数控机床边界强度过程的非等周期不完全预防维修

上海交通大学学报（自然版） ›› 2013, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (11): 1661-1665.

数控机床边界强度过程的非等周期不完全预防维修

王智明1，杨建国2

(1. 淮海工学院机械工程学院，江苏连云港 222005; 2. 上海交通大学机械与动力工程学院，上海 200240)

收稿日期:2012-12-06 出版日期:2013-11-28 发布日期:2013-11-28
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51275305)

Aperiodic Imperfect Preventive Maintenance Method of Bounded Intensity Process for Numerical Control Machine Tools

WANG Zhiming1,YANG Jianguo2

(1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Lianyungang 222005, Jiangsu, China; 2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Received:2012-12-06 Online:2013-11-28 Published:2013-11-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于边界强度过程理论，提出了数控机床在可靠度限制下任意维修质量的非等周期不完全预防维修方法，建立了综合考虑维修对役龄的影响和故障强度随时间增加的混合模型，并且假设修复质量和故障强度增加值均为服从均匀分布的随机变量，以平均维修费用为目标函数，用迭代方法给出了非等周期预防维修周期和最佳的维修次数，并结合工程实例讨论了费用参数对平均维修费用的影响.

关键词: 预防维修, 可靠性, 边界强度过程, 任意维修质量, 虚龄

Abstract:

Based on bounded intensity process, an aperiodic imperfect preventive maintenance policy for numerical control machine tools with random maintenance quality under reliability limit was proposed. A hybrid model, which considers the effect of maintenance to virtual age and the fact that failure intensity increases as operational time increases, was presented. The treating average cost as an objective function, maintenance intervals and the number of optimum maintenance were given iteratively when increasing value of failure intensity and maintenance quality were both random variables with uniform distribution. Finally, a discussion for a real numerical example was presented to show the dependence of optimal results on different cost parameters.

Key words: preventive maintenance, reliability, bounded intensity process, random maintenance quality; , virtual age

中图分类号:

TG659
TB114

王智明1，杨建国2. 数控机床边界强度过程的非等周期不完全预防维修[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(11): 1661-1665.

WANG Zhiming1,YANG Jianguo2. Aperiodic Imperfect Preventive Maintenance Method of Bounded Intensity Process for Numerical Control Machine Tools[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(11): 1661-1665.

参考文献

［1］Pham H, Wang H. Imperfect Repair［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 94: 425438.

［2］Kijima M. Some results for repairable systems with general repair［J］. Journal of Applied Probability, 1989, 26: 89102.

［3］Guo R, Ascher H E, Love C E. Generalized models of repairable systems—A survey via stochastic processes formalism［J］. ORiON, 2000, 16(2): 87128.

［4］Liu X, Makis V, Jardine A K S. A replacement model with overhauls and repairs［J］. Naval Research Logistics, 1995, 42: 10631079.

［5］Nakagawa T. A summary of imperfect preventive maintenance policies with minimal repair［J］. RAIRO Operations Research, 1980, 14: 249255.

［6］Nakagawa T. Periodic and sequential preventive maintenance policies［J］. Journal of Applied Probability, 1986, 23: 536542.

［7］Lin D, Zuo M J, Yam R C M. General sequential imperfect preventive maintenance models［J］. International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering, 2000, 7: 253266.

［8］Wang Z M, Yang J G, Wang G Q, et al. Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance policy with random maintenance quality under reliability limit［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2011, 225(8): 19261935.

［9］Jayabalan V, Chaudhuri D. Cost optimization of maintenance scheduling for a system with assured reliability［J］. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1992, 41(1): 2125.

［10］韩帮军, 范秀敏, 马登哲. 基于可靠度约束的预防性维修策略的优化研究［J］. 机械工程学报, 2003, 39(6): 102105.

HAN Bangjun, FAN Xiumin, MA Dengzhe. Research on the optimal preventive maintenance policy based on reliability constraints ［J］. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2003, 39(6)：102105.

［11］Zhao X J, Xi L F, Lee J. Reliabilitycentered predictive maintenance scheduling for a continuously monitored system subject to degradation［J］. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007, 92: 530534.

［12］Wu S, ClementsCroome D. Preventive maintenance models with random maintenance quality［J］. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2005, 90: 99105.

［13］Pulcini G. A bounded intensity process for the reliability of repairable equipment［J］. Journal of Quality Technology, 2001, 33(4): 480492.

［14］王智明, 杨建国. 数控机床可靠性评估中的边界强度过程［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2012, 46(10): 16221626.

WANG Zhiming, YANG Jianguo. Bounded intensity process and its applications in reliability assessment of NC machine tools［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2012, 46(10): 16221626.

［15］Kijima M, Morimura H, Suzuki Y. Periodical replacement problem without assuming minimal repair［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 1988, 37: 194203.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

270

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	5	0	265

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	27	243
比例	10%	90%

摘要

600

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

60	0	540

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	278	322
比例	46%	54%

[1]	陶威, 刘钊, 许灿, 朱平. 三维正交机织复合材料翼子板多尺度可靠性优化设计[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(5): 615-623.
[2]	倪何, 覃海波, 郑奕杨. 考虑给水泄漏的锅炉升负荷仿真及其可靠性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(4): 444-454.
[3]	高英铭, 陈震, 张秀芳, 潘尔顺. 基于随机流网络与Markov过程的制造系统可靠性建模及维护优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(3): 229-235.
[4]	许显杨，陈璐. 考虑设备可靠性与能耗的平行机调度[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(3): 247-255.
[5]	高魏华, 吕广强, 曹鲁光, 丁小芩, 李烽. 软硬件综合FMEA在弹载嵌入式软件中的应用[J]. 空天防御, 2020, 3(1): 10-16.
[6]	吴礼银，许标，张庆，文宾双. 降额设计在核电厂安全级DCS可靠性分析中的研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(Sup.1): 98-103.
[7]	倪安宁1，刘晏尘1，崔毓伟1，卢军莉2. 评价公交行程时间可靠性价值的Mixed Logit模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2019, 53(2): 146-152.
[8]	龙周, 陈松坤, 王德禹. 基于SMOTE算法的船舶结构可靠性优化设计[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(1): 26-34.
[9]	李林斌. 深水结构设计流剖面的推算方法研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(增刊): 193-198.
[10]	甘志云, 刘贵吉, 李江, 董春, 马璟. 手工超声波检验在CRA复合管焊缝中的应用[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(增刊): 287-289.
[11]	王威, 陈国民, 陈琦, 鲁瑜, 张宗超. 海底腐蚀缺陷管道可靠性分析及风险评估[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(6): 390-395.
[12]	陈松坤，王德禹. 基于神经网络的蒙特卡罗可靠性分析方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(6): 687-692.
[13]	韦益夫1,2，KAWAMURA Yasumi3，王德禹1,2,3. 改进移动最小二乘法及其在结构可靠性分析中的应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(4): 455-460.
[14]	张立波1，程浩忠1，曾平良2，张沈习1，周勤勇2. 基于Johnson分布体系的发输电系统可靠性评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(5): 555-.
[15]	胡新明,王德禹. 基于迭代均值组合近似模型和序贯优化与可靠性评估法的船舶结构优化设计[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(2): 150-.