有限淋滤作用下石灰处治膨胀土的力学性能

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对南阳膨胀土的基本力学性能及经石灰处治后的力学性能进行了测试，探讨了石灰处治膨胀土的力学性能指标随掺灰比和龄期变化的规律，获得了最优掺灰比；同时，自行设计了一套针对石灰处治膨胀土的室内有限淋滤试验装置和试验方法，并利用此方法对南阳膨胀土进行了有限淋滤试验，分析了石灰处治膨胀土内Ca2+含量、黏聚力及内摩擦角随淋滤天数变化的规律.结果表明：经石灰处治后，膨胀土的黏聚力随着淋滤天数增加而明显降低，其内摩擦角的变化较小；在降雨淋滤作用下，石灰处治膨胀土内Ca2+含量的减少将引起路基强度的降低，从而对路基性能产生不利的影响.

关键词: 石灰处治膨胀土, 淋滤作用, Ca2+含量, 力学性能

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effect of eluviations on the mechanic performance of lime stabilized expansive soil, laboratory tests were conducted to reveal the influencing rules of lime proportion and age on the swellshrink properties of stabilized expansive soil. An optimal lime proportion was derived, a measuring device of eluviations was designed and the detailed test steps were given for reference. Besides, the variation law of the content of Ca2+ and the strength indexes with leaching days were discussed according to leaching tests. Based on the results of the laboratory tests, it is found that the cohesion force of the stabilized soils decreases with the decrease of the content of Ca2+, however, the internal friction angle remains constant. The influence of the decrease of the content of Ca2+ on the strength is disadvantageous to the long-term performance of subgrade.

Key words: lime stabilized expansive soil, eluviations effect, content of Ca2+, mechanical property

中图分类号:

TU 501

范永丰. 有限淋滤作用下石灰处治膨胀土的力学性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(09): 1390-1394.

FAN Yongfeng. Experimental Study of Mechanical Properties of Lime Stabilized Expansive Soil under the Condition of Eluviations[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(09): 1390-1394.

参考文献

［1］Shi Bin, Li Shenglin. Quantitative approach on SEM images of microstructure of clay soils ［J］. Science in China, 1995, 38(6): 74l748．

［2］Lee M R, Yeh Y C, Hsiang W S, et al. Solidphase microextraction and gas chromatographymass spectrometry for determining chlorophenols from landfill leaches and soil ［J］. Journal of Chromatography A, 1998, 806(2): 317324.

［3］张小平, 施斌, 陆现彩. 石灰改良膨胀土微孔结构试验研究［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2003, 25(6): 761763.

ZHANG Xiaoping, SHI Bin, LU Xiancai. Experimental study on micropore structure of expansive soil improved by lime ［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(6): 761763.

［4］AlRawas A A, Taha R, Nelson J D, et al. A comparative evaluation of various additives used in the stabilization of expansive soils ［J］. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2002, 25(2): 199209.

［5］AlRawas A A, Hago A W, AlSarmi H. Effect of lime, cement and Sarooj (artificial pozzolan) on the swelling potential of an expansive soil from Oman ［J］. Building and Environment, 2005, 40(5): 681687.

［6］陈善雄. 膨胀土工程特性与处治技术研究［D］. 武汉:华中科技大学土木工程与力学学院, 2006.

［7］陈善雄, 孔令伟, 郭爱国. 膨胀土工程特性及其石灰改性试验研究［J］. 岩土力学, 2002, 23(S1): 912.

CHEN Shanxiong, KONG Lingwei, GUO Aiguo. Experimental research on engineering properties of expansive soil and lime stabilized soil ［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2002, 23(S1): 912.

［8］Meroi E A, Schrefler B A, Zienkiewicz O C. Large strain static and dynamic semisaturated soil behavior ［J］. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1995, 19(2): 81106.

［9］Schrefler B A, Scotta R. A fully coupled dynamic model for twophase fluid flow in deformable porous media ［J］. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 190(5): 32233246.

［10］包承纲. 非饱和土的性状及膨胀土边坡稳定问题［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2004, 26(1): 115.

BAO Chenggang. Behavior of unsaturated soil and stability of expansive soil slope ［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2004, 26(1): 115.

［11］姚海林, 程平, 吴万平. 基于固结试验的膨胀土地基变形预测方法［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(21): 39113915.

YAO Hailin, CHENG Ping, WU Wanping. Prediction of ground heaves in expansive soils based on consolidation tests ［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(21): 39113915.

［12］Rao S M, Reddy B V, Muttharam M. The impact of cyclic wetting and drying on the swelling behavior of stabilized expansive soils ［J］. Engineering Geology, 2001, 60(14): 223233.

［13］Quyum A, Achari G, Goodman R H. Effect of wetting and drying and dilution on moisture migration through oil contaminated hydrophobic soils ［J］. The Science of the Total Environment, 2002, 296(13): 7787.

［14］Rajaram G, Erbach D C. Effect of wetting and drying on soil physical properties ［J］. Journal of Terramechanics, 1999, 36(1): 3949.

［15］杨洋. 公路处治土THMC耦合模型及路基变形数值模拟［D］. 武汉: 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所, 2008.

[1]	王烨成, 李洋, 张迪, 杨越, 罗震. 碳纤维增强热塑性复合材料与高强钢的电阻单元焊[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(10): 1349-1358.
[2]	朱强，秦飞，王武荣，韦习成. 不同搭接顺序下三层板电阻点焊接头力学性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(9): 1122-1129.
[3]	张威，敖三三，罗震，郝志壮，陈瑶，冯梦楠，解龑. 焊接能量对铝镍超声波焊接接头性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(9): 1130-1135.
[4]	何冠中,楼铭,马运五,李永兵. 铝钢电阻单元焊接头力学性能模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(5): 616-623.
[5]	祁睿格，何春霞，付菁菁，赵丽梅，姜彩昀. 无机纳米粒子对木粉/高密度聚乙烯木塑复合材料热学及力学性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2019, 53(3): 373-379.
[6]	杜思琦，王继崇，彭雄奇，顾海麟. 可生物降解的黄麻纤维/聚乳酸复合材料的制备和力学性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(11): 1335-1341.
[7]	李萍，张凯，王薄笑天，薛克敏. 7A60铝合金搅拌摩擦加工组织及性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(11): 1381-1388.
[8]	俞建超，林有希. 高速加工中无氧铜的动态力学性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(5): 587-592.
[9]	陈建稳1，周涵1，陈务军2,赵兵2,王明洋3. 飞艇用层压织物膜材料在双向应力作用下的弹性参数分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(3): 344-.
[10]	金雪，朱平，李晗，王庆. 防松帽搭接焊缝力学性能及分区建模方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(11): 1297-1303.
[11]	赵君1,余海东2. 基于绝对节点坐标法的柔性双臂机构动力学分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(10): 1160-1165.
[12]	郑钰，李宏烨，庄新村，赵震. 金属板料剪切试验方法及应用的研究现状[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2014, 48(03): 422-426.
[13]	张克伟1，佘欢2，刘宏亮2，疏达2，王俊2. Si含量对高强高韧7050铝合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(11): 1712-1716.
[14]	徐媛媛，桂宗彦，杲云，陆冲，程树军. 柠檬酸基聚酯/聚乳酸共混物的力学性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(05): 806-810.
[15]	钟宇a, b, 李云飞b, c. 表面活性剂对可食性葛根淀粉膜性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2012, 46(05): 813-818.