腐蚀方式对灌注桩劣化及硫酸盐扩散规律影响

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.11.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用室内试验模拟盐渍土地区混凝土灌注桩的腐蚀过程，对比研究灌注桩混凝土在半浸泡及全浸泡腐蚀环境下的劣化过程及硫酸盐扩散规律. 通过室内试验制备现浇混凝土试样，采用人工腐蚀环境，分别模拟全浸泡及半浸泡腐蚀作用方式下混凝土灌注桩的腐蚀过程，测定混凝土试件在1、3、6、9个月等不同腐蚀时间的尺寸、抗压强度变化及硫酸盐扩散深度，分析两种腐蚀作用下灌注桩现浇混凝土的劣化过程及差异，并探讨不同腐蚀方式对灌注桩混凝土中硫酸盐扩散的影响规律.结果显示，半浸泡与全浸泡腐蚀的灌注桩混凝土劣化过程差异显著；半浸泡的混凝土劣化速度显著快于全浸泡混凝土，强度损失也更严重；半浸泡混凝土同时遭受硫酸盐的化学及结晶腐蚀，液面附近表面发生较为严重的脱落并发生一定程度的膨胀；液面以上混凝土硫酸盐的扩散速度显著高于全浸泡下混凝土中硫酸盐的扩散.研究表明，灌注桩中处于地下水位活动范围的混凝土在硫酸盐腐蚀下的劣化速度较快，在较短时间内发生严重的损伤；全浸泡现浇混凝土则由于其环境较稳定，主要受到硫酸盐的化学侵蚀，损伤过程较慢.因此，在混凝土灌注桩抗硫酸盐腐蚀设计中，应重点考虑地下水位附近桩体混凝土的抗蚀性能.

关键词: 灌注桩混凝土, 硫酸盐腐蚀, 硫酸盐扩散, 腐蚀方式, 劣化过程

Abstract: Sulfate corrosion process of the cast-in-situ piles in the saline area was simulated by laboratory experiments. Comparison study of degradation process and sulfate diffusion laws of cast-in-situ pile concrete was conducted to reveal the degradation mechanism. Cast-in-situ concrete specimens were manufactured and immersed in sulfate solutions to reproduce the completely and semi-immersed service conditions of cast-in-situ concrete piles in practical engineering. The size changes were recorded after 1, 3, 6 and 9 months. The compressive strength test was conducted and the sulfate concentration of different depths in concrete were measured to reveal the differences of degradation process in different service conditions. The effect of service condition on diffusion properties of sulfate in pile concrete were analyzed based on the experiments. Results show that degradation process of concrete and sulfate diffusion in concrete are quite different in different service conditions. The deterioration of concrete semi-immersed in sulfate solution is faster than those completely immersed below the liquid surface. Expansion and shedding of concrete are detected since sulfate chemical and crystallization conducted on the surface of semi-immersed specimens. The sulfate diffusion ratio in concrete above the liquid surface is more rapid than that of specimens completely immersed in sulfates solution. Results indicate that pile concrete above the groundwater level suffers greater damage and encounters more serious degradation in a relatively short time. The deterioration of pile concrete below groundwater level is relatively slow since the serving environment is stable and only chemical attack is encountered. The anti-sulfate attack of cast-in-situ pile concrete near the groundwater level should be considered in the design of pile foundation in sulfate saline area.

Key words: cast-in-situ pile concrete, sulfate attack, sulfate diffusion properties, corrosion forms, degradation process

中图分类号:

TU 528

赵高文，李镜培，李林，崔纪飞. 腐蚀方式对灌注桩劣化及硫酸盐扩散规律影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(11): 1483-1491.

ZHAO Gaowen,LI Jingpei,LI Lin,CUI Jifei. Influence of Corrosion Forms on the Degradation Process and Sulfate Diffusion Laws of Cast-in-Situ Piles[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(11): 1483-1491.

参考文献

［1］PERKINS P H. Portland cement concrete underground pipelines［J］. Transportation Engineering Journal of ASCE, 1979, 105(5): 577-588. ［2］FREAS G C, SHOEMAKER M J, ERVIN D. Precast pre-stressed underground fuel storage tanks in ADAK, Alaska［J］. PCI Journal, 1985, 30(4): 52-63. ［3］ZIVICA V. Acidic attack of cement based materials—A review Part 3: Research and test methods［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2004, 18(9): 683-688. ［4］LEEMANN A, LOSER R. Analysis of concrete in a vertical ventilation shaft exposed to sulfate-containing groundwater for 45 years［J］. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2011, 33(1): 74-83. ［5］SUMER M. Compressive strength and sulfate resistance properties of concretes containing Class F and Class C fly ashes［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 34: 531-536. ［6］NIE Q K, ZHOU C J, SHU X, et al. Chemical, mechanical, and durability properties of concrete with local mineral admixtures under sulfate environment in northwest China［J］. Materials, 2014, 7(5): 3772-3785. ［7］SOTIRIADIS K, NIKOLOPOULOU E, TSIVILIS S. Sulfate resistance of limestone cement concrete exposed to combined chloride and sulfate environment at low temperature［J］. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2012, 34(8): 903-910. ［8］NEHDI M L, SULEIMAN A R, SOLIMAN A M. Investigation of concrete exposed to dual sulfate attack［J］. Cement and Concrete Research, 2014, 64: 42-53. ［9］HOBBS D W, TAYLOR M G. Nature of the thau-masite sulfate attack mechanism in field concrete［J］. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(4): 529-533. ［10］HAYNES H, O’NEILL R, NEFF M, et al. Salt weathering distress on concrete exposed to sodium sulfate environment［J］. ACI Material Journal, 2008, 105(1): 35-43. ［11］HARTELL J A, ANDREW J B, CHRISTOPHER C F. Sulfate attack on concrete: effect of partial immersion［J］. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2011, 23(5): 572-579. ［12］高润东, 赵顺波, 李庆斌, 等. 干湿循环作用下混凝土硫酸盐侵蚀劣化机理试验研究［J］. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(2): 48-54. GAO Rundong, ZHAO Shunbo, LI Qingbin, et al. Experimental study of the deterioration mechanism of concrete under sulfate attack in wet-dry cycles［J］. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(2): 48-54. ［13］邓承宗. 硫酸对地基的腐蚀［J］. 勘察科学技术, 1985(6): 38-41. DENG Chengzong. Corrosion of sulfuric acid on foundation［J］. Site Investigation Science and Technology, 1985(6): 38-41. ［14］张敬书, 张银华, 冯立平, 等. 硫酸盐环境下混凝土抗压强度耐蚀系数研究［J］. 建筑材料学报, 2014, 17(3): 369-377. ZHANG Jingshu, ZHANG Yinhua, FENG Liping, et al. Corrosion resistant coefficient for concrete compressive strength under sulfate environment［J］. Journal of Building Materials, 2014, 17(3): 369-377. ［15］肖杰, 屈文俊, 朱鹏. 混凝土硫酸腐蚀表面形貌的分形维数表征［J］. 材料导报, 2016, 30(1): 130-134. XIAO Jie, QU Wenjun, ZHU Peng. Surface topo-graphy of concrete after sulfuric acid corrosion characterized by fractal dimension［J］. Materials Review, 2016, 30(1): 130-134. ［16］施峰, 汪俊华. 硫酸盐侵蚀混凝土立方体的性能退化［J］. 混凝土, 2013(3): 52-54. SHI Feng, WANG Junhua. Performance degradation of concrete cube attacked by sulfate［J］. Concrete, 2013(3): 52-54. ［17］李镜培, 赵高文, 李林. 夹泥引起的混凝土内部SO2-4扩散特性及破坏模式研究与分析［J］. 混凝土, 2017(3): 1-6. LI Jingpei, ZHAO Gaowen, LI Lin. Study on failure mode and diffusion manner of SO2-4 within concrete caused by infiltrated mud［J］. Concrete, 2017(3): 1-6. ［18］李镜培, 赵高文, 李林, 等. 硫酸盐渍土中灌注桩竖向承载力演变规律［J］. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2017, 49(6): 84-89. LI Jingpei, ZHAO Gaowen, LI Lin, et al. Bored piles’ bearing strength evolution in sulfate saline soil［J］. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017, 49(6): 84-89. ［19］张廷毅, 汪自力, 郑光和, 等. 碳化与硫酸盐溶液干湿循环后混凝土断裂韧度［J］. 水利学报, 2016, 47(8): 1062-1069. ZHANG Tingyi, WANG Zili, ZHENG Guanghe, et al. Fracture toughness of concrete after carbonation and wet-dry cycle of sulfate solution［J］. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2016, 47(8): 1062-1069. ［20］姜磊, 牛荻涛. 硫酸盐侵蚀作用下混凝土损伤层与微观研究［J］. 硅酸盐通报, 2015, 34(12): 3462-3467. JIANG Lei, NIU Ditao. Damage layer and microscopic analysis of concrete under sulfate attack［J］. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2015, 34(12): 3462-3467. ［21］邓德华, 刘赞群, DE SCHUTTER G, 等. 关于“混凝土硫酸盐结晶破坏”理论的研究进展［J］. 硅酸盐学报, 2012, 40(2): 175-185. DENG Dehua, LIU Zanqun, DE SCHUTTER G, et al. Research progress on theory of “sulfate salt weathering on concrete”［J］. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2012, 40(2): 175-185. ［22］苑立冬, 牛荻涛, 姜磊, 等. 硫酸盐侵蚀与冻融循环共同作用下混凝土损伤研究［J］. 硅酸盐通报, 2013, 32(6): 1171-1176. YUAN Lidong, NIU Ditao, JIANG Lei, et al. Study on damage of concrete under the combined action of sulfate attack and freeze-thaw cycle［J］. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2013, 32(6): 1171-1176. ［23］刘金龙, 韩建德, 王曙光, 等. 硫酸盐侵蚀与环境多因素耦合作用下混凝土耐久性研究进展［J］. 混凝土, 2014(9): 33-40. LIU Jinlong, HAN Jiande, WANG Shuguang, et al. Overview of concrete durability under sulfate attack and multi-factor coupling effects［J］. Concrete, 2014(9): 33-40. ［24］金祖权, 孙伟, 张云升, 等. 混凝土在硫酸盐、氯盐溶液中的损伤过程［J］. 硅酸盐学报, 2006, 34(5): 630-635. JIN Zuquan, SUN Wei, ZHANG Yunsheng, et al. Damage of concrete in sulfate and chloride solution［J］. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2006, 34(5): 630-635. ［25］刘赞群, 混凝土硫酸盐侵蚀基本机理研究［D］. 长沙: 中南大学, 2010. LIU Zanqun. Study of the basic mechanism of sulfate attack on cementitious materials［D］. Changsha: Central South University, 2010. ［26］卢永成. 硫酸盐与氯盐强腐蚀环境桥梁钻孔灌注桩防腐蚀对策［J］. 城市道桥与防洪, 2014(8): 70-72. LU Yongcheng. Counter measures for anticorrosion of cast-in-situ pile of bridge in strong corrosive environment of sulfate and chloride［J］. Urban Roads Bridges and Flood Control, 2014(8): 70-72.

[1]	张强, 卢朝辉, 赵然, 伦培元. 基于初始缺陷的混凝土锈裂模型时变可靠度[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(4): 413-420.
[2]	朱叶艇，朱雁飞，张子新，庄欠伟，郑宜枫. 异形盾构管片原型试验混凝土裂缝宽度预测与可视化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(10): 1259-1268.
[3]	汤洁冬，翟晓强. 立体式预制构件养护仓温湿度分布建模及数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(12): 1543-1551.
[4]	吴灵杰，寇新建，周拥军，蒋萌. 既有混凝土码头的时变氯离子扩散过程[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(4): 444-.
[5]	岳著文, 李镜培, 李林, 邵伟. 海工环境下预应力高强混凝土管桩使用寿命计算[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(03): 370-376.