Approximate Method for Reliability Assessment of Complex Phased Mission Systems

Expand
  • (1. Center for System Reliability and Safety, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China; 2. School of Computer Engineering, Chengdu Technological University, Chengdu 611731, China)

Online published: 2017-04-04

Abstract

Phased-mission systems (PMSs) have wide applications in engineering practices, such as manmade satellites. Certain critical parts in the system, such as cold standby, hot standby and functional standby, are designed in redundancy architecture to achieve high reliability performance. State-space models such as Markov process have been used extensively in previous studies for reliability evaluation of PMSs with dynamic behaviors. The most popular way to deal with the dynamic behaviors is Markov process, but it is well known that Markov process is limited to exponential distribution. In practice, however, the lifetime of most machinery products can follow non-exponential distributions like the Weibull distribution which cannot be handled by the Markov process. In order to solve this kind of problem, we present a semi-Markov model combined with an approximation algorithm to analyze PMS reliability subjected to non-exponential failures. Furthermore, the accuracy of the approximation algorithm is investigated by comparing to an accurate solution, and a typical PMS (attitude and orbit control system) is analyzed to demonstrate the implementation of the method.

Cite this article

ZHOU Hang1,2 (周行), LI Xiangyu1 (李翔宇), HUANG Hongzhong1* (黄洪钟) . Approximate Method for Reliability Assessment of Complex Phased Mission Systems[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2017 , 22(2) : 247 -251 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-017-1828-2

References

[1] XING L D, BECHTA DUGAN J B. Analysis of generalizedphased-mission system reliability, performance,and sensitivity [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2002, 51(2): 199-211. [2] ZANG X Y, SUN H R, TRIVEDI K S. A BDD-basedalgorithm for reliability analysis of phased-missionsystems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1999,48(1): 50-60. [3] OU Y, DUGAN J B. Modular solution of dynamicmulti-phase systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2004, 53(4): 499-508. [4] LEVITIN G, XING L D, AMARI S V. Recursivealgorithm for reliability evaluation of non-repairablephased mission systems with binary elements [J]. IEEETransactions on Reliability, 2012, 61(2): 533-542. [5] XING L D, MESHKAT L, DONOHUE S K. Reliabilityanalysis of hierarchical computer-based systemssubject to common-cause failures [J]. Reliability Engineeringand System Safety, 2007, 92: 351-359. [6] BOBBIO A, PREMOLI A, SARACCO O. Multi-statehomogeneous Markov models in reliability analysis [J].Microelectronics Reliability, 1980, 20(6): 875-880. [7] ERYILMAZ S. Modeling dependence between twomulti-state components via copulas [J]. IEEE Transactionson Reliability, 2014, 63(3): 715-720. [8] DHOPLE SV, DOM′INGUEZ-GARC′IA A D. A parametricuncertainty analysis method for Markov reliabilityand reward models [J]. IEEE Transactions onReliability, 2012, 61(3): 634-648. [9] XING L D, AMARI S V. Reliability of phased-missionsystems [C]//Handbook of Performability Engineering.London: Springer, 2008: 349-368. [10] DISTEFANO S, TRIVEDI K S. Non-Markovian statespacemodels in dependability evaluation [J]. Qualityand Reliability Engineer International, 2013, 29(2):225-239. [11] DUTUIT Y, RAUZY A. A linear-time algorithm tofind modules of fault trees [J]. IEEE Transactions onReliability, 1996, 45(3): 422-425.
Options
Outlines

/