基于扰动观测器的压缩式制冷系统改进Smith预估解耦控制

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.05.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决压缩式制冷系统运行时存在的时滞、耦合及外部干扰等问题，提出一种基于扰动观测器(DOB)的改进Smith预估解耦控制方案.首先，在常规Smith预估控制结构中引入DOB对系统总体扰动进行观测；然后，利用一阶Pade近似将系统模型中的时滞环节做线性化处理，进而通过串联对角矩阵的方式实现系统解耦；最后，根据ITAE(Integral of Time-weighted Absolute Error)最小评价准则完成控制器参数整定，并分析了系统鲁棒稳定性.仿真结果表明：该方法较好地实现压缩式制冷系统解耦的同时，使系统获得了更强的鲁棒性及抗扰性，并且约有 0.6% 的节能效果.

关键词: 压缩式制冷系统, Smith预估控制, 时滞, 扰动观测器, 鲁棒性, 解耦

Abstract: Since compression refrigeration system has problems of delay, coupling and external disturbance, an improved Smith predictive decoupling control based on disturbance observer has been proposed. First, the disturbance observer is used to observe overall disturbances of the system in the conventional Smith predictive control structure. The time-delay element is linearized by first-order Pade model. Then a diagonal matrix is applied to decouple the compression refrigeration system. Finally, the tuning of the controller parameter is realized based on the minimization of ITAE criterion, and the robust stability of the whole control system is discussed. Through the simulation, the proposed method can provide a better decoupling, better robustness and immunity for the compression refrigeration system. Moreover, it saves about 0.6% energy.

Key words: compression refrigeration system, Smith predictive control, time delay, disturbance observer (DOB), robustness, decoupling

中图分类号:

TP 273

李冬辉，高峰. 基于扰动观测器的压缩式制冷系统改进Smith预估解耦控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(5): 593-599.

LI Donghui,GAO Feng. Improved Smith Predictive Decoupling Control Based on Disturbance Observer for Compression Refrigeration System[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2019, 53(5): 593-599.

参考文献

［1］RADHAKISHNAN N, SU Y,SU R, et al. Token based scheduling for energy management in building HVAC systems［J］. Applied Energy, 2016, 173: 67-79. ［2］李兆博, 吴爱国, 何熠, 等. 制冷系统的改进Smith预估补偿和解耦控制［J］. 控制理论与应用, 2013, 30(1): 111-117. LI Zhaobo, WU Aiguo, HE Yi, et al. Improved Smith predictive compensation and decoupling in refrigeration system［J］. Control Theory & Applications, 2013, 30(1): 111-117. ［3］CHEN W, CHEN Z, ZHU R, et al. Experimental investigation of a minimum stable superheat control system of an evaporator ［J］. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2002, 25(8): 1137-1142. ［4］CHEN Y, TREADO S. Development of a simulation platform based on dynamic models for HVAC control analysis ［J］. Energy and Buildings, 2014, 68(Part A): 376-386. ［5］PING W. Control design of the cold intermediary flow with the electronic expansion value ［C］//The Japanese Freezing Academic Paper Collection. Tokyo: The Technology Paper Publisher, 1989: 4-11. ［6］SCHURT L C, HERMES C J L, NETO A T. Assessment of the controlling envelope of a model-based multivariable controller for vapor compression refrigeration systems［J］. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(13): 1538-1546. ［7］薛洪武, 吴爱国, 董娜. 制冷系统自抗扰解耦控制［J］. 西安交通大学学报, 2016, 50(9): 85-90. XUE Hongwu, WU Aiguo, DONG Na. Active disturbance rejection decoupling control for refrigeration systems［J］. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2016, 50(9): 85-90. ［8］YIN X, LI S. Energy efficient predictive control for vapor compression refrigeration cycle systems ［J］. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2018, 5(5): 953-960. ［9］赵东亚, 邹涛, 王治平. Smith 预估控制研究进展［J］. 化工进展, 2010, 29(8): 1406-1410. ZHAO Dongya, ZOU Tao, WANG Zhiping. Progress in study of Smith-predictor controller［J］. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2010, 29(8): 1406-1410. ［10］翟文鹏, 吴爱国, 由玉文, 等. 制冷系统的广义预测控制方法研究［J］. 制冷技术, 2012, 40(2): 28-33. ZHAI Wenpeng, WU Aiguo, YOU Yuwen, et al. Dynamic modeling of vapor-compression refrigeration system with a high pressure receiver［J］. Refrigeration, 2012, 40(2): 28-33. ［11］薛定宇. 反馈控制系统设计与分析——MATLAB语言应用［M］. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2000. XUE Dingyu. Design and analysis of feedback control system—Application of MATLAB language［M］. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2000. ［12］白建波, 郑宇, 苗国厂. 暖通空调系统基于SMITH预估自校正控制算法［J］. 化工学报, 2012, 63(S2): 100-105. BAI Jianbo, ZHENG Yu, MIAO Guochang. Self-tuning control algorithm with SMITH predictor for HVAC systems［J］. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(S2): 100-105. ［13］刘康志, 姚郁. 线性鲁棒控制［M］. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013. LIU Kangzhi, YAO Yu. Linear robust control［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 2013. ［14］张井岗, 刘志远, 陈志梅, 等. 时滞系统的二自由度控制［J］. 信息与控制, 2002, 31(4): 325-328. ZHANG Jinggang, LIU Zhiyuan, CHEN Zhimei, et al. Two-degree-of-freedom control for time-delay system［J］. Information and Control, 2002, 31(4): 325-328. ［15］王丽君, 童朝南, 李擎, 等. 实用自抗扰控制在大时滞厚度自动监控系统中的应用［J］. 控制理论与应用, 2012, 29(3): 368-374. WANG Lijun, TONG Chaonan, LI Qing, et al. Practical active disturbance rejection solution for monitoring automatic gauge control system with large time-delay ［J］. Control Theory & Applications, 2012, 29(3): 368-374.

[1]	. 基于非线性扰动观测器的多模式混合动力车辆离合器滑摩扭矩估计[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2026, 31(2): 420-427.
[2]	. DSNet：用于语音情感识别的带有中性校准的解耦孪生网络[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2026, 31(2): 248-257.
[3]	傅圣来, 陈俐, 陈自强. 考虑不确定延迟的并联式气电混合动力系统模式切换控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(9): 1225-1236.
[4]	皇金锋, 章乾. 基于超螺旋扩张状态观测器的耦合单电感双输出Buck变换器串级滑模解耦控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(5): 592-604.
[5]	周宇, 贾军, 李豪, 杜毅晖, 乔文远. 智能飞行器认知诱骗场景生成技术[J]. 空天防御, 2025, 8(4): 9-19.
[6]	蒋标, 刘佳, 曾平良, 唐早, 李亚楼. 考虑碳交易量自适应决策的输电网两阶段鲁棒规划[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(6): 826-835.
[7]	王晓静1，刘晓华2，高荣2. 具有状态时滞的奇异随机系统基于滚动时域控制的镇定[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(3): 436-449.
[8]	章涛, 张雪瑞, 陈勇, 钟科林, 罗其俊. 面向民机可视导航的场面多尺度目标检测[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(11): 1816-1825.
[9]	范宏, 何杰, 田书欣. 变步长仿真与改进熵权法联动的综合能源系统鲁棒性评估方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(1): 59-68.
[10]	陈静, 柯世堂, 李文杰, 朱庭瑞, 员亦雯, 任贺贺. 浅海风-浪-流-海床耦合场非定常时空演化规律及评价指标[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(6): 666-679.
[11]	位广宇, 谷朝臣, 杨舒盛, 关新平. 非对称柔性支撑龙门双驱平台的解耦与同步控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(5): 593-600.
[12]	李林霖, 高飞扬, 郑雄飞, 张黎明, 李世杰, 王赫然. 多结构柔性夹持器提高夹持的鲁棒性[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2023, 28(3): 307-311.
[13]	陶海军, 杜长顺, 张金生, 郑征. 海洋电磁发射机二级母线冲击电压产生机理及抑制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(12): 1597-1608.
[14]	. 考虑电动汽车行为异质性的鲁棒性充电需求预测方法和充电网络规划研究[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2023, 28(1): 136-149.
[15]	符杨, 丁枳尹, 米阳. 计及储能调节的时滞互联电力系统频率控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1128-1138.