吊舱式推进器偏转工况下水动力性能

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对吊舱推进器的关键技术，探讨了吊舱推进器在偏转状态下的水动力性能.利用空泡水洞以及吊舱动力仪进行了吊舱推进器在偏转工况下的一系列试验研究，比较分析了不同偏转角下吊舱推进器水动力性能.同时，结合RANS（Reynoldsaveraged Navier-Stokes）方程和RNG（Random number generation） k-ε湍流模型，运用滑移网格方法对吊舱推进器在偏转状态下水动力性能进行了数值模拟,并将试验结果和数值结果进行了比较分析.结果表明：偏转角度越大，试验值与计算值偏差越大，尤其是吊舱推进器沿来流方向推力的偏差较大，但总体变化趋势较为一致.

关键词: 吊舱推进器, 水动力性能, 空泡水洞, 偏转角度, 模型试验, 数值模拟

Abstract:

The hydrodynamics performance of podded propulsion at declination angles was discussed. A series of experimental investigations for hydrodynamics performance of podded propulsion at declination angles were conducted by pod dynamical instrument and cavitation tunnel. The hydrodynamics performance of podded propulsion at different declination angles were compared and analyzed. Meanwhile, the hydrodynamics performance of podded propulsion at declination angles were predicted using the RANS formula with RNG k-ε turbulence model based on the sliding mesh method. The experimental and the numerical results were compared and analyzed, which indicate that, along with the augmentation of the declination angle, the warp between the experimental and the numerical results is larger, especially for the thrust of podded propulsion in the flow direction. However, the variational trend is consistent.

Key words: podded propulsion, hydrodynamics performance, cavitation tunnel, declination angles, model test, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

U 661.71

熊鹰1，盛立2，杨勇1. 吊舱式推进器偏转工况下水动力性能[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2013, 47(06): 956-961.

XIONG Ying1，SHENG Li2，YANG Yong1. Hydrodynamics Performance of Podded Propulsion at Declination Angles[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47(06): 956-961.

参考文献

［1］熊鹰，叶金铭．吊舱电力推进系统性能评估及设计方法［J］．海军工程大学学报，2002，14（1）:23 26.

XIONG Ying，YE Jinming．Evaluation of podded electric propulsion system performance and design method of podded electric propulsion［J］．Journal of Naval University of Engineering，2002，14（1）:23 26．

［2］Woodward M D， Atlar M， Clarke D．A comparison of the stopping modes for poddriven ships［C］∥Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion．UK：University of Newcastle， 2004： 339356．

［3］Junglewitz A， Moctar O， Franic O．Podded rudder［C］∥ Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion．UK：University of Newcastle， 2004： 401418．

［4］Johannsen C， Koop K H．Cavitation tests for two fast ferries with poddriver carried out in HSVA’large cavitation tunnel HYKAT［C］ ∥ Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion．France：University of Brest， 2006： 121132．

［5］Heinke H J．Investigation about the forces and moments at podded drives［C］ ∥Proceedings of the first International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion．UK：University of Newcastle， 2004： 305320．

［6］Grygorowicz M， Szantyr J A．Open water experiments with two pod propulsor models［C］ ∥Proceedings of the first International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion．UK： University of Newcastle， 2004： 357370．

［7］Friesch J．Cavitation and vibration investigation for podded drivers［C］ ∥ Proceedings of the first International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion．UK：University of Newcastle， 2004：387379．

［8］Szantry J A．Hydrodynamic model experiments with pod propulsor［C］ ∥Proceedings of International Symposium of Ship Propulsion．St Petersburg，Russia：State Marine Technical University， 2001： 91104．

［9］Stettler J W， Hover F S， Triantafyllou M S．Preliminary results of testing on the dynamics of an Azimuthing Podded propulsor relating to vehicle manoeuvring［C］ ∥Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion．UK： University of Newcastle， 2004： 321337．

［10］Wang D，Altar M，Paterson．Cavitation observations hull pressures and noise measurements with the OPTIPOD supply ship in cavitation tunnel［R］．UK：Newcastle University，2003．

［11］Islam M F， Veitch B， Liu P F．Experimental research on marine podded propulsors［J］．Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering， 2007， 4（50）： 5771．

［12］Islam M F， Moqin H．Cavitation performance testing of podded propellers with different hubtyper angles［R］．Canada： Institute for Ocean Technology， 2007．

［13］Islam M F，Akinturk A．Performance characteristics of static and dynamic azimuthing podded propulsor［C］∥First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors，2009．Trondheim，Norway：SMP， 2009：190202．

［14］Liu P F， Islam M F， Veitch B．Some unsteady propulsive characteristics of a podded propeller unit under maneuvering operation［C］ ∥First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors，2009．Trondheim，Norway: SMP， 2009： 166173．

［15］郭春雨，杨晨俊，马宁．吊舱推进器斜航状态下水动力性能研究［C］ ∥ 2008年船舶水动力学学术会议.上海：上海力学学会，2008：4450．

［16］孙俊岭，于凯．黏性流场中吊舱推进器性能的数值模拟［J］．哈尔滨工程大学学报，2010（11）：14301436．

SUN Junling，YU Kai．Numberical simulation on the performance of a podded propulsor in a viscous flow field［J］．Journal of Harbin Engineering University，2010（11）：14301436．

［17］SHENG Li， XIONG Ying， WANG Song． Experimental Investigations and CFD validation on the openwater performance of podded propulsor［C］∥2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering. Shanghai：IEEE，2011：145149．

［18］SHENG Li, XIONG Ying， WU Wei， et al. Study on the prediction of propeller openwater

performance using RANS formula and sliding meshes［C］∥ Proceedings of 2011 4th IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Techology．Chengdu： IEEE， 2011： 8286．

[1]	丁恩宝, 常晟铭, 孙聪, 赵雷明, 吴浩. 半浸桨不同半径切面入水的水动力特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1188-1198.
[2]	吴怀娜, 冯东林, 刘源, 蓝淦洲, 陈仁朋. 基于门式抗浮框架的基坑开挖下卧隧道变形控制[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(9): 1227-1237.
[3]	刘谨豪, 严远忠, 张琪, 卞荣, 贺雷, 叶冠林. 地面堆载对既有隧道影响离心试验和数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 886-896.
[4]	孙健, 彭斌, 朱兵国. 无油双涡圈空气涡旋压缩机的数值模拟及试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(5): 611-621.
[5]	李鹏, 王超, 孙华伟, 郭春雨. 潜艇阻力及流场数值仿真策略优化分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(4): 506-515.
[6]	秦汉, 伍彬, 宋玉辉, 刘金, 陈兰. 细长体高速风洞超大攻角支撑干扰数值分析[J]. 空天防御, 2022, 5(3): 44-51.
[7]	薛飞, 王誉超, 伍彬. 高速飞行器后向分离特性研究[J]. 空天防御, 2022, 5(3): 80-86.
[8]	杜登轩 , 乐绍林 , 周欢 , HtayHtayAung , 喻国良. 均匀来流中承台相对埋深对复合桩墩局部水动力及冲刷的影响 [J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(2): 64-71.
[9]	郑高媛, 赵亦希, 崔峻辉. 车身用铝饰条拉弯成形面畸变缺陷形成规律[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(1): 53-61.
[10]	金戈, 范珉, 周振栋, 谭勇, 钟小波. 升降式止回阀动态特性分析与改进[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(S2): 110-118.
[11]	徐德辉, 顾汉洋, 刘莉, 黄超. 新型锥形式旋叶汽水分离器热态试验与数值研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(9): 1087-1094.
[12]	刘恒, 伍锐, 孙硕. 非均匀流场螺旋桨空泡数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 976-983.
[13]	王超, 刘正, 李兴, 汪春辉, 徐佩. 自由状态冰块尺寸及初始位置参数对冰桨耦合水动力性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 990-1000.
[14]	李岩松, 丁鼎倩, 韩东, 刘静, 梁永图. 起伏输油管道临界完全携积水油速数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(7): 878-890.
[15]	张源, 李范春, 贾德君. 点阵压气机叶轮的设计与3D打印仿真[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 729-740.