考虑需求响应资源和储能容量价值的新型电力系统电源规划方法

doi:10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.477

上海交通大学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 432-441.doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.477

所属专题：《上海交通大学学报》2023年“新型电力系统与综合能源”专题

• 新型电力系统与综合能源 • 上一篇下一篇

考虑需求响应资源和储能容量价值的新型电力系统电源规划方法

黄远明¹, 张玉欣²(), 夏赞阳², 王浩浩¹, 吴明兴¹, 王宁¹, 陈青¹, 朱涛¹, 陈新宇²

1.广东电力交易中心有限责任公司,广州 510600
2.华中科技大学电气与电子工程学院,武汉 430074

收稿日期:2021-12-01 修回日期:2022-05-13 接受日期:2022-05-16 出版日期:2023-04-28 发布日期:2023-05-05
通讯作者: 张玉欣,博士生,电话(Tel.):027-87543437;E-mail:zhangyuxin09@qq.com.
作者简介:黄远明(1969-),硕士,高级工程师,从事电力市场、电力系统规划研究.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51907066);中国南方电网公司科技项目(GDKJXM20200187)

Power System Planning Considering Demand Response Resources and Capacity Value of Energy Storage

HUANG Yuanming¹, ZHANG Yuxin²(), XIA Zanyang², WANG Haohao¹, WU Mingxing¹, WANG Ning¹, CHEN Qing¹, ZHU Tao¹, CHEN Xinyu²

1. Guangdong Power Exchange Center Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510600, China
2. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2021-12-01 Revised:2022-05-13 Accepted:2022-05-16 Online:2023-04-28 Published:2023-05-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

高比例可再生能源的接入对电力系统容量充裕性带来了新的挑战,系统必须具备充足的置信容量应对可再生能源的出力波动性和随机性.由于储能置信容量与电源规划结果的非线性关系,传统电源规划方法难以准确计算储能置信容量并建立系统置信容量充裕度约束.通过综合考虑火电、可再生能源、储能以及需求侧响应建立了电源规划模型,内嵌全年8 760时段生产运行模拟以确保系统具有充足灵活性,同时改进容量充裕性约束以考虑需求响应资源和储能的容量价值.针对储能置信容量的非线性问题,设计了迭代算法进行求解,并用某区域电力系统验证了模型的有效性.结果表明,高比例可再生能源系统中,影响系统成本的主要因素是灵活性约束,引入少量需求侧响应资源可大幅降低系统成本,为未来高比例可再生资源电力系统规划问题提供了新的思路.

关键词: 电源规划, 可再生能源, 置信容量, 需求侧响应, 储能资源

Abstract:

The access of a high proportion of renewable energy has posed new challenges to the supply reliability of the power system. The system must have sufficient capacity credit to cope with the output fluctuation and randomness of renewable energy. Due to the nonlinear relationship between energy storage capacity credit and power planning results, it is difficult to establish accurate capacity adequacy constraints for traditional power planning methods. Therefore, a generation expansion model is established, in which thermal power, renewable energy, energy storage, and demand response resources are incorporated, with the full-year hourly production simulation to ensure adequate operation flexibility and improved capacity adequacy constraint to incorporate the capacity value of energy storage and demand response resources. An iterative algorithm is designed to solve the nonlinear problem of energy storage capacity credit, and the validity of the model is verified by some regional grid in China. The results show that in the high-proportion renewable energy system, the system capacity is surplus, and the main factor affecting the system cost is the flexibility constraint. The introduction of a small amount of demand response resources can greatly reduce the system cost, which provides new ideas for power system planning at a high proportion of renewable energy.

Key words: power system planning, renewable energy, capacity credit, demand response, energy storage

中图分类号:

TM715

黄远明, 张玉欣, 夏赞阳, 王浩浩, 吴明兴, 王宁, 陈青, 朱涛, 陈新宇. 考虑需求响应资源和储能容量价值的新型电力系统电源规划方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(4): 432-441.

HUANG Yuanming, ZHANG Yuxin, XIA Zanyang, WANG Haohao, WU Mingxing, WANG Ning, CHEN Qing, ZHU Tao, CHEN Xinyu. Power System Planning Considering Demand Response Resources and Capacity Value of Energy Storage[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023, 57(4): 432-441.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

表1

表2

图4

图5

参考文献 27

[1]	MYHRE G, BOUCHER O, BRÉON F M, et al. Declining uncertainty in transient climate response as CO₂ forcing dominates future climate change[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2015, 8(3): 181-185. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2371
[2]	康重庆. 能源互联网促进实现“双碳”目标[J]. 全球能源互联网, 2021, 4(3): 205-206.
	KANG Chongqing. Energy Internet promotes the achievement of carbon peak and neutrality targets[J]. Journal of Global Energy Interconnection, 2021, 4(3): 205-206.
[3]	CHEN X Y, LIU Y X, WANG Q, et al. Pathway toward carbon-neutral electrical systems in China by mid-century with negative CO₂ abatement costs informed by high-resolution modeling[J]. Joule, 2021, 5(10): 2715-2741. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.10.006 URL
[4]	舒印彪, 张智刚, 郭剑波, 等. 新能源消纳关键因素分析及解决措施研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(1): 1-9.
	SHU Yinbiao, ZHANG Zhigang, GUO Jianbo, et al. Study on key factors and solution of renewable energy accommodation[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37(1): 1-9.
[5]	EL-KHATTAM W, BHATTACHARYA K, HEGAZY Y, et al. Optimal investment planning for distributed generation in a competitive electricity market[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(3): 1674-1684. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.831699 URL
[6]	鲁宗相, 李海波, 乔颖. 含高比例可再生能源电力系统灵活性规划及挑战[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40(13): 147-158.
	LU Zongxiang, LI Haibo, QIAO Ying. Power system flexibility planning and challenges considering high proportion of renewable energy[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40(13): 147-158.
[7]	ZHANG N, LU X, MCELROY M B, et al. Reducing curtailment of wind electricity in China by employing electric boilers for heat and pumped hydro for energy storage[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 184: 987-994. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.147 URL
[8]	HARKER STEELE A J, BURNETT J W, BERGSTROM J C. The impact of variable renewable energy resources on power system reliability[J]. Energy Policy, 2021, 151: 111947. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111947 URL
[9]	胡秦然, 丁昊晖, 陈心宜, 等. 美国加州2020年轮流停电事故分析及其对中国电网的启示[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(24): 11-18.
	HU Qinran, DING Haohui, CHEN Xinyi, et al. Analysis on rotating power outage in California, USA in 2020 and its enlightenment to power grid of China[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44(24): 11-18.
[10]	王一, 朱涛, 张玉欣, 等. 适应中国电力现货市场发展的容量补偿机制初探[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(6): 52-61.
	WANG Yi, ZHU Tao, ZHANG Yuxin, et al. Preliminary study on capacity compensation mechanism adapted to development of electricity spot market in China[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(6): 52-61.
[11]	BERTSCH J, GROWITSCH C, LORENCZIK S, et al. Flexibility in Europe’s power sector—An additional requirement or an automatic complement?[J]. Energy Economics, 2016, 53: 118-131. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.10.022 URL
[12]	黄旭祥, 韩学山, 李家维, 等. 大电网储能与各类电源协同规划[J]. 分布式能源, 2019, 4(5): 67-74.
	HUANG Xuxiang, HAN Xueshan, LI Jiawei, et al. Coordinated planning of energy storage and various power sources in large power grid[J]. Distributed Energy, 2019, 4(5): 67-74.
[13]	姜海洋, 杜尔顺, 金晨, 等. 高比例清洁能源并网的跨国互联电力系统多时间尺度储能容量优化规划[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(6): 2101-2115.
	JIANG Haiyang, DU Ershun, JIN Chen, et al. Optimal planning of multi-time scale energy storage capacity of cross-national interconnected power system with high proportion of clean energy[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(6): 2101-2115.
[14]	KARGARIAN A, HUG G, MOHAMMADI J. A multi-time scale co-optimization method for sizing of energy storage and fast-ramping generation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2016, 7(4): 1351-1361. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2016.2541685 URL
[15]	杨珺, 李凤婷, 张高航. 考虑灵活性需求的新能源高渗透系统规划方法[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46(6): 2171-2182.
	YANG Jun, LI Fengting, ZHANG Gaohang. Power system planning method with high new energy penetration considering flexibility requirements[J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46(6): 2171-2182.
[16]	鉴庆之, 刘晓明, 杨金叶, 等. 考虑需求响应的电力系统灵活性资源优化配置[J]. 现代电力, 2021, 38(3): 286-296.
	JIAN Qingzhi, LIU Xiaoming, YANG Jinye, et al. Optimal allocation of power system flexible resources considering demand response[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2021, 38(3): 286-296.
[17]	何俊. 基于等可信容量的含风光储微电网电源优化规划研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2014.
	HE Jun. Optimal power planning of micro grid containing wind PV battery power sources based on equivalent credible capacity theory[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2014.
[18]	袁小明, 程时杰, 文劲宇. 储能技术在解决大规模风电并网问题中的应用前景分析[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2013, 37(1): 14-18.
	YUAN Xiaoming, CHENG Shijie, WEN Jinyu. Prospects analysis of energy storage application in grid integration of large-scale wind power[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2013, 37(1): 14-18.
[19]	MCPHERSON M, STOLL B. Demand response for variable renewable energy integration: A proposed approach and its impacts[J]. Energy, 2020, 197: 117205. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117205 URL
[20]	BILLINTON R, HUANG D G. Basic concepts in generating capacity adequacy evaluation[C]// 2006 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems. Stockholm, Sweden: IEEE, 2006: 1-6.
[21]	GARVER L L. Effective load carrying capability of generating units[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1966, 85(8): 910-919.
[22]	PUDARUTH G R, LI F. Capacity credit evaluation: A literature review[C]// 2008 Third International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies. Nanjing, China: IEEE, 2008: 2719-2724.
[23]	MILLS A D, RODRIGUEZ P. A simple and fast algorithm for estimating the capacity credit of solar and storage[J]. Energy, 2020, 210: 118587. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118587 URL
[24]	ZHOU Y T, MANCARELLA P, MUTALE J. Framework for capacity credit assessment of electrical energy storage and demand response[J]. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2016, 10(9): 2267-2276. doi: 10.1049/gtd2.v10.9 URL
[25]	张宁, 康重庆, 肖晋宇, 等. 风电容量可信度研究综述与展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(1): 82-94.
	ZHANG Ning, KANG Chongqing, XIAO Jinyu, et al. Review and prospect of wind power capacity credit[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(1): 82-94.
[26]	HAN X N, CHEN X Y, MCELROY M B, et al. Modeling formulation and validation for accelerated simulation and flexibility assessment on large scale power systems under higher renewable penetrations[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 237: 145-154. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.047 URL
[27]	CHEN X Y, LV J J, MCELROY M B, et al. Power system capacity expansion under higher penetration of renewables considering flexibility constraints and low carbon policies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018, 33(6): 6240-6253. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2827003 URL

机组类型	无储能/h	有储能/h	变化/%
煤电	2056.82	3016.33	+46.65
气电	563.03	218.04	-61.27
光伏	928.09	1607.80	+73.24
风电	1568.59	1936.69	+23.47

机组类型	已有容量	新增容量
机组类型	已有容量	0%	5%	10%	15%	20%
煤电	215.6	92.2	93.2	87.1	63.6	59.9
气电	46.0	45.6	19.1	0.0	0.0	0.0
光伏	183.9	270.5	270.2	269.1	261.7	258.0
风电	110.4	705.9	705.6	705.2	709.2	712.5
储能(2 h)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
储能(4 h)	0.0	86.9	87.2	88.5	91.8	93.9
储能(6 h)	0.0	44.2	43.7	41.7	34.7	30.6
储能(12 h)	0.0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

考虑需求响应资源和储能容量价值的新型电力系统电源规划方法

Power System Planning Considering Demand Response Resources and Capacity Value of Energy Storage

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 27

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	叶伦, 欧阳旭, 姚建刚, 杨胜杰, 尹骏刚. 考虑多重不确定性因素的可靠性指标计算与备用容量优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2024, 58(1): 30-39.
[2]	李俊双, 胡炎, 邰能灵. 计及通信负载与供电可靠性的5G基站储能与配电网协同优化调度[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(7): 791-802.
[3]	刘子旭, 米阳, 卢长坤, 符杨, 苏向敬. 计及需求响应和风力发电消纳的电-热系统低碳优化调度[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(7): 835-844.
[4]	叶志亮, 黎灿兵, 张勇军, 李立浧, 肖银璟, 吴雨杭, 邰能灵. 含高比例气象敏感可再生能源电网日前调度时间颗粒度优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(7): 781-790.
[5]	俞发强, 张名捷, 程语, 陈达伟, 杨函煜, 黎灿兵. 需求响应下的并网型风-光-沼微能源网优化配置[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(1): 10-16.
[6]	刘迪迪, 杨益菲, 杨玉荟, 邹艳丽, 王小华, 黎新. 随机环境下电动汽车充电实时管理与优化控制算法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(1): 1-9.
[7]	方晓涛, 严正, 王晗, 徐潇源, 陈玥. 考虑概率电压不平衡度越限风险的共享储能优化运行方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(7): 827-839.
[8]	张硕, 李薇, 李英姿, 刘强, 曾鸣. 面向新型电力系统的可再生能源绿色电力证书差异化配置模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2022, 56(12): 1561-1571.
[9]	李玲芳, 陈占鹏, 胡炎, 邰能灵, 高孟平, 朱涛. 基于灵活性和经济性的可再生能源电力系统扩展规划[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(7): 791-801.
[10]	孙欣, 严佳嘉, 谢敬东, 孙波. “碳中和”目标下电气互联系统有功-无功协同优化模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(12): 1554-1566.
[11]	张立波1，程浩忠1，曾平良2，张沈习1，周勤勇2. 基于Johnson分布体系的发输电系统可靠性评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2017, 51(5): 555-.