Abstract: This paper presents a comparative study
of evolutionary algorithms which are considered to be effective in
solving the multilevel lot-sizing problem in material requirement
planning (MRP) systems. Three evolutionary algorithms (simulated
annealing (SA), particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic
algorithm (GA)) are provided. For evaluating the performances of
algorithms, the distribution of total cost (objective function) and
the average computational time are compared. As a result, both GA
and PSO have better cost performances with lower average total costs
and smaller standard deviations. When the scale of the multilevel
lot-sizing problem becomes larger, PSO is of a shorter computational
time.
HAN Yi (韩 毅), CAI Jian-hu (蔡建湖), IKOU Kaku, LI Yan-lai (李延来) CHEN Yi-zeng (陈以增), TANG Jia-fu (唐加福)
. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Unconstrained Multilevel Lot-Sizing Problem with Series Structure[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2012
, 17(1)
: 39
-044
.
DOI: 10.1007/s12204-012-1227-7
1 Afentakis P, Gavish B, Karmarkar U. Computationally efficient
optimal solutions to the lot-sizing problem in multistage assembly
systems [J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(2): 223-239.
2 Barany I, Van Roy T J, Wolsey L A. Uncapacitated lot
sizing: The convex hull of solutions [J]. Mathematical
Programming Studies, 1984, 22: 32-43.
3 Ball M O, Magnanti T L, Monma C L, et al. Handbooks in
operations research and management science: Network routing [M].
Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995.
4 Crowston W B, Wagner M H. Dynamic lot size models for
multi-stage assembly systems [J]. Management Science, 1973,
20(1): 14-21.
5 Constantino M. Lower bounds in lot-sizing models: A polyhedral study
[J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1998, 23(1):
101-118.
6 Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A. Ant system: Optimization by a
colony of cooperating agents [J]. IEEE Trans on System, Man,
and Cybernetics, 1996, 26(1): 28-41.
7 Dellaert N, Jeunet J. Solving large unconstrained multilevel
lot-sizing problems using a hybrid genetic algorithm [J].
International Journal of Production Research, 2000, 38(5):
1083-1099.
8 Eberhart R, Kennedy J. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory
[C]// Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Micro
Machine and Human Science. Nagoya, Japan: IEEE, 1995: 39-43.
9 Eppen G D, Martin R K. Solving multi-item capacitated lot-sizing
problems using variable redefinition [J]. Operations Research,
1987, 35(6): 832-848.
10 Goldberg D E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine
learning [M]. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
11 Glover F, Kelly J P, Laguna M. Genetic algorithm and Tabu search:
Hybrid for optimizations [J]. Computers \& Operations
Research, 1995, 22(1): 111-134.
12 Holland J H. Adoption in natural and artificial systems [M].
Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 1975.
13 Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C D, Vecchi M P. Optimization by simulated
annealing [J]. Science, 1983, 220(4598): 671-680.
14 Karmarkar U S, Schrage L. The deterministic dynamic product cycling
problem [J]. Operations Research, 1985, 33(2): 326-345.
15 Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization [C]//
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.
Perth, WA, Australia: IEEE, 1995: 1942-1948.
16 Kennedy J, Spears W M. Matching algorithms to problems: An
experimental tests of the particle swarm and some genetic algorithms
on the multimodal problem generator [C]// Proceedings of IEEE
International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. Anchorage,
USA: IEEE, 1998: 78-83.
17 Kaku I, Xiao Y, Xia G. The deterministic annealing algorithms for
vehicle routing problems [J]. International Journal of Smart
Engineering System Design, 2003, 5(4): 327-339.
18 Lin F, Kao C, Hsu C. Applying the genetic approach to simulated
annealing in solving some NP-hard problems [J]. IEEE
Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1993, 23(6):
1752-1766.
19 Millonas M M. Swarms, phase transition, and collective intelligence [M]. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1994.
20 Mitchell M. An introduction to genetic algorithms [M]. Cambridge:
MIT Press, 1996.
21 Pochet Y, Wolsey L A. Lot size model with backlogging: Strong
formulations and cut planes [J]. Mathematical Programming,
1988, 40(1-3): 317-335.
22 Rutenbar R A. Simulated annealing algorithms: An overview [J].
IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, 1989, 5(1): 19-26.
23 Su J, Hu A, He Z. Solving a kind of nonlinear programming problems
via analog neural networks [J]. Neurocomputing, 1998,
18(1-3): 1-9.
24 Shi Y, Eberhart R C. A modified particle swarm optimizer [C]//
Proceedings of IEEE International Confeence on Evolutionary
Computation. Anchorage, USA: IEEE, 1998: 69-73.
25 Suganthan P N. Particle swarm optimizer with neighborhood operator
[C]// Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation.
Washington, USA: IEEE, 1999: 1958-1962.
26 Shi Y, Eberhart R C. Parameter selection in particle swarm
optimization [C]// Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on
Evolutionary Programming. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1998:
591-600.
27 Tang O. Simulated annealing in lot sizing problems [J].
International Journal of Production Economics, 2004, 88(2):
173-181.
28 Veral E A, Laforge R L. The performance of a simple incremental
lot-sizing rule in a multilevel inventory environment [J].
Decision Sciences, 1985, 16(1): 57-72.
29 Wolsey L A. Uncapacitated lot-sizing problems with start-up costs
[J]. Operations Research, 1989, 37(5): 741-747.
30 Wolsey L A. Solving multi-item lot-sizing problems with a MIP solver
using classification and reformulation [J]. Management
Science, 2002, 48(12): 1587-1602.
31 Wagner H M, Whitin T M. Dynamic version of the economic lot size
model [J]. Management Science, 1958, 5(1): 89-96.
32 Yelle L E. Materials requirements lot sizing: A multilevel approach
[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 1979,
17(3): 223-232.
33 Zangwill W I. Minimum concave cost flows in certain networks [J].
Management Science, 1968, 14(7): 429-450.
34 Zangwill W I. A backlogging model and a multi-echelon model of a
dynamic economic lot size production system---A network approach
[J]. Management Science, 1969, 15(9): 506-527.