基于企业综合绩效多维度评估决策分析

上海交通大学学报（自然版） ›› 2016, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (05): 742-749.

基于企业综合绩效多维度评估决策分析

吴易洲，苗瑞，高喆，顾希垚，吴琪，张洁

（上海交通大学机械与动力工程学院，上海 200240）

收稿日期:2015-04-23 出版日期:2016-05-28 发布日期:2016-05-28
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（51435009），上海大学生创新活动计划（IPP10059）

Multi-Dimensional DecisionMaking Analysis Based on Integrated Performance Evaluation

WU Yizhou,MIAO Rui,GAO Zhe,GU Xiyao,WU Qi,ZHANG Jie

(School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Received:2015-04-23 Online:2016-05-28 Published:2016-05-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 摘要：针对企业绩效评估在全面性方面存在的局限，提出构建N维评估系统，多角度评估影响企业绩效的关键因素，并在分析的过程中从价值、风险、成本和效益4个维度展开研究.在MACBETH绩效评估模型的基础上加入2测度Choquet积分，考虑了评估准则间的相互影响，同时降低了计算的复杂度.根据评估准则的权重和影响因子聚集得到综合绩效，增强绩效评估的全面性，帮助企业执行有效决策.

关键词: 绩效评估, MACBETH方法, 2测度Choquet积分, 多准则决策

Abstract: Abstract： Performance evaluation of enterprises is a multicriteria decisionmaking problem. A system of N dimensions was constructed in view of the limitations of the previous research, which could be used to evaluate the corporate performance in multidimension. Four dimensions, that is, value, risk, cost and benefit were studied for their importance in the real problems. The MACBETH multicriteria method was used to quantify the elementary performances. Moreover, the 2additive Choquet integral considering the interactions between criteria was added to the model while reducing the complexity of the calculations. The system enhances the comprehensive of performance assessment and effectively helps enterprises to make multiple criteria decisions.

Key words: Key words： performance evaluation, method of MACBETH, 2additive Choquet integral, multiple criteria decision making

中图分类号:

TH 122

吴易洲，苗瑞，高喆，顾希垚，吴琪，张洁. 基于企业综合绩效多维度评估决策分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2016, 50(05): 742-749.

WU Yizhou,MIAO Rui,GAO Zhe,GU Xiyao,WU Qi,ZHANG Jie. Multi-Dimensional DecisionMaking Analysis Based on Integrated Performance Evaluation [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2016, 50(05): 742-749.

参考文献

［1］BOSCHMAUCHAND M, SIADAT A, PERRY N, et al. VCS: Value chains simulator, a tool for value analysis of manufacturing enterprise processes (a valuebased decision support tool)［J］. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2012, 23(4): 13891402. ［2］TUNCEL G, ALPANLPAN G. Risk assessment and management for supply chain networks: A case study［J］. Computers In industry, 2010, 61(3): 250259. ［3］VERNADAT F, SHAH L, ETIENNE A, et al. VRPMS: A new approach for performance measurement and management of industrial systems［J］. International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 51(23/24): 74207438. ［4］NUDURUPATI S S, BITITCI U S, KUMAR V, et al. State of the art literature review on performance measurement［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2011, 60(2): 279290. ［5］DUCQ Y, VALLESPIR B. Definition and aggregation of a performance measurement system in three aeronautical workshops using the ECOGRAI method［J］. Production Planning & Control, 2005, 16(2): 163177. ［6］SUWIGNJO P, BITITCI U S, CARRIE A S. Quantitative models for performance measurement system［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2000, 64(1): 231241. ［7］王坚强. 模糊多准则决策方法研究综述［J］. 控制与决策, 2008, 23(6): 601607. WANG Jianqiang. Overview on fuzzy multicriteria decisionmaking approach［J］. Control and Decision, 2008, 23(6): 601606. ［8］蒋耀. 基于层次分析法 (AHP) 的区域可持续发展综合评价: 以青浦区为例［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2009，43 (4): 566571. JIANG Yao. Evaluation of regional sustainable development based on analytial hierarchy process: Qingpu district as an example［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2009, 43（4）：566571. ［9］WANG T, XIN B C, QIN L J. AHPBased capacity evaluation of enterprise development［J］. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 15(1): 46934696. ［10］CLIVLL V, BERRAH L, MAURIS G. Quantitative expression and aggregation of performance measurements based on the MACBETH multicriteria method［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2007, 105(1): 171189. ［11］BANA E COSTA C A, de CORTE J M, VANSNICK J C. Measuring attractiveness by a categorical based evaluation technique［C］∥Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. New York：Wikey, 2011：29452950. ［12］BANA E COSTA C A, OLIVEIRRA M D. A multicriteria decision analysis model for faculty evaluation［J］. Omega, 2012, 40(4): 424436. ［13］BANA E COSTA C A, LOURENCO J C, OLIVEIRA M D, et al. A sociotechnical approach for group decision support in public strategic planning: The Pernambuco PPA case［J］. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2014, 23(1): 529. ［14］BANA E COSTA C A, CHAGAS M P. A career choice problem: An example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 153(2): 323331. ［15］GRABISCH M, LABREUCHE C. A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multicriteria decision aid［J］. Annals of Operations Research, 2010, 175(1): 247286. ［16］PARNELL G S, HUGHES D W, BURK R C, et al. Invited review—survey of value‐focused thinking: Applications, research developments and areas for future research［J］. Journal of MultiCriteria Decision Analysis, 2013, 20(1/2): 4960.