岩质高陡边坡动力响应及失稳机制大型振动台模型试验研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

摘要：针对岩质高陡边坡动力响应和失稳机制问题，设计并完成了含不连续节理的岩质高陡边坡大型振动台模型试验.对主要岩性特征，采用水泥、沙、铁粉、黏土与混合剂配制岩体材料.对岩质边坡的不连续节理，在边坡内部按照一定的规律设置表面摩擦系数极低的特氟龙布.试验表明，含顺向不连续面的高陡岩质边坡地震作用下的破坏形态主要有三个阶段：裂缝开展，坡面剥落，崩塌滑动；主要滑动面沿特氟龙开展，发生在2/3坡高的位置；加速度响应沿坡面向上有明显放大，水平向加速度占主导；当地震烈度加大时，离坡尖越近，加速度放大效应越强.

关键词: 失稳机制, 岩质高陡边坡, 不连续节理, 大型振动台试验, 动力响应

Abstract:

Abstract： Seismic response of rock slope with discontinuous is mainly affected by its geometrical and mechanical properties. Due to its reverse or bedding joints, high and steep rock slope is at high risk of collapse and damage. To solve this problem, the dynamic response and failure mechanism were studied using a largescale shaking table test. The rock material was prepared with cement, sand, iron powder, clay and mixture. The discontinuous joint was imitated using Teflon fabric with low skin-friction coefficient. The experimental results indicate that there are three steps during the failure, that is, development of cracks, spalling of the slope, collapse and sliding. The main slide surface appears at the height of 2/3 of the slope, along the Teflon fabric. The internal acceleration of the slope shows an obvious amplification effect along the slope surface, and horizontal acceleration is more effective. Besides, as the earthquake intensity increase, the acceleration amplification increases near the tip of the slope.

Key words: high and steep rock slope, discontinuous joints, shaking table test, dynamic response, failure mechanism

中图分类号:

TU 455

王斌，车爱兰，葛修润. 岩质高陡边坡动力响应及失稳机制大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(07): 951-956.

WANG Bin,CHE Ailan,GE Xiurun. Shaking Table Test on Earthquake Response of Discontinuous Medium High and Steep Rock Slope[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(07): 951-956.

参考文献

［1］李宁, 程国栋, 谢定义. 西部大开发中的岩土力学问题［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2001, 23(3): 268272.

LI Ning, CHEN Guodong, XIE Dingyi. Geomechanics development in civil construction in Western China［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(3)；268272.

［2］Hack R, Alkema D, Kruse G A M, et al. Influence of earthquakes on the stability of slopes［J］. Engineering Geology, 2007, 91(1): 415.

［3］徐光兴, 姚令侃, 高召宁, 等. 边坡动力特性与动力响应的大型振动台模型试验研究［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(3): 624632.

XU Guangxing, YAO Lingkan, GAO Zhaoning, et al. Largescale shaking table model test study on dynamic characteristics and dynamic responses of slope［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(3): 624632.

［4］薄景山, 徐国栋, 景立平. 土边坡地震反应及其动力稳定性分析［J］. 地震工程与工程振动, 2001, 21(2): 116120.

BO Jingshan, XU Guodong, JING Liping. Seismic response and dynamic stability analysis of soil slopes［J］. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2001, 21(2): 116120.

［5］李振生, 巨能攀, 侯伟龙, 等. 陡倾层状岩质边坡动力响应大型振动台模型试验研究［J］. 工程地质学报, 2012, 20(2): 242248.

LI Zhensheng, JU Nengpan, HOU Weilong, et al. Largescale shaking table model tests for dynamic response of steep stratified rock slopes［J］. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2012, 20(2): 242248.

［6］贾俊. 强震作用下陡倾顺层岩质边坡动力响应分析及失稳机制研究［D］. 成都：成都理工大学科学院, 2011.

［7］杨国香, 叶海林, 伍法权, 等. 反倾层状结构岩质边坡动力响应特性及破坏机制振动台模型试验研究［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(11): 22142221.

YANG Guoxiang, YE Hailing, WU Faquan, et al. Shaking table model test on dynamic response characteristics and failure mechanism of antidip layered rock slope ［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(11): 22142221.

［8］黄润秋, 李果, 巨能攀. 层状岩体斜坡强震动力响应的振动台试验［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(5): 865875.

HUANG Runqiu，LI Guo，JU Nengpan. Shaking table test on strong earthquake response of stratified rock slopes［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(5): 866875.

［9］Ishimaru M, Kawai T. Basic study on the evaluation of seismic stability of rock slope using centrifuge model test［C］∥The Collection of Academic Conference on Civil Engineering. Chiha Japan: ［s.n.］, 2011: 3649.

［10］吴志坚, 王兰民, 陈拓, 等. 汶川地震远场黄土场地地震动场地放大效应机制研究［J］. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(12)： 37363740.

WU Zhijian, WANG Lanmin, CHEN Tuo, et al. Study of mechanism of site amplification effects on ground motion in far field loess during Wenchuan Ms8.0 earthquake［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(12): 37363740.

[1]	张磊, 封少雄, 谭昆, 郭涛, 宋成果, 初秀民, 苗洋. 基于船舶-流场运动耦合的内河航道设计方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(1): 89-98.
[2]	陈易人, 姚靳羽, 李明轩, 张新曙. 带月池驳船式浮式风力机水动力性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(7): 965-982.
[3]	冯忠居, 王伟, 张聪, 朱继新, 王逸然, 孟莹莹. 震陷土层变化下变截面单、群桩动力响应差异[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(7): 1086-1096.
[4]	裴斐a, 林焰b. 波浪能转换器平台几何布局设计的数值研究[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(5): 780-790.
[5]	占玲玉, 何文君, 周岱, 韩兆龙, 朱宏博, 张凯, 涂佳黄. 基于BESO算法的高桩承台式水平轴风力机支撑结构优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(8): 939-947.
[6]	曲晓奇, 李红涛, 唐广银, 杜海越, 杨林林. 海上浮式风力机动力响应分析与数值仿真关键技术研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2023, 10(2): 72-78.
[7]	何文君, 苏捷, 周岱, 韩兆龙, 包艳, 赵永生, 许玉旺, 涂佳黄. 基于BESO算法的大型海洋垂直轴风力机支撑结构优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(2): 127-137.
[8]	毕建巍, 苏雷, 解立波, 张昱, 凌贤长. 波浪作用下液化场地高桩码头动力响应试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(11): 1442-1454.
[9]	邱杰凯, 丁肇伟, 宋春雨, 陈龙珠. 成层广义Gibson地基中桩的水平动力响应[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(4): 431-442.
[10]	王锐, 薛鸿祥, 袁昱超, 唐文勇. 高温环境下海洋平台防爆墙结构冲击动力响应特性研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 968-975.
[11]	刘晨晨, 张琪, 李明广, 周香莲, 黎蔚杰. 波浪与地震荷载共同作用下桩的动力响应[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 638-644.
[12]	王威, 陆思逵, 杨成忠, 冯青松. 有砟客专路基结构参数的优化研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(1): 48-55.
[13]	阳杰, 何炎平, 孟龙, 赵永生, 吴浩宇. 极限海况下6 MW单柱型浮式风力机耦合动力响应[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(1): 21-31.
[14]	胡永利, 尹汉军, 王盛炜, 姚宝恒, 连琏. 一种新型水下升降装置着底碰撞动力响应分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(03): 456-459.
[15]	李磊1,2，张孟喜1，吴惠明2. 地铁列车荷载计算方法对盾构隧道动力响应的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(07): 1030-1034.