Effects of Blade Loading Distribution on the Cavitation and Excitation Forces of a Tunnel Thruster

doi:10.1007/s12204-019-2052-z

Abstract

Abstract: Compared with open propellers, the impeller of a tunnel thruster is more vulnerable to cavitation and structural vibration problems because the impeller is typically subject to severe non-uniformity of inflow produced by the blunt gearbox. Model tests and numerical simulations are carried out in the cavitation tunnel of Shanghai Jiao Tong University for a tunnel thruster using a “flat plate” impeller and a tip-unloaded one. The characteristics of fluctuating pressures on the tunnel wall and the resultant excitation forces are investigated. It is found that although unloading the blade tips of an impeller is effective in reducing the fluctuating pressures in a local tunnel wall area near the tips, the same trend does not apply to the case of the excitation forces. The results show that care should be taken when the experimentally measured fluctuating pressures are utilized as the input to the analysis of structural vibrations.

Key words: tunnel thruster| cavitation| fluctuating pressures| computational fluid dynamics (CFD)

摘要： Compared with open propellers, the impeller of a tunnel thruster is more vulnerable to cavitation and structural vibration problems because the impeller is typically subject to severe non-uniformity of inflow produced by the blunt gearbox. Model tests and numerical simulations are carried out in the cavitation tunnel of Shanghai Jiao Tong University for a tunnel thruster using a “flat plate” impeller and a tip-unloaded one. The characteristics of fluctuating pressures on the tunnel wall and the resultant excitation forces are investigated. It is found that although unloading the blade tips of an impeller is effective in reducing the fluctuating pressures in a local tunnel wall area near the tips, the same trend does not apply to the case of the excitation forces. The results show that care should be taken when the experimentally measured fluctuating pressures are utilized as the input to the analysis of structural vibrations.

关键词: tunnel thruster| cavitation| fluctuating pressures| computational fluid dynamics (CFD)

CLC Number:

U 664.33

YU Cheng (郁程), DONG Xiaoqian (董小倩), YANG Chenjun (杨晨俊), LI Wei (李巍), NOBLESSE Francis. Effects of Blade Loading Distribution on the Cavitation and Excitation Forces of a Tunnel Thruster[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2019, 24(2): 158-167.

References 9

[1]	PEREIRA F, SALVATORE F, DI FELICE F, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation of the cavitationpattern on a marine propeller [C]//Proceedingsof the 24th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics.Fukuoka, Japan: Office of Naval Research, 2002: 1-16.
[2]	PEREIRA F, SALVATORE F, DI FELICE F, et al.Experimental investigation of a cavitating propeller innon-uniform inflow [C]//Proceedings of the 25th Symposiumon Naval Hydrodynamics. St. John’s, Canada:Office of Naval Research, 2004: 1-13.
[3]	JI B, LUO X W, PENG X X, et al. Numerical analysisof cavitation evolution and excited pressure fluctuationaround a propeller in non-uniform wake [J]. InternationalJournal of Multiphase Flow, 2012, 43: 13-21.
[4]	SALVATORE F, STRECKWALL H, VAN TERWISGA T. Propeller cavitation modellingby CFD: Results from the VIRTUE 2008 Romeworkshop [C]//Proceedings of the 1st InternationalSymposium on Marine Propulsors. Trondheim,Norway: Norwegian Marine Technology ResearchInstitute, 2009: 1-10.
[5]	PEHRSSON L, MENDE R G. Design, model testingand application of controllable pitch bow thrusters [J].Journal of the American Society for Naval Engineers,1961, 73(4): 787-796.
[6]	YAO Z Q, YAN Z G. Hydrodynamic performance analysisand verification of transverse thrusters [J]. Journalof Ship Mechanics, 2012, 16(3): 236-245.
[7]	LU P, WANG S. CFD Simulation of propeller andtunnel thruster performance [C]//Proceedings of theASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean,Offshore and Arctic Engineering. San Francisco, USA:American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014: 1-12.
[8]	YU C, YANG C J. Study of tunnel thruster performanceand flow by quasi-steady Reynolds-averagedNavier-Stokes simulation [J]. Journal of Shanghai JiaoTong University (Science), 2016, 21(6): 662-671.
[9]	STEFANO G, LUCA S, STEFANO B, et al. Comparisonof experimental measurements and numericalcalculations for a propeller in axial cylinder[C]//Proceedings of the 1st International Symposiumon Marine Propulsors. Trondheim, Norway: NorwegianMarine Technology Research Institute, 2009: 1-12.

[1]	WANG Zhiwei, HE Yanping, LI Mingzhi, QIU Ming, HUANG Chao, LIU Yadong. Numerical Simulation and Flow Pattern Evolution of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Passing Through a 90° Pipe Bend Based on CFD [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(9): 1159-1167.
[2]	SONG Shenke, XIA Li, ZOU Zaojian, ZOU Lu. A Numerical Study of Hydrodynamic Interactions Between a Large Cruise Ship and a Container Ship [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(7): 919-928.
[3]	SUN Jian, PENG Bin, ZHU Bingguo. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study of Oil-Free Double-Warp Air Scroll Compressor [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(5): 611-621.
[4]	DAI Mengyi, ZHANG Zhihao, TU Jiahuang, HAN Zhaolong, ZHOU Dai, ZHU Hongbo. Aerodynamic Effect of Deflection Angle of Trailing Edge Flap on Vertical Axis Wind Turbine with Different Airfoils [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(12): 1619-1629.
[5]	CHEN Zhixin, WANG Yiping, YANG Yafeng, SU Jianjun, YANG Bin. Characteristics of Droplet Transmission in Buses in Different Air Supply Modes [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2022, 56(11): 1532-1540.
[6]	LIU Heng, WU Rui, SUN Shuo. Numerical Simulation of Propeller Cavitation in Non-Uniform Flow [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021, 55(8): 976-983.
[7]	YANG Mengyao, MAO Lulu, HAN Zhaolong, ZHOU Dai, LEI Hang, CAO Yu. Wind Vibration and Vibration Reduction of a H-Rotor Type Three-Bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbine [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021, 55(4): 347-356.
[8]	ZHANG Yu, WANG Xiaoliang. Simulation on Aeroelasticity of Flexible Propellers Based onRadial Point Interpolation Method [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2020, 54(9): 924-934.
[9]	XU Ye, XIONG Ying, HUANG Zheng. Test and Numerical Study of Propeller Cavitation Induced Fluctuating Pressure of Twin-Propeller Ship [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2020, 54(8): 831-838.
[10]	MOU Jiegang, ZHANG Zicheng, GU Yunqing, SHI Zhengzan, ZHENG Shuihua. Effect of Circular Non-Smooth Surface Blades on Cavitation Characteristics of Centrifugal Pump [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2020, 54(6): 577-583.
[11]	XIA Li, ZOU Zaojian, YUAN Shuai, ZENG Zhihua. Uncertainty Quantification for CFD Simulation of Stochastic Drag Flow Based on Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos Method [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2020, 54(6): 584-591.
[12]	LI Han, PAN Guang, HUANG Qiaogao, SHI Yao. Numerical Prediction of the Pumpjet Propulsor Tip Clearance Vortex Cavitation in Uniform Flow [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Science), 2020, 25(3): 352-364.
[13]	GUO Jun,CHEN Zuogang,DAI Yuanxing,CHEN Jianping. Research and Application of the Capture Area Obtaining Method for Waterjet [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2020, 54(1): 1-9.
[14]	LUO Yang (罗扬), PAN Guang* (潘光), HUANG Qiaogao (黄桥高), SHI Yao (施瑶), LAI Hui (赖慧). Parametric Geometric Model and Shape Optimization of Airfoils of a Biomimetic Manta Ray Underwater Vehicle [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Science), 2019, 24(3): 402-408.
[15]	. Analysis of Wind Load on Semi-submersible Drilling Platform and the Key Influence Factor [J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2019, 6(3): 548-.