基于形貌优化技术的邮轮轻型防火围壁设计

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2020.201

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了开发具有优良防火和承载性能的新型轻量化围壁结构,替代上层建筑区域的传统加筋防火围壁,提出一种基于形貌优化技术的邮轮轻型防火围壁设计方法.基于该方法设计的轻型围壁中波纹加筋的位置和数量是根据承载要求及加工工艺要求生成,克服了常规波纹围壁设计中波纹位置和数量均已事先确定的缺点.针对指定设计区域,以邮轮防火围壁结构轻量化为目标函数,以焊缝区结构应力、非焊缝区结构应力以及围壁一阶屈曲因子为约束条件,建立了邮轮防火围壁形貌优化设计模型并求解.提取形貌优化结果得到可行的邮轮防火围壁构型,经二次设计得到最终构型,并与传统加筋防火围壁的力学性能进行了比较.结果表明,新型邮轮防火围壁与传统加筋防火围壁相比具备轻量化优势和良好的强度.

关键词: 形貌优化, 二次设计, 邮轮防火围壁, 轻量化设计

Abstract:

In order to develop a new lightweight enclosure structure with an excellent fireproof and bearing performance, and to replace the traditional stiffened fire enclosure bulkheads in the superstructure area, a design method of light fireproof enclosure bulkheads for cruise ship based on the topography optimization technology was proposed. The location and numbers of corrugated beads in lightweight wall designed by this method were generated according to the requirements of load bearing capacity and manufacturing process, and this method overcomes the disadvantages that the location and numbers of beads in the design of conventional corrugated wall have to be determined in advance. Aimed at the specified design regions, the lightweight of cruise fireproof enclosure bulkheads (CFEB) structure was taken as the objective function while the stress in the weld zone, the stress in the nonweld zone, and the first-order buckling factor of CFEB were taken as constraints. Then, the topography design models of CFEB were established and solved. Feasible configurations were obtained by topography optimization, and the final configurations of CFEB were formed by secondary design. The mechanical properties of the final configurations were compared with the traditional stiffened fireproof bulkheads. It is concluded that the new CFEB has advantages of lightweight and good strength compared with the traditional stiffened fireproof bulkheads.

Key words: topography optimization, secondary design, cruise fireproof enclosure bulkheads, lightweight design

中图分类号:

U662.2

张帆, 杨德庆, 邱伟强. 基于形貌优化技术的邮轮轻型防火围壁设计[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(10): 1175-1187.

ZHANG Fan, YANG Deqing, QIU Weiqiang. Design of Light Fireproof Enclosure Bulkheads Based on Topography Optimization for Cruise Ships[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021, 55(10): 1175-1187.

图/表 30

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表1

图8

图9

表2

图10

图11

图12

表3

图13

表4

图14

图15

图16

表5

表6

图17

图18

图19

图20

表7

图21

图22

图23

参考文献 12

[1]	LIANG C C, YANG M F, WU P W. Optimum design of metallic corrugated core sandwich panels subjected to blast loads[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2001, 28(7):825-861. doi: 10.1016/S0029-8018(00)00034-2 URL
[2]	RINGSBERG J W, SAĞLAM H, SARDER M A, et al. Lightweight design of offshore platform marine structures-optimisation of weight to strength utilisation of corrugated shell plating[J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2014, 9(1):38-53. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2012.712005 URL
[3]	SAGLAM H, SARDER M A. Use of corrugated shell plating in semi-submersible offshore platforms[D]. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology, 2010.
[4]	甘水来, 李国强, 李勇. 基于共同规范的散货船槽型横舱壁设计研究[J]. 船舶与海洋工程, 2014, 30(1):32-38.
	GAN Shuilai, LI Guoqiang, LI Yong. Study on the design of bulk carrier corrugation bulkhead based on CSR rules[J]. Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2014, 30(1):32-38.
[5]	RAHMAN M K. Optimization of panel forms for improvement in ship structures[J]. Structural Optimization, 1996, 11(3/4):195-212. doi: 10.1007/BF01197035 URL
[6]	李文涛. 38000dwt小灵便散货船槽型横舱壁的设计研究[J]. 船舶与海洋工程, 2016, 32(2):10-15.
	LI Wentao. Study on 38000dwt handy-size bulk carrier corrugated transverse bulkhead design[J]. Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2016, 32(2):10-15.
[7]	ANDRIC J, ZANIC V, GRGIC M. Structural optimization of corrugated transverse bulkheads made of stainless steel[J]. Brodogradnja, 2010, 61(1):18-27.
[8]	SHIN S H, KO D E. A study on minimum weight design of vertical corrugated bulkheads for chemical tankers[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2018, 10(2):180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.06.005 URL
[9]	洪清泉, 赵康, 张攀, 等. OptiStruct & HyperStudy理论基础与工程应用[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2013.
	HONG Qingquan, ZHAO Kang, ZHANG Pan, et al. Theoretical basis and engineering applications of OptiStruct & Hyper Study[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2013.
[10]	张胜兰, 郑冬黎, 郝琪. 基于HyperWorks的结构优化设计技术[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2007.
	ZHANG Shenglan, ZHENG Dongli, HAO Qi. Structure optimization design technology based on HyperWorks [M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2007.
[11]	中国船级社. 钢质海船入级规范[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2018.
	China Classification Society Rules for classification of sea-going steel ships[S]. Beijing: China Communication Press, 2018.
[12]	席少霖. 非线性最优化方法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1992.
	XI Shaolin. Method of nonlinear optimizatio [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1992.

材料	弹性模量/MPa	密度/(kg·m^-3)	泊松比	厚度/mm
钢制蒙皮	210000	7850	0.3	5
岩棉板	6.2	120	0.3	40

性能参数	数值
屈服强度/MPa	235
焊缝区许用应力放大因子	1.5
非焊缝区许用应力放大因子	1.7
安全系数	2
非焊缝区螺栓孔的应力集中系数	3

序号	工艺约束	收敛性	H/mm	S_K/MPa	S_W/MPa	F	M/kg
OPT1	30 mm非设计域	否	57.87	72.95	107.60	4.18	339.80
OPT2	30 mm非设计域+sys	否	37.42	71.68	141.20	4.36	335.80
OPT3	90 mm非设计域+sys	否	61.96	75.25	163.80	4.18	341.80
OPT4	180 mm非设计域	否	44.94	79.59	158.00	4.86	336.20
OPT5	180 mm非设计域+sys	否	57.71	68.11	117.70	5.91	341.40
OPT6	180 mm非设计域+sys+buffer	否	39.23	75.96	165.80	5.13	334.80

序号	工艺约束	收敛性	H/mm	S_K/MPa	S_W/MPa	F	M/kg
OPT1	180 mm非设计域+buffer	否	80.00	69.15	151.50	4.21	343.50
OPT2	180 mm非设计域+buffer +sys	是	69.57	67.00	176.00	3.72	336.50
OPT3	180 mm非设计域+repetition	是	45.63	67.23	122.10	7.05	336.60
OPT4	30 mm非设计域+repetition	是	45.40	67.00	150.50	3.01	332.40
OPT5	90 mm非设计域+repetition	是	48.07	67.00	174.60	3.22	332.30
OPT6	30 mm非设计域+repetition+sys	是	36.98	67.16	124.00	6.04	335.40
OPT7	90 mm非设计域+repetition+sys	是	39.40	67.00	134.70	7.30	335.40
OPT8	180 mm非设计域+repetition+sys	是	43.34	67.08	163.90	3.15	331.80

构型	上面板宽度/mm	下面板宽度/mm	腹板宽度/mm	腹板高度/mm	单个槽宽/mm	波纹角度/(°)
DS3	167.67	305.56,250.00,138.89	138.89	45.63	445.45	18.00
DS7	277.78	250.00,333.33,194.45	83.33	39.40	444.45	25.31
DS8	444.45	333.33	277.78	43.34	1000.00	8.87