大直径泥水盾构浅覆土穿越机场的风险演化分析

上海交通大学学报（自然版） ›› 2012, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (01): 58-63.

大直径泥水盾构浅覆土穿越机场的风险演化分析

邵伟1，周松2，胡劲松3

（1. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系，上海 200092； 2. 上海市第二市政工程有限公司，上海 200065； 3. 上海城建（集团）公司，上海 200122）

收稿日期:2011-06-11 出版日期:2012-01-30 发布日期:2012-01-30
基金资助:
上海市2009及2010年科技攻关计划（09231200200，10231200200）

Analysis of Risk and Its Evolvement for Large Slurry Shield Crossing the Airport at Shallow Depths

SHAO Wei-1, ZHOU Song-2, HU Jin-Song-3

(1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;2. Shanghai No.2 Municipal Engineering Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200065, China;3. Shanghai Urban Construction Group Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200122, China)

Received:2011-06-11 Online:2012-01-30 Published:2012-01-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以上海市仙霞西路隧道地下穿越虹桥机场绕滑道工程为背景，对其规划设计、施工和运营3个阶段的风险因素及其相互关联性和演化关系进行了分析，并提出了风险演化的概念，在一定程度上实现了机场飞行区穿越工程的全过程风险识别.结果表明，盾构隧道3个阶段之间的风险演化为其风险识别与分析的重要组成部分，在工程设计阶段应对整个工程各阶段的风险因素及其相互演化关系进行分析，并制定应对措施.

关键词: 大直径泥水盾构, 浅覆土, 穿越机场, 风险演化

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to solve the problem of risk control for airport crossing project. The project of Xianxia vehicle tunnels crossing Shanghai Hongqiao airport taxiway at shallow depths is employed. Risks at the phases of design, construction and operation, as well as their inter-correlations were studied. Moreover, the conception of risk evolvement between phases was proposed for identification and control of risks during the entire process to some extent. The result indicates that, risk evolvement between phases was an important part of risk recognition and risk analysis, and thus should be analysed in detail to provide relevant countermeasures.

Key words: large slurry shield, shallow depths, crossing airport, risk evolvement

中图分类号:

U 455.43

邵伟1, 周松2, 胡劲松3. 大直径泥水盾构浅覆土穿越机场的风险演化分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2012, 46(01): 58-63.

SHAO Wei-1, ZHOU Song-2, HU Jin-Song-3. Analysis of Risk and Its Evolvement for Large Slurry Shield Crossing the Airport at Shallow Depths[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2012, 46(01): 58-63.

参考文献

［1］Einstein H H. Risk and risk analysis in rock engineering［J］. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11(2): 1415.

［2］Einstein H H, Xu S, Grasos P, et al. Decision aids in tunneling［J］. World Tunneling, 1998(4): 157159.

［3］Sturk R, Olsson L, Johansson J. Risk and decision analysis for large underground projects as applied to the Stockholm ring road tunnels ［J］. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11(2): 158164.

［4］You K, Park Y, Lee J S. Risk analysis for determination of a tunnel support pattern ［J］. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2005, 20(2): 479486.

［5］黄宏伟. 隧道及地下工程建设中的风险管理研究进展［J］.地下空间与工程学报, 2006, 2(1): 1320.

HUANG Hongwei. State of the art of the research on risk management in construction of tunnel and underground works ［J］. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2006, 2(1): 1320.

［6］陈桂香, 黄宏伟, 尤建新. 对地铁项目全寿命周期风险管理的研究［J］. 地下空间与工程学报, 2006, 2(1): 4751.

CHAN Guixiang, HUANG Hongwei, YOU Jianxin. Study on life cycle risk management of metro［J］. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2006, 2(1): 4751.

［7］周红波. 基于贝叶斯网络的深基坑风险模糊综合评估方法［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2009, 43(9): 14731479.

ZHOU Hongbo. Risk assessment of deep foundation pit by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on Bayesian networks［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2009, 43(9): 14731479.

［8］程子聪. 大直径泥水盾构下穿机场道面施工控制技术研究［D］. 上海: 同济大学土木工程学院, 2010.