盾构隧道壁后注浆体固结变形特性试验研究

上海交通大学学报（自然版） ›› 2011, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (04): 446-450.

盾构隧道壁后注浆体固结变形特性试验研究

袁小会, 韩月旺, 钟小春

（1. 华北水利水电学院土木与交通学院，郑州 450011； 2.郑州市轨道交通有限公司，郑州 450046；
3.河海大学土木工程学院，南京 210098）

收稿日期:2010-06-30 出版日期:2011-04-29 发布日期:2011-04-29
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（50908075）,高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金（20070294029）

Research on Grout Consolidation Deformation Characteristics of Backfill Grouting of Shield Tunnel

YUAN Xiao-Hui, HAN Yue-Wang, ZHONG Xiao-Chun

(1. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power, Zhengzhou 450011, China; 2. Zhengzhou Rail Traffic Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450046, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

Received:2010-06-30 Online:2011-04-29 Published:2011-04-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究浆液在盾尾空隙中的固结变形特性，采用自制的壁后注浆体固结变形试验装置，对不同注浆材料、不同固结压力、不同土质条件和地下水压力条件下的浆液固结变形特性进行了试验研究.结果表明：随固结压力的增大，浆液的固结变形速率加快，最终的变形量也相应增大，且浆液的固结应变处于4%~12%；在砂土条件下的固结变形速率要远快于黏土条件，在砂土条件下1 h内变形即可趋于稳定，而黏土条件则需要5~6 h；随地下水压力的增大，浆液的排水速率减缓，最终的固结变形量也相应减小.

关键词: 壁后注浆, 固结, 变形, 盾构隧道

Abstract: Abstract： In order to investigate consolidation deformation characteristics of grout in shield tail void, the changing regulars were tested under different consolidation pressures, different grout material mix ratios, surrounding soil type, and groundwater pressures utilizing the selfmade consolidation deformation device. With consolidation pressure increasing, consolidation rate is accelerated, and ultimate deformation is bigger accordingly. Ultimate strain of consolidation varies between 4% and 12%. Consolidation deformation rate in sandy soil is faster than that in clay soil. Grout consolidation deformation can be stabilized within about 1 hour in sandy soil, which needs 5~6 hours in clay soil. With the water pressure increases, grout drainage rate slows, the final consolidation deformation reduces accordingly. Groundwater pressure hinders grout drainage, reduces the rate of consolidation deformation.

Key words: shield tunnel, backfill grouting, consolidation, deformation

中图分类号:

U451

袁小会, 韩月旺, 钟小春. 盾构隧道壁后注浆体固结变形特性试验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2011, 45(04): 446-450.

YUAN Xiao-Hui, HAN Yue-Wang, ZHONG Xiao-Chun. Research on Grout Consolidation Deformation Characteristics of Backfill Grouting of Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2011, 45(04): 446-450.

参考文献

［1］朱伟, 陈仁俊. 盾构隧道施工技术现状及展望: 盾构隧道基本原理及在我国的使用情况［J］. 岩土工程界, 2001, 4(11): 1921.

ZHU Wei, CHEN Renjun. Present state and perspectives of shield construction techniques: fundamental principles and uses of shield tunnel in China［J］. Geotechnical Engineering World, 2001, 4(11): 1921.

［2］刘招伟, 王梦恕, 董新平. 地铁隧道盾构法施工引起的地表沉降分析［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(8): 12971301.

LIU Zhaowei, WANG Mengshu, DONG Xinping. Analysis of ground surface subsidence of metro tunnel induced by shield construction［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 22(8): 12971301.

［3］张海波, 殷宗泽, 朱俊高. 地铁隧道盾构法施工过程中地层变位的三维有限元模拟［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(5): 755760.

ZHANG Haibo，YIN Zongze，ZHU Jungao. 3D finite element simulation on deformation of soil mass during shield tunneling［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(5): 755760.

［4］张云, 殷宗泽, 徐永福. 盾构法隧道引起的地表变形分析［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(3): 388392.

ZHANG Yun, YING Zongze, XU Yongfu. Analysis on threedimensional ground surface deformations due to shield tunnel［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(3): 388392.

［5］姜忻良, 崔奕, 李园,等. 天津地铁盾构施工地层变形实测及动态模拟［J］. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(10): 16121616.

JIANG Xinliang, CUI Yi, LI Yuan, et al. Measurement and simulation of ground settlements of Tianjin subway shield tunnel construction［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(10): 16121616.

［6］Bezuijen A, Talmon A M, Kaalberg F J, et al. Field measurements of grout pressures during tunnelling of the Sophia Rail Tunnel［J］. Soils and Foundations, 2004, 44(1): 3948.

［7］Rowe R K，Lo K Y. A method of estimating ground settlement above tunnels constructed in soft ground［J］. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1983, 20(1): 1122.

［8］Loganathan N, Poulos H G. Analytical prediction for tunnelinginduced ground movements in clays［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(9): 846856.

［9］Kasper T, Meschke G. On the influence of face pressure, grouting pressure and TBM design in soft ground tunnelling［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2006, 21(2): 160171.

［10］Kasper T, Meschke G. A numerical study of the effect of soil and grout material properties and cover depth in shield tunnelling［J］. Computers and Geotechnics, 2006, 33(5): 234247.

［11］沈建奇, 金先龙, 王吉云. 基于并行计算的盾构机过大堤三维数值模拟［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2008, 42(8): 12961300.

SHEN Jianqi, JIN Xianlong, WANG Jiyun. Three dimensional numerical simulation of shield tunneling through flood levee based on parallel computing［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2008, 42(8): 12961300.

[1]	李建军, 朱文峰, 孙海涛, 李元辉, 王顺超. 异质滚合结构固化变形预测及曲面重构预补偿方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 965-976.
[2]	杨其润, 李明广, 陈锦剑, 吴航. 同步实施的相邻基坑相互作用机理[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(6): 722-729.
[3]	吴灌伦, 施光林. 双并联机构耦合连续体机械臂的设计与实现[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(6): 809-817.
[4]	林张鹏, 余海东, 袁可. 基于高阶复合曲面单元的非均匀大薄板装配偏差计算模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(5): 584-593.
[5]	胡亚元, 王啊强. 饱和孔隙-裂隙黏土双层地基的一维固结分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(4): 443-453.
[6]	李泽垚, 周洁, 田万君, 裴万胜. 地铁变频荷载循环作用下饱和软黏土累积塑性变形[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(4): 454-463.
[7]	徐长节, 曾怡婷, 田威, 陈明. Pasternak地基降水对邻近管线影响的解析研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 652-662.
[8]	陈拴, 吴怀娜, 陈仁朋, 沈水龙, 刘源. 上方长距离基坑开挖引起的共线隧道变形研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 698-706.
[9]	陈培帅, 潘亚洲, 梁发云, 李德杰. 沉井接高过程中砂桩复合地基固结承载特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 707-715.
[10]	肖朝昀, 李明广, 王大发, 陈锦剑. 降雨影响下残积土层中深基坑变形特性测试及分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(8): 873-880.
[11]	曲扬, 罗永峰, 朱钊辰, 黄青隆. 两维地震激励下格构拱动力响应简化评估方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(4): 387-396.
[12]	刘丽斌, 兰立信, 李明广, 叶冠林. 上海第⑧层黏土沉积环境及超固结特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(3): 221-226.
[13]	郑启宇，夏小和，李明广，张扬清. 深基坑降承压水对墙体变形和地表沉降的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(10): 1094-1100.
[14]	宋晓龙，赵维，年廷凯，焦厚滨. 水合物分解条件下海底黏土质斜坡破坏实验模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(1): 43-51.
[15]	李煜, 程广益, 李宗阳, 窦怡彬, 蒋君庭. 固体火箭发动机喷管两相流动下的热固耦合研究[J]. 空天防御, 2020, 3(1): 1-9.