9): 967-972.
[9]	张建军, 吴中华, 刘群坡, 王红旗, 刘卫东. 主从机械手遥操作双边自适应阻抗控制策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(6): 615-623.
[10]	张晓宇, 张鹏, 郑鑫, 倪元华. 基于固定时间收敛的终端角约束滑模制导律设计[J]. 空天防御, 2020, 3(3): 9-15.
[11]	方佳, 陆志强. 考虑设备故障的鲁棒调度计划模板的建模优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(12): 1278-1290.
[12]	庄鹏，冯正平，毕安元，郑天海，潘万钧，赵硕. 近水面低速工况下的潜航器深度复合控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(9): 1084-1090.
[13]	陈兵, 李克勇, 陈国良. 全捷联光电导引头的高动态解耦方法[J]. 空天防御, 2019, 2(4): 32-39.
[14]	姜晓明, 王旭烽, 张伟芳, 刘宜罡. 激光跟瞄系统粗精复合轴协同控制策略优化研究[J]. 空天防御, 2019, 2(3): 31-37.
[15]	韩刚，蔡旭. 不平衡电网下风电并网变流器的滑模电流控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(9): 1065-1071.