Slat Noise Suppression Using Upstream Mass Injection

Expand
  • (School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Online published: 2013-12-05

Abstract

A new approach, mass injection near the slat cusp, is proposed for the suppression of slat noise. The mechanism and efficiency of the slat noise suppression using upstream mass injection are numerically studied with hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulation/Large eddy simulation (RANS/LES) of a three-component high-lift model. Ffowcs-Williams and Hawking (FW-H) integration is employed to obtain far-field acoustic characteristics. Results show that with injection, aerodynamic capability of the high-lift devices is sustained. In addition, a considerable noise reduction is observed in the downward direction. With detailed analysis of the time-averaged and instantaneous flow fields, two mechanisms are identified as the reason accounting for the noise suppression: upstream mass injection significantly reduces the scale and strength of the vortices stemming from the cusp; the shear layer is lifted up, which relieves the shear layer impingement on the slat lower surface.

Cite this article

HUANG Hua (黄 华), LI Wei-peng (李伟鹏), WANG Fu-xin* (王福新) . Slat Noise Suppression Using Upstream Mass Injection[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2013 , 18(5) : 620 -629 . DOI: 10.1007/s12204-013-1432-z

References

[1] Dobrzynski W, Nagakura K, Gehlhar B, et al. Airframe noise studies on wings with deployed high-lift devices [C]//Proceedings of 4th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Toulouse, France: AIAA, 1998: 1998-2337.
[2] Chow L C, Mau K, Remy H. Landing gears and high lift devices airframe noise research [C]//Proceedings of 8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit. Breckenridge, Colorado: AIAA, 2002: 2002-2408.
[3] Khorrami M R. Understanding slat noise sources [C]//Proceedings of Computational Aeroacoustics: from Acoustic Sources Modeling to Far-Field Radiated Noise Prediction. Chamonix, France: [s.n.], 2003: 1-4.
[4] Khorrami M R, Singer B A, Lockard D P. Time-accurate simulations and acoustic analysis of slat free-shear-layer. Part II [C]//Proceedings of 8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit. Breckenridge, Colorado: AIAA, 2002: 2002-2579.
[5] Imamura T, Ura H, Yokokawa Y, et al. Designing of slat cove filler as a noise reduction device for leading-edge slat [C]//Proceedings of 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (28th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). Rome, Italy: AIAA, 2007: 2007-3473.
[6] Khorrami M R, Lockard D P. Effects of geometric detail on slat noise generation and propagation [J]. International Journal of aeroacoustics, 2010, 9(4-5): 655-678.
[7] Ma Z, Zhang X. Numerical investigation of broadband slat noise attenuation with acoustic liner treatment [J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(12): 2812-2820.
[8] Wells A K. Slat aerodynamics and aeroacoustics with flow control [D]. Southampton: Faculty of Engineering, Science and Mathematics, University of Southampton,2007.
[9] Knacke T, Thiele F, Slat noise reduction using steady suction [C]//Proceedings of 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada: AIAA, 2008: 2008-0017.
[10] Klausmeyer S M, Lin J C. Comparative results from a CFD challenge over a 2D three-element high-lift airfoil [R]. Hampton, Virginia: NASA Langley Research Center, 1997.
[11] Ffowcs-Williams J E, Hawkings D L. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion [J]. Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 1969, 264(1151): 321-342.
[12] Olson S, Thomas F O, Nelson R C. A preliminary investigation into slat noise production mechanisms in a high-lift configuration [C]//Proceedings of 18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Denver, Colorado: AIAA, 2000: 2000-4508.
[13] Chappell S, Cai Z, Zhang X, et al. Slat noise feedback control with a dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator [C]// Proceedings of 6th AIAA Flow Control Conference. New Orleans, Louisiana: AIAA, 2012: 2012-2806.
[14] Kolb A, Faulhaber P, Drobietz R, et al. Aeroacoustic wind tunnel measurements on a 2D high-lift configuration [C]//Proceedings of 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (28th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). Rome, Italy: AIAA, 2007: 2007-3447.
[15] Lockard D P, Choudhari M M. Noise radiation from a leading-edge slat [C]//Proceedings of 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Miami, Florida: AIAA, 2009: 2009-3101.
[16] Ukeiley L S, Sheehan M, Coiffet F, et al. Control of pressure loads in geometrically complex cavities [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2008, 45(3): 1014-1024.
[17] Rizzetta D P, Visbal M R. Large-eddy simulation of supersonic cavity flowfields including flow control [J]. AIAA Journal, 2003, 41(8): 1452-1462.
[18] Arunajatesan S, Kannepalli C, Sinha N, et al. Suppression of cavity loads using leading-edge blowing [J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(5): 1132-1144.
[19] Vakili A D, Gauthier C. Control of cavity flow by upstream mass-injection [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1994, 31(1): 169-174.
[20] Lusk T, Dudley J, Ukeiley L, et al. Flow field effects of control on supersonic open cavities [C]//Proceedings of 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Orlando, Florida: AIAA, 2011: 2011-0039.
[21] Sahoo D, Annaswamy A. Control of cavity tones in supersonic flow [C]//Proceedings of 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada: AIAA, 2005: 2005-0793.
[22] Vakiii A D, Gauthier C. Control of cavity flow by upstream mass injection [C]// Proceedings of AlAA 22nd Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and lasers Conference. Honolulu, Hawaii: AlAA, 1991: 1991-1645.
[23] Meganathan A J, Vakili A D. Upstream mass-injection effect on cavity flow oscillations (PIV measurements and numerical simulations) [C]//Proceedings of 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada: AIAA, 2003: 2003-0224.
[24] Kuo B C, Sarigul-Klijn N. Conceptual study of micro-tab device in airframe noise reduction: (II) 3D computation [J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2012, 17: 32-39.
[25] Michel U, Eschricht D, Greschner B, et al. Advanced DES methods and their application to aeroacoustics [J]. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, 2010, 111: 59-76.
[26] Jenkins L N, Khorrami M R, Choudhari M. Characterization of unsteady flow structures near leading-edge slat. Part I. PIV measurements [C]//Proceedings of 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Manchester, UK: AIAA, 2004: 2004-2801.
[27] Pott-Pollenske M, Alvarez-Gonzales J, Dobrzynski W. Effect of slat gap on farfield radiated noise and correlation with local flow characteristics [C]//Proceedings of 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit. Hilton Head, South Carolina: AIAA, 2003: 2003-3228.
[28] Khorrami M R, Choudhari M M, Jenkins L N. Characterization of unsteady flow structures near leading-edge slat. Part II. 2D computations [C]//Proceedings of 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Manchester, UK: AIAA, 2004: 2004-2802.
[29] Dobrzynski W, Pott-Pollenske M. Slat noise source studies for farfield noise prediction [C]//Proceedings of 7th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Maastricht, The Netherlands: AIAA, 2001: 2001-2158.

Options
Outlines

/