高负荷扩压静叶中附面层抽吸策略的设计与优化

上海交通大学学报（自然版） ›› 2014, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (02): 222-228.

高负荷扩压静叶中附面层抽吸策略的设计与优化

余锐，羌晓青，滕金芳，杜朝辉

(上海交通大学航空航天学院，上海 200240)

收稿日期:2013-03-14 出版日期:2014-02-28 发布日期:2014-02-28

Design and Optimization of Boundary Layer Suction Configurations Within a Highly-Loaded Diffusion Stator

YU Rui，QIANG Xiaoqing，TENG Jinfang，DU Zhaohui

(School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Received:2013-03-14 Online:2014-02-28 Published:2014-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以某高负荷、大折转角扩压静叶为研究对象，采用数值方法进行了二维叶型和全三维流动层面的附面层抽吸策略设计与优化研究.从流动机理和作用机制出发，揭示附面层抽吸减小流动分离、改善压气机性能的原因.研究结果表明，在实施二维叶型的附面层抽吸时，效果最佳的抽吸位置位于流动分离起始点后的临近区域；进行三维抽吸时，采取叶片表面全叶高抽吸缝和下端壁沿流向抽吸缝的复合抽吸方式，可以有效地控制静叶吸力面及角区的强三维分离流动，改善叶栅流动条件，提高性能.

关键词: 压气机, 扩压叶栅, 附面层抽吸, 高负荷, 流动控制

Abstract:

The design and optimization of 2D and 3D boundary layer suction (BLS) configurations within a highly-loaded diffusion stator was conducted in this paper by using numerical simulations. A detailed analysis was done based on flow mechanism to reveal the reason for reducing flow separation and improving compressor performance by BLS method. The numerical results show that the best BLS position is located at the region a little backward from the separation point in 2D cascade. Further discussion on 3D BLS shows that the combination of blade suction slots along the whole span and slots along streamline at the hub-suction side region achieves the best effect. This compound BLS configuration can effectively control the strong 3D separation flow at the hub-suction side region, which improves the flow condition and leads to a better stage performance.

Key words：

Key words: compressor, diffusion cascade, boundary layer suction, high load, flow control

中图分类号:

V 231

余锐，羌晓青，滕金芳，杜朝辉. 高负荷扩压静叶中附面层抽吸策略的设计与优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(02): 222-228.

YU Rui，QIANG Xiaoqing，TENG Jinfang，DU Zhaohui. Design and Optimization of Boundary Layer Suction Configurations Within a Highly-Loaded Diffusion Stator[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2014, 48(02): 222-228.

参考文献

［1］董葳, 侯玉柱, 闵现花. 进口导向叶片热气防冰系统试验［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2010,44(11):15791582.

DONG Wei, HOU Yuzhu, MIN Xianhua. Experimental study of hot air anticing system of inlet guide vane［J］.Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2010, 44(11): 15791582.

［2］Conan F, Savarese S. Bleed airflow CFD modeling in aerodynamics simulations of jet engine compressors［C］// Proceedings of ASME TURBO EXPO 2001. New Orleans, Louisiana: ASME, 2001:2001GT0544.

［3］Wellborn S R, Michael L K. Bleed flow interactions with an axialflow compressor power stream［C］// 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. Indianapolis Indiana: AIAA, 2002:AIAA20024057.

［4］Leishman B A, Cumpsty N A, Denton J D. Effects of bleed rate and endwall location on the aerodynamic behavior of a circular hole bleed offtake［J］. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2007, 129(10):645658.

［5］Leishman B A, Cumpsty N A, Denton J D. Effects of inlet ramp surfaces on the aerodynamic behavior of bleed hole and bleed slot offtake configurations［J］. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2007, 129(10):659668.

［6］Leishman B A, Cumpsty N A. Mechanism of the interaction of a ramped bleed slot with the primary flow［J］. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2007, 129(10): 669678.

［7］Horn R A, Loughery J R, Tramm P C. Single stage experimental evaluation of boundary layer blowing and bleed techniques for high lift stator blades［R］. Cleveland, Ohio: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1971: NASACR54573.

［8］Kerrebrock J L, Drela M, Merchant A A. A family of designs for aspirated compressors［C］//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 1998. Stockholm, Sweden: ASME, 1998:98GT196.

［9］Gümmer V, Goller M, Swoboda M. Numerical investigation of end wall boundary layer removal on highly loaded axial compressor blade rows［J］. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2008, 130(1):19.

［10］王松涛, 潜纪儒, 冯国泰, 等. 壁面吸气抑制分离减少流动损失的研究［J］. 工程热物理学报, 2006, 27(1): 4850.

WANG Songtao, QIAN Jiru, FENG Guotai, et al. The research about loss reduction and separation suppress by wall suction［J］. Journal of Engineering Thermo Physics, 2006, 27(1): 4850.

［11］Hollis R, Bons J P. The effects of localized blade endwall suction on secondary flows and heat transfer［C］// Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010. Glasgow, UK: ASME, 2010:861871.

［12］羌晓青. 低反动度附面层抽吸式压气机流动控制及设计方法研究［D］. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学能源科学与工程学院, 2009.

［13］Reid L, Moore R D. Performance of singlestage axialflow transonic comressor with rotor and stator aspect ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, respectively, and with design pressure ratio of 1.82［R］. Cleveland, Ohio: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1978: NASATP1338.

［14］张华良. 采用叶片弯/掠及附面层抽吸控制扩压叶栅内涡结构的研究［D］.哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学能源科学与工程学院, 2007.

[1]	易仕和, 丁浩林. 适用高超声速飞行环境的超声速气膜冷却光学窗口研究进展[J]. 空天防御, 2021, 4(4): 1-13.
[2]	田新亮. “软尾减阻”述评[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(2): 213-214.
[3]	庄皓琬, 滕金芳, 朱铭敏, 羌晓青. 考虑加工公差的叶片对压气机气动性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(9): 935-942.
[4]	吴亚东, 李涛, 张永杰. 基于圆弧斜缝处理机匣的压气机叶顶泄漏流实验和数值研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(7): 745-755.
[5]	杨晓建，胡晨星，竺晓程，杜朝辉. 离心压气机无叶扩压器非定常流动本征正交分解法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(12): 1450-1458.
[6]	胡晨星，丁杰，竺晓程，杜朝辉. 离心压气机蜗壳内非定常流场的动态模态分解[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(9): 1044-1049.
[7]	徐玺，羌晓青，滕金芳. 基于四象限法的跨声速压气机非设计点损失分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(09): 1416-1421.
[8]	周涛，李亚林,陈迎春. 增升装置中的流动控制技术[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(02): 215-221.
[9]	尹纪富,尤云祥,李巍,胡天群. 电磁力控制圆柱体三维绕流场的脱体涡模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(02): 244-251.
[10]	徐伟, 王彤, 丁亮, 谷传纲. 带有孔式机匣的离心压气机非定常数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2012, 46(04): 536-539.
[11]	胡江峰，欧阳华，竺晓程，杜朝辉. 跨音速压气机非设计点性能预测 [J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2010, 44(10): 1342-1346.