Inspection-Based Policy Considering Human Errors for Three-Stage Delay Time Degradation Systems

Expand
  • (1. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China; 2. School of Management, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China; 3. Donlinks School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

Online published: 2018-10-07

Abstract

A periodic inspection policy for a single component system based on a three-stage failure process is proposed, and two different kinds of failures covering “hard” and “human” are considered in the proposed policy. The system is periodically inspected and inspections are perfect so that they can identify the intended defect. If the severe defect is detected by an inspection, an immediate repair is needed. However, once the system is identified to be in the minor defective state, there are two options. The first is to do nothing till the arrival of identifying the severe defect or hard failure, and the second is to repair immediately. Repair for any defect can renew the system with a limited probability such that the system may fail after repair due to human errors, which is common in many industrial applications. Two models are constructed by minimizing the expected cost per unit time and compared. We provide a numerical example to demonstrate the proposed model.

Cite this article

ZHAO Fei (赵斐), LIU Xuejuan (刘学娟), PENG Rui (彭锐) . Inspection-Based Policy Considering Human Errors for Three-Stage Delay Time Degradation Systems[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2018 , 23(5) : 702 -706 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-018-1966-1

References

[1] AHMAD R, KAMARUDDIN S. An overview of timebasedand condition-based maintenance in industrialapplication [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2012, 63(1): 135-149. [2] NAKAGAWA T,MIZUTANI S, CHENM. A summaryof periodic and random inspection policies [J]. ReliabilityEngineering and System Safety, 2010, 95(8): 906-911. [3] BAD′IA F G, BERRADE M D, CAMPOS C A. Optimalinspection and preventive maintenance of unitswith revealed and unrevealed failures [J]. ReliabilityEngineering and System Safety, 2002, 78(2): 157-163. [4] YEH R H. Optimal inspection and replacement policiesfor multi-state deteriorating systems [J]. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research, 1997, 96(2): 248-259. [5] KOBBACY K A H, MURTHY D N P. Complex systemmaintenance handbook [M]. London, UK: Springer,2008: 345-370. [6] ZHAO F, WANG W B, PENG R. Delay-time-basedpreventive maintenance modelling for a productionplant: A case study in a steel mill [J]. Journal ofthe Operational Research Society, 2015, 66(12): 2015-2024. [7] JONES B, JENKINSON I, WANG J. Methodology ofusing delay-time analysis for a manufacturing industry[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009,94(1): 111-124. [8] WANG W B. An overview of the recent advances indelay-time-based maintenance modelling [J]. ReliabilityEngineering and System Safety, 2012, 106: 165-178. [9] WANGWB, ZHAOF, PENGR. A preventivemaintenancemodel with a two-level inspection policy basedon a three-stage failure process [J]. Reliability Engineeringand System Safety, 2014, 121: 207-220. [10] BLISCHKEWR, MURTHY D N P. Case studies in reliabilityand maintenance [M]. New Jersey, USA: JohnWiley & Sons, 2003: 165-185. [11] LATORELLA K A, PRABHU P V. A review of humanerror in aviation maintenance and inspection [J].International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2000,26(2): 133-161.
Options
Outlines

/