Comparison Between North-South Aid and South-South Cooperation:Based on the Analysis of the New Development Finance Institutions

Expand
  • (Center for BRICS Studies, Fudan Development Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Online published: 2016-03-21

Abstract

According to the different players, development cooperation is often divided into North-South Aid and South-South Cooperation, both of which have a history of several decades. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the rise of a number of emerging economies has brought South-South Cooperation into a new stage, which can be seen from the establishment of some new development finance institutions led by developing countries. BRICS Bank, Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and Silk Road Fund are three important new development finance institutions. Compared with the traditional development finance institutions like World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), they have their own concepts of development cooperation, which are different from the traditional ones. First, the new finance institutions pay more attention to the equality between partners, not imposing conditions and respecting the ownership of development partners. Second, the new development finance institutions value the market philosophy, which means that they emphasize the importance of field investigation and implement development cooperation in accordance with the actual needs of the partners and the comparative advantages of the providers. Finally, the new development finance institutions focus their resources on problem-solving and avoid doctrines-imposing. They believe that it is easier for the developing countries to achieve development through a gradual and bottom-up model. Although there are differences between the traditional and new development finance institutions, the latter is not parallel to or substitute of the former. They can cooperate with each other and provide better public goods for international cooperation through inclusive competition.

Cite this article

CUI Wenxing (崔文星) . Comparison Between North-South Aid and South-South Cooperation:Based on the Analysis of the New Development Finance Institutions[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2016 , 21(1) : 25 -32 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-016-1695-2

References

[1] UK Government. Colonial development act 1929[EB/OL]. [2015-08-23]. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/20-21/5/enacted. [2] UK Government. The colonial development andwelfare act 1940 [EB/OL]. [2015-08-23]. http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publicationsopinion-files/ 8077.pdf. [3] ZHU J J. Strategic positioning and mechanism designof the BRICS Bank [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai People’sPublishing House, 2015: 106 (in Chinese). [4] Agreement on the new development bank [EB/OL].[2015-08-23]. http://ndbbrics.org/agreement.html.[5] Asian infrastructure investment bank—Articles ofagreement [EB/OL]. [2015-08-23]. http://www.aiib.org/uploadfile/2015/0814/20150814022158430.pdf. [6] WANG T Y. International law [M]. Beijing: Law PressChina, 1995: 84-85 (in Chinese). [7] ZHANG H B. Development-oriented aid—Pattern ofChina’s aid to Africa [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai People’sPublishing House, 2013: 130 (in Chinese). [8] CUMMING G. Aid to Africa: French and British policiesfrom the Cold War to the New Millennium [M].Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001: 104-113. [9] ZHANG Y P. International Development Cooperationand Africa—A comparative study on Chinese andwestern aid to Africa [M]. Beijing: Social Sciences AcademicPress, 2012: 44 (in Chinese). [10] BROWNE S. Aid and influence: Does donors help orhinder? [M]. New York: Routledge, 2006: 45. [11] BANGUI T. China, Africa’s new developmentpartner—European privileges on the black continentare ending? [M]. XIAO H, ZHOU P, XU J, et al trans.Beijing: World Knowledge Press, 2011: 103-104 (inChinese). [12] Chinese Government. China’s African policy [EB/OL].[2015-08-23]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2006-01/12/content 4042333.htm. [13] GLOSNY A M. Meet the development challengein the 21st century: American and Chinese perspectiveon foreign aid [EB/OL]. [2015-08-23].http: // www.cctr.ust.hk/materials/library/20070201ForeignAidReport.pdf. [14] ZHAO J J. BRICS Bank—Seeking discourse power ininternational finance [N]. Dongguan Daily, 2013-04-01(B04) (in Chinese). [15] ZHANG H B. Development innovation of BRICS Bank[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House,2015: 81-88 (in Chinese). [16] ZHU G Y. The BRICS countries represent theemerging powers [EB/OL]. [2015-08-23]. http://www.mof.gov.cn / zhengwuxinxi / caizhengxinwen/201411/t20141106 1156391.html. [17] The Russian State Duma approved BRICS bankagreement [EB/OL]. [2015-08-23]. http://world.people.com.cn/n/2015/0226/c1002-26599330.html. [18] CAI E Z. BRICS bank—Opening the new patternof international finance [N]. China Audit Newspaper,2014-07-28 (005) (in Chinese). [19] EASTERLY W. The white man’s burden—Why thewest’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill andso little good [M]. CUI X Y, trans. Beijing: CITICPublishing House, 2008 (in Chinese). [20] DUGGAN W. The art of what works: How successreally happens [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003. [21] POPPER K. The poverty of histori
Options
Outlines

/