对转式垂直轴风力机气动性能研究

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.360

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 141-148.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2019.360

所属专题：《上海交通大学学报》2021年12期专题汇总专辑；《上海交通大学学报》2021年“工程力学”专题

对转式垂直轴风力机气动性能研究

曹宇^a, 韩兆龙^a^,^b, 周岱^a^,^b^,^c(), 雷航^a

^a.上海交通大学　船舶海洋与建筑工程学院
^b.上海交通大学　海洋工程国家重点实验室上海
^c.上海交通大学　高新船舶与深海开发装备协同创新中心，上海　200240

收稿日期:2019-12-12 出版日期:2021-02-01 发布日期:2021-03-03
通讯作者: 周岱 E-mail:zhoudai@sjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:曹宇(1996-)，男，江苏省盐城市人，硕士生，主要研究方向为海上风力机气动性能研究．
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(11772193);上海市教委科研创新计划项目(2019-01-07-00-02-E00066);上海市自然科学基金项目(18ZR1418000);上海交通大学新引进人员科研启动基金项目(WF220401005);上海高校特聘教授（东方学者）岗位计划(ZXDF010037);上海市国际科技合作基金项目(18290710600)

Aerodynamic Performance of Counter-Rotating Vertical Axis Wind Turbine

CAO Yu^a, HAN Zhaolong^a^,^b, ZHOU Dai^a^,^b^,^c(), LEI Hang^a

^a.School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering
^b.State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering
^c.Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea Exploration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received:2019-12-12 Online:2021-02-01 Published:2021-03-03
Contact: ZHOU Dai E-mail:zhoudai@sjtu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了改进漂浮独立式垂直轴风力机的气动和稳定性能，提出风力机的新型结构设计理念，即同轴对转式垂直轴风力机．基于计算流体力学理论，借助雷诺时均剪切应力传输RANS SST k-ω湍流模型对风力机进行数值模拟，并结合涡流理论，比较对转式与独立式垂直轴风力机在不同叶尖速比(TSR)时的气动和稳定性能．结果表明，相同流场条件下，对转式风力机浮式平台的稳定性更强．当TSR<1.3时，长时间的失速状态使得对转式风力机的脱涡现象更严重，风能利用效率更低；当TSR>1.3时，外流场的风能更多地被对转式风力机转子吸收，风力机的远端涡流长度更短且脱涡强度更低，风能利用效率更高．同轴对转式的结构设计理念和分析方法对海上垂直轴风力机的性能优化有一定的参考价值.

关键词: 对转式垂直轴风力机, 数值模拟, 气动性能, 稳定性能, 涡流理论

Abstract:

In order to improve the aerodynamic performance and stability of the floating platform of an isolated vertical axis wind turbine, a novel structure design concept of the wind turbine with a coaxial counter-rotating vertical axis was proposed. Based on the computational fluid dynamics theory, a numerical simulation was conducted with the application of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) shear stress transfer (SST) k-ω turbulence model, and combined with the eddy current theory, the aerodynamic performance and stability with different tip speed ratios (TSR) were further compared. The results show that in the same flow field, the floating platform of the counter-rotating wind turbine is more stable. When TSR<1.3, the long-time stall makes the de-vortex of the counter-rotating wind turbine more serious, and the wind energy utilization efficiency is lower. When TSR>1.3, the wind energy in outflow field is more absorbed by the rotor of the counter-rotating wind turbine. In addition, the length of remote vortex is shorter and the intensity is lower. Therefore, the wind energy utilization efficiency is higher. Coaxial counter-rotating has a certain reference value for the performance optimization of the vertical axis wind turbine.

Key words: counter-rotating vertical axis wind turbine, numerical simulation, aerodynamic performance, stability, vortex theory

中图分类号:

O352

曹宇, 韩兆龙, 周岱, 雷航. 对转式垂直轴风力机气动性能研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(2): 141-148.

CAO Yu, HAN Zhaolong, ZHOU Dai, LEI Hang. Aerodynamic Performance of Counter-Rotating Vertical Axis Wind Turbine[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021, 55(2): 141-148.

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

参考文献 17

[1]	JIN X, ZHAO G Y, GAO K J, et al. Darrieus vertical axis wind turbine: Basic research methods [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 42: 212-225.
[2]	徐应瑜，胡志强，刘格梁. 10MW级海上浮式风机运动特性研究[J]. 海洋工程，2017, 35(3): 44-51.
	XU Yingyu, HU Zhiqiang, LIU Geliang. Kinetic characteristics research of the 10 MW-level offshore floating wind turbine[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 35(3): 44-51.
[3]	刘中柏，唐友刚，王涵，等. 半潜型风电浮式基础运动特性试验研究[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报，2015, 36(1): 51-56.
	LIU Zhongbai, TANG Yougang, WANG Han, et al. Experimental study of motion behaviors for semi-submersible floating foundation of wind power[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2015, 36(1): 51-56.
[4]	LAM H F, PENG H Y. Measurements of the wake characteristics of co-and counter-rotating twin H-rotor vertical axis wind turbines[J]. Energy, 2017, 131: 13-26.
[5]	SHUR M L, SPALART P R, STRELETS M K, et al. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2008, 29(6): 1638-1649.
[6]	MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications [J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.
[7]	LEE Y T, LIM H C. Numerical study of the aerodynamic performance of a 500 W Darrieus-type vertical-axis wind turbine[J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 83: 407-415.
[8]	REZAEIHA A, KALKMAN I, BLOCKEN B. Effect of pitch angle on power performance and aerodynamics of a vertical axis wind turbine[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 197: 132-150.
[9]	GHASEMIAN M, NEJAT A. Aerodynamic noise prediction of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine using Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation and acoustic analogy[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 99: 210-220.
[10]	REZAEIHA A, MONTAZERI H, BLOCKEN B. Characterization of aerodynamic performance of vertical axis wind turbines: Impact of operational parameters[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 169: 45-77.
[11]	LI Q A, MAEDA T, KAMADA Y, et al. The influence of flow field and aerodynamic forces on a straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine[J]. Energy, 2016, 111: 260-271.
[12]	BALDUZZI F, BIANCHINI A, MALECI R, et al. Critical issues in the CFD simulation of Darrieus wind turbines[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 85: 419-435.
[13]	LI Q A, MAEDA T, KAMADA Y, et al. Investigation of power performance and wake on a straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine with field experiments[J]. Energy, 2017, 141: 1113-1123.
[14]	LI Q A, MAEDA T, KAMADA Y, et al. Study on power performance for straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine by field and wind tunnel test[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 90: 291-300.
[15]	LEI H, ZHOU D, LU J B, et al. The impact of pitch motion of a platform on the aerodynamic performance of a floating vertical axis wind turbine[J]. Energy, 2017, 119: 369-383.
[16]	LEI H, ZHOU D, BAO Y, et al. Three-dimensional Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation of a two-bladed vertical axis wind turbine[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 133: 235-248.
[17]	BEDON G, SCHMIDT P U, AAGAARD M H, et al. Computational assessment of the DeepWind aerodynamic performance with different blade and airfoil configurations[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 185: 1100-1108.

网格类型	网格基础尺寸/m	网格最小尺寸/m	总网格数	C_p			y⁺
网格类型	网格基础尺寸/m	网格最小尺寸/m	总网格数	数值模拟	风洞试验	相对误差/%	y⁺
粗糙	0.010	0.004	2 976 672	0.126	0.176	28.35	1.360 7
中等	0.010	0.002	4 027 823	0.180	0.176	2.46	0.683 5
精细	0.005	0.001	5 494 114	0.176	0.176	—	0.294 7

对转式垂直轴风力机气动性能研究

Aerodynamic Performance of Counter-Rotating Vertical Axis Wind Turbine

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	祝怡情, 吴锋, 周岱, 韩兆龙, 卓杨, 朱宏博, 张凯. 海洋风电场尾流荷载作用下水平轴风力机结构动力响应[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(8): 1081-1091.
[2]	金韬, 高斌, 王强强, 周行, 何文, 冯少孔. 拟共震源高密度面波法数据反演模拟算法及应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(7): 1029-1040.
[3]	张强, 陈振华, 王文龙, 苏怀维, 迟德建. 炸点控制对钢筋混凝土T梁桥的毁伤特性数值模拟研究[J]. 空天防御, 2025, 8(5): 83-90.
[4]	巩超, 侯远杭, 张宇骐, 刘殿勇, 万跃进. 畸形波浪环境下的埋首式无人艇水面运动特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(4): 447-457.
[5]	王子阳 , 王晓华, 郭冲霄, 等. 串油工艺研究及方法优化[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2025, 12(4): 104-115.
[6]	武晓龙, 夏凯龙, 孟德君, 郝晟淳, 朱铭敏. 非轴对称布局压气机试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(12): 1916-1928.
[7]	李易, 欧树彦, 梁伟栋, 董佳宝, 庄至栋. 飞行器低空大动压整流罩旋抛分离数值模拟[J]. 空天防御, 2025, 8(1): 102-108.
[8]	徐浩东, 余童真, 樊伟, 李明广, 刘念武. 顶管施工过程中浆液扩散对减阻效果影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(7): 1067-1074.
[9]	邓贺方, 夏凯龙, 滕金芳, 羌晓青, 朱铭敏, 卢少鹏. 不同转速下沟槽型机匣对跨声速压气机性能的影响[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(6): 1151-1160.
[10]	刘羿伯1, 毕羽琴1, 马强2, 3, 肖华平1, 刘书海1. 水下螺旋轴流混输泵叶轮的结构设计与优化[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2024, 11(4): 14-20.
[11]	冯漾漾, 丁浩亮, 胡平山, 严波. 注塑模稳态温度场的有限体积法模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(4): 461-467.
[12]	王慧, 杜登轩, 刘海超, 喻国良, 张民曦. 均匀来流中带环翼的复合桩墩的局部冲刷数值试验研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2024, 11(3): 1-9.
[13]	张念凡, 肖龙飞, 陈刚. 海洋结构物波浪砰击的数值研究综述[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(2): 127-140.
[14]	郭同彪, 张吉, 李新亮. 压缩拐角强激波边界层干扰直接数值模拟研究[J]. 空天防御, 2024, 7(2): 29-35.
[15]	李树勋，沈恒云，刘斌才，胡迎港，马廷前. 高温熔盐止回阀受熔盐颗粒冲击的压力脉动响应[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(2): 271-279.