大面积基坑开挖工序对邻近供能管沟的影响

上海交通大学学报（自然版） ›› 2015, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (07): 998-1004.

大面积基坑开挖工序对邻近供能管沟的影响

杜家论1，4，左自波2，荣建3，黄醒春1, 2

(1. 上海交通大学船舶海洋与建筑工程学院，上海 200240；2. 上海交通大学海科（集团）有限公司，上海 200231；3. 上海城建市政工程（集团）有限公司，上海 200065； 4. 上海信达银泰置业有限公司，上海 201206)

收稿日期:2014-12-01 出版日期:2015-07-30 发布日期:2015-07-30

Influence of Construction Procedures on Adjacent Energy Supply Pipeline due to Large Foundation Pit Excavation

DU Jialun1，4,ZUO Zibo2,RONG Jian3,HUANG Xingchun1, 2

(1. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China； 2. Shanghai Jiaotong University Hike (Group) Co. Ltd, Shanghai 200231,China; 3.Shanghai Urban Construction Municipal Engineering (Group) Co. Ltd, Shanghai 200265, China;4. Cinda Real Estate Co. Ltd., Shanghai 201206, China;)

Received:2014-12-01 Online:2015-07-30 Published:2015-07-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

摘要：以虹源盛世国际文化城A1区基坑工程为背景，采用有限元数值模拟的方法，研究了开挖工序对基坑本身及周围环境的影响.结果表明，相同开挖支护条件下，基坑开挖完成后方案1（以岛式开挖为主）和方案2（以盆式开挖为主）的基坑坑底隆起量、格构柱立柱桩竖向位移、支撑围檩格构柱体系应力、地下连续墙侧移和管沟竖向位移的最终数值大小相近但后者略小；相较方案1，方案2施工过程中各工况土方开挖对基坑本身及周围环境影响的急剧变化程度更缓和，因而更偏于安全.

关键词: 基坑, 开挖工序, 邻近管线, 三维有限元

Abstract:

Abstract： In this paper, numerical simulation analyses were performed to investigate the influence of construction procedures on foundation pit itself and the surrounding environment based on the background of A1 foundation pit of Shanghai Hongyuan Prime International Cultural City. The results show that when the excavation is completed, the final values of the amount of excavation pit bottom, vertical displacement of lattice and erect columns, stress of supporting system, lateral displacement of diaphragm wall and vertical displacement of adjacent energy supply pipeline for the Scheme One (mainly using island excavation) and Scheme Two (mainly using basin excavation) under the same conditions for the excavation and supporting are similar, but the latter is slightly smaller. In Scheme Two, the degree of the value dramatic changes for the impact of large foundation pit excavation on the foundation pit itself and the surrounding environment during each working condition is gentler than the value changes in Scheme One, therefore, Scheme Two is safer.

Key words: foundation pit, excavation procedures, adjacent pipeline, three-dimensional finite element

中图分类号:

TU 473， TV 551.4

杜家论1，4，左自波2，荣建3，黄醒春1, 2. 大面积基坑开挖工序对邻近供能管沟的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(07): 998-1004.

DU Jialun1，4,ZUO Zibo2,RONG Jian3,HUANG Xingchun1, 2. Influence of Construction Procedures on Adjacent Energy Supply Pipeline due to Large Foundation Pit Excavation[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(07): 998-1004.

参考文献

［1］郑刚，颜志雄，雷华阳，等. 基坑开挖对临近桩基影响的实测及有限元数值模拟分析［J］. 岩土工程学报，2007, 29(5): 638643.

ZHENG Gang, YAN Zhixiong, LEI Huayang, et al. Field observation and finite element numerical simulation analysis of effect on adjacent piles due to excavation［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(5): 638643.

［2］郑刚，李志伟. 基坑开挖对邻近任意角度建筑物影响的有限元分析［J］. 岩土工程学报，2012, 34(4): 615624.

ZHENG Gang, LI Zhiwei. Finite element analysis of response of buildings with arbitrary angle adjacent to excavations［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(4): 615624.

［3］张陈蓉，蔡建鹏，黄茂松. 基坑开挖对邻近地埋管线的影响分析［J］. 岩土工程学报，2010, 32(sup.2): 154157.

ZHANG Chenrong, CAI Jianpeng, HUANG Maosong. Influence of deep excavation on adjacent underground pipelines［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(sup.2): 154157.

［4］陈福全，汪金卫，刘毓氚. 基坑开挖时邻近桩基性状的数值分析［J］. 岩土力学，2008, 29(7): 19721975.

CHEN Fuquan, WANG Jinwei, LIU Yuchuan. Numerical analysis of pile response due to braced excavationinduced soil lateral movement［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(7): 19721975.

［5］段绍伟，沈蒲生. 深基坑开挖引起邻近管线破坏分析［J］. 工程力学, 2005, 22(4): 7983.

DUAN Shaowei, SHEN Pusheng. Analysis of nearby pipeline damage induced by deep excavation［J］. Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 22(4): 7983.

［6］Goh A T C, Wong K S, Teh C I, et al. Pile response adjacent to braced excavation［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(4): 383386.

［7］Hong S H, Lee F H, Yong K Y. Threedimensional pilesoil interaction in soldierpiled excavations［J］. Computers and Geotechnics, 2003, 30: 81107.

［8］王卫东，吴江斌，翁其平. 基坑开挖卸载对地铁区间隧道影响的数值模拟［J］. 岩土力学，2004, 25(sup.2): 251255.

WANG Weidong, WU Jiangbin, WENG Qiping. Numerical modeling of affection of foundation pit excavation on metro tunnel［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(sup.2): 251255.

［9］刘国彬，王卫东. 基坑工程手册［M］. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.

[1]	熊一帆, 应宏伟, 张金红, 程康, 李冰河. 考虑时空效应的杭州软黏土超深基坑地表沉降分析方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(1): 48-59.
[2]	刘俊城, 谭勇, 张生杰. 地铁车站深基坑开挖变形智能多步预测方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(7): 1108-1117.
[3]	聂东清1, 翟之阳1, 张威1, 李志2. 双排桩桩间土加固影响的有限元分析[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(5): 919-929.
[4]	徐长节, 李欣雨. 基于人工神经网络的深基坑支护结构侧移预测[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(11): 1735-1744.
[5]	杨其润, 李明广, 陈锦剑, 吴航. 同步实施的相邻基坑相互作用机理[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(6): 722-729.
[6]	冯国辉, 徐兴, 侯世磊, 范润东, 杨开放, 管凌霄, 徐长节. 基于Kerr地基模型的基坑开挖引起下卧既有隧道受力变形[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(4): 474-485.
[7]	何维, 孙宏磊, 陶袁钦, 蔡袁强. 开挖引起的隧道位移动态多目标优化反演预测[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(12): 1688-1699.
[8]	陈拴, 吴怀娜, 陈仁朋, 沈水龙, 刘源. 上方长距离基坑开挖引起的共线隧道变形研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 698-706.
[9]	肖朝昀, 李明广, 王大发, 陈锦剑. 降雨影响下残积土层中深基坑变形特性测试及分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(8): 873-880.
[10]	高亿文, 李明广, 陈锦剑. 超载影响下围护结构非对称基坑的受力及变形特性分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(6): 643-651.
[11]	范晓真, 许海明, 徐长节, 方焘, 谭勇. 非对称开挖砂性土基坑刚性支护结构解析解[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(4): 397-405.
[12]	应宏伟, 许鼎业, 王迪, 章丽莎. 波动承压水下基坑底部弱透水层的非Darcy渗流分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(12): 1300-1306.
[13]	范凡, 章红兵, 王建华, 陈锦剑, 张毅鹏. 软土地区分隔型基坑群变形特性实测分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(2): 133-140.
[14]	肖潇，李明广，陈锦剑，夏小和. 基坑开挖对围护墙竖向变形的影响机理[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(12): 1552-1558.
[15]	李镜培，崔纪飞，李林，赵高文. 静压沉桩对邻近地下连续墙变形的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(12): 1580-1586.