A group multiattribute decision-making model was proposed by implementing prospect theory, multiattribute decision-making, group decision-making and entropy methods for the optimization in commercial space investment. First, the decision-making function was decided using prospect theory by the preference of each expert to reach the comprehensive prospect value based on different investment options; second, expert decision weights were reached according to entropy method; third, the expert group decision-making information was congregated according to the group decision-making congregation algorithm to reach the most optimized investment option; finally, an example was given to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the method. This model comprehensively takes the advantages of many methods to congregate experts’ experiences and avoid the subjective influences, thus providing a scientific decision-making approach for the commercial space investment.
ZHANG Yiming (张-鸣)，HOU Junjie1* (侯俊杰)，ZHONG Shaowen2 (钟少文)
. Optimization of Group Multiattribute Decision-Making Model in Commercial Space Investment[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2023
, 28(6)
: 831
-840
.
DOI: 10.1007/s12204-021-2400-7
[1] WANG W M, XU H Y. Multiple attribute large-scale group decision making method based on hybrid information [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(11): 2560-2569 (in Chinese).
[2] REN R R, LI W W, ZHAO M, et al. A large group decision making method based on public evaluation [J]. Management Review, 2018, 30(10): 238-247 (in Chinese).
[3] GONG C Z, LI L L, WEI Z F, et al. A method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making based onprospect theory and membership [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(10): 122-128 (in Chinese).
[4] ZHANG H Y, WEN F S, ZHANG C, et al. Prospect theory based multiple-attribute decisionmaking method for determining portfolio of construction projects in power systems [J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40(14): 8-14 (in Chinese).
[5] JIANG G T. Method for hybrid stochastic multiple attribute decision making considering decision maker’s psychological behavior [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(6): 78-84 (in Chinese).
[6] WAN S P, LI D F. Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making with Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 22(2): 300-312.
[7] WAN S P, QIN Y L, DONG J Y. A hesitant fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multicriteria group decision making with hesitant fuzzy truth degrees [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2017, 138: 232-248.
[8] WAN S P, ZOU W C, DONG J Y. Prospect theory based method for heterogeneous group decision making with hybrid truth degrees of alternative comparisons [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 141: 106285.
[9] WAN S P, LI D F. Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees [J]. Omega, 2013, 41(6): 925-940.
[10] WAN S P, DONG J Y. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with intervalvalued intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees [J]. Information Fusion, 2015, 26: 49-65.
[11] DONG J Y, WAN S P. Virtual enterprise partner selection integrating LINMAP and TOPSIS [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2016, 67(10): 1288- 1308.
[12] LI R. Summary of prospect theory research [J]. Tribune of Social Sciences, 2014(2): 214-222 (in Chinese).
[13] FAN Z P, CHEN F D, ZHANG X. Method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making based on cumulative prospect theory [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2012, 27(3): 295-301 (in Chinese).
[14] TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5: 297-323.
[15] FENG D D. Research on credit rating method based on ELECTRE-III and application [D]. Dalian: Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, 2019 (in Chinese).
[16] ZHANG S, ZHANG M, CHI G T. The science and technology evaluation model based on entropy weight and empirical research during the 10th five-year of China [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2010, 7(1): 34-42 (in Chinese).
[17] SHEN F. Multi-attribute group decision-making method and its application based on ELECTRE-III algorithm [D]. Guizhou: Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2012 (in Chinese).
[18] CHENG Q Y. Structure entropy weight method to con- firm the weight of evaluating index [J]. Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice, 2010, 30(7): 1225-1228 (in Chinese).
