焊缝层数对特厚度管板焊接残余应力与变形影响的有限元分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于ABAQUS软件，建立了顺序耦合的焊接残余应力与变形有限元计算程序，对大型环氧乙烷（EO）反应器国产化中采用的390 mm厚20MnMoNb特厚板拼焊反应器管板的焊接过程进行了残余应力与变形计算，并讨论采用不同焊缝层数对管板焊后残余应力与变形的影响.焊接采用双U形坡口，通过翻转管板进行两面坡口的交替焊接，为防止管板发生过度变形，焊接时始终在管板两端压有重量为4.5 MN配重.计算结果表明：焊后管板发生了一端翘起的角变形，在靠近表层的焊缝及热影响区存在较大残余拉应力，在焊缝内部为较大的残余压应力；由于配重对变形的限制导致先焊面的应力大于后焊面；增加焊缝层数，使变形增加，残余应力降低，但并不显著.对如此大型特厚板约束焊，增加焊缝层数不是降低其焊接残余应力的有效手段.

关键词: 焊接残余应力, 特厚板, 焊缝层数, 变形

Abstract:

Butt-welding residual stress and deformation of 390mm 20MnMoNb ultra-thick plates for manufacturing the tube sheet of a large scale EO (Ethylene Oxide) reactor were simulated by using finite element program ABAQUS. The effect of layers on the residual stress and deformation was discussed. The welding grove was double U-shaped which were welded alternatively by flipping over the tube sheet. Moreover, in order to avoid the excessive deformation of the tube-sheet, two 4 500 kN loads were applied on both ends of the tube-sheet. The results showd that angular deformation occurred in the tubesheet. A large tensile residual stress was generated in the weld seam, the heat affected the zone near the surfaces of the tube-sheet, and compressive residual stress was generated in the weld root. As the layers increased, the deformation increased, however the stress decreased(which wass not significant). The result proves that it is not an effective method to decrease the residual stress by increasing the layer number for such ultra-thick plates.

Key words: welding residual stress, ultra-thick plate, layer number, deformation

中图分类号:

TG 404

王艳飞1，巩建鸣1，蒋文春2. 焊缝层数对特厚度管板焊接残余应力与变形影响的有限元分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(11): 1675-1679.

WANG Yanfei1,GONG Jianming1,JIANG Wenchun2. Finite Element Analysis of Effect of Layers on Residual Stress and Deformation in Butt-Welded Ultra-Thick TubeSheet[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(11): 1675-1679.

参考文献

［1］James M N, Hughes D J, Chen Z. Residual stress and fatigue performance［J］. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2007, 14(2): 384395.

［2］Mochizuki M. Control of welding residual stress for ensuring integrity against fatigue and stresscorrosion cracking［J］. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2007, 237(2): 107123.

［3］Kim S W, Kim H P, Jeong J U, et al. Effect of residual stress of dissimilar metal welding on stress corrosion cracking of bottommounted instrumentation penetration mockup［J］. Corrosion, 2010, 66(10): 10600111060018.

［4］SattariFar I, Farahani M R. Effect of the weld groove shape and pass number on the residual stresses in buttwelded pipes［J］. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2009, 86(11): 723731.

［5］Jiang W C, Wang B Y, Gong J M, et al. Finite element analysis of the effect of welding heat input and layer number on residual stress in repair welds for a stainless steel clad plate［J］. Materials & Design, 2011, 32(5): 28512857.

［6］汪建华, 戚新海, 钟小敏, 等. 焊接结构三维热变形的有限元模拟［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 1994, 28(6): 5965.

WANG Jianhua, QI Xinhai, ZHONG Xiaomin, et al. Three dimensional simulation of welding deformations by FEM［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 1994, 28(6): 5965.

［7］陆皓, 汪建华, 村川英一. 多层焊焊接应力分布对管子局部热处理应力释放准则的影响［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2000, 34(12): 16181621.

LU Hao, WANG Jianhua, Murakawa H. Effect of residual stress distribution in multipass welding on stress relief criterion in local post weld heat treatment of pipe［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2000, 34(12): 16181621.

［8］陈希章, 沈政, 李冬升. LD10铝合金环形薄板焊接应力与应变的数值模拟［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2010, 44(S1): 2932.

CHEN Xizhang, SHEN Zheng, LI Dongsheng. Finite element analysis of LD10 aluminum annular plate welds［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2010, 44(S1): 2932.

［9］ AkbariMousavi S A A, Miresmaeili R. Experimental and numerical analyses of residual stress distributions in TIG welding process for 304L stainless steel［J］. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2008, 208(13): 383394.

［10］Ohms C, Wimpory R C, Katsareas D E, et al. NET TG1: Residual stress assessment by neutron diffraction and finite element modeling on a single bead weld on a steel plate［J］. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2009, 86(1): 6372.

［11］潘家祯. 压力容器材料实用手册—碳钢及合金钢［M］. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2000.

［12］谭伯聪, 谢德, 李荣锋, 等. 超厚钢板焊接残余应力剖析［J］. 钢铁研究, 1993(5): 3539.

TAN Bocong, XIE De, LI Rongfeng, et al. Analysis on residual welding stress of extra thick steel plate［J］. Research on Iron & Steel, 1993(5): 3539.

[1]	李建军, 朱文峰, 孙海涛, 李元辉, 王顺超. 异质滚合结构固化变形预测及曲面重构预补偿方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 965-976.
[2]	杨其润, 李明广, 陈锦剑, 吴航. 同步实施的相邻基坑相互作用机理[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(6): 722-729.
[3]	吴灌伦, 施光林. 双并联机构耦合连续体机械臂的设计与实现[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(6): 809-817.
[4]	林张鹏, 余海东, 袁可. 基于高阶复合曲面单元的非均匀大薄板装配偏差计算模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(5): 584-593.
[5]	李泽垚, 周洁, 田万君, 裴万胜. 地铁变频荷载循环作用下饱和软黏土累积塑性变形[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(4): 454-463.
[6]	徐长节, 曾怡婷, 田威, 陈明. Pasternak地基降水对邻近管线影响的解析研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 652-662.
[7]	陈拴, 吴怀娜, 陈仁朋, 沈水龙, 刘源. 上方长距离基坑开挖引起的共线隧道变形研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 698-706.
[8]	肖朝昀, 李明广, 王大发, 陈锦剑. 降雨影响下残积土层中深基坑变形特性测试及分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(8): 873-880.
[9]	曲扬, 罗永峰, 朱钊辰, 黄青隆. 两维地震激励下格构拱动力响应简化评估方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(4): 387-396.
[10]	郑启宇，夏小和，李明广，张扬清. 深基坑降承压水对墙体变形和地表沉降的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(10): 1094-1100.
[11]	宋晓龙，赵维，年廷凯，焦厚滨. 水合物分解条件下海底黏土质斜坡破坏实验模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(1): 43-51.
[12]	李煜, 程广益, 李宗阳, 窦怡彬, 蒋君庭. 固体火箭发动机喷管两相流动下的热固耦合研究[J]. 空天防御, 2020, 3(1): 1-9.
[13]	潘佳禾，廖晨聪，陈锦剑. 孤立波作用下埋管斜坡海床及海底管道的响应分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(8): 898-906.
[14]	易灿明，余海东，王皓. 基于绝对节点坐标法的压电驱动复合结构动力学特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(6): 665-672.
[15]	姚利民，张道刘，侯秀娟，刘涛，李志敏. 考虑焊接变形的装配偏差分析在动力集中型动车组中的应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2019, 53(3): 260-268.